tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post5196317694294548841..comments2024-03-29T06:00:43.974-04:00Comments on field negro: More hearings?field negrohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15411743587725023134noreply@blogger.comBlogger244125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-71922134411538105362012-07-02T17:54:11.548-04:002012-07-02T17:54:11.548-04:00What exactly have the KKK done to protect or prese...What exactly have the KKK done to protect or preserve anything white? It is easy in an all white suburb or small town to create an illusion of the preservation or promotion of already polluted white blood due to white women being so promiscuous and searching for another alternative to white viagra dependent whiteboy sexual lames. Never heard of a KKK member meeting in an all white inner city area where they are supposedly needed. The KKK hide their faces like a bitch pulling down their skirts to hide minority semen running down their legs and crotch.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-91911350856136345582011-03-09T14:22:20.490-05:002011-03-09T14:22:20.490-05:00I have a bit more time now to pontificate further....I have a bit more time now to pontificate further. To dismiss the possibility of future enhanced warming based on past climate data is as bad science as wholeheartedly believing computer projections. Without specific knowledge of the earth's exact position during past climate events, the absence or presence of increased/decreased solar activity, ect. ect. we cannot just say "well we've seen CO2 levels like this before and X happened". How much data do we really have from past climates? How long have we been recording data? Is the data accurate? Can we really verify the exact climate modifications 1,000,000 years ago? Those conclusions are as suspect as computer models. Like I stated before the atmosphere is complex and fragile and we have no clue as to what increased levels of CO2 will do in the future. To say otherwise is somewhat foolish IMHO.PilotXnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-23367632822150537052011-03-09T11:52:41.692-05:002011-03-09T11:52:41.692-05:00Because the models used are completely dependent o...Because the models used are completely dependent on tweaks and assumptions that render any conclusions useless<br /><br />Of course models are dependent on assumptions but they are useful tools to get an idea of what MAY happen if certain parameters are met. What are "normal" parameters? Define normal. Also what were the climatic effects when CO2 levels were similar to todays? <br />I'm not worried about bad science, I prefer good science and dismissing a conclusion either way without good evidence is not good science.<br />BTW, anything on the fingerprints left by Ayers on the bomb in New York or did you make that up?PilotXnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-67591478335906088762011-03-08T23:13:30.988-05:002011-03-08T23:13:30.988-05:00@PilotX:
I said: "I base this belief on a fi...@PilotX:<br /><br />I said: "I base this belief on a firm (if not personally expert) grasp of the science"<br /><br />NOT personally expert.<br /><br />A firm, not expert, grasp. OK?.<br /><br />I don't think AGW is a problem because there is absolutely no evidence that it is.<br /><br />Because all the variability we have seen is within normal climate flucuations.<br /><br />Beacause we are are actually still in a relatively cool climate phase.<br /><br />Beacuse there have been periods in the past where CO2 levels have been multiples of current levels.<br /><br />Beacause ice ages suck.<br /><br />Because the models used are completely dependent on tweaks and assumptions that render any conclusions useless.<br /><br />Because scientific truth is defined not by consensus but by proof and because money and power are behind promoting the "consensus" view (which in fact is not really much of a consensus anymore).Rev. Righthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10165887113835960014noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-86731594281398290582011-03-08T22:28:28.799-05:002011-03-08T22:28:28.799-05:00Why don't you think AGW is a problem? Is this ...Why don't you think AGW is a problem? Is this a guess or is it based on sound scientific reasoning? What data are you relying on and what are the temp projections in 50 years? 100 years? Thanks Rev.PilotXnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-80176217254681472592011-03-08T22:13:09.444-05:002011-03-08T22:13:09.444-05:00BTW, Rev Right since you are such the expert maybe...BTW, Rev Right since you are such the expert maybe you can explain the relationship of temperature to heat to Slappz and how it can be warmer AND cooler on earth. I mean since you are such an expert and have such a grasp on atmospheric science.<br />Also Rev did you find that evidence linking Ayers to the bomb that went off in New York in 1970?<br />Just checking.PilotXnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-35523807052108713972011-03-08T22:10:18.190-05:002011-03-08T22:10:18.190-05:00"Ergo, so is the assertion global warming is ..."Ergo, so is the assertion global warming is real..."<br /><br />Didn't say that. I don't know one way or the other.<br /><br />"I do not believe anthropogenic global warming is a significant problem, and I base this belief on a firm (if not personally expert) grasp of the science."<br /><br />expert grasp of the science? Where did you get your degree in atmospheric science? A Phd and some research into the subject would make you an expert. If you really are an expert I have a few questions for ya.PilotXnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-24468217217101495752011-03-08T22:06:14.748-05:002011-03-08T22:06:14.748-05:00Rev. Right, your science denying buddy Slappz didn...Rev. Right, your science denying buddy Slappz didn't get the memo about the Cessna 172 that is planned to be able to fly for two hours and has a 180 hp engine. You can explain that to him to.<br />http://www.flyingmag.com/news/two-place-electric-skyhawkPilotXnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-88126995589506412702011-03-08T21:28:15.341-05:002011-03-08T21:28:15.341-05:00PilotX said...
"Correct, climate models are p...PilotX said...<br />"Correct, climate models are projections of future climates. Until someone discovers a time machine we have no way of accurately predicting future climate thus your assertion that global warming is bunk is a false assumption."<br /><br />Ergo, so is the assertion global warming is real...<br /><br />So, explain again why we need to immediately spend trillions of dollars and sacrifice our chances for future economic growth?<br /><br />I do not believe anthropogenic global warming is a significant problem, and I base this belief on a firm (if not personally expert) grasp of the science. Dissing on people as "science deniers" when in fact your own opinion is in reality just as faith-based as theirs is puerile and not becoming of a man of your intellect.Rev. Righthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10165887113835960014noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-6288521870174596422011-03-08T21:20:58.992-05:002011-03-08T21:20:58.992-05:00"AMERICA FUCK YEAH!!!! *SALUTE*"
LOL. Y..."AMERICA FUCK YEAH!!!! *SALUTE*"<br /><br />LOL. Ya'll know that was a white guy, right?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-66777286564753327222011-03-08T21:12:11.193-05:002011-03-08T21:12:11.193-05:00pilotx,
Here's a basic fact -- humans are goi...pilotx,<br /><br />Here's a basic fact -- humans are going to use more and more hydrocarbons as long as they are available. When supplies truly began to dwindle, substitutes will have their day.<br /><br />Or, if an alternative outperforms hydrocarbons, a market for it will develop with no help from government idiots. <br /><br />But there are no alternatives.<br /><br />Meanwhile we will NEVER have an electric airplane. NEVER. Unless there's a reason to build a plane that carries batteries, but nothing else. Of course it will fly for only a few minutes before its batteries are fully discharged.no_slappzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04207475509053402475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-3413102334855438642011-03-08T21:07:18.498-05:002011-03-08T21:07:18.498-05:00pilotx,
Based on your obsession with average temp...pilotx,<br /><br />Based on your obsession with average temperatures and temperature differentials in places around the globe I see that you have dropped the essence of the Global Warming argument, which is about HEAT, not Temperature.<br /><br />It really matters almost not at all if it's hot here and cold there. It is the total HEAT content of system that matters.<br /><br />If London gets a little colder and another Chicago gets warmer, well, it just doesn't matter.no_slappzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04207475509053402475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-319328663978044822011-03-08T21:00:09.533-05:002011-03-08T21:00:09.533-05:00So do you kinda understand how an increase in aver...So do you kinda understand how an increase in average global temps can also cause temp decreases in certain locations? I'll help you a little more if you need it.PilotXnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-23306318432438086072011-03-08T20:59:59.009-05:002011-03-08T20:59:59.009-05:00pilotx, you wrote:
And best of all it conforms to...pilotx, you wrote:<br /><br /><i>And best of all it conforms to the laws of thermal dynamics.</i><br /><br />The field is known as thermodynamics. Other factors playing a role are fluid dynamics and heat transfer.<br /><br />Doesn't matter. The "climate models" are self-serving vehicles easily manipulated to produce any desired result, and when it comes to academics and scientific study, the models always point to something that demands a lot of costly analysis paid for with tax-payers' money. <br /><br />Like I said previously, if the air is warmer, it will, as a matter of thermodynamic fact, contain more moisture. The moisture will come from all the traditional sources, which means instead of melting polar ice caps adding water to the oceans, they will give up moisture that is absorbed into the atmosphere. <br /><br />If we have more storms, so what? Maybe we'll have fewer storms. Maybe changes will turn deserts into bread baskets. <br /><br />What difference does it make? If the water levels of the oceans rise, I know that Americans will move away from the shore. <br /><br />The only people who will care are the people in New Orleans, who already live below sea level. They will feel really stupid if they stick around a place that's further and further below the surface of the surrounding water and they get washed away by a little storm.no_slappzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04207475509053402475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-65244045817415764512011-03-08T20:58:52.520-05:002011-03-08T20:58:52.520-05:00Correct, climate models are projections of future ...Correct, climate models are projections of future climates. Until someone discovers a time machine we have no way of accurately predicting future climate thus your assertion that global warming is bunk is a false assumption. We are working on trying to figure out what effects CO2 will have on future climates but we don't know, that's what I was trying to tell your fellow conservative friend who stated emphatically what will happen in 50 and 100 years. I'm glad you understand that but we can determine if the polar ice is melting and that would be another parameter to put into the models to attempt to figure out what will happen.<br />Slappz, you are trying to wriggle out of your statement. You claimed that the Black emrollment at the University of mississippi increased from the years 1965 to 1969. If you did not have the numbers to back up your claim you pulled it out of your ass. If you did have the numbers what are they?<br />i do not care what the number of Black students at ole Miss are today, yesterday or in they year 2079. I want to know the increase in Black enrollment from the years 1965 to 1969! Not before or after! You made a specific claim and I want to know if you made it up or not. Seems obvious you did so why should we trust anything you post? Get it? 1965 to 1969.PilotXnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-82986057838192684682011-03-08T20:48:45.480-05:002011-03-08T20:48:45.480-05:00pilotx, you wrote:
I did not ask the Black female...pilotx, you wrote:<br /><br /><i>I did not ask the Black female population, I asked the INCREASE in Black students from the period 1965-1969. What is so hard about that question?</i><br /><br />Because James Meredith enrolled in 1962 and he was the FIRST black student, it seemed as though you were capable of seeing the trend of rising black enrollment which had reached about 3.5% in 1969.<br /><br />Today, black enrollment at Ole Miss is about 15% and the student population is around 15,000.no_slappzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04207475509053402475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-72470233820196163532011-03-08T20:44:17.111-05:002011-03-08T20:44:17.111-05:00pilotx, you wrote:
If climate models are correct....pilotx, you wrote:<br /><br /><i>If climate models are correct...</i><br /><br />Inasmuch as there is NO WAY to test the models, you can be certain they reach the conclusion most desired by the grant-seeking scientist who concocted it.no_slappzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04207475509053402475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-83888574255619900852011-03-08T20:40:51.210-05:002011-03-08T20:40:51.210-05:00pilotx,
In the early 1980s, when fear of AIDS was...pilotx,<br /><br />In the early 1980s, when fear of AIDS was blossoming, it was predicted by every credible and responsible organization of levelheaded experts that AIDS was going to wipe out huge swaths of humanity, and do more damage than the Black Plague, which wiped out about one-third of the people in the known world. <br /><br />Well, nothing of the sort has happened in most of the world. But the human devastation is running rampant in Africa.<br /><br />Meanwhile, there's no cure for AIDS and there's no vaccine to protect humans from infection.<br /><br />Nevertheless, the world has continued to spin and the global population is growing as wildly and uncontrollably as ever.<br /><br />The median age in almost all African nations is 19 or less. The espected life span in most African nations is around 50.<br /><br />But despite the multitude of threats that actually kill people in huge numbers today, you concern yourself with an even more complex issue that has, so far, harmed no one.<br /><br />More silly is your belief in "climate models" that predict whatever it is that worries you so.<br /><br />However, inasmuch as we cannot predict the weather more than a few days ahead, it is inconceivable that you or anyone else believes it's possible to reach only ONE conclusion about what's coming in 100 years.<br /><br />Here's what's true. There's always been a good business in predicting the apocalypse.<br /><br />Famous Scottish economist Thomas Malthus concluded -- in 1803 -- that the world was headed for mass starvation in a matter of a few years because there were too many people to feed. <br /><br />In 1803, the best estimate for global population was 1 billion.<br /><br />We are now approaching 7 billion, and the only place on the planet where people face starvation is in parts of Africa, because, well, you know, because African leaders are such vicious idiots that they do not care about food or clean water.no_slappzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04207475509053402475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-59064476167884568922011-03-08T20:39:40.477-05:002011-03-08T20:39:40.477-05:00No Slappz, you missed the question. I did not ask ...No Slappz, you missed the question. I did not ask the Black female population, I asked the INCREASE in Black students from the period 1965-1969. What is so hard about that question?<br /><br />As far as why warming can also cause certain areas to cool I won't answer you directly as you will dismiss any expanation but I will put you on the path of self discovery and thus you may understand the dynamics better. If climate models are correct the areas that will experience the most warming would be the poles, thus lower latitudes may not even have sensible temp changes but increased temps in the poles would cause melting on the ice. Polar ice is mostly composed of fresh water thus its melting would change the salinity of the oceans. Keep that in mind and keep in mind the old glass of water, egg and salt experiment we all did as kids. Flowing along the western coast of Europe is a current of warm water that influences its climate, thus London experiences warmer winters than a U.S. city at a similar latitude. Now imagine the melting polar ice influencing the ocean current of warm water flowing nearby Europe. Put that puzzle together and you will begin to understand how an overall increase in global temps can cause colder winters and drier hotter summers in certain locations. And best of all it conforms to the laws of thermal dynamics.PilotXnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-63227883985134950142011-03-08T20:28:13.211-05:002011-03-08T20:28:13.211-05:00pilotx,
The number of black women at Ole Miss in ...pilotx,<br /><br />The number of black women at Ole Miss in 1969? <br /><br />Half the black total. Is that too tough for you?<br /><br />That means 116 black men, virtually all of whom -- with exception of a few who had already served in the military -- were benefiting from draft deferments.no_slappzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04207475509053402475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-18919836653885605132011-03-08T20:25:00.234-05:002011-03-08T20:25:00.234-05:00pilotx,
Climate Change: total nonsense.
We'v...pilotx,<br /><br />Climate Change: total nonsense.<br /><br />We've gone from Global Warming to Climate Change. <br /><br />Why? Because Global Warming states an incontestable conclusion, which cannot be made about anything 100 years down the road.<br /><br />Thus, the Climate Scammers shifted to Climate Change, which accounts for warming AND cooling.<br /><br />The latest nonsense is priceless. According to the Weather Cult, the current trend of cold weather is, in their view, caused by Global Warming. <br /><br />Cooling is caused by warming. <br /><br />Yeah, that's consistent with everything humans know about heat, temperature, heat transfer and thermodynamics.<br /><br />This idea of cooling being caused by warming may have a great future if I can make ice by heating a pot of water on my stove.<br /><br />Now, I admit that an air conditioner gets hot when it cools the air, That's why we put the air conditioning unit away from the area it's cooling. <br /><br />Therfore, if we're really worried about too much heat, then all we have to do is move the planet a little further from the source of the heat, which is the sun.<br /><br />Seems easy enough.no_slappzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04207475509053402475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-89587027458167672752011-03-08T20:20:56.514-05:002011-03-08T20:20:56.514-05:00No Slappz, 1965 to 1969. Nice try, you're gett...No Slappz, 1965 to 1969. Nice try, you're getting closer. I won't even ask how many were women but I am still interested in the aformentioned years. Is my question too hard for you?PilotXnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-70557616719201172212011-03-08T20:18:19.311-05:002011-03-08T20:18:19.311-05:00These conservatrolls are interesting. They do not ...These conservatrolls are interesting. They do not understand science and proudly display this with their "evolution is only a THEORY" and climate change is officially debunked by a quoting a book written by an agriculture professor funded by the fossile fuel industry. No climate modeling, no consulting with geologists to replicate past climates no real understanding about greenhouse gas forcings. <br />I also love the whole concept of ignoring the intent of the First Amendment to get their religion into schools. Sad if so many of these fools aren't in power in this country. At least he quoted an agriculturalist and not Genesis, that is progress I guess.PilotXnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-46544796061410098702011-03-08T20:10:40.900-05:002011-03-08T20:10:40.900-05:00pilotx,
University of Mississippi enrollment:
19...pilotx,<br /><br />University of Mississippi enrollment:<br /><br />1962-63 -- 4,770 -- the year James Meredith was admitted. Black enrollment -- 1.<br /><br />1965-66 -- 5,488<br /><br />1968-69 -- 6,736<br /><br />Black enrollment in 68-69: 232<br /><br />Thus, from one black student in 1962 to 232 in 1969. <br /><br />In percentage terms, the increase was huge.<br /><br />With respect to draft deferments, what do <i>you</i> think.no_slappzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04207475509053402475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-18235668305429411882011-03-08T20:09:31.059-05:002011-03-08T20:09:31.059-05:00"What is clear from reading this is that Amer..."What is clear from reading this is that America is truly, deeply, and irredeemably fucked. Do you have an escape plan, Field? A plot of land with room for a nice little place somewhere in west Jamaica? If not, you need to start thinking about acquiring one."<br /><br />Not in West jamaica, but in the hills of Manchester. A wonderful little town called Mandeville.:)field negrohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15411743587725023134noreply@blogger.com