tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post5849659936041548418..comments2024-03-28T13:14:09.150-04:00Comments on field negro: "Racism without racists"?field negrohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15411743587725023134noreply@blogger.comBlogger54125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-39873174893915750522015-03-05T16:59:01.943-05:002015-03-05T16:59:01.943-05:00What a fucking gasbag...
Josh, will you just STFU...What a fucking gasbag...<br /><br />Josh, will you just STFU!!!Immolate Josh and all of his relatives!noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-83486662056058908702015-02-23T21:57:24.082-05:002015-02-23T21:57:24.082-05:00Sorry, missed this one:
"There are people wh...Sorry, missed this one:<br /><br /><i>"There are people who have fundamentally changed countries they love for the better.<br /><br />What point of this simple and obvious assertion don't you get?"</i><br /><br />Simple? Yes, at this point, I believe you are. <br /><br />You seem far too stupid to continue arguing with me on this point. Honestly. It must be a total lack of shame. You haven't even the slightest fucking understanding of what the term "fundamentally transform" implies, do you?<br /><br />You pooh-pooh my examples about the dog and shit, saying it's stupid and illogical, but that's what the fuck it means to "fundamentally transform" something! <br /><br />Jesus H Christ on a biscuit, man. Take two fucking minutes out of your day and look this shit up! I'm not making this shit up; I didn't invent the fucking definitions; I'm not using quote-mined bits of them to prove my point. That's what the fucking thing means! Objectively. <br /><br />You wanna speak about straw-men? You are creating a straw-man out of the meaning of the term, as if to imply that it only entails so-so changes to various aspects of a system which one may disagree with.<br /><br />That's demonstrably <b>wrong.</b><br /><br />Incorrect. Untrue. False. Bullshit. Nonsense. FAIL. How many more ways can it be said?<br /><br />To fundamentally transform something is to completely convert or change that thing at its most foundational level. <br /><br />Are you capable of honestly admitting what this fucking means?<br /><br />Don't even do it here. We wouldn't want you to look foolish in front of everyone. Go in the bedroom, shut the door, don't look anyone in the eye, and think about what it means to fundamentally transform something. <br /><br />It's turning a computer into a fish tank. It's turning a paint bucket into a flower pot. It's turning a soda can into an ash tray. It is <b>necessarily</b> transforming X at its foundation and completely converting it into something that is no longer X. <br /><br />F = X = Y. <br /><br />Obama didn't say he wanted to do this with healthcare. He didn't say he wanted to do this with financial regulations. He didn't say he wanted to do this with immigration or foreign policy or education or college loans or taxes. <br /><br /><b>He said he wanted to do it to AMERICA -- the entire fucking country!</b><br /><br />Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-81546191894032768212015-02-23T21:46:32.927-05:002015-02-23T21:46:32.927-05:00"Your point is that they could not have, it&#...<i>"Your point is that they could not have, it's impossible. That's the difference."</i><br /><br />So, you pulled a logical analysis on my comments, and all you come back with is a horseshit straw-man?<br /><br />This is the level of intellect calling me stupid. You can't make this shit up.<br /><br />So, I'll repeat again, as I've said multiple times -- you know, because I have a habit of repeating myself. Not impossible. Just unlikely. <br /><br />It is very, very unlikely that an individual would seek to <b>fundamentally transform</b> a thing they love. Do you need a refresher course on what that term implies?<br /><br />In the examples you cite, we're to assume love for Poland over hatred of communism, and love for Germany over hatred of whatever dumbfuckery those crafty Germans were up to. <br /><br />They obviously didn't love motherfucking Poland the way Poland was, did they? Holy shit. They loved <b>what Poland COULD BE without communism!</b><br /><br />How many fucking instances have you been able to seriously reach incredibly far for over the past three days and successfully pull back? 1 1/2. Out of every other fucking thing. That's such an infinitesimal number that it hardly qualifies as 0.00000001%.<br /><br />Not impossible, just definitely the outlier. And as that pertains to Obama, I still haven't the slightest bit of evidence that he loves or has ever loved America; you just want to assume that as the default position. Maybe it's a "black thang." <br /><br /><i>"No rational human being would read what I said and claim that that was what I am saying."</i><br /><br />The <b>only</b> examples you were able to dredge up, given every fucking thing in the world, were two examples of people who sought to change their governments.<br /><br />So, forgive me if, with that explicit context, I extrapolated that this is the thing you see Obama as doing -- attempting to crash and rebuild America's government and economic system because he "loves" America. <br /><br />I mean, it ties right the fuck in. You describe yourself as a socialist even, if I'm not mistaken, so it's not exactly as if you're all gung-ho about America's capitalistic economic system. And the examples were specifically about bad governments that were dispelled. So, it seems that was the path you were taking. <br /><br />My bad if that's not what you meant.<br /><br />And the difference between the two of us: I'll say my bad if I got something wrong; you'll just insist the other person is too stupid to realize you're really right. <br /><br /><i>"You said it's IMPOSSIBLE for someone to love a country they want to fundamentally transform."</i><br /><br />You'll have to show me this. You infer what you want, attribute it wrongly to me, and then proceed to tear it down. Straw-men won't help. <br /><br />And what the fuck is wrong with "lol"? You don't approve of acronyms, oh ye brilliant arbiter of all that's fair, true and acceptable language to use in an Internet debate? <br /><br />GFY, FFS. STFU and GTFO. <br /><br />How about initialism? Better? <br /><br />Which, by the way, brings me to another point: I would have probably said "Impossibru" lolJoshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-58119933933241387682015-02-23T20:27:10.491-05:002015-02-23T20:27:10.491-05:00Close your eyes and listen to sports announcers, y...Close your eyes and listen to sports announcers, you can tell the race of the athletes by what descriptive words are used.<br /><br />I have yet to hear the word "heady" for a Black player. The bi-racial players are described as "having a 'basketball' IQ"A Black Panther Foreverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15174647870334146834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-48681088342111333802015-02-23T19:21:34.227-05:002015-02-23T19:21:34.227-05:00Part Two
"Isn't more logical a conclusi...<b>Part Two</b><br /><br /><br /><i>"Isn't more logical a conclusion that those who fought against fascists and communists did so because the loved freedom, any piece of named land be damned?"</i><br /><br />Nope.<br /><br />If you love something, would;t you want it to be free?<br /><br />**<br /><br /><i>" It was freedom, not necessarily the territory. But I won't go backwards. Sure, they did it for love of country."</i><br /><br />You're repeating yourself again - a habit of yours.<br /><br />My answer remains the same though. My point is MAYBE they did it for love. Your point is that they could not have, it's impossible. That's the difference. <br /><br />**<br /><i>"The Pols (sic) didn't love communist Poland; they loved the idea of having a Poland bereft of communists."</i><br /><br />Correct, because they loved Poland.<br /><br />**<br /> <i>"But applying this same logic to Obama is causing immense butthurt. I can sense it through airborne osmosis all the way across the pond. You're clinching up over there. You don't like the idea that, by your own examples, you're basically painting Obama as an agent bent on overthrowing the government because he loves America. lol"</i><br /><br />Lol? Lol???? Am I debating with a thirteen year old girl?<br /><br />But OK, let me explain it one last time in terms so simple, that even you, <i>EVEN YOU</i>, might just understand.<br /><br />1. You said it's IMPOSSIBLE for someone to love a country they want to fundamentally transform. I used the example of Solidarnosc to demonstrate that your assertion is a logical nonsense. That doesn't mean to say that I think Obama wanted to overthrow the system. It was an example of how people could want to affect change of something they love.<br /><br />2. Obama is a conservative man in a largely conservative country. He saw things that needed changing for America to survive. Your totally insane health care policies for one. So he tried to change them and largely failed.<br /><br />**<br /><i>"So, is that the verdict? Obama wants to do like the Pols and change America's government because he loves America so much that Democracy must be stopped?"</i><br /><br />No rational human being would read what I said and claim that that was what I am saying.<br /><br />Paranoid far-Right nut jobs might though. <br /><br />**<br />Your line of reasoning is inherently totally fucking insane.The Purple Cowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17455065546313599875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-706500716217948762015-02-23T19:20:45.633-05:002015-02-23T19:20:45.633-05:00Part One" Okay, so what you're saying is ...<b>Part One</b><i>" Okay, so what you're saying is that the love for a country is the reason someone would fundamentally transform its governing political systems. Fine."</i><br /><br />Yet another straw man, I'm saying no such thing.<br /><br />You said Obama could not love America because he wanted to fundamentally change it. I'm saying that's nonsense. There are people who have fundamentally changed countries they love for the better.<br /><br />What point of this simple and obvious assertion don't you get?<br /><br />**<br /><i>"Now, let's look at what we have. To change a way a government operates is to fundamentally transform something, and doing so doesn't necessarily mean you don't love that country. In fact, it means you do love that country."</i><br /><br />It might well do, yes. <br /><br />**<br /><i>"Though, let me ask you: If an individual wants to fundamentally transform the government of America, the very thing that, after our liberation from England, made us every single thing we are, what, then, does said person love about America?"</i><br /><br />[Point of information. The Pilgrims fathers came to america not to escape religious persecution, but because they wanted to practice religious persecution. They had executed a woman in East Anglia whose religious views they didn't approve of. The English authorities disapproved of such behaviour, so the Pilgrims took off to the USA where there was nobody to stop them hanging women they didn't like.]<br /><br />But I digress...<br /><br />I don't know what they love about America, I for one can't imagine, but that really isn't the point. They <b>may</b> or <b>may not</b> love America, a country is more than its system of government. He or she might love the spirit of the people, might love the country because it's all he's ever known. Again none of this matters, my point was and remains, your assertion that necessarily if you want to transform a nation you cannot love it, is quite clearly bollocks of the highest order.<br /><br />**<br /><i>"So, Obama wants to completely collapse the American government to install a new type of government and economic system, and that's because he loves America?"</i><br /><br />If that was really what Obama wanted to do, why hasn't he done it? He's only Prez for eight years, so he's leaving it kinda late, huh? Doncha think, Joshy?<br /><br />The Purple Cowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17455065546313599875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-4169077847300506732015-02-23T17:18:37.331-05:002015-02-23T17:18:37.331-05:00"My peeps" ? I don't think so.
If c..."My peeps" ? I don't think so. <br />If cooning was a sport this Negro would be in the Hall Of Fame. :)field negrohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15411743587725023134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-74043387294239108342015-02-23T17:04:16.848-05:002015-02-23T17:04:16.848-05:00"those who fought against fascists and commun..."those who fought against fascists and communists"<br /><br />I reckon.Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-17442239060055707402015-02-23T16:28:17.131-05:002015-02-23T16:28:17.131-05:00Josh said...
Isn't more logical a conclusion t... <br /><b>Josh said...<br />Isn't more logical a conclusion that those who fought against fascists and communists</b><br /><br />These fighters you speak of, who were they fighting?<br /> <br /> Billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-26238764415758340642015-02-23T16:22:46.770-05:002015-02-23T16:22:46.770-05:00"This post doesn't make me feel evil, bad...<i>"This post doesn't make me feel evil, bad, or wrong about being white. It does make me think about the reality of automatic privilege and the effect it has on others. Clearly you are guilty of some intentional oppression and it feels wrong, doesn't it?"</i> <br /><br />That you grew up a child of privilege is no reason to (a) force that on someone else, as if they had the same life, or (b) extrapolate that as nothing more than an advantage of your skin color.<br /><br />Were your mother and father lazy bums? Were they handed shit by some mysterious leader of the Whites Party solely for being white? Did they hold White Party meetings in the dining room where they were given benefits because of being white? Did they have a get-out-of-bills free card for being white? Did they inherent tons of money just for being white? <br /><br />Or, more likely, did they go out and fucking work hard and make sure you got an education? <br /><br />I grew up on the underside of poor. I came up in the slums. I did not lead a life of white privilege. Take your projection and find a better screen to see yourself reflected back at you. This white boy didn't come up that way. <br /><br />Oh, am I processing oppression internally? Really? That's funny. It seems to me you're projecting privilege <i>externally.</i><br /><br />Check your privilege, shitlord. Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-25554094038017837392015-02-23T16:17:52.806-05:002015-02-23T16:17:52.806-05:00Okay. Let's use your own logic here and extrap...Okay. Let's use your own logic here and extrapolate that to Obama and America. I'll concede that to remove communists from Poland is to fundamentally change Poland. Hell, I'll even concede--even though it's illogical--that the only reason to attempt to get rid of the communists is that a person <b>must love Poland</b> and not simply hate communists. I'll leave it up to you to decide what to do with the nature of said concession; if you're okay<br />with it being illogical, I'm okay with it. <br /><br />Same with Germans and Fascism. Okay, so what you're saying is that the love for a country is the reason someone would fundamentally transform its governing political systems. Fine.<br /><br />Now, let's look at what we have. To change a way a government operates is to fundamentally transform something, and doing so doesn't necessarily mean you don't love that country. In fact, it means you do love that country. <br /><br />So, applying this to America, this would suggest Obama wants to change America <b>from</b> a Democratic Republic implementing capitalism to some other type of government and economic system...<b>because he loves it?</b> <br /><br />Wow. You mean all that "socialist is code for 'nigger'" and "Obama doesn't want to change government" and "the righties are just paranoid" stuff was wrong and the righties were actually right all this time?<br /><br />So, Obama wants to completely collapse the American government to install a new type of government and economic system, and that's because he <b>loves</b> America?<br /><br />Got it, PC. <br /><br />Though, let me ask you: If an individual wants to fundamentally transform the government of America, the very thing that, <br />after our liberation from England, made us every single thing we are, what, then, does said person love about America? Its mountains? Its rivers? Its vegetables? And if those are the things loved, then isn't it more logical to assert that the person in question just loves the mountains and rivers and vegetables and <b>not</b> America?<br /><br />Isn't more logical a conclusion that those who fought against fascists and communists did so because the loved <b>freedom,</b> any piece of named land be damned? It was freedom, not necessarily the territory. But I won't go backwards. Sure, they did it for love of country. <br /><br /><i>Of course, <b>not</b> for the way the country was, but the way they <b>envisioned</b> the country as being bereft of communism or fascism.</i><br /><br /><b>Let's not overlook that fundamental aspect.</b><br /><br />The Pols didn't love communist Poland; they loved the idea of having a Poland bereft of communists. <br /><br />But applying this same logic to Obama is causing immense butthurt. I can sense it through airborne osmosis all the way across the pond. You're clinching up over there. You don't like the idea that, by your own examples, you're basically painting Obama as an agent bent on overthrowing the government because he loves America. lol<br /><br />Ironically, it's you who's painting yourself into a corner with these forced examples that don't exactly fit the<br />term you were so thrilled to quibble with. <br /><br />I can love a girl's tits, her ass, her eyes, but in no way does that mean I necessarily love her. As long as she keeps her T 'n A, she can change her personality, her weight, her voice, her name, her politics, etc. She can<br />fundamentally transform 'til the cows come home, so long as she keeps intact those things which I love. <br /><br />So, is that the verdict? Obama wants to do like the Pols and change America's government because he loves America<br />so much that Democracy must be stopped? <br /><br />And one would fault another person for suggesting the man who wants to completely change America's government<br />doesn't really love America? <br /><br />Your line of reasoning is inherently logically inconsistent. Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-10928106441707636672015-02-23T15:35:49.516-05:002015-02-23T15:35:49.516-05:00Thank you for this great post. I noticed when appl...Thank you for this great post. I noticed when applying for a job it was much harder once I took my husbands Hispanic name. It's easier for white folk to just ignore this topic rather than admit they are being unfair (intentional or not) and contributing to subtle<br />suffering of another human being. There is hope! Posters like Bill will die off soon enough. Surely he has passed on his nasty opinions to his offspring, but maybe they will change their attitude one day when they crawl out of their white assholes and realize once upon a time their great grandpap was a black African.<br />Josh, you're an idiot. Speak for yourself! This post doesn't make me feel evil, bad, or wrong about being white. It does make me think about the reality of automatic privilege and the effect it has on others. Clearly you are guilty of some intentional oppression and it feels wrong, doesn't it? If it didn't your ego wouldn't be here posting nonsense so often. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-35352892240939543912015-02-23T15:27:38.665-05:002015-02-23T15:27:38.665-05:00Josh, have you been working too hard recently? Hav...Josh, have you been working too hard recently? Have you been working at all? Perhaps you need a vacation, you appear to be over-stressed and it's affecting your ability to think logically.<br /><br />**<br /><i>"What happens to a thing that undergoes a conversion and metamorphosis at its foundational level? Ask the caterpillar after it becomes a butterfly."</i><br /><br />Or ask a nation of people who no longer live under totalitarian rule...<br /><br />Ask those 400,000 ethnic Aryan Germans who gave their lives to defeat fascism. What greater love can a person have for his country than to give your life in the defeat of fascism. To sacrifice your own life to totally transform your nation from one that murders millions of people, to a modern democracy.<br /><br />Doncha think Josh? <br />The Purple Cowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17455065546313599875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-12609859448574645422015-02-23T15:12:17.382-05:002015-02-23T15:12:17.382-05:00Without Blacks, Whites wouldn't exist.
You...Without Blacks, Whites wouldn't exist.<br /><br />You're simply a mutant run amuck from the original Black man which is why you don't thrive all that well below the equator/outside of Europe. Yīshēnghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06024585246737144458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-87243046734292756462015-02-23T14:48:00.533-05:002015-02-23T14:48:00.533-05:00Yīshēng said...
It's absolutely FANTASTIC to b...Yīshēng said...<br />It's absolutely FANTASTIC to be regularly reminded that modern day Blacks are descendants of Africans who survived unspeakable horror to thrive as so many if us do today!!! While it would be ideal if we all were thriving in this racist society, the fact that ANY of us are thriving is a testimony to our strength as a people!!!<br /><br /><br />Violence, low IQ, lack of impulse control and victimization is also a testimony to your people.<br /><br />If all the white people packed up and went back to Europe, America would turn into Africkkka within weeks. <br /><br />Without blacks, whites thrive.<br /><br />Without whites, blacks die.<br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-37776216850342801622015-02-23T12:43:07.544-05:002015-02-23T12:43:07.544-05:00"Josh, I think you are one of those guys who ...<i>"Josh, I think you are one of those guys who can never accept that anything he says is wrong..."</i><br /><br />So, let's see what exactly is going on here. <br /><br />You are arguing that someone <b>would</b> fundamentally transform something they love, and that my saying to fundamentally transform something is to completely change that thing doesn't hold up to logical analysis.<br /><br />Okay. And what logical analysis would that be? Oh, I see, TPC saying, "That's stupid."<br /><br />Well, there we fucking have it! Logical analysis over!<br /><br />However, when we decide to logically analyze said assertion, here's what we objectively find -- when we aren't attempting to be subjective twats because conceding a point to a white man on Field's blog isn't a good look for black pride.<br /><br />1) The definitions of fundamental and transform:<br /><br />Fundamental - adjective<br /><br />1. serving as, or being an essential part of, a foundation or basis; basic; underlying<br />2. of, relating to, or affecting the foundation or basis:<br /><br />Transform - verb<br /><br />1. to change in form, appearance, or structure; metamorphose <br />2. to change in condition, nature, or character; convert<br /><br />2) Place those words together as a term objectively, and define what it means<br /><br />To change the structure, appearance and/or nature of a thing at its essential, foundational level.<br /><br />3) Understand what said term implicates. <br /><br />What happens to a thing that undergoes a conversion and metamorphosis at its foundational level? Ask the caterpillar after it becomes a butterfly. <br /><br />4) Determine if said term is applicable to the scenario; e.g. <b>would you fundamentally transform a thing which you love?</b> <br /><br />According to TPC, who evidently only uses the correct meaning of words when he's on the appropriate side of the argument, to "fundamentally transform" something is to perform very minor changes to a thing in the areas you don't like. However, that is <b>objectively</b> incorrect. It is to <b>change that entire thing!</b><br /><br />That is what the fuck fundamentally transform means. <br /><br />So, if you must continue to save face by belittling my stance, so be it. <br /><br /><i>Your entire fucking rebuttal is, "You're wrong; you're stupid."</i> LOL...sounds like my brothers and me arguing in the late '80s when we were little kids. Great job, man! <br /><br />I don't want you to stop; you're giving me all kinds of opportunities to show how narrow-minded and unflinching you are in the face of actual objectivity. You're dogmatic. <br /><br /><i>"So even now when you have painted yourself into a corner..."</i><br /><br />There is no "corner." And you saying there's a "corner" doesn't make a fucking "corner." I know you don't agree with this, but you are <i>not</i> the arbiter of what's factual here. In fact, you are <b>demonstrably wrong</b> here. Objectively, unequivocally, demonstrably, entirely wrong. And it can be proven definitively. <br /><br />To fundamentally transform X means, explicitly, that you are <b>transforming on a fundamental level</b> that thing, so that it is no longer X.<br /><br />Now, fuckwit, let's hear your "logic" as to why somebody does that to a thing they love. Commies in Poland? Hardly. Get the commies out is all that's needed there. Communism is the problem. Your wife put on 20 extra pounds? Your dog has fleas? <br /><br />In what twisted, convoluted scenario are you going to <b>pretend</b> that someone fundamentally transforms a thing they love? <br /><br />But, sure, let's use your creationist-V-evolution tactic here. Call me wrong and stupid often enough, and hope somebody else agrees with you. <br /><br />Wow. Yisheng, seriously? <i>This</i> is the guy you called the most intelligent black man on the Internet? lol It's FAIL-Fest 3000. Dude refuses to acknowledge what words mean, in order to feign victory over a debate which arose from a quibble <i>he</i> initiated. Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-76619069819612589972015-02-23T12:30:57.602-05:002015-02-23T12:30:57.602-05:00If racist Whites are so sick of Blacks and other B...If racist Whites are so sick of Blacks and other Brown minorities in America, which don't you pack your shit and return to Europe.<br /><br />I'm certain your dysplastic nevi would greatly appreciate it as you really weren't "designed" to live outside of Europe anyway.<br /><br />BLOOP!!! Yīshēnghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06024585246737144458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-19420785127944906492015-02-23T12:21:45.145-05:002015-02-23T12:21:45.145-05:00It's absolutely FANTASTIC to be regularly remi...It's absolutely FANTASTIC to be regularly reminded that modern day Blacks are descendants of Africans who survived unspeakable horror to thrive as so many if us do today!!! While it would be ideal if we all were thriving in this racist society, the fact that ANY of us are thriving is a testimony to our strength as a people!!! Yīshēnghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06024585246737144458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-74454009434746645572015-02-23T11:44:48.039-05:002015-02-23T11:44:48.039-05:00There can be no doubt that Muslim terrorism is a t...There can be no doubt that Muslim terrorism is a terrible thing. There have been over 25,000 lethal Islamic terror attacks just since 9/11. But the real question for our liberal rulers is, who is to blame for it? The answer of course is non-Muslims:<br /><br /><i>American and European citizens and journalists are spurring jihadi violence by protesting the arrival of Muslim populations into their societies, President Barack Obama declared Thursday.<br /><br />“We’ve also seen, most recently in Europe, a rise in inexcusable acts of anti-Semitism, or in some cases, anti-Muslim sentiment or anti-immigrant sentiment,” Obama told a Feb. 19 audience of U.S. and foreign officials and advocates, who met to discuss ways to minimize jihadi violence.<br /><br />Peaceful criticism of Islamic culture is bad, he suggested. “When people spew hatred toward others — because of their faith or because they’re immigrants — it feeds into terrorist narratives. … It feeds a cycle of fear and resentment and a sense of injustice upon which extremists prey,” he said.</i><br /><br />It isn’t just resistance to Muslim colonization that causes Muslim terrorism. Noticing that the Islamic State is Islamic also causes Muslim terrorism:<br /><br /><i>President Obama told a gathering of international dignitaries … that “all of us have a responsibility to refute the notion that groups like ISIL somehow represent Islam, because that is a falsehood that embraces the terrorists’ narrative.”</i><br /><br />In reality, there are two causes of Muslim terrorism. One of course is Islam. The other is political correctness, which makes terrorism effective by preventing us from responding to it appropriately.<br /><br />It is a sick society that elects a man that hates it as their President.World of Lieshttp://dailycaller.com/2015/02/19/obama-americans-are-inviting-jihad-by-criticizing-islam/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-40568886976875514142015-02-23T10:47:06.408-05:002015-02-23T10:47:06.408-05:00"I can't think of any other reason Field ..."I can't think of any other reason Field Negro would go crickets on the hollywood color arousal problem"<br /><br />STFU Bill.<br /><br />Don't play that stupid game.<br /><br />Oprah got her Oscar, even though her movie sucked.<br /><br />How much condescension is too much?Oscarbergnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-21055389338093211492015-02-23T10:44:56.380-05:002015-02-23T10:44:56.380-05:00For Yisheng, being black and female means never ha...For Yisheng, being black and female means never having to say you're sorry.<br /><br />Or never having to actually achieve anything. Just trying is good enough.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-40306111778889019572015-02-23T10:39:31.036-05:002015-02-23T10:39:31.036-05:00"Tonight we honor Hollywood's best and wh... <br /><b>"Tonight we honor Hollywood's best and whitest." </b><br /><br />Thankfully the winners at the Oscars were dumbocrats.<br /><br />I can't think of any other reason Field Negro would go crickets on the hollywood color arousal problem.<br /> <br /> <br />Imagine the left-wingnut outrage if the NRA had a "best and whitest" awards show.<br /><br /> Billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-67475660908959754562015-02-23T10:21:47.746-05:002015-02-23T10:21:47.746-05:00And no one plays denial like White men, so chicken...And no one plays denial like White men, so chicken shit afraid that your reign inlt the world is drawing close to an end.Yishengnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-60137732909908262722015-02-23T10:03:40.611-05:002015-02-23T10:03:40.611-05:00Nobody plays victim like white liberals and black ...Nobody plays victim like white liberals and black folks.<br /><br />You guys and gals were made for each other.Joder La Resistenciahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00982440244234443056noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-47756675961575655052015-02-23T09:59:39.516-05:002015-02-23T09:59:39.516-05:00Arquette's call for equal pay for women...
---...Arquette's call for equal pay for women...<br />---<br /><br />Just to reiterate, there is no gender wage gap. Anyone who is smart enough to understand basic math and industrious enough to bother to look up a few facts knows that this is a myth.<br /><br />Men get paid more on average because they work higher paying jobs then women (e.g. coal miner vs waitress), they work more hours each week, and they work for more years in their lives.<br /><br />When normed for job and time worked, there is no difference in what men or women are paid.<br /><br />Corporations are all about profits. If employers could the same work out of women for less cost, they would hire only women.<br /><br />Politics is based on resentment fueled by lies. Stop it.Enoughnoreply@blogger.com