tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post8900457910244405640..comments2024-03-18T22:34:29.437-04:00Comments on field negro: Days of dysfunction, chaos, and law breaking. field negrohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15411743587725023134noreply@blogger.comBlogger123125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-72286357815347779232017-02-15T23:36:50.806-05:002017-02-15T23:36:50.806-05:00FN:"We will start with Kellyanne Polls, who c...FN:"We will start with Kellyanne Polls, who clearly broke the law by promoting the sale of Ivanka trump's products on FOX VIEWS from the White House."<br /><br />But Hillary let a US Ambassado,CIA case officer,and two retired(?)SEALS/security contractors die.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-71562510654464380202017-02-14T15:24:49.543-05:002017-02-14T15:24:49.543-05:00Huh. I've always wondered, why do most Negro n...Huh. I've always wondered, why do most Negro names end with a vowel? especially the women?<br /><br />Can someone explain that...or just try to evade the answer.Lt. Commander Johnsonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-63625579425114881512017-02-14T10:59:01.790-05:002017-02-14T10:59:01.790-05:00Right. I haven't read shit. I just happen to k...Right. I haven't read shit. I just happen to know what the study actually says, how it was conducted, why it fails to use a control or baseline, and how it is objectively flawed by being set up to operate on confirmation bias; whereas your take on it is that <b>every single "black" name in the world carries a negative connotation.</b> LMFAO! You don't even pretend anymore not to be a fucking retarded person. You've dropped the pretense completely. <br /><br />You're another white liberal projection machine, viewing every single black as some poor victim, believing every single white has an uppity name and is doing well, and yet it's everyone else who's racist -- never you.<br /><br />You're a joke. <br /><br />By the bye: This "haplobabble" of which you speak is literally responsible for heredity and the human population. Now, you think it's more important in life to defend a fixed, biased study than to understand genetics. And that's fine. Live your life how you see fit. But maybe since you have the literal education of a middle-school student, it would be better for you to STFU and let the educated people speak. Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-62561214825502541422017-02-14T08:42:56.011-05:002017-02-14T08:42:56.011-05:00You haven't read shit. What we were speaking ...You haven't read shit. What we were speaking about was your selective skepticism. Whatever. You and your Aryan soulmate talk amongst yourselves and haplobabble each other to oblivion.Lance Cockstrongnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-40846684157103331302017-02-14T01:15:20.607-05:002017-02-14T01:15:20.607-05:00"Who the fuck would put Billy Bob or Bubba on..."Who the fuck would put Billy Bob or Bubba on a resume?" <br /><br />Why so racist, you fuck-wit? Not every fucking white person is named Josh or Lance or Emily or Wentworth. Holy shit; all you progressives are capable of is projection. <b>Some guys are named BUBBA, you projecting bastard!</b><br /><br />"How the fuck would they know the race of the hiring manager?"<br /><br />Well, it's an important thing to find out if you want to draw the conclusion that people are being discriminated against. Why? Because, apparently, black people CANNOT be racists. Only white people can. So if it's not actually white people doing the discrimination, Field's gonna have a pretty big list of house nigglets, ain't it?<br /><br />"Read the study and convince yourself."<br /><br />Unlike you, I have read the entire study, and even copycat studies. And, not shocking at all, they claim to EVEN OUT in callback rates among people whose resumes don't claim to live in the smack-dab middle of the ghetto. So it's not actually NAMES at all that people are discriminating against; it's more about LOCATION. But since you're a moron, you missed that part. And likely is the case these people have a good reason for wanting to avoid hiring people from the ghetto, and who the fuck are you to tell them otherwise? Start your own fucking business and hire ghetto residents and change the world! <br /><br />"Meanwhile not a peep out of you on thugs in uniform"<br /><br />Yeah. And did you know the moon's not really made out of cheese? Did you know blue whales are the largest mammal on the planet? Let's see -- what else <b>weren't</b> we speaking about that you're somehow going to hold against me for not mentioning. Holy fucking shit, Lance, you are one retarded motherfucker. Joshnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-54390215106681784362017-02-13T17:51:52.423-05:002017-02-13T17:51:52.423-05:00Josh you are dumber than a dildo. So they didn...Josh you are dumber than a dildo. So they didn't use white trash names? Who the fuck would put Billy Bob or Bubba on a resume? For that matter they didn't use Beulah, Tupac, or Dirty Old Bastard either. <br /><br /><b><i>"I ain't hiring this ghetto baby"</i></b>? How the fuck would they know the race of the hiring manager? They just sent out resumes in response to a bunch of random newpaper ads. The managers were all black? Could be. But do you don't really believe that do you?<br /><br />Everything else you say is bullshit. Read the study and convince yourself. Meanwhile not a peep out of you on thugs in uniform, "True The Vote" etc. Whatever. Keep on babbling about genotypes, phenotypes, no one gives a shit. You think we all are the racists not you, I am not going to try to convince you otherwise. But when even the resident Nazi thinks you are a racist you might want to check yourself out.Lance Cockstrongnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-19348709736346510082017-02-13T09:33:43.573-05:002017-02-13T09:33:43.573-05:00What in the actual fuck are you babbling about?
...What in the actual fuck are you babbling about? <br /><br />Does any black-sounding name have "connotations"? Really? Is that your expert opinion?<br /><br />It was the expert opinion of fake scientists too. And how did they seek to prove it? Well, by creating a fake fucking study to juxtapose names THEY believed carried negative connotations against names THEY believed to carry positive ones. <br /><br />That's the point your simple fucking ass is missing here, moron. <b>These people who started the research themselves chose names they personally believed held negative connotations!</b> I.e. <b>THEY were discriminating against people with certain names!</b> That's how they started the study, by picking the BEST sounding "white" names and the WORST sounding "black" names. LOL Holy shit. <br /><br />Want to know other ways the study was fatally flawed on top of starting from a biased perspective and refusing to create a metric against negative connotation white names?<br /><br />There's no gauge of employers' races, for starters. The study simply implies that every single employer in the entire world is white, and that black people only need jobs and cannot be in a position to hire. But maybe there were black bosses and managers saying, "I ain't hiring this ghetto baby!" but why wouldn't they list that information? The farthest they go is to say "employers in African-American neighborhoods," which still doesn't say the bosses were black. This is important information to know. Are white people discriminating at higher rates?<br /><br />They debunk their own fucking study by explaining the variant! LMMFAO! I don't make this shit up, I swear. In resumes where the black-sounding name appears to live in a wealthier location and not the ghetto, the data adjusts to reflect on par with white resumes. What this is saying: It's not the ghetto-sounding NAME that's the problem. <b>It's that employers don't want to hire folks from the actual GHETTO!</b> And are you going to blame anyone for that?<br /><br />Again, you simple bastard, think hard here and see if you can spot what's wrong with this. Why aren't they also using white resumes that claim to be from the trailer court or a mountain holler in Kentucky? Becky's resume is always from a nice, quite little cul de sac. Jamal's is in the heart of Chiraq. Fucking dumbasses. This shit is a disgrace to real studies. Only uneducated pampered Americans would believe such shit (and probably a few English wogs...). <br />Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-55770823280599836252017-02-13T08:28:16.208-05:002017-02-13T08:28:16.208-05:00Flattery will get you nowhere asshole. "The ...Flattery will get you nowhere asshole. <b><i>"The only words with negative connotations are black sounding names"</i></b>? You have it ass backwards as usual. The point is that <b>any</b> black sounding name (<b>any</b> as in <b>100%</b>) has "connotations". As do you, as anyone here including the prick that precedes you on this thread will tell you. The only difference between you and him is you haven't made overt threats yet. But you are getting there.Lance Cockstrongnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-90261564911777400352017-02-13T01:04:51.459-05:002017-02-13T01:04:51.459-05:00"Whatever it is that you are trying to prove&..."Whatever it is that you are trying to prove"<br /><br />That's kinda the point. I'm not trying to "prove" anything. I'm saying that the study is drastically flawed and used only the conductors' confirmation bias. There are many ways to set up controls and baselines in studies. Sorry, Lance; whatever you think of me, that study was objectively NOT scientific. And you don't have to take my word for it. Look at a real study for gauge. Look at, say, studies on PTSD or even hard science like Jupiter's moons for reference of how real studies are conducted. They never tested the idea of color or how our eyes register color or how a certain color may evoke a different emotion in people (oh, I'm felling so BLUE!). They went only with representations of <i>children</i> and sought to confirm their biases. Why not also study it in the Congo where small black children have no earthly idea of what a white person even is? Rhetorical question. Why not, as James mentions, also study associations these children already had with other children? The answer: Because the potential for crushing the presupposition exists. <br /><br />"The "ghetto connotation" of any "black sounding name" is precisely the point."<br /><br />You're proving MY point! I mentioned names like Adolf and Jordan, and the FACT that WORDS--you fucking moron; LANGUAGE!--have connotations. They INTENTIONALLY chose names that THEY THEMSELVES BELIEVED had negative connotations, and juxtaposed them against names that THEY THEMSELVES BELIEVED had positive connotations. What they didn't do: Use white names that have negative connotations, like redneck-sounding white-trash names. Why didn't they do that? Rhetorical question. The answer: Because the potential for crushing the presupposition exists. <br /><br />It's not fucking racism to blame for names having negative connotations, unless someone's a cuck like you and believes that the ONLY words with negative connotations that exist are black-sounding names. Which is just bullshit on its face. <br /><br />"your obvious contempt for black folks is what comes thru loud and clear."<br /><br />These sophist arguments are old. You don't actually have an argument, so the race card comes flying out at break-neck speeds. Seriously. It's so fucking tiresome. You people need a new trick or two. <br /><br />But more to the point, so fucking what? So fucking what if I were actually a white nationalist and a flag-waving, card-carrying member of the KKK? How would that change the FACTS here that these studies are utterly flawed pieces of bullshit? This is the problem with you cunts who worship identity politics. If Trump tells you the sky is blue, you'll want to get into a semantics sort of argument and explain how that's technically a lie. Whereas if someone on your team, like Obama, said it, then everyone needs to agree or they're RACIST. You folks are the reason these studies are inherently flawed. You start out with the conclusion (white people are racist), and you work backwards to prove it. <br /><br />And let's not forget the MOST important point here: You're the one who asked me about my skepticism toward the study, you fucking abject failure of a human being. Now I say I don't think the study's scientific, and suddenly I have contempt for black people because I don't allow an objectively flawed study to change my way of thinking. There's not a single thing about that study that makes it scientific, other than the fact sophist social science outlets choose to post it because it confirms their shared presuppositions. Fake news has been around since the dawn of man. <br /><br />It's always the people without a scientific education who are the biggest cheerleaders for pseudoscience. And that's to be expected. You're literally their target market. They're not looking to be published in peer-reviewed journals. They're looking for emotional genderqueer beta males like you to push forth their narrative. Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-34299286745834116922017-02-13T00:07:37.832-05:002017-02-13T00:07:37.832-05:00"they showed pictures of children of differen..."they showed pictures of children of different colors and said "show me the ___ child" (good, bad, smart dumb etc) and asked why."<br /><br /><b>Never did it occur to them, or you, that Black children as well as White children in integrated environments have experience with both Black and White children and have formed associations. Their judgements are not from prejudice, but personal learning.</b>James Boldnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-24473081773132587882017-02-13T00:02:04.068-05:002017-02-13T00:02:04.068-05:00"In interviews on CBS, NBC, ABC and Fox, Mill..."In interviews on CBS, NBC, ABC and Fox, Miller repeated the same talking points about the president’s travel ban, asserting that the judiciary was not the “supreme” branch of government for deciding on the constitutionality of laws."<br /><br /><b>Have you actually read the relevant section of the statute? It quite clearly gives unfettered authority to the President. Funny, when it was Obama telling Arizona it couldn't enforce the clear letter of the law, the President's power was all fine with you. But when it's the other way around...<br /><br />Neither Robart nor the 9th Circus even mentioned the text of the law in their decisions. This proves that they are consciously legislating from the bench. This may get the entire 9th Circus abolished and new circuits established. It's certainly long overdue.</b>James Boldnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-334636817581683272017-02-12T23:54:56.167-05:002017-02-12T23:54:56.167-05:00The "ghetto connotation" of any "bl...The "ghetto connotation" of <b>any "black sounding name"</b> is precisely the point. As for the doll study they didn't just have children choose dolls, they asked why they chose the doll and the response was that black is ugly. And it wasn't just dolls, they showed pictures of children of different colors and said "show me the ___ child" (good, bad, smart dumb etc) and asked why. Whatever it is that you are trying to prove, your obvious contempt for black folks is what comes thru loud and clear.Lance Cockstrongnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-20345099732629293782017-02-12T22:41:50.243-05:002017-02-12T22:41:50.243-05:00"are you skeptical of studies which show iden..."are you skeptical of studies which show identical resumes with only names changed receive different outcomes depending on how African the name sounds?"<br /><br />Good question, Lance. The answer: I most certainly am skeptical of those studies! You should be, too. After all, they're using confirmation bias and skewing results by cherry-picking data. <br /><br />Start with a question: Are black people being discriminated against due to their names on applications? Now, address how we would find that out. Why, you'd attempt to juxtapose names you considered "black" sounding up against names you'd consider non-black sounding. But be really careful here! As people conducting the study, it's imperative not to be a moron here and forget that name associations are powerful. This isn't racism; this is simply word association. Imagine telling your blind date your name is Ted Bundy. Why don't parents name their male children Adolf? What do you think of when people name their kid Jordan? It's crucial here, if you want to conduct a study on names, that you understand socioeconomic and other societal connotations of names. <br /><br />But what did these people do in the study? They took a name they think sounds ghetto, like LaToya, and they juxtaposed that against a name that they thought sounds more upper-class white, like Emily or Wentworth, etc. So, they're assuming that names themselves have class connotations, yet they <b>refuse</b> to draw from the well of white-trash-sounding names to match ghetto-sounding names; e.g. they <b>never</b> juxtapose DeAndre with Billy Bob or Bocephus or Betty Ann or Peggy Sue. When these brilliant people behind the study drew from the well, they <b>intentionally</b> used only white-sounding names that had higher socioeconomic connotations, and used only black-sounding names that have more of a ghetto connotation. <br /><br />Maybe this is what happens when you allow social "scientists" to conduct a study. They look at data we have a fairly clear idea on: Blacks choose to name their children uniquely more than other groups, while most other ethnic groups choose from popular names. But instead of juxtaposing ethnic-specific (denoting class) names against their direct counterparts, they take only the classy-sounding white names for the study. Maybe if they would have gotten physics or biology or engineering graduates to conduct the study, the people involved would have known how to conduct a study. <br /><br />But these race-based studies are usually bullshit. They're usually carried out by people who aren't lettered in natural sciences and thus don't know WTF they're doing. Remember that white doll vs. black doll study? The "researchers" just went all over <i>America</i> and allowed children to choose dolls. Since most children chose the white doll, their <b>conclusion</b> was that American society was teaching little kids to be ashamed of being black. LMFAO! Holy shit. Anyone who's gone so far as to take high-school chemistry can probably understand how they fucked the dog here. They had no control. They had no baseline. Why didn't they travel to Africa to try their experiment in places bereft white influence? Why didn't they "study" the possibility that human eyes are simply drawn to softer colors and more vivid details? Why didn't they consider the possibility that day-night cycles and the amygdala plays a role in color associations? Why did they only use dolls? (Rhetoric questions; they wanted to support their presuppositions.) <br /><br />Thanks for bringing this up, Lance! I'm extremely skeptical of these studies. They're typically carried out by people who are (a) completely unqualified to do scientific studies, or (b) people who (like TPC and religious people) start with their presuppositions and work backwards to "prove" them. Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-3104943671821693962017-02-12T19:46:48.025-05:002017-02-12T19:46:48.025-05:00http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2017/02/int...http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2017/02/intelligence-agencies-are-so.html<br /><br />America's spies don't trust Drumpf or his cabinet picks and don't want to turn over classified info. What a joke of a government. Just what wingnuts ordered.mike from iowahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05493799586846040115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-44897041068967900202017-02-12T15:24:24.940-05:002017-02-12T15:24:24.940-05:00In interviews on CBS, NBC, ABC and Fox, Miller rep...In interviews on CBS, NBC, ABC and Fox, Miller repeated the same talking points about the president’s travel ban, asserting that the judiciary was not the “supreme” branch of government for deciding on the constitutionality of laws.<br /><br />Drumpf's dummies really are THAT stoopid. And of course the bloviater in chief thought Miller did a good job lying. mike from iowahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05493799586846040115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-90921943150299118332017-02-12T14:17:36.521-05:002017-02-12T14:17:36.521-05:00http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/2/11/1632589/...http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/2/11/1632589/-New-Jersey-congressman-invokes-1924-tax-law-giving-Congress-power-to-examine-Trump-s-tax-returns<br /><br />See if wingnuts band together like rattlesnakes and block this.mike from iowahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05493799586846040115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-75290079822278607462017-02-12T13:22:13.534-05:002017-02-12T13:22:13.534-05:00Well now Mr. Professional Skeptic ... are you skep...Well now <a href="http://field-negro.blogspot.com/2017/02/days-of-dysfunction-chaos-and-law.html?showComment=1486868447789#c3925006936408417043" rel="nofollow"><b>Mr. Professional Skeptic</b></a> ... are you skeptical when thugs in police uniforms commit murder clearly captured on video and get away with said murder because by definition they cannot break the law because they are the law? ... are you skeptical of studies which show identical resumes with only names changed receive different outcomes depending on how African the name sounds? ... are you skeptical of "true the vote" when no shortage of dumbass right wingers have spilled the beans? Are you skeptical of racial superiority "research" which has no purpose but to justify persecution of whatever minority group the prejudice of the "researcher" who undertakes such sets out to justify? Josh you obviously think you have something to prove. Haplobabble aside, if what you are trying to prove is that you will inherit the earth in a million years (or maybe sooner if you and the prick that follows you on this thread go on a rampage or something), no one else gives a shit. I didn't take you for a hater but you have made a believer out of me. You really are a tired act.Lance Cockstrongnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-28675966466479669882017-02-12T11:42:24.829-05:002017-02-12T11:42:24.829-05:00Josh-get over yourself. You are never going to rep...Josh-get over yourself. You are never going to replace Mel Blanc as the voice of Elmer Fudd. <br /><br />Like the late, great Harry Chapin once opined in a song- full time consideration of another endeavor might be in order.mike from iowahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05493799586846040115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-13733272704329608552017-02-12T11:32:15.930-05:002017-02-12T11:32:15.930-05:00"Mutations provide the phenotypic variability..."Mutations provide the phenotypic variability on which selection acts."<br /><br />Also accepted would be the grade-school version: Mutation is what makes natural selection the viable mechanism by which evolution is possible.<br /><br />It's interesting, at least to me. People who objectively <b>don't</b> know even the most rudimentary aspects of phenotypic distributions and how natural selection function are the ones who want to argue against it, like they have a leg to stand on by linking retarded gender studies observations and claiming waycism. <br /><br />It's not as if we need to get into (x) average trait variance or Vp = Vg + Ve genetic environmental equations, or Vg = Va + Vd + Vi additives; nor do we need broach even broad-sense heritability as would be expected in laboratory conditions; e.g. H2 = Vg/Vp, nor Va/Vp narrow-sense to conclude ethnic regression slopes of offspring or the bell curve of high-selective mates vs. potentials. Fuck forbid this swayed more toward geometric interpretations whereby R = S and one must account for selection differential relative to responses of selection. And fuggedaboudit if we're going to conclusively show how midparent values affect additive genetic variance, which is why offspring bear genetic resemblance to their parents. We're trying to keep things simple-stupid here, so folks can play along. <br /><br />Actually using the scientific method to account for observable evidence on the planet, we can place pieces of the puzzle like behavioral modernity and sweeping phenotypic landscape changes onto the board and conclude, reasonably, that races diverge as much--if not more--in behavior and problem-solving attributes as in immune systems and gestation. And by understanding that, in the aggregate, some races are more predisposed to tribes while others society, it makes sense to have such a wide income gap. One race created the entire economic structure used in the first-world, others are inhabitants benefiting from it. <br /><br />Though rather than arguing based on scientific merit, the response is always "DAT'S WAYCIS!" Which brings up the most important point: So what? Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-59662349172056067942017-02-12T11:01:53.415-05:002017-02-12T11:01:53.415-05:00http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/tennessee-gop-bill...http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/tennessee-gop-bill-says-children-born-through-artificial-are-not-legitimate/<br /><br />Stoopid ass wingnuts in Tennessee lege trotting out another unconstitutional piece of garbage legislation to show their disdain for women and children because they are stoopid and just because they can get away with it temporarily. GAWD I HATE WINGNUTS!!!!!mike from iowahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05493799586846040115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-59733205943326208682017-02-12T10:32:19.614-05:002017-02-12T10:32:19.614-05:00Fucking nutjobs are deliriously uneducated.
Citiz...Fucking nutjobs are deliriously uneducated. <br />Citizens United was serious overreach. <br />Claiming racism didn't exist anymore was serious overreach. <br />Claiming money is free speech went way beyond judicial overreach.<br />Korporations have individual rights was just plain pathetic overreach.<br />dumbass dubya v Gore-contorting the 14th amendment into pretzel shapes to give the 2000 election to loser dumbass dubya was an impeachable offense.<br /><br /><br />All done by activist wingnut judges. Pathetic whiny sappy little wingnut crybabies. Don't understand how our judicial system works. Drumpf is gonna lose his ass in court time after time because he has no idea how the constitution or anything else works. Get used to losing even more, losers.<br /><br />If Obama had once disparaged the courts like Drumpf does repeatedly you traitorious bastards would have impeachment papers ready in record time. You and I know that. Wah,fucking wah!<br />mike from iowahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05493799586846040115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-76584396914102267582017-02-12T10:12:10.785-05:002017-02-12T10:12:10.785-05:00"no one is supposed to tell a Drumpf no."..."no one is supposed to tell a Drumpf no."<br /><br /><b>Not when he's exercising powers Constitutionally reserved to the President, no.<br /><br />That is called "judicial overreach", and will get the kritarchy's wings clipped. Given the Trumpenfurher's skill at 4-D chess, that may well have been his goal at the outset.</b><br /><br />"we'd appreciate it if you would keep your pie hole shut"<br /><br /><b>You don't realize it yet, but you don't matter any more.</b><br /><br />"Trump voters are officially stooooooooooooooopid."<br /><br /><b>You won't admit any surveys of 'hood rats on the utter nonsense THEY believe. Most People Are Idiots (MPAI), but Black people take the cake in that regard.</b><br /><br />"It's amazing that most of red-state America doesn't die from forgetting to breathe."<br /><br /><b>If it wasn't an autonomic function, you would haven't survived infancy.</b><br /><br />"idiots like you and James are predisposed to understanding physics."<br /><br /><b>Physics, chemistry and the rest favor those able to grasp them. That doesn't map evenly to the races of the earth, so have Disparate Impact and are Oh-fish-oh-wee Wayciss®. You're welcome.</b><br /><br />"explain to the dumb white kids why they can't grasp mathmatic and scientific concepts as quickly as the smart negro kids?"<br /><br /><b>The set of smart negro kids is vastly smaller. The 1 standard deviation gap has consequences.</b><br /><br />"sometimes we just like to discuss politics and such without having to become overrun by white racists who question our humanity."<br /><br /><b>By politics you mean "your so-called oppression by wypeepo", as you culturally appropriate White everything down to the English language and enjoy the highest standard of living of people of your race anywhere in the world.<br /><br />Blogger has this thing called "private blogs", available only to select users who are logged in. If that was what you were after, you could easily have it... if you were bright enough to pay attention.</b><br /><br />"it is inevitable that a James or Josh type individual will come and take a shit and ruin any kind of peaceful conversation."<br /><br /><b>So all of this "fuck White people" stuff never really happened here, eh? If you ever discussed how to peacefully leave White countries and go do your own thing back in Afreaka, you would suddenly enjoy the most enthusiastic assistance you've ever seen. Try it, it'll blow your mind.</b><br /><br />"It's funny to see them try to erase any and all accomplishments. For example the strong pushback against the movie Hidden Figures."<br /><br /><b>It's funny how these so-called "accomplishments" were buried at the time when LBJ was trying to get Ed Dwight onto the LEM crew of Apollo 11, weren't mentioned in ANY of the astronauts's own memoirs or interviews, and conveniently come out just as the people able to authoritatively confirm or deny such stories are dying. This is called "revisionist history", or in words of one syllable, "lies".</b><br /><br />"I did NOT know that wanting laws to be enforced is actually "coded" white supremacy. Huh... Guess I'm a white supremacist then!"<br /><br /><b>When they called me Literally Hitler for wanting Black people to behave themselves and observe the other duties of citizenship in return for the rights they demanded, I realized that the Nazis might have been on to something. No society can survive savage or perfidious minorities without damage, and the majority has every right to insist they be rid of them.</b><br /><br />"What is a mutation's relationship to natural selection?"<br /><br /><b>Ye gods, how simple. Mutations provide the phenotypic variability on which selection acts.</b>James Boldnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-22925581278983638632017-02-12T08:24:55.999-05:002017-02-12T08:24:55.999-05:00Posting here is VERY amusing!
You black collecti...Posting here is VERY amusing! <br /><br />You black collectivists are, without a shred of doubt, the MOST entertaining conspiracy cult I have ever ran across! Yes, I post here because it's fun reading the replies. I laugh constantly at the hypocrisy, double-think, and the hordes of logical fallacies used on the daily. <br /><br />Something I'm LMAO about as I'm typing this: Flying Junior's self-righteous cuntiness. He'll read Random calling for the entire extinction of white people, and read you say the most horrid shit about white people one can think of, and not a single word spoken to you. Yet I point out a <b>factual point of history</b> that Sub-Saharan Africans present as a third-world race that has never created any societal advancement of its own, and he calls me dangerous, hateful, and the reason fucking Dylan Roof killed people.<br /><br />I'd pass out if I LOL'd any harder at his stupid hypocritical, cherry-picking, racist ass! <br /><br />It's funny because he exposes <i>himself</i> as the fucking racist. Black people can say the nastiest shit imaginable about whites, and he scrolls right past it (undoubtedly agreeing with it). But anyone who tells the TRUTH, that blacks <i>are not responsible for creating the first-world West,</i> and it's "dangerous" and "extreme" to hold those views. It's not a fucking view, dumbshits. It's a historical fact. Objective. Demonstrable. Universal. No? Prove it fucking wrong! Trick challenge, obviously. It cannot be, as it's simply the truth. <br /><br />You people are pure entertainment. Not the highlight of my day to see TPC fail miserably at making a case for factory-created, identical races, by using someone who doesn't even know haplogroups; I'd rather drink a 12 of Bud Light and play Assassin's Creed and avoid arguing with the old lady. Plenty of shit tops the list. But the LULZ keep me coming back. <br /><br />For instance, Random; your inability to write English as well as the average second-grader is fucking HILARIOUS. Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-48857907837452831582017-02-12T03:54:27.646-05:002017-02-12T03:54:27.646-05:00Fuck the gooks and chinks!Fuck the gooks and chinks!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-48736560588445932882017-02-12T03:00:34.235-05:002017-02-12T03:00:34.235-05:00Having a life and a racist pathetic existence you ...Having a life and a racist pathetic existence you imbeciles declare your empty pathetic existence with each paragraph and please don't stop because I find it amusingrandomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00064264845230180504noreply@blogger.com