tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post4804520483409761280..comments2024-03-29T06:00:43.974-04:00Comments on field negro: "Fascist In Chief"?field negrohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15411743587725023134noreply@blogger.comBlogger35125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-80670630122228088232015-10-12T19:54:45.544-04:002015-10-12T19:54:45.544-04:00Obama is stupid in chief. He thinks global warmin...Obama is stupid in chief. He thinks global warming is the standard for leadership in the world if you watch his latest interview. He is a prissy, sissy, man who if not married I would assume was gay. Given his chosen mate, I'm still not sure he isn't.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-70370888251518998282015-10-12T01:09:25.334-04:002015-10-12T01:09:25.334-04:00Yup! xDYup! xDAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-72385362545344098932015-10-11T17:05:01.790-04:002015-10-11T17:05:01.790-04:00"Haha! Okay Pilot! You won! :)"
The fix..."Haha! Okay Pilot! You won! :)"<br /><br />The fix is definitely in.PilotXhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15234878016006206713noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-44371263067343036532015-10-11T13:34:34.215-04:002015-10-11T13:34:34.215-04:00Haha! Okay Pilot! You won! :)Haha! Okay Pilot! You won! :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-14863805995292561932015-10-10T21:53:28.755-04:002015-10-10T21:53:28.755-04:00Sorry Dessert but this week's pic caption cont...Sorry Dessert but this week's pic caption contest is mine. Prizes and winners must reside in the lower 48 states so you and PC are out.PilotXhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15234878016006206713noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-25185051989184217392015-10-10T21:30:26.684-04:002015-10-10T21:30:26.684-04:00Bravo, Field. The best so far of your "educat...Bravo, Field. The best so far of your "education series."<br /><br />I'd read a few of these stats on executive orders, but you really drive it home. <br /><br />These wingnuts can't get their act together. The same wag can call Obama a "fascist" and a "socialist" in the same week. <br /><br />Just as Serena Williams has been called "masculine" and a "curvaceous sexpot" by the same people. Make up your minds! <br /><br />Why do I connect these two examples of incoherence? Irrational, self-contradictory smears are common as dirt these days and reveal so much about their authors as to be embarrassing to any thinking human.anotherbozohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04183343842257894399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-6404766104590628262015-10-10T20:46:04.798-04:002015-10-10T20:46:04.798-04:00Anonymous said...
Scared of those 2.5 million fox ... <br /><b>Anonymous said...<br />Scared of those 2.5 million fox viewers."<br />As far as I can tell, that 2.5 million number you keep quoting </b><br /><br />That's the figure FieldNegro uses when he wants to mock their small audience.<br /><br /> Billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-12011658701028966292015-10-10T20:42:25.195-04:002015-10-10T20:42:25.195-04:00The FieldNegro said...
President Obama is consider... <br /><b>The FieldNegro said...<br />President Obama is considering bypassing Congress in order to implement further gun control measures</b><br /><br />Obama, once again proving right-wingnuts were correct about him.<br /> <br /> Billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-85675708479290370352015-10-10T17:45:22.245-04:002015-10-10T17:45:22.245-04:00Sure. And then bring the shit up again, for a four...Sure. And then bring the shit up <b>again,</b> for a fourth time, in another unrelated post, just trying to score some points from the folks and the anon crew, and I'll be happy to again speak the exact truth and reference people to where they can find all of this in its full context, starting in the "Staring while Black" post. <br /><br />Everybody here, even the most avid PC ball lickers, know if you thought you had me on anything, you'd be quoting the shit out of it, as you tend to do. But alas, nothing but your make believe shit, bare assertion, and Pee-Wee Herman argument tactics. <br /><br />There is no defense of your position. Your position is that the greenhouse effect must be man-made and that there is no natural warming. These positions are indefensible. Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-10626455457903023032015-10-10T17:35:55.458-04:002015-10-10T17:35:55.458-04:00Josh, I urge ou to seek psychiatric help, you are ...Josh, I urge ou to seek psychiatric help, you are clearly a very disturbed individual.<br /><br />You constantly lie about things everyone here can see I never said, constantly misrepresent my arguments no matter how often I make them, and you respond with growing hysteria to every defence of my position I make.<br /><br />Seek help.The Purple Cowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17455065546313599875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-49049106816714104482015-10-10T13:29:58.277-04:002015-10-10T13:29:58.277-04:00Josh - you really seem to need more meaning in you...Josh - you really seem to need more meaning in your life. Some things really matter, and others don't. Arguing with Purple Cow definitely does not.<br /><br />It's time to develop and strengthen your relationships with those close to you. There is always less time than you think.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-39441141493089356072015-10-10T12:39:11.131-04:002015-10-10T12:39:11.131-04:00"and it’s obvious to anyone who is not a lyin...<i>"and it’s obvious to anyone who is not a lying little sleazeball that the greenhouse effect that I was referring to was that effect that had caused the 0.8C rise since 1900."</i><br /><br />1) There are not <i>different types</i> of the one model, stunad. Still you refuse to fucking see what it is about which you're speaking. Still. Why will you go dig up research links for actual levels of C02 but <i>not for the greenhouse effect?</i> 'Cause I'm white, yo!? <br /><br />2) Yeah, because asking how the greenhouse effect can <i>possibly be happening</i> if it's <b>not</b> man-made is the <b>exact same</b> as saying that levels of C02 in the atmosphere have increased since 1900. The identity of indiscernibles over here...<br /><br />You didn't ask, "If man-made climate change isn't happening (a claim I never, ever fucking made anyway), how do you explain a rise in C02 levels greater than predicted values in natural warming?" or anything to that effect. I know that's not what you fucking meant, you lying douchenugget, because <b>you did ask me PRECISELY THAT on multiple occasions</b>, expecting me to rebut YOUR straw-men. So if that's what you were asking, if that's what you were getting at, you would have just fucking asked it -- just like you've asked me <b>multiple times</b> to tell you which climate scientist said Florida would be underwater, as if I actually made that fucking claim. So talk about internally inconsistent and illogical lies. You're bare-ass for the world, homes. You're exposed as a lying asshat. Spin if you must. <br /><br />Your explicit implication within the frame of a rhetorical, condescending, "GOTCHA" question was that the greenhouse effect <b>only</b> dealt with man-caused warming, and that natural warming couldn't possibly trigger the greenhouse effect. <br /><br />You thought you were scoring some quick points, so you listed the greenhouse effect as an accurate prediction of global warming. However, it was shown to you, empirically, demonstrably and objectively, that the greenhouse effect measures <i>warming</i> in general; it does not discern between causes. Therefore, to say it's an accurate gauge for man-made warming is illogical. That implies A, B and C stimuli have an explicit and discernible X, Y and Z result. However, if <i>any</i> warming triggers it, that's more variables to the equation, D, E and F, and thus the accuracy for any man-made prediction, measurement, or theoretical model in general would have to be scrapped. This shit is starter science!(It's a motherfucking <b>effect</b> not a model for measurement.) To that, you argued with me that it does, in fact, discern causes, and your big "GOTCHA!" moment in attempt to prove your intelligence was to claim that the greenhouse effect obviously measures man-made warming, or else WTF does it measure?<br /><br />That you continue to lie about it says a lot about your character. That you continue to bring it up in every single new and unrelated post says a lot about your need to save face in front of the folks. That everything you said is on the record and easily accessible is just reality. <br /><br />You didn't know WTF the greenhouse effect was. You still don't really seem to know WTF it actually is. Hey, maybe I'm lying and what I printed as the effect was just shit I made up. There's a good way to find out: Hold it to typical rigor of other things and go see for yourself...Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970377995219031351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-65068496561351628982015-10-10T12:13:41.659-04:002015-10-10T12:13:41.659-04:00Dear Field;
I have one question in all of this fra...Dear Field;<br />I have one question in all of this fracas. <br /><br />What is the caption Saturday going to be about?<br /><br />(I would like a sneak peek so I can win again) xp<br /><br />Yours truly,<br />Lilac pr<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-57786550392835158392015-10-10T10:56:05.527-04:002015-10-10T10:56:05.527-04:00field negro said...
Amen Pilot, u would think this...field negro said...<br />Amen Pilot, u would think this right leaning Supreme Court would put the HNIC in check. But of course they won't , because there is nothing illegal about what he has done or is doing<br />---<br /><br />Fake lawyer or shameless liar?<br /><br /><i>You make the call!</i>President Criminalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-74166642056659485102015-10-10T09:19:46.615-04:002015-10-10T09:19:46.615-04:00"The FieldNegro said...
Fox host Gregg Jarret...<i>"The FieldNegro said...<br />Fox host Gregg Jarrett<br /><br />There you go again FieldNegro.<br /><br />Scared of those 2.5 million fox viewers."</i><br /><br />As far as I can tell, that 2.5 million number you keep quoting is people who watch Fox News <i>during prime time</i>. But that's a useless number (for Fox and for any of the other news networks). Way more people in total watch Fox throughout the day and on the Internet. Hell, it's running continuously in restaurants and airport waiting lounges and even some workplaces.<br /><br />And Fox is just one section (the best-funded section) of the gigantic apparatus of wingnut disinformation -- including print, hate radio, and garbage websites Redstate/Breibart/WorldNet/Drudge/Newsmax/TownHall/PajamaMedia/Twitchy. There's no shortage of fascists flogging fallacious flapdoodle.<br /><br />And, of course, it's the same bogus talking points parroted by all of them, issued from on high by Republican HQ.<br /><br />Come on, you know this. You're not fooling anyone here.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-43897014112471009622015-10-10T09:17:07.962-04:002015-10-10T09:17:07.962-04:00Let me give you a definition of the word ‘liberal.... <i>Let me give you a definition of the word ‘liberal.’…Franklin D. Roosevelt once said…It is a wonderful definition, and I agree with him. ‘A liberal is a man who wants to build bridges over the chasms that separate humanity from a better life.’</i> – Richard Nixon<br /><br /><br /><i>Richard Nixon was our last liberal president.</i> – Noam Chomsky<br />The Purple Cowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17455065546313599875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-24973818699497493372015-10-10T09:09:38.222-04:002015-10-10T09:09:38.222-04:00”I am not wrong and it was PC who blatantly create...<i>”I am not wrong and it was PC who blatantly created straw-men and literally tried to argue that (a) man-man climate change is the reason for the entire greenhouse effect, and (b) that there is no natural warming. While he took three days to think about how to spin it, the facts are the facts and have been listed. Anyone with a modicum of honesty in their veins can see what's what. So I was not wrong there.”</i><br /><br />Ohhh yes you were, sunshine. I did not say there is no such thing as natural warming, (as I said earlier, July is hotter than January here in the civilized world) and it’s obvious to anyone who is not a lying little sleazeball that the greenhouse effect that I was referring to was that effect that had caused the 0.8C rise since 1900. I note you’ve come up with a new lie, you are now claiming that I waited three days to respond to your accusations. A patently ridiculous little lie that can be easily disproved with a cursory view of this blog.<br /><br />**<br /><i>”And that's obviously the play PC is looking for when he blatantly lies, when the facts are literally sharing a screen.”</i><br /><br />…except of course that they are not.<br />The Purple Cowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17455065546313599875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-83587424545785124532015-10-10T08:40:11.437-04:002015-10-10T08:40:11.437-04:00@ Kinky
Those links you attached still don't ...@ Kinky<br /><br />Those links you attached still don't support your contention. At minimum, they undermine Republicans' claim that Obama has written some huge number of orders as compared to previous presidents.<br /><br />This graphic from USA Today shows executive orders AND memoranda put together:<br /><br />http://i.imgur.com/fgN9H8v.png<br /><br />And, waddaya know, Obama's numbers are right in line with those of most previous presidents and well under those written by Truman, Kennedy, Ford, and Carter.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-46572403307451333852015-10-10T08:35:31.680-04:002015-10-10T08:35:31.680-04:00Amen Pilot, u would think this right leaning Supre...Amen Pilot, u would think this right leaning Supreme Court would put the HNIC in check. But of course they won't , because there is nothing illegal about what he has done or is doing. <br /><br />Kinky con-man, the only "facts" are that O beat u clowns twice, and that your party is rudderless and dysfunctional. Good luck with your new speaker.;)field negrohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15411743587725023134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-52132639018737466302015-10-10T08:16:08.417-04:002015-10-10T08:16:08.417-04:00"The only ones full of b.s. are the moonbats ...<i>"The only ones full of b.s. are the moonbats that work at salon and the moonbats who read and repost their lies."</i><br /><br />Haha, that line that Carson is repeating about the Nazis is the dumbest talking point in the world.<br /><br />The Nazis <i>reduced</i> gun control (they are a far-right-wing movement, so this is unsurprising); they did not increase it. And even if all the Jews had been "concealed carrying," the Nazis would still have exterminated them, because the Jews were vastly outnumbered and civilian with their small arms will never be a match for an <i>actual army.</i><br /><br />This is a fantasy that people on the far right in the U.S. so badly want to believe could be true, now that the country is trending away from conservative views, that they are deluding themselves into believing they could do what the Jews could not: successfully fight the government. But this is even more preposterous even than the prospect of Jews fighting the Nazis, because the U.S. military is today vastly more powerful than the German army ever was. <br /><br />If you're a wingnut who hates democracy and thinks he can opt out of federal law with his arsenal of small arms, Uncle Sam has cruise missiles, and cluster bombs, and Apache helicopters, and God knows what else to show you differently. "I need my gun to preserve liberty" is easily the most embarrassing and dumbest rallying cry of the right-winger. Repeating it reveals to everyone else that you were dropped on your head as a child.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-11866933230023420422015-10-10T07:11:04.913-04:002015-10-10T07:11:04.913-04:00The only ones full of b.s. are the moonbats that w...The only ones full of b.s. are the moonbats that work at salon and the moonbats who read and repost their lies.<br /><br /><br />Maybe whitey's conspiracy should take a moment before visiting the gay gloryhole at his favorite truckstop and learn history.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-55277955660684289142015-10-10T05:22:07.612-04:002015-10-10T05:22:07.612-04:00The biggest gun supplier in the world is the Unite...The biggest gun supplier in the world is the United States government.Limbaughnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-50587374995770608282015-10-10T02:29:42.053-04:002015-10-10T02:29:42.053-04:00Good thing the couch commandos aren't politici...Good thing the couch commandos aren't politicizing it. That preserves their credibility. <br /><br />It turns out that the history that Dr Carson is learning from NRA pamphlets & truckstop bathroom walls is a little completely full of BS about the Nazi gun control laws. The democratic socialist Weimar Republic that preceded the Nazi's took them away after the communist revolution was put down to take guns out of politics, and leaving only hunting arms by permit. The Nazi's inherited those laws & in 1938, when they were stirring up trouble with ethnic Germans in neighboring countries, they liberalized the firearms laws for ethnic Germans there & abroad with no regulation at all for Nazi party members, soldiers (including reserves) & police.<br /><br />http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/stop_talking_about_hitler/Whitey's Conspiracyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17758651000294515794noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-59025018871688403272015-10-10T00:48:41.410-04:002015-10-10T00:48:41.410-04:00The FieldNegro said...
Fox host Gregg Jarrett
Th... <br /><b>The FieldNegro said...<br />Fox host Gregg Jarrett </b><br /><br />There you go again FieldNegro.<br /><br />Scared of those 2.5 million fox viewers.<br /><br /><br /><b>George W. Bush issued 291 executive orders.</b><br /><br />I remember the old days when people had high hopes for Obama. Hope and Change.<br /><br />To think that in 2015 the Obama lapdogs have been reduced to defending him by saying bush did it too.<br /><br /> Billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23428832.post-56780643378525452212015-10-09T23:49:55.100-04:002015-10-09T23:49:55.100-04:00PilotX said...
If it's good enough for Trick D...PilotX said...<br />If it's good enough for Trick Dick then it should be good enough for us.<br />--<br /><br />At least Nixon had the respect for the institution to resign.<br /><br />There is nothing honorable about Obama.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com