Thursday, May 28, 2015

State violence redux.

Image result for san bernardino pregnant woman image      We can thank the institution of body cameras on law enforcement officials for allowing us to get yet another glimpse of encounters between police officers and citizens here in America.

"Shocking body camera video shows two Southern California cops slam an eight-months pregnant woman to the ground after a parking lot dispute started as the woman dropped her child off at school.
 
The city of Barstow, an Inland Empire city in San Bernardino County, defended the officers' actions, writing in a statement that Charlena Michelle Cooks was actively resisting arrest during the January incident.

"The Barstow Police Department continues to be proactive in training its officers to assess and handle interactions with emotionally charged individuals while conducting an investigation, for the protection of everyone involved," the statement, obtained by the Desert Dispatch, reads.

The bizarre confrontation began when Cooks and another woman, a school employee, got into a “road rage” confrontation in the parking lot at Crestline Elementary School, where Cooks was dropping off her second-grade daughter.

The officer, speaking to the other woman, says no crime has been committed and he’ll go speak to Cooks about what happened and “document her name.”

As Cooks explains her side, the officer suddenly cuts her off and asks for identification, something he hadn’t done with the other woman.

"I don't even think that that disagreement in the parking lot was enough to warrant a call to the police," Cooks told the Dispatch.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, which took up Cooks’ case and released the video, says California law does not require someone to identify themselves “for no reason.”Cooks, in the video, tells the officer that she’d like to call her boyfriend and verify the law about identification. But the officer, after first promising to give her “two minutes” to find out whether she must give up her name, walks up to Cooks after 20 seconds and grabs her arm as she wriggles and starts to yell.

Do not touch me, do not touch me, I’m pregnant!” Cooks begs as she’s pushed against a chain link fence. “What the f--k is going on!”

A second officer comes over and the officer with the camera on asks, “Why are you resisting, ma’am?”

He and the other officer then took her to the ground, stomach down, and handcuffed her behind her back.

“This is ridiculous, what are you doing?” the incredulous Cooks asks. “I didn’t even do anything wrong.”

"I don't think I've ever been that terrified in my life," Cooks recently told the Dispatch. "I never saw that coming. I told him I was pregnant so he could proceed with caution. That didn't happen and the first thing I thought was I didn't want to fall to the ground. I felt the pressure on my stomach from falling and I was calling for help. But those guys are supposed to help me. But who is supposed to help me when they are attacking me?"

Cooks was put in the back of a police cruiser and later booked on a charge of resisting or obstructing a police officer, a charge later tossed by a judge.

The officer involved in the incident is shown on video recounting for another officer what happened.
“I gave her a minute to give up her name and I went to put her under arrest and she resisted arrest,” he said. “That’s all there is to it.”' [See video and story here]

Yep, "That's all there is to it."

Unbelievable!

107 comments:

  1. Anonymous8:25 PM

    Hey negroes: For the 87 billionth time - Resist arrest, get beat.

    WTF is wrong with y'all?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Go Pack Go8:29 PM

    There is definite reason blacks tend to live in shit holes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous9:16 PM

    Brother Field, did she actually think she would get the same consideration as the blonde? Yep, she sure did. How stupid!

    Furthermore, she was provoking the cops by her eff'd up attitude. Nevertheless, I understand how she emotionally lost it.

    As Blacks we have got to find the inner strength to 'suck it up' when the cops arrive. It's a given we won't be treated fairly...EVER! Those cops are no different than the cops who killed Freddie Gray. It's in white blood to treat Blacks for who they think we are, "blah", as PX and Santorum calls us.

    It's no fun being Black in America...

    I am sure JOSH will love this post.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous9:19 PM

    Anonymous Go Pack Go said...
    There is definite reason blacks tend to live in shit holes.

    8:29 PM
    ----------
    What is the 'definite reason'? Please explain.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous9:34 PM

    Lord have mercy. I get so tired of hearing that shrilling high-pitched voice of so many sisters. Why do so many sound the same...loud, high pitched, blaming, disrespectful, threatening and emotionally charged....and overweight, pregnant and unmarried.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous9:35 PM

    Blacks say phuck the police. Police say phuck blacks and then you get the wild wild jungle. Because without police blacks are unable to stop themselves from wilding.

    Every city where Blacks protest, police should withdraw and leave them to each other.

    “There was a shooting down the street, and the man was standing in the middle of the street with a gun, just shooting,” Lee added. “Usually, you can’t walk up and down the street drinking or smoking weed. Now, people are everywhere smoking weed, and police just ride by, look at you, and keep going. There used to be police on every corner. I don’t think they’ll be back this summer.”

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous9:55 PM

    West Baltimore residents worry they’ve been abandoned by the officers they once accused of harassing them, leaving some neighborhoods like the Wild West without a lawman around.


    It isn't state violence when they are stopping violent savages from killing each other - now you know. You're on your own. Africa comes to America.

    ReplyDelete
  8. And why was he arresting her? What was the charge? Her statement should have been "let me call my lawyer and see if I have to give up my identification". $50 says that encounter would have gone much differently.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous10:00 PM

    hmmmmmm. I wonder what JOSH has to say about this post. That BW was clearly innocent and the ww was definitely guilty.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous10:05 PM

    Blogger PilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...
    And why was he arresting her? What was the charge? Her statement should have been "let me call my lawyer and see if I have to give up my identification". $50 says that encounter would have gone much differently.

    9:58 PM
    ---------------
    Well, your sister is a lawyer and the cops still took your blah ass to jail in Chicago. So quit trying to play big shot. You are "blah", remember?

    The point is she is Black and anything can happen when there is an encounter with the police. It doesn't matter if she had a lawyer or not.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous10:10 PM

    anon@10p, leave JOSH alone. Stop picking on him. Go after Renaldo aka Kinky.

    Has anyone seen Desert?

    ReplyDelete
  12. "West Baltimore residents worry they’ve been abandoned by the officers they once accused of harassing them, leaving some neighborhoods like the Wild West without a lawman around"

    That's what black America wants. Let's see how it plays out.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Blackie10:20 PM

    I’m black y’all, I’m black y’all, and I’m blacker than black, and I’m black y’all.

    ReplyDelete
  14. How can black people, on the one hand, reject the reduction of, say, Obama to a monkey, and yet be against speciesism?

    ReplyDelete
  15. SFNorCal10:49 PM

    How about this? Only allow at most two black families to live in any one neighborhood across the entire country.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or how about this, let people live wherever the hell they want. Seems our buddy SF wants to back to the days of slavery. That's mighty white of her, wanna bet she's a Republican?

      Delete
  16. Yep, they took me to jail and I was out within the hour and when my lawyer called the station the cop nearly shit his pants. He was talking big shit on the drive over but punked out when the phone rang. Like I said, cops act totally different when a lawyer is involved. BTW, I wasn't arrested in Chicago.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous11:41 PM

    PX I can tell you know nothing about SF. In SF you don't have to be a Republican to be a racist. Actually, Democratic racists outnumber the Republicans in the category of racism.

    Nevertheless, the Bay Area is crawling with racists in SF, Oakland, and Berkeley and other places along that corridor.

    FYI, Republicans here match Dems when it comes to race...both for and against.

    The strangest and weirdest thing about racism in the bay area is there are more uncle toms in one area i have ever seen. They sell-out their brothers and sisters without shame.

    There is no place more racist than SF. Surely you have read about the racial profiling by the SF cops?

    SF NorCal is a white democrat who is racist to the core.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous11:42 PM

    Earlier, you covered those two gentlemen from Colorado who refused to give ID and were arrested as a result. In that case, I believe the civilians were in the wrong and they did need to show ID. The cops have do the right to demand ID from motorists in most, if not all, states.

    But in this case, the cop was in the wrong. The woman was not a motorist and did have the right in this situation to refuse to give ID. (I'm not sure why she felt she shouldn't provide ID, but it is her right to refuse.) She had committed no crime; she'd simply had an argument with a school staff member.

    The weird thing is it seems like the cops sort of knew this. He was unsure of what the rules were, and called his superiors for verification, but then got impatient and decided to bust her anyway, regardless of what the rules might be. On top of that, he slams her into the ground? Obviously, I wasn't there so I can't know for sure, but even if he'd had the right to arrest her (he didn't), was it really necessary to use that much force against a pregnant woman? Doubtful.

    It's crazy that what should have been a polite conversation unnecessarily turned into a violent incident. This cop should be sent back for retraining on the basics of how to deal with the public.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous12:10 AM

    Blogger PilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...

    "Or how about this, let people live wherever the hell they want."

    --------------------------------------------------------------------

    White people want to live in their own homogeneous communities as far away from blacks as possible.

    Thanks for your support, X.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous12:14 AM

    Cooks later gave birth to a healthy baby girl, but she’s been banned from the school property and is considering leaving Barstow after the incident.

    Good riddance!
    DLTDHYOTWO !!

    If that's all it takes for psychotic, maladjusted blacks to leave, of their own volition, then you geaux, PD!! Someone give those officers a bonus!

    ReplyDelete
  21. PilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...
    Yep, they took me to jail
    -----

    Whatever happened to the midget you raped?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Immanuel Kant12:36 AM

    The blacks are very vain but in the Negro’s way, and so talkative that they must be driven apart from each other with thrashings.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous12:36 AM

    "If that's all it takes for psychotic, maladjusted blacks to leave, of their own volition, then you geaux, PD!! Someone give those officers a bonus!"

    They won't be getting a bonus. They might get disciplined and possibly fired.

    The taxpayers will likely be writing the pregnant woman a big, fat check after she sues them.

    Yay?

    Still, the white residents of Barstow are probably free from an impending influx of black residents in any event, because Barstow is a lame backwater town in the middle of the desert. I guess that's always an option if you're a redneck who truly can't cope with the demands of being around brown people: Go to live in a shithole.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:51 PM

      It has nothing to do with being able to cope and everything to do with not wanting blacks around. If they are crime increases and property values go down. Who wants that?

      Why would the blah people want to live around whites anyway? Apparently we all hate blacks and yet you continue to force your way into white towns and neighborhoods. It doesn't make any sense.

      Delete
  24. Lt. Commander Johnson12:41 AM

    Oh, I'm sure this po negress was abused. I'm sure she's already in contact with the slimy Civil Rights Attorneys....you got some of this action, field?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous12:46 AM

    "Go to live in a shithole."

    Shithole = Black population in excess of 21%.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Balzac12:50 AM

    I realize that millions of people very genuinely believe that the ethnic demographics of a society are totally irrelevant. I understand that millions of people genuinely believe that IQ does not measure intelligence and that every human sub-species is equally capable of all things. Of course, I also recognize that most people are idiots.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Ha! Shithole=poor white trash. W. Virginia is a shithole and there are no blah people around. You may want to redo your math asshole.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Alright, looks like my man Dr. Ben Carson is leading the polls of Republican candidates. Here we come President Dr. Ben!

    Carson/Cain 16.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Man Field, the trailer park crowd escaped to your spot tonite.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Bosephus1:18 AM

    PilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...
    Ha! Shithole=poor white trash. W. Virginia is a shithole and there are no blah people around.
    ----

    No blah people means no shithole.

    West Virginia is poor but peeps ain't be robbin' and killin' like in the hood.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Lt. Commander Johnson1:18 AM

    Have you ever seen anyone defending, or denying "White Trash" on this blog, Mr. X?

    Your Trailer Park retort is getting old. If I could, I'd show you pics on this blog where it's a morass of blacks living in trailer parks, the murder, assault, rapes and robberies, from their own uncivility. The cops stay out of there, since if they shoot one, they might get in trouble.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Anonymous1:33 AM

    "Alright, looks like my man Dr. Ben Carson is leading the polls of Republican candidates. Here we come President Dr. Ben!

    Carson/Cain 16."


    I think Cain has basically bowed out of the race, so it looks like your dream team will not be realized. :) I guess ol' Herman couldn't handle being mercilessly mocked a second time. A resume of running a pizza chain and groping unwilling women isn't particularly good preparation for the White House.

    Fortunately for our nation's comedians, there's still plenty of fodder for comedy among the rest of the Republican field of candidates. Hell, Rick "Brain Fart" Perry might even run again. That ought to be good for at least a few laughs.

    ReplyDelete
  33. @11:42 PM-

    thank you for being sane.

    Black folk would do well to know that some folk provoke...

    so they may call the police and watch their white privilege in action.

    seen it with my own eyes.

    it is best to flip the script and be SUPER appropriate and proper.

    not that it will help with some racist demons.

    all the same, though.

    hopefully ms lady and her boyfriend got married. the babies deserve a family...

    Blessings all!

    ReplyDelete
  34. "There is definite reason blacks tend to live in shit holes."

    Well when that shit hole is called 'The United States of America', African Americans don't have a lot of choice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:06 PM

      Why? Are you chained down? Has someone said you can't leave? What's preventing the blah people from leaving?

      I know what it is! No govt subsidized housing or EBT cards in da mudda land!

      Delete
  35. Quote: Big Foot - Small Brain

    "Seven whitewashings by ideological co-conspirators cannot blot out the stain falsifying data and manipulating conclusions."

    Why would a committee of prominent individuals taken from a list supplied by Global Warming Deniers seek to whitewash anything? Even for somebody of your limited intellect, surely that doesn't make sense. Your ability to stare reality in the face and deny that it exists is truly breath-taking. Bordering on the psychotic.

    **

    "There have been zero explanations as to why these falsifications do not invalidate the conclusions."

    Au contraire mon gros petit ami, there has been mountains of explanations. Here is an exhaustive list of links that provide a total, comprehensive debunking of your alleged 'climategate' nonsense.

    http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/solutions/fight-misinformation/debunking-misinformation-stolen-emails-climategate.html#.VWg7YmCA3ww

    **

    "The evidence is damning."

    I agree, and the damning evidence is that yet again you have lost another round of this debate.

    **

    "Read the emails."

    I have. Clearly you have not.

    **
    As an aside here is a list of just some of the organisations who say that Global Warming is real.

    NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) – http://www.giss.nasa.gov/edu/gwdebate/

    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html

    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm

    National Academy of Sciences (NAS) – http://books.nap.edu/collections/global_warming/index.html

    State of the Canadian Cryosphere (SOCC) – http://www.socc.ca/permafrost/permafrost_future_e.cfm

    Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – http://epa.gov/climatechange/index.html

    The Royal Society of the UK (RS) – http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id=3135

    American Geophysical Union (AGU) – http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/policy/climate_change_position.html

    American Meteorological Society (AMS) – http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/climatechangeresearch_2003.html

    American Institute of Physics (AIP) – http://www.aip.org/gov/policy12.html

    National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) – http://eo.ucar.edu/basics/cc_1.html

    American Meteorological Society (AMS) – http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/jointacademies.html

    Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS) – http://www.cmos.ca/climatechangepole.html


    ReplyDelete
  36. Somewhere in America a trailer-park is missing its one computer.

    I need some stronger troll spray.:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:19 PM

      Yeah it was stolen by future Roads Scholar Shitavious Dindu Nuffins so he could buy some crack for hims mammy.

      Delete
  37. Dr. Ramos, PHD7:38 AM

    Black privilege doesn't excuse blacks from the human race. At no time, in any of these incidents that fn posts about, do we see black people behaving in a civilized matter. None.

    Democrats have taught blacks that they can't help themselves and therefore they can't/shouldn't be held responsible for their actions. The results are a race of people who are out of control and think they can act anyways with consequences for their actions.


    History shows Daniel Patrick Moynihan was right about blacks. Blacks and most liberals called him racist and destroyed him.Daniel Patrick Moynihan deserves an apology from all blacks and white liberals.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Dr. Ramos, PHD7:47 AM

    "Democrats have taught blacks that they can't help themselves and therefore they can't/shouldn't be held responsible for their actions. The results are a race of people who are out of control and think they can act anyways with consequences for their actions."

    With no consequences.....


    Mother, 7-Year-Old Son Killed In Baltimore Shooting

    BALTIMORE (WJZ) — Shock and sadness in a Southwest Baltimore community after a double murder. One of the victims — just seven-years-old.
    Derek Valcourt has more on the victims and where the investigation stands right now.
    Family members look on in horror as the bodies of the mother and her young son are pulled from their home at 103 Upmanor Road in the Uplands neighborhood of Southwest Baltimore.
    Jennifer Jeffrey Browne, 31, and her seven-year-old son Kester “Tony” Browne were found dead just after 8 a.m. Thursday — both shot in the head.
    Neighbors — appalled.
    “Who can do this? What kind of person is he?” asked Donald Barber.


    http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2015/05/28/8-year-old-another-woman-killed-in-baltimore-shooting/



    “Who can do this? What kind of person is he?”

    A person who feels embolden by the hate coming from fn and his friends on the left.


    Words have consequences. All the cop bashing and hatred coming from the left has resulted in a rise in cop killings and a spike in violent crime in liberal cities like New York, Chicago, and Baltimore.

    How is the left going to solve the problems they created?







    ReplyDelete
  39. "Words have consequences. All the cop bashing and hatred coming from the left has resulted in a rise in cop killings and a spike in violent crime in liberal cities like New York, Chicago, and Baltimore."

    Words have consequence do they?

    How about cops shooting dead unarmed citizens in the street?

    Should that have consequences?

    In March 2015 American cops shot more citizens in that one month than U.K. cops did in the entire twentieth century. Think about that, there were 1200 months in the 20th century.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Anon 0133, while the Herminator may not have the will to go through the circus that is the GOP nominating process he would definitely accept the VP nomination when Dr. Ben wins the Presidential nomination.

    Carson/Cain 16.

    ReplyDelete
  41. And for the record W. Virginia and other like poor rural white areas are rampant with violence, drugs and lack of teeth. Trust me, I've driven through Missouri.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Shhh,PC, do not destroy the narrative floating around in his brain. It might explode.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Pilot, meth is a drug,correct?
    Just checking.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Meth is a way of life for some.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Cletus10:32 AM

    The Purple Cow said...
    "How about cops shooting dead unarmed citizens in the street?"

    Why would the cops should a dead unarmed citizen?

    ReplyDelete
  46. Bosephus10:35 AM

    PilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...
    And for the record W. Virginia and other like poor rural white areas are rampant with violence, drugs and lack of teeth. Trust me, I've driven through Missouri.
    ---

    The only dangerous parts of Missouri is where there be lot's o' negroes - St. Louie, KC and Columbia.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Bigfoot11:16 AM

    The Purple Cow dissembled....
    "Au contraire mon gros petit ami, there has been mountains of explanations."

    Sorry, but no educated person takes seriously reports that exonerate an institution of wrongdoing that were commissioned by the institutions themselves, institutions that receive tens of millions in federal global warming research funding. That would be like BP handpicking and paying a panel of experts to investigate its handling of the Macondo oil spill. No one would accept it at face value when such a panel cleared BP. Likewise, no one with any sense ignores the facts and pretends the global warming science is valid after reading the Climategate emails for themselves.

    But you do, because you are a True Believer.

    Real science doesn't need to perform "tricks" with data or have to "hide the decline".

    I'll bet you believe Hillary when she says there was nothing on her email server that should concern the American people, or that payments made to her husband from foreign interests she was involved with as Secretary of State did not influence her decisions.

    What's the one thing all the organizations you listed have in common? They all have a direct financial interest in the Global Warming industry, almost every single one through direct government funding. What might you expect their opinion to be as to whether or not they should continue to receive that funding?

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704075604575356611173414140

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2011/06/28/michael-mann-and-the-climategate-whitewash-part-one/

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2011/07/05/michael-mann-and-the-climategate-whitewash-part-ii/

    http://triblive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_689731.html#axzz3bXSfWjiR

    https://cei.org/blog/climategate-whitewash

    ReplyDelete
  48. What does all those links have in common, bigfoot?

    They all have a financial interest in denying climate change.

    ReplyDelete
  49. "Sorry, but no educated person takes seriously reports that exonerate an institution of wrongdoing that were commissioned by the institutions themselves..."

    They were not.

    **

    "institutions that receive tens of millions in federal global warming research funding."

    Are you saying that the University of East Anglia receives tens of millions in Federal climate research funding?

    Seriously? That's what you think???

    **

    "Likewise, no one with any sense ignores the facts and pretends the global warming science is valid after reading the Climategate emails for themselves."

    I don't think you've ever read them at all have you? I have. Theres absolutely nothing in those Emails to suggest to any sane and rational person that fraud was committed.

    Incidentally, I see you have given up arguing the science. You are now left only with arguing that no less than SEVEN independent commissions one of which was peopled by scientists taken from list provided by climate change deniers ALL lied.

    Think about how just plain stupid and illogical your position is.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Bigfoot11:53 AM

    The Purple Cow said...
    "Incidentally, I see you have given up arguing the science."

    There is no "science" when you are fraudulently manipulating data.

    Good thing there has been no actual warming in the past 19 years.

    "Theres absolutely nothing in those Emails to suggest to any sane and rational person that fraud was committed."

    Email sent on May 29, 2008 from Phil Jones, director of East Anglia's CRU, to Michael Mann, under the subject line "IPCC & FOI,":

    "Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith [Briffa] re AR4 [the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report]? Keith will do likewise . . . can you also email Gene [Wahl, an employee of the U.S. Department of Commerce] to do the same . . . We will be getting Caspar [Amman, of the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research] to do likewise."

    Phil Jones emailed later that he had "deleted loads of emails" so that anyone who might bring a Freedom of Information Act request would get very little. The "independent" investigators who compiled the University of East Anglia-commissioned Russell Report never even asked Jones or his colleagues whether they had actually done this.

    Why would someone delete "loads of emails" if not to cover up fraud? Why would an investigative team evaluating whether or not fraud had been committed not even ask this question?

    ReplyDelete
  51. "The only dangerous parts of Missouri is where there be lot's o' negroes - St. Louie, KC and Columbia."

    Bullshit. It's even more dangerous in the rural areas outside of the cities especially to my eyes as fat white trash don't find it necessary to wear shirts. Agggggghhhhhhhhhhhh!

    ReplyDelete
  52. Earlier I said there were seven enquiries into the alleged Climategate scandal. This it turns out is not quite true, in fact there were eight. The University of Pennsylvania investigated twice.

    Here are links to stories on the conclusions of all eight reports.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/08/science/earth/08climate.html?_r=0

    http://news.sciencemag.org/europe/2010/04/oxburgh-report-clears-controversial-climate-research-unit

    http://news.sciencemag.org/education/2010/02/climate-scientist-mann-partially-absolved-penn-state

    http://news.sciencemag.org/2010/07/michael-mann-exonerated-penn-state-inquiry-finds-no-substance-allegations

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-10899538

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/u-s-scientists-cleared-in-climategate-1.1031242

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-08-22/climate-change-scientist-cleared-in-u-s-data-altering-inquiry

    http://www.deccanherald.com/content/61233/uk-climategate-inquiry-largely-clears.html

    ReplyDelete
  53. "Why would someone delete "loads of emails" if not to cover up fraud? Why would an investigative team evaluating whether or not fraud had been committed not even ask this question?"

    Who knows? If you have to ask that means you don't know if it was necessarily something nefarious.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Limpbaugh12:06 PM

    From the looks of the comments, I probably shouldn't have let not having something intelligent to say stopped me from commenting.

    ReplyDelete
  55. PilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...

    "The only dangerous parts of Missouri is where there be lot's o' negroes - St. Louie, KC and Columbia."

    Bullshit. It's even more dangerous in the rural areas outside of the cities especially to my eyes as fat white trash don't find it necessary to wear shirts. Agggggghhhhhhhhhhhh!

    --


    In the eyes of a racist this is true. In the eyes of everyone else, not so much..

    ReplyDelete
  56. Bigfoot, I know you can't help yourself but you are being disingenuous again. Jones's Email was a response to many freedom of information requests already received by a variety of Climate change denier nutcases, especially one organization called Climate Audit, who had misrepresented Jones's work and views in the past. It was not a pre-emptive strike against FoI requests as you infer.

    Jones was worried that C.A. would again misuse or quote out of context his work again.

    If you quote the entire passage, this becomes abundantly obvious.

    ""When the FOI requests began here, the FOI person said we had to abide by the requests. It took a couple of half hour sessions - one at a screen, to convince them otherwise showing them what CA [Climate Audit] was all about... I don't know who else at UEA may be getting them... We're away of requests going to others in the UK.

    "The inadvertent email I sent last month has led to a Data Protection Act request sent by a certain Canadian, saying that the email maligned his scientific credibility with his peers! If he pays 10 pounds (which he hasn't yet) I am supposed to go through my emails and he can get anything I've written about him. About 2 months ago I deleted loads of emails, so have very little - if anything at all. This legislation is different from the FOI - it is supposed to be used to find put why you might have a poor credit rating !

    "In response to FOI and EIR requests, we've put up some data - mainly paleo data. Each request generally leads to more - to explain what we've put up. Every time, so far, that hasn't led to anything being added - instead just statements saying read what is in the papers and what is on the web site! ... We've never sent programs, any codes and manuals.

    "In the UK, the Research Assessment Exercise results will be out in 2 weeks time. These are expensive to produce and take too much time, so from next year we'll be moving onto a metric based system. The metrics will be # and amounts of grants, papers and citations etc. I did flippantly suggest that the # of FOI requests you get should be another."

    ReplyDelete
  57. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  58. The Purple Cow said...

    Earlier I said there were seven enquiries into the alleged Climategate scandal. This it turns out is not quite true, in fact there were eight. The University of Pennsylvania investigated twice.


    Which climategate scandal? Since there's been 3 so far.......


    You think climate change supporters clearing alleged climate change scientists and researches is suppose to mean something?


    HA!

    I guess you think the Arctic has no ice, 5 billion people are in poverty because of climate change and there are 50 million climate change refugees out there somewhere....

    ReplyDelete
  59. PilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...

    And for the record W. Virginia and other like poor rural white areas are rampant with violence, drugs and lack of teeth. Trust me, I've driven through Missouri.

    10:22 AM


    Why disparities in dental care persist for African-Americans even when they have insurance coverage


    African Americans receive poorer dental care than white Americans, even when they have some dental insurance coverage. To better understand why this is so, researchers at Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health and the College of Dental Medicine, surveyed African American adults with recent oral health symptoms, including toothaches and gum disease. Their findings provide insights into why disparities persist even among those with dental insurance and suggest strategies to removing barriers to dental care.


    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110616193738.htm


    Me thinks blahs should be the last people talking about other folks missing they teeth. Just sayin'.


    ReplyDelete
  60. Toothless Hillbilly12:47 PM

    "In the eyes of a racist this is true. In the eyes of everyone else, not so much.."

    Irony at its finest.

    "Me thinks blahs should be the last people talking about other folks missing they teeth. Just sayin'."

    And yet even with worse dental care blahs don't have the toothless problem poor whites have. I have more teeth than the entire state of West Virginia that bastion of white utopia.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Toothless Hillbilly12:50 PM

    "United Health Foundation's "America's Health Rankings" for 2013 found that Americans are making considerable progress in key health measures. West Virginia, however, ranked either last or second-to-last in 20 categories, including cancer, child immunization, diabetes, disabilities, drug deaths, teeth loss, low birth weight, missed work days due to health, prescription drug overdose, preventable hospitalizations, and senior clinical care.[105] Wisconsin Population Health Institute annual "Health Rankings" for 2012 showed West Virginia spends $9,671 per capita on health care annually. El Salvador spends just $467, yet both have the same life expectancy.[106] In 2012, according to the Census Bureau, West Virginia was the only state where death rates exceeds birth rates. During 2010-2013, about 21,000 babies per year were born in West Virginia, but there were 24,000 deaths.[99] In demographics, this is called a "net mortality society."

    Hmmmmmmmmmm, tooth loss and drug overdoses. White folks are good at that huh? Kinky should know.

    ReplyDelete
  62. The GOP12:53 PM

    You think climate change supporters clearing alleged climate change scientists and researches is suppose to mean something?
    -----------------------

    Of course not, we need some idiot with a conservative blog with a financial stake and no training in atmospheric science to tell us what to think.






    I guess you think the Arctic has no ice, 5 billion people are in poverty because of climate change and there are 50 million climate change refugees out there somewhere....
    -----------------------
    No, we believe the UN is using climate change to enslave us all in abandoned Walmarts.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Bigfoot12:53 PM

    PilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...
    "Why would someone delete "loads of emails" if not to cover up fraud? Why would an investigative team evaluating whether or not fraud had been committed not even ask this question?"

    Who knows?
    --

    That's the point X, no one knows because the commissions who were supposed to find out instead whitewashed the scandal. Which is in itself damning.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Kinky has no teeth12:56 PM

    West Virginia Racial Breakdown of Population
    [hide]Racial composition 1990[49] 2000[50] 2010[51]
    White 96.2% 95.0% 93.9%
    Black 3.1% 3.2% 3.4%
    Asian 0.4% 0.5% 0.7%
    Native 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%
    Native Hawaiian and
    other Pacific Islander - - -
    Other race 0.1% 0.2% 0.3%
    Two or more races - 0.9% 1.5%


    94% white. With the highest level of drug overdoses and tooth loss of course WV is almost exclusively white.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Toothless Hillbilly said...

    I have more teeth than the entire state of West Virginia that bastion of white utopia.

    12:47 PM

    And yet you call yourself toothless...... Me thinks you be a lying racist.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Anonymous The GOP said...

    " Of course not, we need some idiot with a conservative blog with a financial stake and no training in atmospheric science to tell us what to think."

    Much better to have leftwingers with a financial stake telling us what to think....





    " No, we believe the UN is using climate change to enslave us all in abandoned Walmarts."



    Is that what climate alarmists are pushing these days?

    ReplyDelete
  66. Anonymous Kinky has no teeth said...

    West Virginia Racial Breakdown of Population
    [hide]Racial composition 1990[49] 2000[50] 2010[51]
    White 96.2% 95.0% 93.9%
    Black 3.1% 3.2% 3.4%
    Asian 0.4% 0.5% 0.7%
    Native 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%
    Native Hawaiian and
    other Pacific Islander - - -
    Other race 0.1% 0.2% 0.3%
    Two or more races - 0.9% 1.5%


    94% white. With the highest level of drug overdoses and tooth loss of course WV is almost exclusively white.

    12:56 PM


    And yet it is blahs with the poorest dental hygiene.


    Blahs/racists who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Bigfoot1:07 PM

    The Purple Cow said...
    Bigfoot, I know you can't help yourself but you are being disingenuous again. Jones's Email was a response to many freedom of information requests already received by a variety of Climate change denier nutcases...
    ---

    So if you call someone who is questioning your tricked-out data a "denier nutcase", everything is just supposed to go away? Does that work in court? Apparently it does work if you commission an investigation that only talks to one side of the case.

    The data was compiled with government funds and is supposed to made available to anyone interested in researching global warming. If there is nothing wrong with your data, then releasing it would only bolster your conclusions, end dissent on this issue, and unite us all in combating the scourge of economic freedom.

    But that's not what they did. They deleted emails, withheld data, and and subverted the peer review and editorial process by bullying journals who published papers at odds with what they thought the "proper" take on global warming should be.

    The truth doesn't need to be defended like that.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Bigfoot, stop lying. You are in danger of sounding every bit as stupid as Uncle Renaldo, and you wouldn't want that stain on your carachter, now would you?

    You can repeat lies time and again, but that doesn't magically make them true. Climate Audit is not interested in researching climate change, it's a blog written by a retired mining consultant. A blog that had knowingly misrepresented Jones's views on several previous occasions.

    EIGHT INDEPENDENT BOARDS OF ENQUIRY - INCLUDING ONE STAFFED BY SCIENTISTS RECOMMENDED BY CLIMATE CHANGE DENIERS - INVESTIGATED THIS INCIDENT, EVERY SINGLE ONE FOUND THAT THERE HAD BEEN NO INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY.

    Secondly where is your evidence that they subverted the peer-review system? Where is your evidence that they bullied journalists?

    ReplyDelete
  69. Let's conceede "climategate". That nonwithstanding there has been considerable data collected from numerous sources since that "scandal" that support increasing temperatures.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Toothless Hillbilly1:37 PM

    And yet it is blahs with the poorest dental hygiene.

    ----------------------

    And yet it is whites with the fewest teeth. Funny that.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Anonymous1:38 PM

    Is that what climate alarmists are pushing these days?
    --------------------
    If that's what you call paranoid conservatives then yes.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Anonymous1:41 PM

    Climate Audit is not interested in researching climate change, it's a blog written by a retired mining consultant.
    -----------------------
    Noticing a trend about the sites these guys are linking? They are all run by non climate scientists with a bad track record of misrepresenting facts. Desperate times.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Bigfoot1:53 PM

    PilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...
    Let's conceede "climategate". That nonwithstanding there has been considerable data collected from numerous sources since that "scandal" that support increasing temperatures.
    -----

    But there has been no increase in global temperatures in almost 19 years, despite this being the period of time with the greatest rate of anthropogenic CO2 production.

    This observed reality is at odds with every single climate model and was not predicted by anyone.

    Why should we trust people who tell us we need to remain in a hysterical state of alarm over a problem that apparently does not exist? Especially when those people have so much to gain if they can keep us in a perpetual state of alarm?

    ReplyDelete
  74. Bigfoot2:04 PM

    The Purple Cow said...
    Climate Audit is not interested in researching climate change, it's a blog written by a retired mining consultant"

    I was referring not to Climate Audit, but to the journal Climate Research, which is (or at least was) a respected scientific journal.

    In 2003, Willie Soon of the Smithsonian Institution and Sallie Baliunas of Harvard published a paper in the journal Climate Research that took exception to Michael Mann's work, work which also was at variance with a large number of independent studies of paleoclimate. So it would seem the Soon-Baliunas paper was just part of the normal to-and-fro of science. But the Climatic Research Unit (CRU)—the source of the Climategate emails— was not going to abide any dissent on such an important issue.

    Phil Jones wrote Michael Mann on March 11, 2003, that:

    "I'll be emailing the journal to tell them I'm having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor," Chris de Freitas of the University of Auckland."

    Mann responded to Jones on the same day:

    "I think we should stop considering 'Climate Research' as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues . . . to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board."

    Mann ultimately wrote to Jones on July 11, 2003, that:

    "I think the community should . . . terminate its involvement with this journal at all levels . . . and leave it to wither away into oblivion and disrepute."

    Climate Research and several other journals thereafter stopped accepting anything that substantially challenged the received wisdom on global warming perpetuated by the CRU. That's how "science" rolls these days.

    ReplyDelete
  75. "But there has been no increase in global temperatures in almost 19 years, despite this being the period of time with the greatest rate of anthropogenic CO2 production."

    I know your hero Dr. Goebbels taught you that if you repeat a lie often enough it will eventually be perceived as the truth, but that was in Germany in the 1930's and '40's. The world has moved on, we live in the information age.

    2015 was the hottest year ever.

    Six of the ten hottest years ever were recorded in the eighteen years before that.

    http://time.com/3656646/2014-hottest-year/

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/summary-info/global/201412

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30852588

    http://www.climatecentral.org/news/record-2014-hottest-year-18502

    http://www.climatecentral.org/news/2014-on-track-to-be-warmest-year-on-record-18041

    http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2014-hottest-year-on-record/

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30683339

    http://www.wired.com/2014/09/2014-pace-warmest-year-ever/

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/17/science/earth/2014-was-hottest-year-on-record-surpassing-2010.html?_r=0

    http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/no-standstill-in-global-warming-2014-will-be-worlds-hottest-year-ever-9901094.html

    http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/11839/20150110/official-2014-hottest-year-recorded.htm

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/543343/Met-Office-blames-climate-change-2014-hottest-year-on-record

    ReplyDelete
  76. Bigfoot2:39 PM

    Your refusal to acknowledge there has been no upward trend in global temperatures in almost 19 years now is alarming, Purple Cow. It's almost as if you are a crazed religious zealot or something.

    Because a plot of global temperatures over the past 18+ years shows no upward trend..

    http://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/RSS-2015-05-560x307.png

    ReplyDelete
  77. "Why should we trust people who tell us we need to remain in a hysterical state of alarm over a problem that apparently does not exist? Especially when those people have so much to gain if they can keep us in a perpetual state of alarm?"

    No one is telling you anything, climate scientists are reporting the global temperatures year after year and comparing them to previous times i.e. doing their jobs. It is conservatives who use hyperbolic terms to dismiss the findings by the vast majority of climate scientists. If they are proven wrong they will be harmed so it is in their interests to provide the most accurate data possible. I mean unless of course 90+% of global climatologists are all involved in a vast conspiracy.

    ReplyDelete
  78. "Because a plot of global temperatures over the past 18+ years shows no upward trend.."

    So because of this you are telling us temperatures will remain constant for the foreseeable future or is this a pause or is the atmosphere a very complex environment that doesn't lead to straightline reactions due to advanced levels of CO2? Or maybe the planet is cooling? Please explain what the 18 year "pause" means.

    But for the record if the past year was warmer than the previous that is an upward tick.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Also, there has never been a consensus that says we will continue to see linear temperature increases. In fact there may be colder and harsher winters on some parts of the planet due to the desalinization of the oceans and the "cooling" of some warm water currents that keep some parts of the globe temperate. These ideas have been postulated previously. We can take the James Inhofe path and make snowballs and therefore conclude warming is a hoax or we can understand there are very complex interactions between the atmosphere and the oceans and go from there. 18 years isn't a good time sample which is why climatologists work with 30 year normals. 18 years is just a little over halfway there, before we make any conclusions let's wait a bit and see where we are.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Anonymous3:57 PM

    TO ALL YOU PALEFACE WHITE MOTHERFUCKERS: YOU DIRTY, SAVAGE, DISGUSTING, FLAT-ASSED, LITTLE DICK, WEAK, DOG FUCKING, METH MAKING, SERIAL KILLERS, INCEST CHILDREN, PEDOPHILES, COLONIAL, MUTANT DNA,

    I can keep going, but sane individuals get the point. YOU HATE US 'CAUSE YOU CAN NEVER BE LIKE US. Deep down you know it's true. That's why you pay to watch us pleasure your wives, something you could NEVER do all mighty white man. Now take that and shove it up your pasty little ass you dirty honky gringo!

    ReplyDelete
  81. Bigfoot3:59 PM

    PilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...
    "Please explain what the 18 year "pause" means."
    ----

    It means the models that tied global warming to anthropogenic CO2 emissions were wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Bigfoot4:11 PM

    PilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...
    "Also, there has never been a consensus that says we will continue to see linear temperature increases. In fact there may be colder and harsher winters on some parts of the planet due to the desalinization of the oceans and the "cooling" of some warm water currents that keep some parts of the globe temperate."
    ------

    Yes, I've heard it before, no matter what happens, it's due to carbon emissions. If it gets colder, hotter, wetter, dryer, or stays the same, too many hurricanes, not enough hurricanes, it's all proof of "climate change".

    "18 years is just a little over halfway there, before we make any conclusions let's wait a bit and see where we are."

    Excellent idea PilotX. In the mean time, let's not levy trillions in job-killing carbon taxes and regulations, let people decide what kind of energy they wish to use, and stop scaring little kids with climate propaganda. Al Gore and Leo DeCaprio can keep all their megamansions and private jets and not worry that they are personally killing the planet. I'm pretty sure the Earth will still be habitable in 12 years and we can go from there.

    ReplyDelete

  83. PilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...
    18 years isn't a good time sample which is why climatologists work with 30 year normals.


    30 year sample on a planet over 4 Billion years old?

    ReplyDelete
  84. "In the mean time, let's not levy trillions in job-killing carbon taxes and regulations, let people decide what kind of energy they wish to use, and stop scaring little kids with climate propaganda. Al Gore and Leo DeCaprio can keep all their megamansions and private jets and not worry that they are personally killing the planet. I'm pretty sure the Earth will still be habitable in 12 years and we can go from there."

    more hyperbole. great, let's bring up Al Gore. CO2 is a greenhouse gas and until we understand the true extent of its influence I think it's better we try to curb our use of it. Environmental regulations are important and I'm not so sure they will kill jobs but better some job loss than possible irreversible damage to the planet?

    ReplyDelete

  85. U.S. economy contracts in first quarter; dollar hurts corporate profits
    ...
    including a problem with the model the government uses to smooth the data for seasonal fluctuations.

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-economy-likely-shrank-first-050330978.html

    Glad to see government computer models are as accurate at predicting as Miss Cleo.

    ReplyDelete
  86. the GOP4:27 PM

    Looks like the party of family values has more problems. Dennis Hastert, the longest serving Republican speaker, has been indicted for playing grab ass with a male student. Let's see the GOP is now the party of child molesters, kooks and hypocrites. Good thing 90% of blah people didn't vote for Dennis Hastert.

    ReplyDelete
  87. "TO ALL YOU PALEFACE WHITE MOTHERFUCKERS: YOU DIRTY, SAVAGE, DISGUSTING, FLAT-ASSED, LITTLE DICK, WEAK, DOG FUCKING, METH MAKING, SERIAL KILLERS, INCEST CHILDREN, PEDOPHILES, COLONIAL, MUTANT DNA,"

    Maybe I'm just being oversensitive, but I'm feeling some underlying hostility here. What gives, Mr. Black Man?

    ReplyDelete
  88. Bill is an F'n Idiot4:34 PM


    30 year sample on a planet over 4 Billion years old?
    ---------------------------------------------------
    Yes dumbass, here's why because we all know you're too stupid to find out on your own.


    "Why does NOAA produce Normals?

    NOAA's computation of climate Normals is in accordance with the recommendation of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), of which the United States is a member. While the WMO mandates each member nation to compute 30-year averages of meteorological quantities at least every 30 years (1931 - 1960, 1961 - 1990, 1991 - 2020, etc.), the WMO recommends a decadal update, in part to incorporate newer weather stations. Further, NOAA's NCDC has a responsibility to fulfill the mandate of Congress "... to establish and record the climatic conditions of the United States." This responsibility stems from a provision of the Organic Act of October 1, 1890, which established the Weather Bureau as a civilian agency (15 U.S.C. 311). (top)
    What are Normals used for?

    Meteorologists and climatologists regularly use Normals for placing recent climate conditions into a historical context. NOAA's Normals are commonly seen on local weather news segments for comparisons with the day's weather conditions. In addition to weather and climate comparisons, Normals are utilized in seemingly countless applications across a variety of sectors. These include: regulation of power companies, energy load forecasting, crop selection and planting times, construction planning, building design, and many others."

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/normals/usnormals.html#WHATARENORMALS

    ReplyDelete
  89. PilotX said...
    "Let's see the GOP is now the party of child molesters, kooks and hypocrites."

    Dennis Hastert the (alleged) child molester deserves all the shit he is about to get.

    ReplyDelete
  90. The GOP4:45 PM

    30 year sample on a planet over 4 Billion years old?
    --------------------------------
    At least we're making progress. The majority of Republicans believe the earth is 6,000 years old. If even Bill's dumb ass can learn something there's hope.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Manifest Density 1619-20195:24 PM

    The symbolism of the curvaceous fertile mother earth figure in contrast to the barren, frail, pale conniving little guttersnipe is beyond the pale of comprehension for the majority of low status euro peons. The earth is hurting and there seems to be no relief in sight. Nobody in this tragedy woke up with ill intent but, this unfortunate instance represents the classic way racism works and should not be ignored. Classical, situational, institutional racism. MS. White feels slighted by Ms. Black, calls cop. Ms. Black seeks justice awaits mediation. Cop arrives on scene, listens to Ms. White, criminalizes Ms. Black.

    Just think if the perpetrator had of been a black man! Who knows what that cop would have done. You know: (Cue trembling voice. )"I feared for my life! That old meanie! I was afraid blah, blah, blah. (Cut to eyes tearing, looks to officer.) My hero! Thank goodness you're here, you big strong man!" (Sunset, music, body bag, fade to black)

    I believe both women wrong. The little Chihuahua admitted she had her blinkers on. Therefore she was obviously signaling a turn that, everybody knows, requires her to yield the right of way to oncoming traffic. She should have waited until it was safe to pass and then proceeded to park. Unfortunately for the other driver, white privilege will always win in territorial disputes ( see Manifest Destiny ). However, ignorance of the law is no excuse and the woman victimized by the oppressor's intermediary, aka the cops, should have just left the parking lot as no crime occurred and she had no obligation to stick around. Her mistake was that she thought justice should be administered fairly and equally. I mean, who does that?!

    Finally, poor Deputy Barney Schwarzenfeiffer (is it me or did he sound like the Arnold?) bless his heart, just wasn't prepared and didn't know what to do. I assume he needed the names of both women to complete his report. But what do you do when no crime was committed? That's right boys and girls you create one; "Thanks for playing… Johnny tell'em what they won."


    Are racists so intoxicated by their lust for power and control that they are incapable of feelings for a pregnant woman? We, as people of color, find ourselves in a sadomasochistic abusive relationship where the louder we cry the harder they whip. We are constantly reminded that there is not much room at the table and that what little room be provided should come at a price most are unable or unwilling to pay, so stay in your place.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Anonymous6:09 PM

    Anonymous Manifest Density 1619-2019 said...

    "However, ignorance of the law is no excuse"

    I agree, that black woman got what she deserved. She's lucky they didn't beat the fetus out of her. When will blacks finally learn how to behave in a civilized society?

    ReplyDelete
  93. Bigfoot6:32 PM

    PilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...
    "... but better some job loss than possible irreversible damage to the planet?"
    ---

    No. We have enough real problems to deal with.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Manifest Density 1619-20196:33 PM


    @609p

    What do you know about civilized society? There was no need to beat her. She broke no law. It is the officer who would have broken the law if he had beaten her. Therefore there was no luck involved. You need to get a name before you come back here. Quit hiding. You sound like you have some violence issues.

    ReplyDelete
  95. Manifest 20196:39 PM

    @609p

    And for the record I never said she deserved anything. Nice try better luck next time.

    ReplyDelete
  96. Anonymous6:53 PM

    Silk Road darknet Ulbright gets two life sentences. Man, the government is coming after these Liberal blogs.

    Hmmmmm. I wonder what this means for FN and it's cronies who berate and name-call innocent well-meaning anons? If FN is investigated PC, PX, Yisheng and 'maybe' even Field will be finished.

    It will be a glorious day for Anon Inc. Field has been ripping off anons for over 3 years. In fact, FN has not paid a dime to Anon Inc for 3+ years. Someone needs to look into this.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Manifest Density 1619-20197:01 PM

    "However, ignorance of the law is no excuse"

    It appears that in California citizens are not required to identify themselves. Turns out the cop was ignorant of the law.

    ReplyDelete
  98. Knockout gamer8:05 PM

    Dear Mr. Field, I have heard nothing in the last 6 months about the Knockout game. It's almost as if it was made up and blown out of proportion. Even Mr. Hannity and O'reilly have let me down. It's up to you to keep track of this game or it's game over. Thank you in advance.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Toothless Hillbilly8:07 PM

    I know what it is! No govt subsidized housing or EBT cards in da mudda land!
    --------------------------
    Nope, that's what keeps whites here. That and they're ashamed of their having no teeth like Kinky. Also their breath stinks like Kinky's too, taht's why he's here all the time he can't get a date because girls don't like smelly toothless jerks.

    ReplyDelete
  100. Anonymous8:28 PM

    Knockout gamer said...
    Dear Mr. Field, I have heard nothing in the last 6 months about the Knockout game. It's almost as if it was made up and blown out of proportion.
    ----

    Couple of weeks ago, a kid my daughter knows at college got jumped by three black guys as he came home late studying during finals week. Didn't know them, never saw them coming, never traded a word with them, but they knocked him right out and kicked him repeatedly as he lay on the ground, breaking several ribs. A cab driver driving by saw them kicking him and thought he was dead. His face was so bloody and swollen his sister couldn't recognize him at the hospital. His left cheek was torn from the corner of his mouth almost to his ear.

    These guys did not know him and did this to him solely because he was white. Such hatred for a stranger is incomprehensible.

    This shit is real.

    ReplyDelete
  101. The "shit" like your made up story, is NOT real.

    ReplyDelete
  102. Anonymous11:44 AM

    Why would you say it is not real?

    Because you don't want it to be.

    My daughter has a picture of the kid in the hospital on her phone, so I know it is real.

    http://www.themaneater.com/stories/2015/5/12/mu-student-assaulted-near-campus/

    ReplyDelete