Thursday, December 04, 2008

We almost stopped the "jigging".

*
"The remaining case with the highest profile is Donofrio vs. Wells. Because it was distributed by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to other justices for conference, it gained undue importance for people unschooled in how the court works...."

In case you were wondering, Donofrio vs. Wells is the one case which could derail the Presidency of his O ness. So let's consider that name I highlighted for a minute:

Does it strike anyone reading this as ironic that the lone black man on the Supreme Court of these divided states is the one member of the Supremes who gave this case a snow ball's chance in hell of surviving? Does it strike anyone as ironic that one of the people who sued to have the certification of the O man's votes halted was a black man? (Alan Keys) I am not surprised. You see, I understand what Malcolm was talking about. A lot of you hate that house Negro field Negro metaphor because you think it divides is. But it doesn't. It was simply his way of commenting about our condition at the time. A condition which still persists today, and which is as relevant now as it ever was.


What really divides us is the hearts and souls of these men. These wimpy insecure self hating men, who lack moral courage or fortitude, and who would do anything to get a pat on the head from certain people while giving certain other people their asses to kiss. Remember that brotha ( I don't even remember his name, his 15 minutes are up) who was doing a jig for all those republicans while begging Mr. Morton not to let Obama win? He is an example of that sickness.


So now guess who is praying real hard that this Obama birth certificate story (please read the comments after this story) has real legs and that the Supremes will actually take it up? Yep, the Negroes avoiding the "colored section" like it was a plague. Those Negroes are keeping their fingers crossed all over A-merry-ca, because if somehow this story would take his O ness down, they would become relevant again, and the head pats could flow.



Relevant and happy. Let the jigging begin.



*Thank you "Moveable Feast "for allowing me to steal that pic from your site





73 comments:

  1. Clarence Thomas is a miserable prick.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10:30 PM

    What an idiot! I guess Clarence didn't get the memo that Hawaii is the 50 the State and that Barack Obama was born there. This is not even a legal issue because the State of Hawaii has already verified that Obama was born there. The fact that his father was foreign born is not a factor either. If that was the case, Thomas Jefferson was ineligible to be president because his mother was born in London England. In fact Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and George Washington were all born as Englishmen, subjects of the Crown, because the American Colonies were British Territories. Of course,they were White and that makes al the difference to Clarence Thomas. TOM!

    ReplyDelete
  3. silly negros, tricks are for kids !!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for the shout out, Field. FYI, Kevin Merida and Mike Fletcher pointed out the depths of CT's venal nature. He is a flawed, hurt human being and frankly I don't think even W's daddy knew what kind of maniac he appointed to the Court.

    Regardless, this is a wingnut blogger, Fox News and Limbaigh issue. In other words, regular people ain't buying it.

    But hey, even if there was any scintilla of merit and the petitioner wasn't a notorious lunatic with a history of frivolous suits, look what happened in "Mad Men" when this dude dimed Don Draper. Nothing. Draper was that cool, he was that needed. Trust me--Arlen Specter, Orrin hatch and the Rethugs who'd bring this up ion Congress aren't b/c they know it's bogus.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The old folks used to call it crabs in a basket. We are the ONLY race that refuses to stick together, the white man knows this. He has always used one of our own to knock us down a peg or two.

    ReplyDelete
  6. From someone who was pulled aside while going to my part time job, by a Negro newly hired as a human resource person, only to ask me if I had a job and told me he decided not to hire me for a FED full time job, because he didn't want to be perceived as hiring too many black people; I am not surprised. I was too dumbfounded to speak at age 19 and hardly knew what to say when he said he knew I would get another Job. A part time cashier vs. full time drafting? I thought it was the jitters from new integration, most jobs you were the first or second black person hired at that time. It happened again, differently and thirty years later, got screwed out of a job, another Negro with his own agenda, all the while he was trying to convince me how badly he was being discriminated against. This time if it was not for my moral conscience, he might have been a dead Negro.

    Unfortunately Obama cannot remove Clarence Thomas from the Supreme Court, but let us hope his appointments means Thomas has less influence. I also wonder if anyone reached out to Donofrio to let him know that Thomas would be the goto judge.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous11:05 PM

    Clarence Thomas needs to sit his Jim Crow jumpin, massa milkin, happy ass down. That's it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Unfortunately Obama cannot remove Clarence Thomas from the Supreme Court, but let us hope his appointments means Thomas has less influence. I also wonder if anyone reached out to Donofrio to let him know that Thomas would be the goto judge."

    Hathor, that's key. I think O man will get at least two appointements before his term is over, so we will see.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree, but whites are up to their gum boots in this to!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Soon these people will have died off. We need to be watching for the ones that are coming up behind them. Obama ain't thinking about these fools, but all the enemies and contrarians have certainly come out of the woodwork.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I read about this after I read your 12/3 post...man, that Negro is crazy! On one hand, I feel sorry for the man. I mean, one can only imagine the experiences he had to make him morph into this self-hating creature. But...on the other hand...this man truly needs to be stopped before he does any more damage to Blacks, ethnic and economic minorities, and the freakin Constitution! Iont know, maybe someone will develop a new psych drug or something.

    L

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous11:42 PM

    I still like Justice Thomas as a man, but I'm disappointed in him for this maneuver. He deserves to take some heat for this, house negroe indeed.

    szpork

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous11:46 PM

    "because he didn't want to be perceived as hiring too many black people;"

    Can't speak for every single case that ever happened, but I can tell you that I never heard of a Greek-American telling another Greek or Greek-American that he wasn't going to hire him because he didn't want to be perceived as hiring too many Greeks.

    ReplyDelete
  14. He is a slave catching coon.

    Period.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Clearly, this is the fruition of a successful conspiracy between Kenya & Indonesia to take over the government of the United States.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous4:40 AM

    Like Ty Cobb, Babe Ruth and Honus Wagner were in baseball, Clarence Thomas would definitely deserve to be in the inaugural group of buck dancing clowns inducted into the House Negro Hall of Fame. In fact, Uncle Thomas deserves his own wing in such a place. Furthermore, this guy has been jigging for so long I'm wondering if he gets to collect royalties whenever the terms like House Negro, slave catcher, tap dancing sambo and stepnfechit are used.

    OK I'm done with this shit, not good for my blood pressure. Let's move on, Field.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I can't even comment on CT without cursing up a storm. He should have never been appointed, never.

    Nice "Mad Men" reference Mr. Chambers.

    I'm forward this some friends and my family. This issue is BS and Keys knows it.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I didn't realize the Wells in the case was Nina Wells, wife of top legal man Ted Wells.

    I wonder as a black woman what she thinks about CT moving this along?

    ReplyDelete
  19. "OK I'm done with this shit, not good for my blood pressure. Let's move on, Field."

    Mine either.:( Hopefully, after today, we can move on. Let's see what the Supremes do.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous8:28 AM

    the consituion is clear even if your a u.s. citizen your parent(s) must have resided in the "states" for more than 10yrs ....5 of which must have been after the age of 16

    his mamma was 18 when he was born and here's the kicker hawaii had only been a state for 2 that's right folks TWO years.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous8:45 AM

    Uncle Clarence needs to sit his behind down, that's all I can say. (shaking head)

    ReplyDelete
  22. I'll take a contrarian POV.

    I hope the SCOTUS hears the case and then the matter will be put to rest once and for all.

    Obama was born in Hawaii -- period.

    Let these lunatics try to derail Obama because their efforts will be be discredited.

    ReplyDelete
  23. "because if somehow this story would take his O ness down, they would become relevant again"

    Nuff said right there. Clearence Crow and crew are working big time for their slave catching medals of all medals... oh this would be the big one.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I am sorry - this WHOLE legal thing is a WASTE of time. Do you REALLY believe that SERIOUS Obama haters would have let him get to the primaries without this tidbit of information not being verified?

    Damn, They went ALL THE WAY TO AFRICA to get dirt on this man!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous9:54 AM

    Clarence always was a sad SOB. His record on the bench has been to vote against any decision that might be of any benefit to blacks.

    I remember when he was first nominated. Alot of blacks protested replacing the honorable Thurgood Marshall with that sell out. Other blacks kept saying "give him a chance". We wanted to give Colin and Condi a "chance" too. Now we're in the process of giving another prominant black politician "a chance" regardless of his agenda.

    Attacking Obama based on that phony birth certificate thing is definately House Negro behavior; propping up "black leaders" based on race rather than policy is just as bad.

    ReplyDelete
  26. If Malcolm (or you, Field) ever wanted proof that the house Negro/field Negro distinction is alive and well, this is it. But of course y'all know it damn well.

    It's pathetic to be ashamed of the only black Supreme Court justice, but there ya have it.

    What the hell is wrong with being black, anyway? Come on, Clarence, get a clue! Get the f*%$ out of the house and go down to the field where you can take pride in yourself, and not your place in massa's esteem.

    B'lieve it or not, white folks will have more respect for you.

    Sheesh.

    ReplyDelete
  27. He's a self-hating, slave catching coon!

    The End!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous10:43 AM

    According to these tricksters, their case against Obama depends on the fact that Obama senior had duo citizenship, both British and Kenyan. And I think there is some law against British Citizenship in this country.
    But isn't anyone born in the US a citizen whether they like it or not?

    I have always had an issue with American race relations. Blacks (me inclusive) constantly point a fingure at the others but our own racism against each other is now what threatens us in this new era. Not that White racism is dead but our biggest threat is ourselves. I think its time to face that.

    I for one no longer take for granted solidarity based on skin color because some of the most offensive things I have had said to me as a foreign black have come from blacks.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anon 8:28am.... you are the poster child for how our schools have failed us. Here is what the constitution says regarding natural born citizenship:

    Natural-born citizen

    Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?

    The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps.

    Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in those gaps. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States at birth:"

    * Anyone born inside the United States
    * Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
    * Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
    * Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
    * Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
    * Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
    * Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
    * A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.

    Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.

    Separate sections handle territories that the United States has acquired over time, such as Puerto Rico (8 USC 1402), Alaska (8 USC 1404), Hawaii (8 USC 1405), the U.S. Virgin Islands (8 USC 1406), and Guam (8 USC 1407). Each of these sections confer citizenship on persons living in these territories as of a certain date, and usually confer natural-born status on persons born in those territories after that date. For example, for Puerto Rico, all persons born in Puerto Rico between April 11, 1899, and January 12, 1941, are automatically conferred citizenship as of the date the law was signed by the President (June 27, 1952). Additionally, all persons born in Puerto Rico on or after January 13, 1941, are natural-born citizens of the United States. Note that because of when the law was passed, for some, the natural-born status was retroactive.

    And here is the provision on Hawaii:
    § 1405. Persons born in Hawaii
    A person born in Hawaii on or after August 12, 1898, and before April 30, 1900, is declared to be a citizen of the United States as of April 30, 1900. A person born in Hawaii on or after April 30, 1900, is a citizen of the United States at birth. A person who was a citizen of the Republic of Hawaii on August 12, 1898, is declared to be a citizen of the United States as of April 30, 1900.

    That's it. Nothing about the age of the mother, or 5 years, or any other bullshit that you idiots that haven't bothered to read the constitution keep throwing out there.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I can't believe anyone is seriously wasting any time on this. It's more insane than the actual accusations.

    My council rep was accused for years of being an illegal alien by a racist in another city, no less. The council rep REFUSED to release documentation proving his status as a US citizen because he REFUSED to dignify the accusations with a response. I personally know county and city officials who have seen his documentation certifying his status as a citizen but they have been directed not to make it public.

    I don't get along with my council rep at all but I respect him for taking this approach to the accusations.

    If this was true, it would have been all over for Obama a very long time ago. It is just sad to see people actually discussing this matter like it is legitimate. The right wingers stir the pot and negroes jump every time. That includes all you non black negroes as well.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I didn't realize that Justice Souiter had already dismissed this and now here comes Uncle Thomas. Unbeleivable!!!

    ReplyDelete
  32. I wrote about this over at my spot as well.

    www.ravingblacklunatic.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  33. Field,

    What Keys and Thomas do to black people is no different than what Hannity and Limbaugh do to my white people, namely harm their standing and try to convince them that their worst interests are actually their best interests. The vast majority of both white and black people do not benefit from modern American conservatism.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Anonymous2:14 PM

    Dumbfucking, son-of-a-goddamn bitchmade house negro. And that's the nicest thing I have to say about Clarence Thomas.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I really cannot believe this. We all know Clarence Thomas' track record but this is just ridiculous.

    www.theloop21.com

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anonymous3:34 PM

    Get used to it O-man. You have 8 years of this kind shit to look forward too. Just ask Bill Clinton.

    They will try every nonsensical, stupid thing they can to get at you. No hairbrained, crackpot scheme will be too outlandish, if there is even the remotest possibilty that it will end up with impeachment papers being filed on you.

    They will tirelessly investigate every rumor, half-truth, innuendo, and crackpot theory from anyone that they think will provide them an opportunity.

    They will do it because they have the money, time and the lawyers to do so, and because they hate you, and they hate that they are not in charge of this country anymore.

    I have faith that the O-man already knows all this though.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Granny believes that Clarence Thomas' motive is revenge. Alan Keyes' motive is too. Whelp, you folks already know that Alan Keyes lost the Senate seat to Obama, so that is part of his motive along with embarrassment among those white folks who behind he loves to kiss. Anyway, read the article to this link:

    http://www.cnsnews.com/Public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=34281

    Granny ain't gone take that back because I feel strong in my spirit about Clarence and Alan's hidden motive and it is not just because of their conservatism, although, that does have a little to do with it, but it's mostly has to do with EGO.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Oops, I forgot to add PRIDE is something else.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Anonymous4:11 PM

    Regarding "official" and "unofficial" birth certificates, I just remembered something about my own "official" certificate. It has just about as much information on it as the image of the BHO birth cert in Field's previous post. One time at a new job that required some minimum of a background check, I brought in the certificate issued at the hospital, the one with my cute widdle footprint on it. Of course that one didn't fly. I had to ask the Texas Dept of Whatever for an official copy, and what they sent on official paper had my name, date of birth, parent's names, and that was about all. Nothing as elaborate as some I've seen from other states. So I don't know what Hawaii does--someone who was born there around the same year would have to tell us.

    BTW, Anonymouse who wrote "his mamma was 18 when he was born and here's the kicker hawaii had only been a state for 2 that's right folks TWO years."

    Do you really believe that no one born to an 18-year-old in Hawaii in 1962 was automatically a US citizen? Who are you getting your legal information from? Please do yourself a favor and do not retain this same person to handle any really important legal matters for you.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Someone said in these comments black people were willing to give Clarence Thomas a chance. My major concern was whether he was smart. After reading Jody's last comment and posting the law, I am beginning to wonder now if my major concern was justified.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Anonymous4:26 PM

    With all due respect field, as a self proclaimed constitutional scholar, with talent on loan from god, I am all over this one.

    Here's what the actual translation of the constitution says on the matter:

    A natural-born citizen is a person who meets the following criteria:

    1. Was born on US soil.

    2. Was born to US citizens.

    3. Subject's parents possessed a valid marriage certificate at the time of conception, and signed by a Christian fundamentalist minister.

    4. Was conceived in the missionary position, on US soil, and only after the proper marriage by a god fearing Christian fundamentalist minister as referenced above.

    5. Has not ever resided outside the US for a duration exceeding one month, except in the service of the military or of any multinational corporation.

    If any of the above criteria are not met, a person may attain natural-born citizenship status if he/she meets the following:

    1. Believes that marriage is only between a man and a woman.

    2. Has attained an arsenal of at least 50 firearms, 10% of which must be automatic or semi-automatic.

    3. Does not support Roe v. Wade.

    4. Is a deacon at his/her church (if it is deemed to be the correct type of church).

    I think this should clear up any future question of a candidate's eligibility.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Anonymous5:43 PM

    This case is BS, under our current immigration law, under a concept of jus sanguine, Obama is an American citizen by blood b/c of his mother being a natural born citizen. The fact that his father is a British citizen is BS. Although, it would be a requirement that he lived in the U.S. continuously for 2-5 years, and then declare that he wanted to be an American citizen. However, this is usually used when the father is a citizen and the mother is not in practice--I believe.

    However, to play the devils advocate, the court could be doing this:
    1.) Judicial economy as there are tons of these suits coming up all around the country. Basically they want to squash the B.S.

    2.) Uncle Thomas an the Court are attempting is to redefine or refine Rehnquist's definition of citizenship under the 14th Amendment.

    3.) Tommy and Scalito want a chance to stick it to the Pres-elect and VP-elect for know more about the right to privacy than they do.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Anonymous7:34 PM

    I think I could live to be 103 and I still can never understand how black people can hate themselves and their people so much that they'd go this far... That's what this issue boils down to, self hate. It's just a shame that Thomas wants to stab his brother in the back like this. Is it really that worth it Clarence?

    ReplyDelete
  44. Anonymous7:49 PM

    I hate to say this Field, but I just read up on old boy Thomas. And it does not look good for Obama. It seems Thomas has some serious issues and plan on making an example out of Obama.

    ReplyDelete
  45. "I hate to say this Field, but I just read up on old boy Thomas. And it does not look good for Obama. It seems Thomas has some serious issues and plan on making an example out of Obama."

    OH lAWD!

    Okay tjwash, that was funny.

    Roger, why don't you tell us how you REALLY feel? :)

    Hathor, I don't think CT is a very bright person, but that's just me.

    ReplyDelete
  46. I really don't give a rat's @ss what kind of issues Uncle Tom, the haters, & other @ss kissers have...Uncle Tom Coon still can't change the fact that Barack Hussein Obama is an American citizen!

    ReplyDelete
  47. Just a thought. But the Justices split up all the cases that come to them for review. If this one ended up on CT's desk and he just droped it instead of referring it would he be being attacked by the otherside for giving preferential treatment because of a shared race? At least now, hopefully, when the entire court votes not to hear it he is covered.

    Maybe I stupidly trying to find a reasonable motive to forward this crap case. I realize I don't have a chip in this particular dispute, but I come from a community where we are often accused of giving preferential treatment to its members.....

    Feel free to tell me to stuff it ;)

    ReplyDelete
  48. Anonymous1:11 AM

    The Supreme Court justices did not agree to hear this nonsense. So it's case dismissed and Clarence The Slave Catching Coon is shit outta luck. I hope Obama appoints 2 or 3 judges that will make his life miserable. Now that would be justice served!

    ReplyDelete
  49. Ernesto, that is good news. earlgrey, I understand what you are saying, but I think the case was dismissed by one of the other Justices before, and CT picked it back up. And trust me the last thing he cares about is trying to seem fair to black people. Go back and look at some of his opinions.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Anonymous11:15 AM

    Ernesto, do you have a link to that? I haven't seen it hit the news sites yet...I have been watching for it.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Anonymous2:33 PM

    OJ(first trial)and Obama(current campaign) played by the rules, had the money and resources and won. That's why I supported them. Period. No body gives us anything.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Great news on the dismissal, but could I second the request for a link? I couldn't find the news, either.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Anonymous7:04 PM

    You got it wrong field. Its not about "head pats". Its just the same ignorance that white republicans have, and it comes from living a rich and sheltered life.

    It seems inexcusable because if these people were more connected to the black community they most likely would not be republicans. But what it boils down to is, you're calling them out on this because of the color of their skin.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Anonymous8:05 PM

    Donofrio sent the request to Thomas specifically, after Souter declined to deal with it. If Thomas had refused to deal with it, Donofrio could have sent it on to another individual Justice until he got one to deal with it. Thomas may have wanted to end the matter once and for all. That said, CT is a anal tongue-bather of the lowest order.
    To Anonymous at 8:28, here are the facts you were trying to obfuscate (yes, I wrote that): For persons born on or after November 14, 1986, a person is a U.S. citizen if all of the following are true:[4]

    1. One of the person's parents was a U.S. citizen when the person in question was born;
    2. The citizen parent lived at least 5 years in the United States before his or her child's birth;
    3. A minimum of 2 of these 5 years in the United States were after the citizen parent's 14th birthday.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Let's see how far this goes first...

    ReplyDelete
  56. Excuse previous comment. I was unsure of my G account and was finding out, my bad.

    Anyway, I blogged about this the day it came out and I'm certain this is a case of self-hate to the nth degree.

    "Shufflin'" Thomas hasn't been right since Anita Hill put his pubic hair up for public reticule.

    He's a broken man that tries to find solace in hurting the only folks he EVER had a chance to get to love him.

    Now, I'm sure even the White's are perplexed by his behavior and are shaking their heads as soon as he turns his back.

    Justice Suter turned this case down
    on it's face, but good ol' liver lipped, nappy headed, Massa serving
    Negro, Shufflin', went right to work. What a fool and a disgrace!!!

    ReplyDelete
  57. Anonymous9:15 PM

    The appointment of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court was a move by Bush Sr to checkmate the black community who were calling for a black person to replace Thurgood Marshall on the Supreme Court. Sometimes I think Bush Sr should have been allowed to replace Justice Marshall with another old dude who would have died off soon.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Anonymous11:44 AM

    Wait a minute. . .one hopes that if the Supreme Court declares that Barack Obama is a "natural born" citizen that that will be the end of all the lawsuits. Maybe it's best that Mr. Thomas put this front and center - to end all the conspiracy theories once and for all.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Anonymous2:20 PM

    I hope that's the case Dailyfare.

    ReplyDelete
  60. PE Obama should just present the birth certificate. case closed. why is that so difficult?

    ReplyDelete
  61. Anonymous5:37 PM

    Why should Mr. Obama have to prove he's a citizen? Has any other president had to put up with this type of shit? I'm sure Hillary Clinton has checked on this and his citizenship is legit. If it weren't she would have all over it.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Breaking News

    MSNBC Reporting:

    The Supreme Court declines to take up case on Barack Obama's citizenship!






    Now all the haters...stfu already

    ReplyDelete
  63. Woohoo!...but you know it won't stop the haters. I was listening to On The Media on NPR during the campaign, and there was a study that showed that when lies were told about candidates, people who were already believers actually became firmer believers when confronted with a refutation of the claims. We live in a strange world.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Well, the SC refused to hear allegations that O is not a US citizen. Salon.com has a story on the decision and the nutbars that believe this in spite of evidence to the contrary.

    http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/12/09/birth_certificate/?source=newsletter

    ReplyDelete
  65. You know Filled Kneegrow - you are a hard one to figure out.

    Where as the honorable Justice Clarence Thomas simply agreed to allow the committee of justices to hear the merits of the case - you and other hate filled Black Progressive-Fundamentalists took this as an opportunity to unleash your torrent of hatred against Thomas. The case was dismissed due to lack of merit. You have no clue.......you have no idea of how Justice Thomas ultimately voted on this issue.


    At the same time it is interesting that in my research of Justice Thurgood Marshall - I doubt that you would have any problem with the actual miscarriage of justice that he and Powell had committed. Both of them who were against the death penalty allowed their PERSONAL ideology to get in the way of the process of justice. Any hair brained claim put forth by the fraudulent defense attorney (hey - you are a defense attorney as well - aren't you FN?) was accepted and thus the execution proceeding delayed.

    In Philadelphia and other places you are now living in the era of "Justice Thurgood Marshall Justice" where the criminal defendant becomes the VICTIM of the system yet you don't know how to effectively deal with the REAL criminals who to date (I'll be right back as I look at your 'right hand strip of shame') 312 human beings are dead on the streets of Philly. A good number of their KILLERS never to face justice.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Constructive Criticism: The case was dismissed due to lack of merit.

    Since you apparently admire Thomas, don't you think that this SC Justice could have determined this from the outset instead of wasting his colleagues time?

    ReplyDelete
  67. Field: I think the case was dismissed by one of the other Justices before, and CT picked it back up.

    Really? Field if what you posted is true, it further buttresses my previous post. This is a man with an agenda and just couldn't defer to his fellow Justict and let the case drop.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Field, SC Justice David Souter dropped the case before SC Justice Thomas picked it back up.

    http://www.afro.com/tabid/456/itemid/2273/Thomas-breaks-custom-forces-court-to-look-at-Obam.aspx

    Man, this guy has an agenda if there ever was one to be had. I didn't like Thomas before, I certainly dislike him now.

    As Adm. Komack said earlier, what a "miserable prick.

    ReplyDelete
  69. [quote]Since you apparently admire Thomas, don't you think that this SC Justice could have determined this from the outset instead of wasting his colleagues time?[/quote]

    Excuse me Sharon from WI (is that Wisconsin as in Milwaukee? - I have plenty of research on Milwaukee that I can share with you).

    This is an interesting point. You see first of all - the lawsuit was NOT JUST AGAINST OBAMA.

    The plantiff said that JOHN MCCAIN was also not a valid candidate since he was born in Panama.

    What is troubling here - besides reading so many Black Hate-filled Progressive-Fundamentalists use this opportunity to spew the same words against Justice Thomas that RACIST WHITE FOLKS used against Blacks who fought for our civil rights (your leaders have taught you all well) is the fact that you would have ONE MAN and his incumbent biases MAKE THE JUDGEMENT rather than allowing the PROCESS to work its way out.

    The fact that the committee of multiple Justicies decided to throw the case out is not any comfort to you that Justice Clarence Thomas believed that this case deserved a fair hearing in committee. You would prefer that he DO YOUR BIDDING and reject it outright.

    For some strange reason when judges and legislative committees do the very same thing with issues that YOU WANT TO MOVE FORWARD....you all say that they have HIJACKED THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.

    Might it be true, dear Sharon - that in fact some of you have little difference from the BIGOTED AND HATE-FILLED White folks that you fight against so frequently - the only difference is that what you believe is JUSTICE is a different list than what THEY BELIEVE is justice?

    My "like" or "dislike" of Justice Clarence Thomas is IRRELEVANT to the point that he or any other Black man deserves to NOT BE CALLED BY IDEOLOGICALLY BIGOTED BLACK FOLKS what the so called CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT has faught to punish WHITE FOLKS for calling Black people.

    Those who don't respect a line that they will not cross in pursuit of their own enemies don't DESERVE to have a line that they draw be RESPECTED by their enemies in pursuit of them.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Constructive Feedback, as I posted earlier, Thomas apparently picked up the case after Justice Souter dropped it as it didn't have any merit.

    Both McCain and Obama are natural born citizens and, of course, both men were/are eligible to serve as POTUS.

    The hysterics (as your caps suggests)that these wingnuts display while dismissing facts in front of them is tiresome, ignorant and a waste of time.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Anonymous10:09 AM

    There's nothing I hate worse than going to a site for something and seeing some jerk(s) posting SPAM! You assholes will do ANYTHING for a dime and I fucking hate your guts! I know others who feel as I do and you probably do yourself more harm than good by posting that shit on sites like this!

    Don't be such money-hungry, slobs that will sell your mother for 25 cents, you tell wayyyy too much about yourself when you do these things, assholes!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  72. Anonymous10:16 AM

    @ Constructive Feedback

    It seems that YOU are the one missing the point. That point being how niggers like CT DESERVE to be called such words because he actually IS everything White's mean when they use such a word.

    The hate, anger, disgust and whatever else comes with such a word is directed at this asshole specifically for that reason.

    WE know why we use that word, apparently, it's you that needs to be schooled!

    ReplyDelete