Correction: January 30, 2015 An earlier version of this article misstated when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel accepted Speaker John A. Boehner’s invitation to address Congress. He accepted after the administration had been informed of the invitation, not before. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/30/us/politics/benjamin-netanyahu-is-talking-to-harry-reid-and-leading-democrats-to-little-effect-so-far.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=2
It sounded good when the media pushed the story to protect Obama.
"Imagine just for a moment how sad and empty his life must be."
I've come to the conclusion that Bill is not actually a real person, just a bot programmed to repeat the latest fact-free talking points from Republican HQ.
Yīshēng said... What's missing Bill, is your ability
I am having fun mocking the dumbocrat party.
The Purple Cow said... You've gotta feel sorry for Bill.
I was starting to feel sorry for you the way anonymous plays you day after day with his hitler was a socialist game. You never seem to catch on. I was thinking of asking Field Negro to do an Intervention on you.
The Purple Cow said... "I was starting to feel sorry for you the way anonymous plays you day after day with his hitler was a socialist game. You never seem to catch on."
This isn't a game Bill, we are at war. You and/or Anonymous are my enemy. You will be my enemy until the day you die.
Wow.
Puts your comment "Imagine just for a moment how sad and empty his life must be." into perspective.
"It is not logical to deny facts you wish not to exist."
I was going to say debating with the likes of you is like debating with a five year old child, actually a two year old would be a better analogy.
The way you deliberately mischaracterise my arguments suggests you are either too stupid to understand how terminally fucking dim this makes you look, or your racism is so deeply ingrained in your psyche that you are losing the ability to argue logically.
Fundamentally the concept of “Race” is rooted in the mistaken belief, or set of beliefs (racism) that postulates that the obviously observable physical differences in human beings are indicators of such factors as intelligence or behavior.
However there is no science behind this thinking, mankind does not have separate subspecies or races in the way that some other species do. Traits such as levels of melanin in your skin are inherited separately from mental traits, or blood-type, or intelligence, or anything else you can think of.
So put it so simply that even somebody like you could understand it - race is a concept invented by human beings rather than something that existed in of itself.
However, saying that race is a social construct, does not mean that race does not exist or that racism is not a problem. Clearly it does, and it is.
I don't know why I'm bothering tying to make you understand, you are either an imbecile or a wind-up artist.
However there is no science behind this thinking, mankind does not have separate subspecies or races in the way that some other species do. Traits such as levels of melanin in your skin are inherited separately from mental traits, or blood-type, or intelligence, or anything else you can think of. ---
Yes, separately, but they are inherited.
And again, your insistence that "mankind does not have separate subspecies or races in the way that some other species do" is entirely unsupported by observation or by the rules applied to other species.
What you are now saying is that while separate populations can develop different traits like skin color, height, body morphology, and adaptations to disease load, they absolutely cannot in any way, shape or fashion develop any different intelligence or behavioral traits.
Your position is that evolution occurs only from the neck down. This is not science, this is ideology.
Progressive ideology does not allow for ideas that could be put to bad use because it has a deep distrust of the common man's capacity to responsibly handle the truth.
But the truth is that there are measurable differences in the distribution of intelligence across racial groups. Different races also have different behavioral tendencies. Much of this can be ascribed to culture, but some of this can be correlated to the presence or absence or expression of different genes.
This description of group properties in no way consigns any individual to any inferior or superior status. We are all one species, and all talents and all abilities can be found among the members of every racial group.
All people have equal value as human beings. All people deserve the same basic rights and protections. All of us are in this together.
The problem is when leftist Progressives deny inherent group differences and use differences in group outcomes to pursue oppressive social justice remedies for what are primarily inherent differences.
Justice can only rightly apply to individuals, not groups.
Progressivism is a racist and classist ideology that places group interests ahead of each person's individual interest. It isn't important to let individuals fulfill their potential and express their dreams, what's important is to make groups have power and representation in all things proportional to their numbers in the population. Fairness is for groups, not for individuals. The ideally fair system is based on quotas, not on merit, because that permits proper precise allocation of results.
But since individuals are different both in abilities and in what they want to do with their lives this fairness must be compelled with unfair treatment.
Progressivist oppression can only be justified by denying the truth. Which is what you are doing Cow, over and over again.
"Progressivism is a racist and classist ideology that places group interests ahead of each person's individual interest. It isn't important to let individuals fulfill their potential and express their dreams, what's important is to make groups have power and representation in all things proportional to their numbers in the population."
The stoopid in this one is legion. By his idea of progressive the klan was a progressive group. Wow, racists go to great lengths to distance to prove they're not racist. Interesting.
'The problem is when leftist Progressives deny inherent group differences and use differences in group outcomes to pursue oppressive social justice remedies for what are primarily inherent differences."
And give us some examples of these inherent group differences.
"field negro said... Bill do u troll conservative blogs with democratic talking points?
Of course when bush was in the white house.
Do I hold Obama to a higher standard then bush, yes. Obama ran on not being bush."
And Bill thinks were as dumb as he is if we were to believe this. So he used terms like "Redumblicans" to describe the Republican Party when Bush was President? Yeah right. This dumbass attacks the entire party when that party occupies the WH? Anybody believe this bullshit?
” And again, your insistence that "mankind does not have separate subspecies or races in the way that some other species do" is entirely unsupported by observation or by the rules applied to other species.”
“Race is not an accurate or productive way to describe human biological variation” (Heather J.H. Edgar and Keith L. Hunley, Race Reconciled, 2009:2)
“We see racial labels as “a culturally constructed label that crudely and imprecisely describes real variation” (Relethford: 2009:20).
“Variation is real, exists, and has been structured by geography and migration, but the labels we use are a “crude first-order approximation” (idem: 2009:21).
Relethford uses the example of how we see height as short, medium, and tall: “We tend to use crude labels in everyday life with the realization that they are fuzzy and subjective. I doubt anyone thinks that terms such as ‘short,’ ‘medium,’ and ‘tall’ refer to discrete groups, or that humanity only comes in three values of height!” (idem:2009:21)
“There are so many possible distinctive biological races that the concept is virtually meaningless. We can only concur with Howells’ modification of Livingstone’s 1962 quote: ‘There are no races, only populations’” (Ousley et al. 2009:74).
You don’t have to look very far back before you have more ancestors than sections of DNA, and that means you have ancestors from whom you have inherited no DNA. Added to this, humans have an undeniable fondness for moving and mating–in spite of ethnic, religious or national boundaries–so looking back through time your many ancestors will be spread out over an increasingly wide area. This means we don’t have to look back much more than around 3,500 years before somebody lived who is the common ancestor of everybody alive today. And perhaps most surprisingly, it has been reasonably estimated that around 5,000 years ago everybody who was alive was either the common ancestor of everybody alive today, or of nobody alive today; at this point in history we all share exactly the same set of ancestors.
"What you are now saying is that while separate populations can develop different traits like skin color, height, body morphology, and adaptations to disease load, they absolutely cannot in any way, shape or fashion develop any different intelligence or behavioral traits.
Your position is that evolution occurs only from the neck down. This is not science, this is ideology."
Actually, it's the other way round, there is no convincing scientific evidence anywhere to support your position. That's why you haven't posted any.
"But the truth is that there are measurable differences in the distribution of intelligence across racial groups. Different races also have different behavioral tendencies. Much of this can be ascribed to culture, but some of this can be correlated to the presence or absence or expression of different genes."
Fascism is a racist and classist ideology that places white interests ahead of each person's individual interest. It isn't important to let individuals fulfill their potential and express their dreams, what's important is to make white people have power and representation in all things proportional to their numbers in the population. Fairness is for white people, not for individuals. The ideally fair system is based on white people's needs, not on merit, because that permits proper precise allocation of results.
But since individuals are different both in abilities and in what they want to do with their lives this white domination must be compelled with unfair treatment.
Fascist oppression can only be justified by denying the truth. Which is what you are doing Anonymous, over and over again.
"Fascist oppression can only be justified by denying the truth. Which is what you are doing Anonymous, over and over again."
i.e. "No I'm not, you are"
You must be the king of the playground.
Fascism, Communism and Progressivism are all collectivist schemes that require oppressive totalitarianism and the suppression of those truths that don't conform to the narrative of power.
You advocate for totalitarian oppression every day. Just because you do it because you think it's 'right' doesn't mean you aren't a fascist. Hitler thought he was doing good too.
Like all bullies, on the playground or on the Western front, you need a good beating to put you in line. Yours is coming.
"Like all bullies, on the playground or on the Western front, you need a good beating to put you in line. Yours is coming."
Blah, blah, fucking blah.
I know your type, you're very brave hiding behind a keyboard in your momma's basement while hidden behind a wall of old pizza boxes and empty beer cans - but if you met me t=in the real world you would shit your pants, nazi-boi.
There have been numerous studies conducted which suggest, on their face, that there is an intelligence difference. But because of the obviously polarizing and bitter subject matter, these studies are poison. So as soon as they're questioned--which they all are--the research pretty much stops. Nobody wants to fund it; nobody really wants to know whether it's true or not. It's one of those things that will remain polarizing, with some people saying it is, and other people saying the mere suggestion of it is bigoted.
Then there are other factors that the social scientists attempt to force into the equation, like environmental factors and this strange, practically meaningless word: "Disenfranchisement."
Here is a video of a guy who lists all the many different studies conducted on racial intelligence:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SJNVb0GnPI
Now, it's up to the individual to review these studies; this is just a bunch of studied enumerated and slightly explained. Though I know what the most likely reaction is: Shoot the messenger rather than examine the message. There's no cure for that. But there have been numerous studies done on the subject, and many of them show a different.
Of course, like I said, it's up to the individual to go through and see what's what with said study(ies).
Ready for the Dead concert yet?
ReplyDeleteIn my country this is what we do before listening to Snoop.
ReplyDeleteAyahuasca? Um...no..that's just plain weed white boy!
ReplyDeleteTell me, Black Yoda, if a white dude smokes this magic weed, will he also live to be 300 years old?
ReplyDeleteBlack Yoda: Don't be ridiculous white boy! Nobody lives to be 300 years old!
ReplyDeleteOy vey,these white boys live their movies!
Stop "hoggin" the bowl.
ReplyDelete"I know how to get high, white boy. What I need help with is the munchies!"
ReplyDeleteGO HAWKS!!!
ReplyDeleteMama Sita, are you 'sure' nothing is going to happen to me if I smoke this?
ReplyDeleteIt's already happening...nobody calls me mama Sita unless they are real high. That's some good shit isn't it?
Field loves it.
ME: "...the genomic differences between us are only of issue because people like you choose to make them an issue."
ReplyDeleteAnonymous: "The "issue" here is that you, and other ideologues, deny that these genomic differences exist."
Do you not see the problem with your logic here, sunshine?
*still laughing at some of those captions *
ReplyDeletePC, that was classic.
Pilot, 'before listening to Snoop" or some of those old Wailer joints.:)
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteDon;t look at me like that.
I'm not a pothead, I'm a medical patient.
FP: This is what I do just before I post those long, nonsensical posts on Field Negro.
ReplyDeleteKuckkoo's son: Yeah whatever, just pass the pipe old lady.
ReplyDeleteI like the smoke, just “don’t dress like Beyoncé."
ReplyDeleteOops.
Correction: January 30, 2015
An earlier version of this article misstated when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel accepted Speaker John A. Boehner’s invitation to address Congress. He accepted after the administration had been informed of the invitation, not before.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/30/us/politics/benjamin-netanyahu-is-talking-to-harry-reid-and-leading-democrats-to-little-effect-so-far.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=2
It sounded good when the media pushed the story to protect Obama.
ReplyDeleteRun Warren Run
https://twitter.com/Rick_Mullin/status/561635413639847937/photo/1
https://twitter.com/Russ_Childers/status/561632173997170688/photo/1
https://twitter.com/mister_nj/status/561622709713780737/photo/1
https://twitter.com/vtessler/status/561619449380233216/photo/1
Can anyone tell what is missing?
What's missing Bill, is your ability to let go of this eternal viagra like long term erection you seem to have with this administration.
ReplyDeleteYou've gotta feel sorry for Bill.
ReplyDeleteImagine just for a moment how sad and empty his life must be.
"Imagine just for a moment how sad and empty his life must be."
ReplyDeleteI've come to the conclusion that Bill is not actually a real person, just a bot programmed to repeat the latest fact-free talking points from Republican HQ.
ReplyDeleteYīshēng said...
What's missing Bill, is your ability
I am having fun mocking the dumbocrat party.
The Purple Cow said...
You've gotta feel sorry for Bill.
I was starting to feel sorry for you the way anonymous plays you day after day with his hitler was a socialist game. You never seem to catch on.
I was thinking of asking Field Negro to do an Intervention on you.
Bill do u troll conservative blogs with democratic talking points?
ReplyDeleteYour answer to that question will determine if u are truly an independent as u claim to be.
"I was starting to feel sorry for you the way anonymous plays you day after day with his hitler was a socialist game. You never seem to catch on."
ReplyDeleteThis isn't a game Bill, we are at war. You and/or Anonymous are my enemy. You will be my enemy until the day you die.
I am proud to be the enemy of preening fanboys of totalitarian Socialists like Hitler.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeletefield negro said...
Bill do u troll conservative blogs with democratic talking points?
Of course when bush was in the white house.
Do I hold Obama to a higher standard then bush, yes. Obama ran on not being bush.
ReplyDeleteThe Purple Cow said...
"I was starting to feel sorry for you the way anonymous plays you day after day with his hitler was a socialist game. You never seem to catch on."
This isn't a game Bill, we are at war. You and/or Anonymous are my enemy. You will be my enemy until the day you die.
Wow.
Puts your comment "Imagine just for a moment how sad and empty his life must be." into perspective.
"Do you not see the problem with your logic here, sunshine?"
ReplyDelete---
It is not logical to deny facts you wish not to exist.
It may help you maintain your fallacious worldview, but it does not actually change reality.
In any event, we transcended the limits of your cognitive ability quite some time ago, and now you are simply embarrassing yourself.
I would suggest you limit your interactions to forums populated by other morons, where your games will garner applause rather than scorn.
Good luck in your quest for meaning, Cow. You are going to need it.
Look at that rhino penis on my head, Bwana.
ReplyDelete"It is not logical to deny facts you wish not to exist."
ReplyDeleteI was going to say debating with the likes of you is like debating with a five year old child, actually a two year old would be a better analogy.
The way you deliberately mischaracterise my arguments suggests you are either too stupid to understand how terminally fucking dim this makes you look, or your racism is so deeply ingrained in your psyche that you are losing the ability to argue logically.
Fundamentally the concept of “Race” is rooted in the mistaken belief, or set of beliefs (racism) that postulates that the obviously observable physical differences in human beings are indicators of such factors as intelligence or behavior.
However there is no science behind this thinking, mankind does not have separate subspecies or races in the way that some other species do. Traits such as levels of melanin in your skin are inherited separately from mental traits, or blood-type, or intelligence, or anything else you can think of.
So put it so simply that even somebody like you could understand it - race is a concept invented by human beings rather than something that existed in of itself.
However, saying that race is a social construct, does not mean that race does not exist or that racism is not a problem. Clearly it does, and it is.
I don't know why I'm bothering tying to make you understand, you are either an imbecile or a wind-up artist.
"Puts your comment "Imagine just for a moment how sad and empty his life must be." into perspective."
ReplyDeleteIt does, doesn't it!
I've got other shit to live for - you don't...
Come on White man Puff, Puff Pass
ReplyDelete"how much for a nickle bag??"
ReplyDelete"im unemployed......are you working??....."
ReplyDelete"Puff, Puff Pass" :)
ReplyDeleteHowever there is no science behind this thinking, mankind does not have separate subspecies or races in the way that some other species do. Traits such as levels of melanin in your skin are inherited separately from mental traits, or blood-type, or intelligence, or anything else you can think of.
ReplyDelete---
Yes, separately, but they are inherited.
And again, your insistence that "mankind does not have separate subspecies or races in the way that some other species do" is entirely unsupported by observation or by the rules applied to other species.
What you are now saying is that while separate populations can develop different traits like skin color, height, body morphology, and adaptations to disease load, they absolutely cannot in any way, shape or fashion develop any different intelligence or behavioral traits.
Your position is that evolution occurs only from the neck down. This is not science, this is ideology.
Progressive ideology does not allow for ideas that could be put to bad use because it has a deep distrust of the common man's capacity to responsibly handle the truth.
But the truth is that there are measurable differences in the distribution of intelligence across racial groups. Different races also have different behavioral tendencies. Much of this can be ascribed to culture, but some of this can be correlated to the presence or absence or expression of different genes.
This description of group properties in no way consigns any individual to any inferior or superior status. We are all one species, and all talents and all abilities can be found among the members of every racial group.
All people have equal value as human beings. All people deserve the same basic rights and protections. All of us are in this together.
The problem is when leftist Progressives deny inherent group differences and use differences in group outcomes to pursue oppressive social justice remedies for what are primarily inherent differences.
Justice can only rightly apply to individuals, not groups.
Progressivism is a racist and classist ideology that places group interests ahead of each person's individual interest. It isn't important to let individuals fulfill their potential and express their dreams, what's important is to make groups have power and representation in all things proportional to their numbers in the population. Fairness is for groups, not for individuals. The ideally fair system is based on quotas, not on merit, because that permits proper precise allocation of results.
But since individuals are different both in abilities and in what they want to do with their lives this fairness must be compelled with unfair treatment.
Progressivist oppression can only be justified by denying the truth. Which is what you are doing Cow, over and over again.
The Cow is a Marxist. He has only that to support his views.
ReplyDeleteAnything contrary is "counter-revolutionary", in his Che mind.
A mind which was well taken care of.
"Progressivism is a racist and classist ideology that places group interests ahead of each person's individual interest. It isn't important to let individuals fulfill their potential and express their dreams, what's important is to make groups have power and representation in all things proportional to their numbers in the population."
ReplyDeleteThe stoopid in this one is legion. By his idea of progressive the klan was a progressive group. Wow, racists go to great lengths to distance to prove they're not racist. Interesting.
'The problem is when leftist Progressives deny inherent group differences and use differences in group outcomes to pursue oppressive social justice remedies for what are primarily inherent differences."
And give us some examples of these inherent group differences.
^^^^
ReplyDeleteMoron
"field negro said...
ReplyDeleteBill do u troll conservative blogs with democratic talking points?
Of course when bush was in the white house.
Do I hold Obama to a higher standard then bush, yes. Obama ran on not being bush."
And Bill thinks were as dumb as he is if we were to believe this. So he used terms like "Redumblicans" to describe the Republican Party when Bush was President? Yeah right. This dumbass attacks the entire party when that party occupies the WH? Anybody believe this bullshit?
Anon 6:38 PM
ReplyDelete^^^^^^^^
Asshat
"Lt. Commander Johnson said..."
ReplyDeletesome stoooopid shit as usual.
” And again, your insistence that "mankind does not have separate subspecies or races in the way that some other species do" is entirely unsupported by observation or by the rules applied to other species.”
ReplyDelete“Race is not an accurate or productive way to describe human biological variation”
(Heather J.H. Edgar and Keith L. Hunley, Race Reconciled, 2009:2)
“We see racial labels as “a culturally constructed label that crudely and imprecisely describes real variation”
(Relethford: 2009:20).
“Variation is real, exists, and has been structured by geography and migration, but the labels we use are a “crude first-order approximation” (idem: 2009:21).
Relethford uses the example of how we see height as short, medium, and tall: “We tend to use crude labels in everyday life with the realization that they are fuzzy and subjective. I doubt anyone thinks that terms such as ‘short,’ ‘medium,’ and ‘tall’ refer to discrete groups, or that humanity only comes in three values of height!” (idem:2009:21)
“There are so many possible distinctive biological races that the concept is virtually meaningless. We can only concur with Howells’ modification of Livingstone’s 1962 quote: ‘There are no races, only populations’” (Ousley et al. 2009:74).
You don’t have to look very far back before you have more ancestors than sections of DNA, and that means you have ancestors from whom you have inherited no DNA. Added to this, humans have an undeniable fondness for moving and mating–in spite of ethnic, religious or national boundaries–so looking back through time your many ancestors will be spread out over an increasingly wide area. This means we don’t have to look back much more than around 3,500 years before somebody lived who is the common ancestor of everybody alive today.
And perhaps most surprisingly, it has been reasonably estimated that around 5,000 years ago everybody who was alive was either the common ancestor of everybody alive today, or of nobody alive today; at this point in history we all share exactly the same set of ancestors.
(http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2013/feb/25/viking-ancestors-astrology)
"What you are now saying is that while separate populations can develop different traits like skin color, height, body morphology, and adaptations to disease load, they absolutely cannot in any way, shape or fashion develop any different intelligence or behavioral traits.
ReplyDeleteYour position is that evolution occurs only from the neck down. This is not science, this is ideology."
Actually, it's the other way round, there is no convincing scientific evidence anywhere to support your position. That's why you haven't posted any.
"But the truth is that there are measurable differences in the distribution of intelligence across racial groups. Different races also have different behavioral tendencies. Much of this can be ascribed to culture, but some of this can be correlated to the presence or absence or expression of different genes."
ReplyDeleteEvidence please
"Justice can only rightly apply to individuals, not groups."
ReplyDeleteNonsense.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFascism is a racist and classist ideology that places white interests ahead of each person's individual interest. It isn't important to let individuals fulfill their potential and express their dreams, what's important is to make white people have power and representation in all things proportional to their numbers in the population. Fairness is for white people, not for individuals. The ideally fair system is based on white people's needs, not on merit, because that permits proper precise allocation of results.
ReplyDeleteBut since individuals are different both in abilities and in what they want to do with their lives this white domination must be compelled with unfair treatment.
Fascist oppression can only be justified by denying the truth. Which is what you are doing Anonymous, over and over again.
5,000 years is a long time. As much as 200 generations.
ReplyDelete"Tame" foxes were produced after ten generations of selective breeding.
The Purple Cow said...
ReplyDelete"Justice can only rightly apply to individuals, not groups."
Nonsense
---
Application of group remedies will always result in injustice to individuals.
Some people will be unjustly punished and some unjustly rewarded.
Everyone's situation needs to be judged on its own merits.
Social justice is oppression.
Oh fuck right off, idiot,
ReplyDelete"Fascist oppression can only be justified by denying the truth. Which is what you are doing Anonymous, over and over again."
ReplyDeletei.e. "No I'm not, you are"
You must be the king of the playground.
Fascism, Communism and Progressivism are all collectivist schemes that require oppressive totalitarianism and the suppression of those truths that don't conform to the narrative of power.
You advocate for totalitarian oppression every day. Just because you do it because you think it's 'right' doesn't mean you aren't a fascist. Hitler thought he was doing good too.
Like all bullies, on the playground or on the Western front, you need a good beating to put you in line. Yours is coming.
He did ask you directly for evidence supporting your conclusions. Anything?
DeleteGotta agree with PC, I would also like to see the evidence that intelligence and behavioral tendencies have some sort of racial component.
ReplyDelete"Like all bullies, on the playground or on the Western front, you need a good beating to put you in line. Yours is coming."
ReplyDeleteBlah, blah, fucking blah.
I know your type, you're very brave hiding behind a keyboard in your momma's basement while hidden behind a wall of old pizza boxes and empty beer cans - but if you met me t=in the real world you would shit your pants, nazi-boi.
'"Tame" foxes were produced after ten generations of selective breeding."
ReplyDeleteI swear to god, you couldn't make it up.
Nighty-night all, this has been fun but 1 a.m. is my limit these days if I want to be coherent in the morning.
Not watching the Super Bowl? Whaaaaa?
ReplyDeleteThe Purple Cow said..
ReplyDelete"Oh fuck right off, idiot,"
"Blah, blah, fucking blah."
---
That, and cutting and pasting from the Guardian?
Stick a fork in the Cow, he's done.
Thanks for playing.
"1 a.m. is my limit these days if I want to be coherent in the morning."
ReplyDeleteYou won't be. Of that I am certain.
Still no evidence? Hmmmmmm.
ReplyDeletePilotX:Freeing slaves from the Republican plantation since the 70's said...
ReplyDeleteStill no evidence? Hmmmmmm.
---
How about every single credible study comparing difference in intelligence across racial groups?
http://sq.4mg.com/IQgap.htm
Are you really that ignorant?
There have been numerous studies conducted which suggest, on their face, that there is an intelligence difference. But because of the obviously polarizing and bitter subject matter, these studies are poison. So as soon as they're questioned--which they all are--the research pretty much stops. Nobody wants to fund it; nobody really wants to know whether it's true or not. It's one of those things that will remain polarizing, with some people saying it is, and other people saying the mere suggestion of it is bigoted.
ReplyDeleteThen there are other factors that the social scientists attempt to force into the equation, like environmental factors and this strange, practically meaningless word: "Disenfranchisement."
Here is a video of a guy who lists all the many different studies conducted on racial intelligence:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SJNVb0GnPI
Now, it's up to the individual to review these studies; this is just a bunch of studied enumerated and slightly explained. Though I know what the most likely reaction is: Shoot the messenger rather than examine the message. There's no cure for that. But there have been numerous studies done on the subject, and many of them show a different.
Of course, like I said, it's up to the individual to go through and see what's what with said study(ies).
"Is it all organic???"
ReplyDeleteJust don't inhale lol
ReplyDelete