Now that I know that my Sixers won't be going anywhere in the playoffs, I think I will be rooting for James and the LeBrons to get a ring. This hateration of LeBron has gotten way out of control. Folks, unless you live in Cleveland, Ohio, you have no business hating on LeBron. None. If you lost nine of your fingers you could count the guys in the NBA with a better game than LeBron with the finger you have left. Dude is that good.
So please fellows, let's ease up on LeBron and his man purse. You might not like it, but please don't knock the hustle.
Speaking of hustle, Flipper is still trying to hustle up votes in the republican primary. Tomorrow is Super Tuesday and I am pretty sure that Flipper will come out smelling like roses. Rick should have just walked away while he is ahead. The more he talked the further he dropped in the polls. And now, sadly, there is no coming back for the theocrat from Pistolvania. He got pounded on FOX NEWS of all places, and he had to come clean about the lie he told about Obama and four year colleges. Even his wife thinks that he is f&^***g up the campaign.
So yes folks, it will be Flipper representing the GOP come November. But he better wrap this thing up fast, because his negatives are rising faster than rush's johnson in an Oxycontin factory.
Finally, if Obama wins some of you Negroes might consider going back to Africa. In case you haven't heard gun sales are on the rise in A-merry-ca because folks are scared of the possibility of Obama winning four more years.
"Obama favors complete ban of handguns (except for the Black Panthers)."
Yipes! Mr. President, please bring the troops home, we might need them here to protect you and the rest of us Negroes in the very near future.
Field, just what could LeBron be carrying in that sissified purse? Is he gay?
ReplyDeleteAnd for you to like that purse says something about you. Are you gay too? Lord have mercy, the gates of hell have lines of dl men waiting to be roasted by Satan.
This is so depressing. What has happened to the human race? Men are sleeping with men; men are carrying purses and there are men who think the purses are fashionable. Lord have mercy the end is near.
The stimulus was supposedly about rescuing the economy from a dire emergency. That was the pressing concern that legitimized the huge expenditures. Then it turned out that the stimulus was really about giving the Democrats and their friends and client groups every pork barrel project they had been lusting to get for decades. Saving the economy was just a pretext.
ReplyDeleteSimilarly, nationalized health insurance was supposedly about helping people in dire need. That was the argument that created the emotional fervor that pushed the legislation through. But it turns out that nationalized health insurance is really about empowering, at the expense of everyone else, the Democrats' primary constituency--single women.
Emanuel Cleaver, the chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, complained today that the current Congressional investigations are racist because the six lawmakers under review by the House Ethics Committee are black.:
ReplyDeleteThe facts say this: African-Americans make up 10 percent of the House, but as of the end of February, five of the sitting six named lawmakers under review by the House Ethics Committee are black. The pattern isn’t new. At one point in late 2009, seven lawmakers were known to be involved in formal House ethics inquiries; all were members of the Congressional Black Caucus. An eighth caucus member, Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. of Illinois, had also been under investigation, but his probe was halted temporarily while the Justice Department undertook an inquiry of its own.
All told, about one-third of sitting black lawmakers have been named in an ethics probe during their careers, according to a National Journal review.
Only two members of Congress have been formally charged with ethics violations in recent years and have faced the specter of public trials — Reps. Charles Rangel of New York (censured) and Maxine Waters of California (investigation ongoing). Both are black. There are no African-Americans in the Senate. Remember the most recent black senator, Roland Burris of Illinois? Reprimanded by the Senate Ethics Committee in 2009.
Those are the facts, as Cleaver said. The question is why so many African-American members have been in the ethics spotlight.
Obviously, it's due to racism.
I don't know if Ms. Fluke is a slut or not. I do know her position on government funded birth control is idiotic and that she's not intelligent enough to understand basic supply and demand or she wouldn't be pursuing a law degree at the age of 30.
ReplyDeleteMs. Fluke is long-time feminist activist who graduated in 2003 from Cornell's "Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies." In the decade since then Ms. Fluke has become a political professional for a huge range of feminist causes. She has worked for the (Democrat) Manhattan Borough Taskforce on Domestic violence and numerous other New York City and New York State coalitions... As the 2010 recipient of the Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles Fran Kandel Public Interest Grant, she researched, wrote, and produced an instructional film on how to apply for a domestic violence restraining order in pro per. ... Through Georgetown's clinic programs, Sandra has proposed legislation ... represented victims of domestic violence ... Sandra is the Development Editor of the Journal of Gender and the Law, and served as the President of Law Students for Reproductive Justice, and the Vice President of the Women's Legal Alliance.
ReplyDeleteAll of which is fine with me. What's not fine is lending oneself to a planted political stunt in collusion with the vicious radical left. But that is exactly what Ms. Fluke has done.
Dixiecrats used to pick some black guy to accuse of rape or making eyes at white girls. Polish demagogues accused Jews of insulting the Catholic Church. Russian demagogues did the same thing against the Poles. The Nazis burned the Reichstag building (parliament) and then accused their remaining democratic enemies of doing it.
Pick the target, freeze it, polarize it.
But who's' going to be the target for the Sandra stunt? Anybody who can be spotlighted as an Evil Republican. In this case, alas, Rush Limbaugh stepped into the trap. It could have been Rick Santorum, but Rush is more famous.
Rush Limbaugh lost his footing, and dropped an unfunny line about Fluke, calling her a "slut." Ms. Fluke is not a slut but planted political bait -- playing a carefully planned role designed to provoke conservatives with her ludicrous claim that privileged women like her should be paid for birth control pills. (Costing 10 dollars a month at Walmart).
Rush rushed into the trap the White House laid for him, during his daily multi-hour extemporaneous monologue. As soon as Rush's misstep hit the headlines all the Demagogue party operatives in the media went ballistic in unison.
Notice that they always sing in unison, using identical words in the same news cycle.
Normal human beings never sound like robots. Radical leftists do so all the time.
"Pick the target, freeze it, polarize it."
ReplyDeleteWell, let's be honest; it's hard to miss rush.
"Notice that they always sing in unison, using identical words in the same news cycle."
Yes, kind of like wingnuts on blogs.
Field, I think your wingnuts are obvious losers, jealous of the tenacity and courage shown by Ms. Fluke in changing careers.
ReplyDeleteI guess basement mold will do that too, make you a dead end job having, coward.
field negro said...
ReplyDelete"Pick the target, freeze it, polarize it."
Well, let's be honest; it's hard to miss rush.
"Notice that they always sing in unison, using identical words in the same news cycle."
Yes, kind of like wingnuts on blogs.
Yeah but the truth writes itself, your side uses collaborated lies. Immediately all the MSM and Soros lefty blogs including you, have the identical and exact same spin that makes no sense and is illogical. No such thing as coincidence and we know liberals aren't that smart. Especially the radical ones. Imagine Obama thinking it's time to crush the constitution and mandate that A church and then companies provide more free stuff, for stuff that is already taxpayer funded and widely availible. Of course they had to find a plant and spin a lie quick -the president thought it was OK to dictate to citizens of the country what they would pay for and for whom because he needs more votes.
It is over for the unconstitutional Alinskite Communist, Marxist, Socialist Radical racial dividing set asides man in the White house.
I can't wait until November, once Obama is voted out the world will breathe a sigh of relief and the global economy will boom.
Maybe the furor is over the idea that even being AfAm, with a man-purse, playing basketball...LeBron is still more desirable than Rush...or the Rush DittoHeads.
ReplyDeleteMany people are going to law school later in life. I personally knew a woman in her 40s...she waited for her children to be older. Not every student is a Legacy like bush.
Poor widdle wite WATBs...no matter how much they pout, whine and throw tantrums...the adults won't let them do anything!
Mold
Dr.Reine c/o 2017 said...
ReplyDeleteField, I think your wingnuts are obvious losers, jealous of the tenacity and courage shown by Ms. Fluke in changing careers.
I guess basement mold will do that too, make you a dead end job having, coward.
You see what trash you are pig vomit? You have nothing else to say so you try and get personal. Do you realize how everyone laughs at you being a financial aid Mama who has been in school her ENTIRE LIFE and accomplished nothing but is always talking about how she is GOING to do something only NOT YET and is better then everyone - You are a legend pig vomit, a legend - in your own mind and no one else's. What a sad small place to be pig vomit, what a sad small place indeed.
You are the perfect example of an extremely low IQ ill informed liberal that Obama depends upon. You couldn't tie your own shoes without marching orders from the democrats and they like that.
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteMaybe the furor is over the idea that even being AfAm, with a man-purse, playing basketball...LeBron is still more desirable than Rush...or the Rush DittoHeads.
So Mold wan'ts to get diddled by Lebron instead of Rush. Fair enough, I wouldn't want either but do understand your choice.
I'm not rooting for LeBron just because he's LeBron. Who the hell cares if Miami doesn't win a championship, except Miami fans, who don't know if a basketball is inflated or stuffed.
ReplyDeleteI guess basement mold will do that too, make you a dead end job having, coward.
ReplyDelete-------------
You and basement Mold wish you qualified for dead end jobs.
You have to have a career in order to change careers. Going from unemployable loser to rejected medical scholl applicant doesn't really qualify.
You will never be a doctor.
VP "I do know her position on government funded birth control is idiotic and that she's not intelligent enough to understand basic supply and demand or she wouldn't be pursuing a law degree at the age of 30."
ReplyDeletePerhaps it would be a good idea for you to go and actually read the transcript of Ms. Fluke's testimony. I read it, and nowhere did I find that she was advocating "government funded birth control." But then again, I might have missed that important part.
Please set me straight. Thanks.
Fluke's Transcript (PDF). Have at it:
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/statement-Congress-letterhead-2nd%20hearing.pdf
Also here:
http://www.datehookup.com/Thread-881380.htm
Belman
LeBron's a punk, or haven't you watched him in the last 2 minutes of any game that counts. Black Mamba and World Peace owned his sorry ass yesterday. Ring ? Ha ! He'll be in the stands again watching the Lakes edge out Bulls for title !
ReplyDeleteMy goodness, there they go with Saul Alinski again. These people are nuts. I bet they close their eyes and see visions of the man dancing in their heads.
ReplyDeleteFor the sake of your own sanity, please let it go. You people are deranged enough as it is.
Field, please do a post on the end of the world. That is, men sleeping with men, and women sleeping with women. It's in the bible. Why do you NOT write about this? Same sex marriage is on the rise and so are people with hate and lack of understanding. We live in a hate filled name calling country, as Limbaugh has shown.
ReplyDeleteBTW, Rush is truly sorry and has apologized profusely, which is more than I can say about some Negroes(you included) on this blog.
I have never known an FN poster to apologize for being wrong about anything. Do you know why? PC and Reine certainly need to apologize because they are always wrong. And need I mention about the errors of your ways? So, fess up! It's good for the soul. Trust me.
Don't forget Super Tuesday. As always, I expect another 'fair' and 'balanced' posting by FN.
Okay Field, the man purse is a little "metrosexual" to me but hey, do your thing.
ReplyDeleteBTW, where your buddy with her righteous indignation of commenters here who aren't sticking to the thread topic?
Like I've seen and said MANY times before, no one sides with a Goober like someone who looks VERY similar to you.
Now someone pass the "old bay".
Dr.Reine c/o 2017 said...
ReplyDeleteBTW, where your buddy
"BTW, where your buddy"?
That should read
BTW, where's your buddy
The left attacks gun owners. The left wants to take their rights away.
ReplyDeleteThe same left fights for light prison sentences for murderers,child molesters and rapists.
Than again, the left knows their base.
Queen-La-La-La-Oh-No-you-Din't-Shaboom Said....
ReplyDeleteOkay Field, the man purse is a little "metrosexual" to me but hey, do your thing.
BTW, where your buddy with her righteous indignation of commenters here who aren't sticking to the thread topic?
Like I've seen and said MANY times before, no one sides with a Goober like someone who looks VERY similar to you.
What a horribly racist thing to say. You are what you are.
Now someone pass the "old bay".
I realize you are getting up there in your age but didnt realize you were just a withered old horse looking for a bay. A free bay no doubt.
field negro said...
ReplyDeleteMy goodness, there they go with Saul Alinski again. These people are nuts. I bet they close their eyes and see visions of the man dancing in their heads.
For the sake of your own sanity, please let it go. You people are deranged enough as it is.
OK you did a lot of name calling as usual, how leftist of you. Are you saying Obama is not an Alinskiite despite all the evidence, his own words, his action? The beliefs and actions of many of those he appoints, selects and places in his administration are you? Who is insane someone who speaks the truth or someone who lies and lives in an alternate reality that will never come to fruition no matter how many down twinkles you use?
Oh Field, WHy won't Obama's ally release the video tape of The love song of Saul Alinsky that Obama engaged in a panel discussion on?
ReplyDeleteI mean this is a chance for good publicity for a play they did honoring the man and discussin political views, wonder why they won't release it?
Sources inform Breitbart.com today that Pam Dickler, director of the 1998 production of The Love Song of Saul Alinsky in Chicago that included a panel discussion featuring then-State Sen. Barack Obama, has a video tape of the play.
And she won’t release it. Wonder why Obama isn't calling for release so the american public can get to know him better. I mean he has time after all to do things no other president in history has done, like call to soothe a liberal plant who was insulted by a talk show host.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/05/obama-ally-hiding-alinsky-tape
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSandra Fluke is a liar: during her testimony, she claimed that birth control had cost a stunning $3,000 during her three years of law school. Unfortunately, it turns out that Walmart and a nearby Target have offered $9-a-month birth control since 2007. Not to mention the fact that there appear to be four Planned Parenthood offices within walking distance of Georgetown Law School, where they seem to dispense contraceptives like candy.
ReplyDelete• Fluke is a kook: among her prior positions (policy positions, that is...), she argued that insurers be required to cover sex-change surgery and other "transgender services".
• Fluke is a professional abortion rights activist: and that's her own description of herself - "A Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies major at Cornell, [she] is also a past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice."
No, Fluke is an activist and a plant.
My only question: what did George Stephanapoulous know and when did he know it; when he asked the question in Jan " Do you believe states have a right to ban contraception or is that trumped by a right to constitutional privacy" Totally insane question as no one has ever talked about banning contraception, it wasn't ever a topic and no state or candidate want's to or even hinted at it.
Forgot the link for the post above so the Alinsyites don't focus on created moral outrage to avoid the issue.
ReplyDeletehttp://thelasttradition.blogspot.com/2012/03/january-7-george-stephanopoulos.html
most people are insecure sexually/homohaters/homophobes
ReplyDeleteand
that is why a real alpha male like lebron, with a purse, sets beta male perps off...
cc this to roland martin
he may have a purse joke too
shame!
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cts=1331044748538&ved=0CDoQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.racialicious.com%2F2008%2F03%2F17%2Flebron-james-as-king-kong-on-cover-of-vogue%2F&ei=hyFWT8n8LMj3sQK65pnUCQ&usg=AFQjCNE3Miy9m9Zp_PzOaw7vCf8_eVWZ5Q
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cts=1331044634203&ved=0CCQQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Faliciabanks.xanga.com%2F732465371%2Fthe-science-of-sexuality%2F&ei=GCFWT-P-ONTCsQLM85zPCQ&usg=AFQjCNF5tzUFzBOtefRJJufMSiQbAVoXTg
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cts=1331044654873&ved=0CCQQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reocities.com%2Fambwww%2Fmanup.htm&ei=LSFWT_mRH8X0sQLH17jWCQ&usg=AFQjCNEfMv9b3wAb4HoYt77Y7z5_CzbHTw
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cts=1331044677153&ved=0CDYQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reocities.com%2Fambwww%2Flazarus.htm&ei=QiFWT5DLKbSAsgLk3rTZCQ&usg=AFQjCNEC__wWLJlOHtLsAC0EA2Hzh3mGwQ
fn/vdlr:
ReplyDeletefyi:
only truly evil trifling niggers would selectively delete my posts
while allowing each slur to which i reply to remain herein
u can never delete my slays/wit etc
i see u
Looks like the evil Koch bros. gave money to Obama and the Clintons.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.php?id=D000000186&type=P&state=&sort=A&cycle=2008
Quote anonymous
ReplyDelete"The same left fights for light prison sentences for murderers,child molesters and rapists."
Really?
Can you name one incidence where a Leftist has said they want lighter sentences for murderers, paedophiles and rapists?
Romney/West 2012 Its' coming. It's coming. Can you say Baracka Flacka Bye Bye?
ReplyDeletefn:
ReplyDeleteno word on this hate crime?
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/teenagers-poured-gasoline-boy-walking-home-school-set-fire-cops-article-1.1033062
Quote Larry
ReplyDelete"The stimulus was supposedly about rescuing the economy from a dire emergency"
It did.
It would have been better if it had been bigger, but even with the limited amount of money spent, it made a demonstrable difference to the American economy.
"But it turns out that nationalized health insurance is really about empowering, at the expense of everyone else, the Democrats' primary constituency--single women."
Firstly, you are not going to get nationalized health insurance (sadly for you). Secondly your objection to empowering single women is what exactly?
more proof that rabidly elitist flipper hobama is worse than mitt
ReplyDeletehttp://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cts=1331046116714&ved=0CEgQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DdSSw_o-hCAk&ei=4iZWT8aJJYT_sQLZpKjlCQ&usg=AFQjCNGCNqYZLvU8XygiLg8DHmJOwif5aQ
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=5&cts=1331046189458&sqi=2&ved=0CEwQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D2qcbKpeEvYc&ei=JydWT_dSxKewAuif7dsJ&usg=AFQjCNGrfQNO5fHQ9V1QEc-r5hjK_qoP4g
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=6&cts=1331046195567&sqi=2&ved=0CFMQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DLl-7v2kyRpQ&ei=JydWT_dSxKewAuif7dsJ&usg=AFQjCNFzugMXE0u26-he3ce6kkDEbocXbw
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=6&cts=1331046195567&sqi=2&ved=0CFMQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DLl-7v2kyRpQ&ei=JydWT_dSxKewAuif7dsJ&usg=AFQjCNFzugMXE0u26-he3ce6kkDEbocXbw
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=7&cts=1331046209894&sqi=2&ved=0CFsQFjAG&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DQJFO6COAMCY&ei=JydWT_dSxKewAuif7dsJ&usg=AFQjCNHj1eXnR93A_fXR8Nf0J6y-J4Xchw
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=9&cts=1331046217128&sqi=2&ved=0CGkQFjAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Frt.com%2Fusa%2Fnews%2Fobama-flip-flops-union-promise%2F&ei=JydWT_dSxKewAuif7dsJ&usg=AFQjCNHJ_mgP0ZhOiT2ocKR8sNlvuLyc0g
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=10&cts=1331046223971&sqi=2&ved=0CHEQFjAJ&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheutubeblog.com%2F2008%2F01%2F06%2Fclinton-camp-obama-flip-flops-on-single-payer-system%2F&ei=JydWT_dSxKewAuif7dsJ&usg=AFQjCNFYU8R6opVi3zU_6k9lkUEWVhwf8w
It's starting to look like that Sandra Fluke wasn't quite the "innocent college student" she was portrayed to be. It's looking like she is just another leftist plant.
ReplyDeletehttp://mrctv.org/blog/sandra-fluke-gender-reassignment-and-health-insurance
Rush was just dumb enough to fall for it.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteQuote Saul
ReplyDelete"Ms. Fluke is long-time feminist activist who graduated in 2003 from Cornell's "Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies." In the decade since then..."
Wait! It's 2013 already?
"All of which is fine with me. What's not fine is lending oneself to a planted political stunt in collusion with the vicious radical left. But that is exactly what Ms. Fluke has done."
No it isn't and if you believe it is, you are certifiably insane.
Try and think rationally for just a moment. You are saying the Democratic party told this woman;
"Go and talk to the committee about your views on contraception, and hopefully Santorum or Limbaugh might just say something offensive about you, and that will be a big propaganda coup for us."
Then I suppose she said;
"Yeah o.k., it's a long shot, but I guess it's worth a try."
Really?
That's seriously what you think happened?
"Rush Limbaugh lost his footing, and dropped an unfunny line about Fluke, calling her a "slut."
No sorry, that's not 'unfunny', that's totally fucking offensive. He called every woman who has sex while using contraception a slut.
He also said that women who have free contraception should video the sex act and allow him and his buddies to watch it.
Remind me again, what percentage of people entitled to vote in your upcoming Presidential election are women?
ie
ReplyDeletedid that sexist dog hobama ever phone to apologize to hillary or sarah????
for what he and his sexist fans slurred....??????
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cts=1331047226113&ved=0CCsQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Faliciabanks.xanga.com%2F734306076%2Fon-righteous-rage---all-who-are-awake-are-angry%2F&ei=NytWT9KhNIT1sQKL_ZnRCQ&usg=AFQjCNFKuWl6fE0XLAOwTgkOsCZhfmg1CA
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cts=1331047279515&ved=0CCQQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Faliciabanks.xanga.com%2F736213191%2Fgender-abuse-trumps-politics---rethinking-sarah-palin%2F&ei=bitWT_KjCqT_sQLxtfnfCQ&usg=AFQjCNEpTOSi5HVh5L14mVnFFuLq8ytOOA
kosher kkk:
ReplyDeleterich & poor pookie moms rule the world
why so mum?????
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/hot_mama_is_kink_link_to_rich_da_2yIysmtqJBcVqISduA6r5M
"My only question: what did George Stephanapoulous know and when did he know it; when he asked the question in Jan " Do you believe states have a right to ban contraception or is that trumped by a right to constitutional privacy" Totally insane question as no one has ever talked about banning contraception, it wasn't ever a topic and no state or candidate want's to or even hinted at it."
ReplyDeleteThe degree of coordination between the national press and the Obama campaign is stunning.
As evidenced by the Journolist scandal, the media actively suppresses stories that are damaging to Democrats, while aggresively hyping any thing that can be used to paint Republicans negatively.
The problem is that most Americans still believe that they are getting objective news from the the mainstream media.
The Purple Cow said...
ReplyDeleteSecondly your objection to empowering single women is what exactly?
------------
I object to the empowerment of any group at the expense of everyone else.
bongo was never a professor of law,he was a lecturer who did not know any law, but he did know alinsky which is what he talked about. 3 negroes raped a white teacher but it was not a hate crime, right house?two negroes set a white boy on fire but this was not a hate crime,right house? do you think negro behavior plus bongo's attempt to destroy the second amendment has anything to do with the increase in gun purches? rush was right the cunt is a slut who is attacking the church for her boy bongo.the real racists in america are lazy negroes.
ReplyDeleteThe Purple Cow said...
ReplyDeleteNo sorry, that's not 'unfunny', that's totally fucking offensive. He called every woman who has sex while using contraception a slut.
-------------------
Your and your fellow leftists' selective outrage is laughable.
While it may have been stupid for Limbaugh to have called Sandra Fluke a “slut,” why is it still acceptable for the left—and reportedly Obama—to call members of the Tea Party “tea-baggers,” which is an extremely vulgar sexual term?
In Newsweek columnist Jonathan Alter's "The Promise: President Obama, Year One," to be released May 18, according to The Washington Post , the President is quoted as saying that Republican opposition to the stimulus "helped create the tea-baggers and empowered that whole wing of the Republican Party."
Oh yeah.
For those (unlike Purple Cow) who have not personally engaged in the practice, google the term "tea-bagging". It's a vulgar and lewd sexual practice that makes a designation like "slut" look downright complimentary. So pardon my skepticism over Mr. Obama's feigned sensitivity.
When it comes to crude, offensive attacks on innocent citizens simply expressing their opinions, Rush Limbaugh's got nothing on Barack Obama.
The Purple Cow said...
ReplyDeleteQuote Saul
"Ms. Fluke is long-time feminist activist who graduated in 2003 from Cornell's "Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies." In the decade since then..."
Wait! It's 2013 already?
Immediate Liberal Flag, focus on the irrelevent. Alinsky rules for radicals. Ignore the lies she told.
"All of which is fine with me. What's not fine is lending oneself to a planted political stunt in collusion with the vicious radical left. But that is exactly what Ms. Fluke has done."
No it isn't and if you believe it is, you are certifiably insane.
Rules for radicals, say nothing, but try and marginalize the person rather then discuss the facts.
Try and think rationally for just a moment. You are saying the Democratic party told this woman;
"Go and talk to the committee about your views on contraception, and hopefully Santorum or Limbaugh might just say something offensive about you, and that will be a big propaganda coup for us."
Of course not you silly twit. Alinsky rules for radicals.. you have created a straw argument and then certify it as insane, well it is you who created it.
You forgot to address this point
"• Fluke is a liar: during her testimony, she claimed that birth control had cost a stunning $3,000 during her three years of law school. Unfortunately, it turns out that Walmart and a nearby Target have offered $9-a-month birth control since 2007. Not to mention the fact that there appear to be four Planned Parenthood offices within walking distance of Georgetown Law School, where they seem to dispense contraceptives like candy."
or this one
"• Fluke is a kook: among her prior positions (policy positions, that is...), she argued that insurers be required to cover sex-change surgery and other "transgender services""
Or this one
".• Fluke is a professional abortion rights activist: and that's her own description of herself - "A Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies major at Cornell, [she] is also a past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice."
Then I suppose she said;
"Yeah o.k., it's a long shot, but I guess it's worth a try."
Really?
That's seriously what you think happened?
Your straw is on fire, you are an Idiot.
"Rush Limbaugh lost his footing, and dropped an unfunny line about Fluke, calling her a "slut."
No sorry, that's not 'unfunny', that's totally fucking offensive. He called every woman who has sex while using contraception a slut.
He also said that women who have free contraception should video the sex act and allow him and his buddies to watch it.
Remind me again, what percentage of people entitled to vote in your upcoming Presidential election are women?
Oh spare me your newfound moral compass. A woman who pimps herself out for the democratic party, specifically lies to promote Obamacare and FREE contraceptives is a political slut. The lie has been exposed, most women aren't falling for the infantile nonsensical democratic fighting invisible Ninja's that don't really exist tactics.
The real and entire issue remains government mandating to a religious organization they will provide more free stuff to the Obamabots, when that did not go over well as it is obviously unconstitional Obama then advised he will order a company to fund it, which is also unconstititional, not to mention unnecessary, we already fund it with taxes. Obama made a serious mistake and will and is getting trounced for this abomination. Then they pull out this activist to give a speech full of lies and create a war that only they are fighting against make believe opponents.
You are a despicable liberal liar. an
more proof that hobama and his fans are sexist hypocrites who are dogging that sexist dog rush
ReplyDeletehttp://www.mediaite.com/tv/laura-ingraham-blasts-the-view-when-i-was-called-a-slut-barbara-walters-laughed-it-off/
AB, "most people are insecure sexually/homohaters/homophobes
ReplyDeleteand
that is why a real alpha male like lebron, with a purse, sets beta male perps off...
cc this to roland martin
he may have a purse joke too"
LIAR!! Most people are NOT insecure homophobes. It's the other way around: "most homosexuals are insecure.
Furthermore, Roland Martin is not homophobic. I bet some of his best friends are gays.
You owe Roland an apology and all hetersexuals for falsely calling them insecure.
moron assnon:
ReplyDeleteu r a gd homohating fool
are u kin to roland?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michelangelo-signorile/roland-martin-superbowl-_b_1259631.html
u kin to roland?
http://aliciabanks.xanga. com/732742147/savage-sanctuaries---their-own-receive-them-not/
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cts=1331049779636&ved=0CCQQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Faliciabanks.xanga.com%2F732741843%2Fblack-homohatred-kills---a-eulogy-for-sakia-gunn%2F&ei=LzVWT9rTH4fpsQLZxbnWCQ&usg=AFQjCNELXtQLS8K1XY-b1jQzi2xazH3c5w
I am unable to do much about this, but I am requesting that some of you Anons ID yourselves with your real names. It would be much appreciated if you stopped hiding behind your "anon blankets". It's time for some of y'all to grow up.
ReplyDeleteSandra Fcukls Statement:
ReplyDelete"Just as we students have faced financial, emotional, and medical burdens as a
result, employees at religiously affiliated hospitals and universities across the
country have suffered similar burdens. We are all grateful for the new regulation
that will meet the critical health care needs of so many women. Simultaneously,
the recently announced adjustment addresses any potential conflict with the
religious identity of Catholic and Jesuit institutions.
Oh no, this wasn't scripted by Pelosi and isn't political in the slightest. No, not at all.
When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected, and I have
heard more and more of their stories. . On a daily basis, I hear from yet another
woman from Georgetown or other schools or who works for a religiously
affiliated employer who has suffered financial, emotional, and medical burdens
because of this lack of contraceptive coverage. And so, I am here to share their
voices and I thank you for allowing them to be heard.
Really? Name one of the faces of the women you see affected who are intelligent enough to go to law school but not smart enough to obtain free, rubbers, pills and or significantly cheap contraceptives at the several planned parenthoods within walking distance and or at the local CVS for 9 dollars a month. or with a simple medical diagnosis for the disease you claim they have from the doctor.
Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during
law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships,
that’s practically an entire summer’s salary. Forty percent of female students at
Georgetown Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy.
Wow, 40% of women students are struggling financially because they don't get free contraceptives and are too stupid to know despite all the advertising on campus the many locations they can get them for free. I don't know, people who are in school who spend so much time needing contraceptives may not actually be doing any learning.
For my friend,
and 20% of women in her situation, she never got the insurance company to cover
her prescription, despite verification of her illness from her doctor.
Wow, so many of her friends have a disease that is treated by many different alternatives yet they only need the offered free birth control. Amazing that only 1 in 20 women get this disease yet she has so many friends with it.
We did not expect that women would be told in the national media that
if we wanted comprehensive insurance that met our needs, not just those of men,
we should have gone to school elsewhere, even if that meant a less prestigious
university. We refuse to pick between a quality education and our health
Yet, she specifically joined the university simply in her own words to fight the catholic religion and policies. So this was her goal all along, she planned it and executed it and now says she never had this in mind.
The
President of the Association of Jesuit Colleges has shared that Jesuit colleges and
universities appreciate the modification to the rule announced last week. Religious
concerns are addressed and women get the healthcare they need
Oh this wasn't political, she makes sure as someone concerned only about womans health to say the problem is over, Obama did good. Well constitutional concerns and religious concerns were not addressed and this woman was obviously reading a Nancy Pelosi prepared political script.
Liberals are disgusting liars. At the end of the day no one is going to remember this nonsense once the supreme court rules Obamacare unconstitutional, but they certainly will remember the lengths and immorality liberals go to.
more on that holy homohating fool roland martin
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/keith-boykin/roland-martin-suspended-tweets_b_1264696.html
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteI am unable to do much about this, but I am requesting that some of you Anons ID yourselves with your real names. It would be much appreciated if you stopped hiding behind your "anon blankets". It's time for some of y'all to grow up.
Has to be a liberal posting as an anon to say something like this. Liberalism is a mental disease.
Rush Limbaugh has had sponsors cancel ads and is being blacklisted because he called a 30 year old woman demanding free contraception a "slut".
ReplyDeleteI wonder what will happen to liberal talk radio host Mike Malloy for mocking Christian victims of last week's tornados:
http://youtu.be/44hU4pVaV4g
AB, "moron assnon:
ReplyDeleteu r a gd homohating fool
are u kin to roland?"
Why must you call me, a 'holy anon', names? See, this is why the bible says what it says about people like you. You call me, a Holy Anon, a "moron", an "ass", and a "gd homohating fool"?"
My Lord, woman. Do you wish to rot in Hell forever?
As far as Roland is concerned, no one believes he hates homosexuals because they are gay.
As I said before I bet some of cousin Roland's best friends are gay.
cc this to your good lesbian friends. Are you kin to Dan Savage?
biblical idiot assnon:
ReplyDeleteu r a generic fool i see.
just like that holy preacher hater roland martin
what a gd shame.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cts=1331050630930&ved=0CCQQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Faliciabanks.xanga.com%2F733349822%2Ftop-10-biblical-myths-about-homosexuals%2F&ei=gzhWT5ePOPOJsALbt6HvCQ&usg=AFQjCNGqUf7zDCJI7hcNyJDMOcgMg8lsiw
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cts=1331050642195&ved=0CCQQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Faliciabanks.xanga.com%2F732464048%2Fbiblical-laws-for-homohating-cherry-pickers%2F&ei=jzhWT_OzFYeAsgKhg4TgCQ&usg=AFQjCNEdR_a13S-dfYiAxuwygYhNA55LHQ
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cts=1331050662631&ved=0CCsQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Faliciabanks.xanga.com%2F732464211%2Fwhat-would-jesus-dojesus-would-love-this-book%2F&ei=ozhWT9SRGZD_sQLo5-naCQ&usg=AFQjCNE32X6HPEoMK3fhcGh_Li6Pxqr1Yw
bible toting but never reading assnon:
ReplyDeletewhy do you holy homohaters always ignore the beautiful gay couples in the bible???
http://www.apocalipsis.org/difficulties/JonathanandDavid.htm
http://www.wouldjesusdiscriminate.org/biblical_evidence/ruth_naomi.html
1. There is no word for homosexuality in the original, ancient Hebrew text. The bible makes NO reference to homosexuals as we know them today, nor as they exist in every living species.
ReplyDeleteFrom The Church and the Homosexual: “Malakoi and arsenokotai are not synonymous with homosexual. The former were simply debauched individuals, and the latter were probably male prostitutes or those given to anal intercourse, which is not necessarily or exclusively homosexual activity.”
From The Good Book: “The King James version of the 1611 text makes no mention of homosexuality or any of its cognates. The first use of the term in an English bible is to be found in the Revised Standard of 1946.”
2. The story of Sodom and Gomorrah has NOTHING to do with homosexuality. You will not even find the word “homosexual” in any version of this text. The angels came to destroy the city BEFORE they met the evil mob. Lot offers his virgin daughters to that same mob. Later, these same girls rape Lot. Lot’s wife was destroyed. If this story condemns homosexuality, then it also condones incest and gang rape. And, Lot’s wife was a lesbian. NONE of which is true.
From The Good Book: “The Hebrew verb “to know” is rarely used in a sexual sense. It occurs 943 times in the Old Testament and in only 10 of those does it have the sense of carnal knowledge. Sodom is referred to throughout the Old Testament as a place of wickedness and is synonymous with it. But, nowhere does it state that homosexuality was the wickedness in question...Sodomite refers almost exclusively to a male prostitute...to say that homosexual conduct is wrong because the bible says it is, is not to answer, but to dismiss the question....Sex can be productive without being reproductive. Homosexual rape is never to be condoned. It is indeed, like heterosexual rape, an abomination before God. David’s sin of adultery with Bathsheba does not make all heterosexual expressions sinful!”
From The Bible, Ezekiel 17:48-50: “The Lord says ‘Your sister Sodom’s sins were pride and laziness and too much food. While the poor and needy suffered outside her door, she insolently worshipped many idols as I watched. Therefore, I crushed her.’”
From What the Bible Really Says About Homosexuality: “The sin of Sodom was abuse and offense to strangers-insult to the traveler, inhospitality to the needy. The story is no more about sex than it is about pounding on someone’s front door. The bible offers NO valid conclusion whatsoever about homosexuality.”
3. Leviticus, Romans, and Corinthians all refer to “unnatural sex” for HETEROSEXUALS. It is NATURAL for HOMOSEXUALS to engage in homosexual sex.(Also see WHAT IS REAL SEX herein.) Yet, heterosexuals sin daily as gay prostitutes, porno film stars, lewd voyeurs, prison rapists, etc....
ReplyDeleteFrom The Good Book: “In Romans...Paul did not discuss gay persons but heterosexual people who performed homosexual acts. To suggest that Paul’s references to excesses of sexual indulgence, involving homosexual behavior, are indicative of a general position in opposition to same-sex eroticism, is as unfounded as arguing that his condemnation of drunkeness implies opposition to the drinking of wine. In Corinthians 1:7, Paul discusses the conjugal relations that ought to obtain between christian husbands and wives. For those whom celibacy was too high a price, he issued his famous edict that it was ‘better to marry than to burn’- not in hell. But with desire for the satisfaction of sex. Nowhere does he mention the sole purpose of such conjugality is the procreation of children.”
4. In Levitcus, homosexuality is an abomination not because it is inherently evil, but because the Gentiles do it. It is, therefore, ritually impure.
From What The Bible Really Says About Homosexuality: “Leviticus condemns sex as a religious crime of idolatry-not as a sexual offense. Romans suggest that sex acts have no ethical significance whatsoever. Corinthians and Timothy object to specific forms of male prostitution.These books do not refer to homosexuality. They make a general condemnation of moral looseness, lewd, lustful, and lascivious behavior.”
5. “Love Thy Neighbor” is a commandment. For the record, millions of your neighbors are homosexuals.
6. The bible is written by human men. They are not God. They never quote God or Jesus as saying ANYTHING about homosexuals. Jesus makes only one statement that can even be remotely viewed as a reference to homosexuality.
Matthew 19:12: “Jesus said ‘Some are born without the ability to marry.’”
7. God is love. Homosexuals are consenting adults who love each other. Gay love is invisible to gaybashers. They see only gay sex. They hunt it down, exclusively, obscenely, curiously, and passionately. Many gaybashers are homosexuals. They will love us when they learn to love themselves.
8. God loves EVERYONE who is GOOD. Some of the best persons in the world are homosexuals. From Dr. Cornel West, in the film "All God’s Children":
“If I have one word for fellow Christians, I would ask them to keep their eyes on the love of Jesus, and to not confuse the blood at Calvary with the KoolAid of homophobia in America. KoolAid is thin and shallow and it’s linked to scapegoating...and trashing other people...But the blood, as thick as it is, is open enough for everybody.”
9. There are thousands of REAL SINS in the bible that gaybashers ignore/commit. Selective smoke and blasphemous mirrors will never save their souls or mask their hypocrisy. Unlike the misinterpretations and exaggerations regarding homosexuality, the bible makes SPECIFIC references to many actual sins that gaybashers habitually ignore. (See NUMEROUS biblical references to adultery, lying, judging, dietary laws, gossiping, infidelity, disrespecting authority, betraying family etc....)
10. The bible is not a primer for hatred. The bible is “the good book”. Gaybashers use it exclusively as an evil bat; one they use exclusively to bash the skulls of homosexuals.
One of the many outstanding qualities of FN is that is a very diversified opinionated place of argumentative discussion. Like NYC, you can find anything you want, here.
ReplyDeleteFor example, I just didn't feel like thinking but felt like arguing with no purpose in mind. Well, FN offers that too. It has some of the finest crazies in the mindless world for this.
Take AB, for instance. She is always willing to argue about "nothing." Some of you FN Negroes should try arguing without thinking...the key is to not "think". After arguing with her I feel so much better and my brain was not taxed at all.
But let me warn you: if you should try thinking, esp. with reason, you are going to have a 'severe' headache. DON'T THINK, JUST ARGUE. and you'll feel better afterwards.
You see, AB is really a therapist who has been hired by Field to reach people who want to put forth NO mental effort. I have said it before and I'll say it again: "The man is a genius". Where else can you go to find such finess? NOWHERE.
illiterate holy hater assnon:
ReplyDeletecatch a movie and share some bible study for dummies
with your fellow sinner fool roland ASAP...ok????
Dear Dr. Laura:
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God’s Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination… End of debate.
I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God’s Laws and how to follow them.
1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can’t I own Canadians?
2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness – Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord – Lev.1:9. The problem is, my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath.Exodus 35:2. clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?
6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination – Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don’t agree. Can you settle this? Are there ‘degrees’ of abomination?
7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle- room here?
8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn’t we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God’s word is eternal and unchanging.
Your adoring fan.
James M. Kauffman, Ed.D. Professor Emeritus Dept. of Curriculum,
Instruction, and Special Education University of Virginia
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cts=1331051606636&ved=0CDoQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Faliciabanks.xanga.com%2F732464048%2Fbiblical-laws-for-homohating-cherry-pickers%2F&ei=UzxWT5jbG9L3sQKFvZHOCQ&usg=AFQjCNEdR_a13S-dfYiAxuwygYhNA55LHQ
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cts=1331051730361&ved=0CDcQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DuJ1v6oFHefc&ei=yjxWT96zF5HHsQKyy4TWCQ&usg=AFQjCNH-S86_xyIDR9lhydYh8WhOVBX8Ww
felled fool assnon:
ReplyDeletethanks for the retarded kudos u slain moron
we see u
your big mirror is redundant
faceless coward cowed assnon:
ReplyDeletewhen you learn to slay fools as well as i do...
u will proudly show your face as u slay too
fyi
good luck with that someday when you grown a brain/read a book/study your buybull belatedly etc
alicia banks said...
ReplyDeletebible toting but never reading assnon:
why do you holy homohaters always ignore the beautiful gay couples in the bible???
Because salt isn't good for you it raises your blood pressure and this is why I don't eat it if it smells like fish.
Then there are FN folks like the "brilliant" Dr Queen/Reine--who is constantly bettering themselves with Scientific degrees.
ReplyDeleteI hope someday Field will reveal how he brought all of this human spectrum together on one blog. It is a stroke of genius...Field should write a "How To Diversify Your Blog From PR to the UK".
I've said it before and I'll say it again: "Field is a genius." I wish he would have lunch with me. It would be the crown of my life just to have lunch with him, even if it's a pretzel with mustard.
holy hater altzish dunce assnon:
ReplyDeleteare u kin to rick perry too???
no prophecy or praise about ndaa?????????
ReplyDeleteDear Professor James Kauffman, regarding your comment and question which was provided by Miss AB, may I suggest you stop reading Leviticus? It seems to be too confusing for you.
ReplyDeleteHowever, it is very clear to me and millions of folks in the USA. Some of us were blessed with great minds like myself and some weren't-- like AB.
But being a good Christian, I still love her sinful ass.
AB, "1. There is no word for homosexuality in the original, ancient Hebrew text. The bible makes NO reference to homosexuals as we know them today, nor as they exist in every living species."
ReplyDeleteDuring the times of the ancient Hebrew text, there were no homosexuals...NONE.
cc this to your gay friends who are ignoring the original text.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFAST & FURIOUS, GUNRUNNER, GUN WALKER, GRENADE WALKER, GUNS FOR DRUGS, REZKO, BLAGOVICH, ILLEGAL ALIENS, TAX FRAUD, VOTER FRAUD, IDENTITY FRAUD, CLIMATE FRAUD, REPARATIONS FRAUD, OBAMACARE FRAUD, POSSE COMISTATUS, POLICE STATE, HOMELAND SECURITY TERROR, TSA TYRANNY, WAR POWER ACT VIOLATIONS, HATCH ACT VIOLATIONS, UNCONSTITUTIONAL PATRIOT ACT, FINANICAL CRIMES, LYING ON SENATE DISCLOSURE FORMS, COVER-UPS, MURDER, 2ND ADMENDMENT VIOLATIONS, TREASON, ILLEGAL SUPER CONGRESS, BRIBEGATE, BLACK PANTHER VOTER INTIMIDATION, BAIL-OUTS, TAKEOVERS, INTERNET TAKEOVER, ATTACKS ON FBI, CIA, MILITARY, AND MURDERS OF THREE AMERICAN CITIZENS.
ReplyDeleteWhat is there to do?
ReplyDeletehttp://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/2012/03/start-game-new-york-times-mother-jones.html
Quote Anonymous
ReplyDelete"Sandra Fluke is a liar: during her testimony, she claimed that birth control had cost a stunning $3,000 during her three years of law school."
She said absolutely no such thing. What she said is that contraception CAN cost up to $3000 per year, she did not say that hers had.
"Unfortunately, it turns out that Walmart and a nearby Target have offered $9-a-month birth control since 2007."
Irrelevant, Walmart only sell two types of oral contraceptive -Tri-Sprintec and Sprintec. These are not suitable for many women.
"• Fluke is a kook: among her prior positions (policy positions, that is...), she argued that insurers be required to cover sex-change surgery and other "transgender services"."
Why shouldn't they? Every country in Western Europe does. It's a medicaal condition, why shouldn;t it be covered?
"• Fluke is a professional abortion rights activist: and that's her own description of herself..."
No it isn't.
"A Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies major at Cornell, [she] is also a past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice."
Thank you. So NOT professional abortion rights activist then.
"Oh spare me your newfound moral compass. A woman who pimps herself out for the democratic party, specifically lies to promote Obamacare and FREE contraceptives is a political slut. The lie has been exposed, most women aren't falling for the infantile nonsensical democratic fighting invisible Ninja's that don't really exist tactics.
There is no lie, you have exposed nothing but your own cluelessness.
"You are a despicable liberal liar. an
An' what?
...a fool
ReplyDeleteQuote Saul
ReplyDelete”When it comes to crude, offensive attacks on innocent citizens simply expressing their opinions, Rush Limbaugh's got nothing on Barack Obama.”
Well, you say that, and yet the Tea-Partiers regularly use the phrase ‘Tea Baggers’ to describe themselves.
Feb. 27, 2009 At the first anti-stimulus "New American Tea Party" rally in Washington D.C., a protestor carries a sign reading "Tea Bag the Liberal Dems before they Tea Bag You!!" The Washington Independent's David Weigel calls it "the best sign I saw."
March 2 Americans for Prosperity, an anti-tax group, is one of the first Tea Party organizations to advocate sending tea bags to elected officials to protest the stimulus package. Several other lobby groups follow suit.
April 1 Several Tea Party protest sites encourage readers to "Tea bag the fools in DC." Jay Nordlinger at National Review Online later admits: "Conservatives started [using the term]... but others ran and ran with it."
April 1 Several Tea Party protest sites encourage readers to "Tea bag the fools in DC." Jay Nordlinger at National Review Online later admits: "Conservatives started [using the term]... but others ran and ran with it."
April 9 Rachel Maddow is the first to mock the Tea Party's use of the phrase on her left-leaning MSNBC show. "Even Governor Mark Sanford of South Carolina is getting in on the hot tea-bagging action," she says, stifling laughter.
September 10 Badges with the message "Proud to be a Tea Bagger" are still on sale at Tea Party events, according to an article written later in the year.
April 14, 2010 Prominent conservative Andrew Breitbart posts a video on the site Big Government in an attempt to reclaim the term. "I'm Proud to be a Tea Bagger" currently has over 90,000 views.
[source:The Week]
Why doesn't that slut Fluke get the guys who are banging her (if there really are any) to pay for her sponges or whatever?
ReplyDeleteThe next thing she is going to ask for is for the university to pay for her drink too.
Quote Anonymous
ReplyDelete...a fool
An fool??????
Wow, you guys are even dumber than I thought.
Purple cow said...
ReplyDeleteWell, you say that, and yet the Tea-Partiers regularly use the phrase ‘Tea Baggers’ to describe themselves.
-----------
OK, so since some women refer to themselves as sluts, it must therefore be an acceptable term for all women, right?
You really ought to try thinking things through for once, Cow.
The Purple Cow said...
ReplyDeleteQuote Anonymous
"Sandra Fluke is a liar: during her testimony, she claimed that birth control had cost a stunning $3,000 during her three years of law school."
She said absolutely no such thing. What she said is that contraception CAN cost up to $3000 per year, she did not say that hers had.
Wow the liberal lying wordsmither strikes again. You are disgusting. Here are her words, technically if it were a legal contract she didnt say precisely that, but she sure crafted the words for effect. So her intent was to mislead then.
Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during
law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships,
that’s practically an entire summer’s salary.
"Unfortunately, it turns out that Walmart and a nearby Target have offered $9-a-month birth control since 2007."
Irrelevant, Walmart only sell two types of oral contraceptive -Tri-Sprintec and Sprintec. These are not suitable for many women.
I won't even waste time checking this liberal talking point, but planned parenthood within walking distance does. So what is your point?
"• Fluke is a kook: among her prior positions (policy positions, that is...), she argued that insurers be required to cover sex-change surgery and other "transgender services"."
Why shouldn't they? Every country in Western Europe does. It's a medicaal condition, why shouldn;t it be covered?
Oh the sickness of the liberal mind. When you were a woman did you really demand Brit taxpayers cut off your johnson and pay for it? Were the hormone treatments expensive?
"• Fluke is a professional abortion rights activist: and that's her own description of herself..."
No it isn't.
Duh - Yes it is.
"A Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies major at Cornell, [she] is also a past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice."
Thank you. So NOT professional abortion rights activist then.
"Oh spare me your newfound moral compass. A woman who pimps herself out for the democratic party, specifically lies to promote Obamacare and FREE contraceptives is a political slut. The lie has been exposed, most women aren't falling for the infantile nonsensical democratic fighting invisible Ninja's that don't really exist tactics.
There is no lie, you have exposed nothing but your own cluelessness.
This is it? The lies are shown and you say nope...
"You are a despicable liberal liar. an
An' what?
Let your liberal imagination wander and fill in the blanks, you will make the shit up anyway.
The Purple Cow said...
ReplyDeleteQuote Saul
”When it comes to crude, offensive attacks on innocent citizens simply expressing their opinions, Rush Limbaugh's got nothing on Barack Obama.”
Well, you say that, and yet the Tea-Partiers regularly use the phrase ‘Tea Baggers’ to describe themselves.
Cow give it up, no one here is going to Teabag you. Go back to living your transgendered life with your sheepskin handbag. You must get lonely on the farm with just you and buttercup.
Quote Anonymous
ReplyDelete"Cow give it up, no one here is going to Teabag you. Go back to living your transgendered life with your sheepskin handbag. You must get lonely on the farm with just you and buttercup."
Yep, you can always tell the exact moment when the far-right nutjobs realize they have lost yet another aargument. Out come the infantile ad homs....
Quote Saul
ReplyDelete"OK, so since some women refer to themselves as sluts, it must therefore be an acceptable term for all women, right?
You really ought to try thinking things through for once, Cow."
Jeeze, that's about as lame an argument as I've ever heard on this website.
The point is, Obama described the Tea Partiers - once! - as Tea baggers, at exactly the same time as tea-partiers were selling "I'm Proud to be a Tea Bagger" badges.
And yet you would have us believe that this was some sort of mortal insult!!
Well, you might have convinced yourself of that (though I doubt it) but you haven't convinced anyone else.
The Purple Cow said...
ReplyDeleteQuote Anonymous
"Cow give it up, no one here is going to Teabag you. Go back to living your transgendered life with your sheepskin handbag. You must get lonely on the farm with just you and buttercup."
Yep, you can always tell the exact moment when the far-right nutjobs realize they have lost yet another aargument. Out come the infantile ad homs....
You are shameless, you are a shameless hypocrite. This is why we despise you. You didn't win any argument and you don't get to use our words Cow Alinsky - We exposed your leftist tactics. Leftist the party of everythign being someone else's fault, demanding everyone pay for thier lifestyles and if you don't agree insert name here starting with racist.
Quote Anonymous 1:42
ReplyDelete”Wow the liberal lying wordsmither strikes again. You are disgusting. Here are her words, technically if it were a legal contract she didnt say precisely that, but she sure crafted the words for effect. So her intent was to mislead then.”
”Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary.”
So let me get this straight.
You are saying that because (by your own admission) I correctly pointed out that Fluke did not say what you claim she said – that makes ME disgusting?
Does that logic make any kind of sense even to you?
"I won't even waste time checking this liberal talking point…”
It’s not a liberal talking point, numbnuts. It’s a verifiable fact, which a simple Google search would have taught you.
"… but Planned Parenthood within walking distance does. So what is your point?”
Planned parenthood doesn’t give away contraceptives for free.
”Oh the sickness of the liberal mind. When you were a woman did you really demand Brit taxpayers cut off your johnson and pay for it? Were the hormone treatments expensive?”
O.K. that is your admission that you have lost this debate. When all else has failed, resort to the Ad Hom attack
Every country in Western Europe funds treatment for transsexuals because it’s a matter of basic medical needs. This is not a Left/Right issue. Conservative governments support the issue too.
”Oh spare me your newfound moral compass. A woman who pimps herself out for the democratic party, specifically lies to promote Obamacare and FREE contraceptives is a political slut.”
...and a man who chooses to smear a woman he does not know, by calling her a slut, and is unable to produce any evidence of wrongdoing on her part when challenged to do so, is a what would you say?
I can think of a good few choice words.
” You are a despicable liberal liar.”
Name one thing I’ve said in this entire exchange that could be construed as a lie, even by a far-right nutjob like you.
”Let your liberal imagination wander and fill in the blanks, you will make the shit up anyway.”
Oh yeah, that’s an intelligent well-argued response.
[/irony]
If Blagojevich is in jail for trying to sell Obama's Senate seat, why isn't Jackson in jail for trying to buy it?
ReplyDeleteQuote Anonymous
ReplyDelete"You are shameless, you are a shameless hypocrite."
Is that code for the guy that always wins the arguments??
"This is why we despise you."
No, you despise me because I'm smarter than you.
Hard to take isn't it?
"You didn't win any argument"
Really?
So why have you given up arguing the facts and are instead posting these foaming-at-the-mouth Ad Hom attacks?
If you are still in the argument, why have you stopped debating the facts?
...and you don't get to use our words Cow Alinsky - We exposed your leftist tactics."
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. There you go again with your Alinsky obsession. I bet this time last year you'd never heard of him. I certainly hadn't.
Tell me, if Glenn Beck told you to jump off a bridge, would you do that as well?
"Leftist the party of everythign being someone else's fault, demanding everyone pay for thier lifestyles and if you don't agree insert name here starting with racist."
I wasn't aware there was a party called 'Leftist' - do you have a URL for me?
I might want to join...
The Purple Cow said...
ReplyDeleteThe point is, Obama described the Tea Partiers - once! - as Tea baggers,
-------------
And Rush Limbaugh called Sandra Fluke a slut - once! I guess you are now agreeing that it is equivalent.
I know you don't believe your arguments and just try to pass off such bluster because you think it works with the less-than-bright audience you are performing poor, but it is a sad act nonetheless.
The problem for you is that there are people much smarter than you that can call you on it.
Back to the pasture, cow.
Quote Anonymous 1:42
ReplyDelete”Wow the liberal lying wordsmither strikes again. You are disgusting. Here are her words, technically if it were a legal contract she didnt say precisely that, but she sure crafted the words for effect. So her intent was to mislead then.”
”Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary.”
So let me get this straight.
You are saying that because (by your own admission) I correctly pointed out that Fluke did not say what you claim she said – that makes ME disgusting?
You are beyond redemption; She specifically read her Pelosi prepared speech thats says
Without insurance contraception can cost a woman over 3k during law school. For a lot of women LIKE ME....
Now MR disenginious. You would have to be insane or a disgusting liar to even imply let alone state she was trying to say anything but contraception costs are in the ballpark of 3k and for a woman like her who someone else is going to school on someone elses dime that is a lot of money.
Would her prepared political statement have had any use to the Obamabots if she simply stated the truth? Of course not you liar.
Yes you are disgusting. Now try and spin that again Mr Liberal tallywhacking liar.
Purple Cow said..
ReplyDelete"Planned parenthood doesn’t give away contraceptives for free."
Yes they do dipshit. There are three federally funded Planned Parenthood clinics in Washington, D.C.--none being more than 3.2 miles from the Georgetown Law School.
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/mbpp/free-birth-control-annual-exams-2656.htm
Besides that there are CVS and target. Of course if you are wealthy and own a 450k home like Sandra FLuck does why then you wouldn't need free birth control would you. Lying liberals make me want to vomit.
...and a man who chooses to smear a woman he does not know, by calling her a slut, and is unable to produce any evidence of wrongdoing on her part when challenged to do so, is a what would you say?
ReplyDeleteI can think of a good few choice words.
The evidence is clear irrefutable to a real man who thinks, not some liberal sit and spin whackjob.
Let your liberal imagination wander and fill in the blanks, you will make the shit up anyway.”
ReplyDeleteOh yeah, that’s an intelligent well-argued response.
You mean your question "An What" was a intelligent well crafted question? Are you a total idiot or just a fucking hypocrite liar? YOu know damn well your question was ridiculous, now you take exception to it being treated as such. Liberals are insane.
Let your liberal imagination wander and fill in the blanks, you will make the shit up anyway.”
ReplyDeleteOh yeah, that’s an intelligent well-argued response.
You mean your question "An What" was a intelligent well crafted question? Are you a total idiot or just a fucking hypocrite liar? YOu know damn well your question was ridiculous, now you take exception to it being treated as such. Liberals are insane.
and you don't get to use our words Cow Alinsky - We exposed your leftist tactics."
ReplyDeleteHa, ha, ha, ha, ha. There you go again with your Alinsky obsession. I bet this time last year you'd never heard of him. I certainly hadn't.
Actually as you have said this at least three times in the past, I have already told you I knew about Saul Alinksy and radical leftists many moons ago when I studied real history and saw the impact of his tactics on promoting collapse of the welfare system to eliminate pushback by overwhelming it.
You really need to stop being such a pompous ass, this might work with those who are at the same IQ level as you, others not so much. IF you just heard about Alinsky from watching Glenn Beck, shame on you for not having the knowledge of who Barack Obama really was in 2008. Now don't give me your usual cop-out you aren't american and you don't care. You sure seem to spend every waking moment battling for liberals and leftists on this blog.
Tell me, if Glenn Beck told you to jump off a bridge, would you do that as well?
Get a new line your low IQ is showing everytime you use it. You are clearly projecting from your level of intelligence, someone can only know something if a talk show host tells you. Sort of like you and liberal talkshows, you are a walking living breathing Leftard talking point, you clearly demonstrate you can't think for yourself.
"Leftist the party of everythign being someone else's fault, demanding everyone pay for thier lifestyles and if you don't agree insert name here starting with racist."
I wasn't aware there was a party called 'Leftist' - do you have a URL for me?
I might want to join...
You truly are a disengenious liberal. Luckily for you, you do not need to PLAY stupid. Definition and links are below. But I am sure you already are a red card carrying member.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/leftistleftist
(Government, Politics & Diplomacy) of, tending towards, or relating to the political left or its principles
n
(Government, Politics & Diplomacy) a person who supports or belongs to the political left
leftism
http://www.barackobama.com
http://www.democrats.org/
http://mediamatters.org/
In the United States of America, there is no longer any systemic racial discrimination by white people against non-whites. In that sense, white racism is dead. Deceased. Extinct.
ReplyDeleteSystemic racial discrimination against white people, on the other hand, has never been worse.
How do we know that white racism is dead? How can we show that something does not exist? By working backwards from the implications of its existence, asking: what do we observe that is unlikely to be true if there is systemic racial discrimination by whites and likely to be true if there is not?
The volume of evidence in our favor is staggering. None of the following should exist anywhere with systemic white racism.
1.laws banning racial discrimination against non-whites (e.g., the Fourteenth Amendment, Brown v. Board of Education, the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1991, the Voting Rights Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, and Title 42, Chapter 21 of the US Code)
2.laws requiring racial discrimination against whites (affirmative action, quotas, etc.)
3.government agencies that enforce this double standard* (e.g., the EEOC and the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ)
4.an epidemic of racially motivated mob violence by blacks against whites, which in general goes unnoticed and unpunished
*The US Commission on Civil Rights has found that the Civil Rights Division displays “open hostility and opposition” to pursuing civil rights cases “in which whites were the perceived victims and minorities the alleged wrongdoers”
The Purple Cow said...
ReplyDeleteQuote Anonymous
"You are shameless, you are a shameless hypocrite."
Is that code for the guy that always wins the arguments??
You haven't won any argument yet. You might twist and contort and ultimately result to your standby of simply just lying. But other then that...
"This is why we despise you."
No, you despise me because I'm smarter than you.
Yes, yes, you are smarter then I. Uh-huh. ^That is the reason you are despised, people envy you. (Liberalism is a really sad mental disorder) You see fairy dust where I don't you make leaps of logic that no one else in the world can. Look up Napoleanic complex and you will see what you have - Delusions of granduer with the key word being delusions. You couldn't conduct a simple conversation soley on facts without adding liberal distortions, you don't have the abilities.
Hard to take isn't it?
"You didn't win any argument"
Really?
So why have you given up arguing the facts and are instead posting these foaming-at-the-mouth Ad Hom attacks?
No one is foaming, though this is another leftist/liberal tactic. I despise you because you are a liar. I hate liars. Anyone who cannot tell the naked truth is never to be trusted and has no opinion of value whatsoever.
Quote UP
ReplyDelete"In the United States of America, there is no longer any systemic racial discrimination by white people against non-whites. In that sense, white racism is dead. Deceased. Extinct."
Part One
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.
Part Two
ReplyDeleteHa, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.
Part Three
ReplyDeleteHa, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.
You're a goddam comedy genius, you should be on TV
"You mean your question "An What" was a intelligent well crafted question? Are you a total idiot or just a fucking hypocrite liar? YOu know damn well your question was ridiculous, now you take exception to it being treated as such. Liberals are insane."
ReplyDeletePot/Kettle/Black
Quote Anonymous 3:38
ReplyDelete"Delusions of granduer with the key word being delusions."
...and the key spelling being g-r-a-n-d-E-U-r.
Thanks for your continual outpouring of wisdom.
ReplyDeleteAnd we're all Negroes now, sweetie!
Being in the 1% recognizes only the color of money.
Love ya,
S
You'll never pass a college course in logic by reasoning if one thing is o.k., another thing is o.k. Which is how Rush is being defended. His slurs were outrageous, unfounded, defamatory, spread out over at least three radio shows, & betrayed a deep disgust for women & profoundly conflicted attitude toward sexuality. It was so perverse it transcended whatever political statement he was trying to make.
ReplyDeleteThe Purple Cow said...
ReplyDeleteQuote Anonymous 3:38
"Delusions of granduer with the key word being delusions."
...and the key spelling being g-r-a-n-d-E-U-r.
Your honor, ladies and gentleman of the jury I rest my case. What a maroon.
The Purple Cow said...
ReplyDelete"You mean your question "An What" was a intelligent well crafted question? Are you a total idiot or just a fucking hypocrite liar? YOu know damn well your question was ridiculous, now you take exception to it being treated as such. Liberals are insane."
Pot/Kettle/Black
Your tired old cliches don't even fit the situation. Are you really and I mean it, are you really this weak minded? You asked a stupid question, got told to screw off and then came back all indignant that your question was pissed on. No, this is all you - I am not like you.
Bob said...
ReplyDeleteYou'll never pass a college course in logic by reasoning if one thing is o.k., another thing is o.k
-------
Isn't that the liberal defense of everything?
When clinton got caught diddling an intern, it was "everybody does it".
When Obama spends us into bankruptcy, it's alway "Bush did it too"
Dear Mr. Field, please write a positive post for Mr. Romney tonight. He deserves it and is the frontrunner to face the O-man. I have no doubt that Romney is capable of beating Obama because of his record against racism and his support of Blacks, which is a lot more than Obama has shown.
ReplyDeleteI know you will do Romney justice tonight. Thank you.
Desert, during your professional years in the health field, how often did you encounter sleep apnea in patients? How accurate is a diagnosis of it?
ReplyDelete