Thursday, September 13, 2012

John is to Mitt what Hillary is to Barack.

As American embassies in the Middle East continue to burn, and the "Arab Spring" turns into the winter of our discontent, we have to ask ourselves one important question: Who do we want to be our Secretary of State? Do we want Hillary Rodham Clinton, or do we want John Bolton? Mr. Bolton is the man most likely to be pegged for that position if Mitt Romney wins in November.

"One of Mitt Romney’s top campaign advisers (and potential Secretary of State if Obama loses) has such inadequate understanding of the Iranian issue, and is so belligerently wrong on the fundamentals, that it should frighten any observer of the 2012 race. In his latest piece at the Weekly Standard, John Bolton says that negotiations are “delusional” and that our only option at this point is to launch a war against Iran. And he’s not kidding." [Read more] 

This might explain the brash imperious posture Mitt is taking when it comes to foreign policy. In case you have been only watching tasteless reality shows on television of late, let me cue you in on where Mitt stands on foreign policy:

Mitt wants to increase military spending by at least two trillion dollars--- according to one estimate--- over the next decade. This is troubling, since, according to him, he plans to cut taxes. Combine this with his Neoconservative policy advisers like the aforementioned Mr. Bolton, and you can see that recipe for disaster just brewing in the pot.

Mitt has declared that when he is president America will be stronger and will deal more forcefully with everyone from Russia to Iran. It is no secret that he will be willing to go to war with Iran, because he has declared himself to be our warrior in chief. No apologies from this guy. He will not apologize for America. (BTW, I would love to see a clip of Obama apologizing for America. This apology is more elusive and mysterious than "Big Foot". And yet I hear these republicans talking about it all the time.)

I love what Ron Westgard had to say about this subject:

"After stumbling through Britain on a recent tour, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney then landed in Israel with bugles sounding and war drums rolling, Iran in his sights. Now he is critical of President Barack Obama for his alleged weakness in the face of the attack on our consulate in Libya.
As with former President George W. Bush, who sounded the trumpets for the invasion of Iraq, Romney would, of course, be safe in Washington, D.C., while others serve on any new battlefield. I suggest we skip new wars with Iran and Libya until we have paid for Iraq and Afghanistan.

It’s obvious Romney wants to prove his manhood before the electorate, perhaps as a way of halting the current slide in his poll numbers. He could have proved it in Vietnam, but he found a way to do his service in southern France. Romney supported the Vietnam War — just not enough to get involved, as he used student deferments and missionary status to stay well away." [More]   

Mitt, in a speech, gave us some insight into how his administration would approach foreign policy:

"My foreign policy has three fundamental branches: first, confidence in our cause, a recognition that the principles America was based upon are not something we shrink from or apologise for, that we stand for those principles," Romney said.

"The second is clarity in our purpose, which is that when we have a foreign policy objective, we describe it honestly and clearly to the American people, to Congress and to the people of the world," he said.

"And number three is resolve in our might, that in those rare circumstances where we decide it's essential for us to apply military might, that we do so with overwhelming force, that we do so in the clarity of a mission, understanding the nature of the US interest involved, understanding when the mission would be complete, what will be left behind us when that mission has been terminated," Romney said."

"Clarity of a mission". Sound familiar? Yes, of course it does; that's what the guy who got us into Iraq said. Unfortunately that mission wasn't so clear, and we are still paying the price for it. Mitt says that he will use "overwhelming force"  to "apply military might". That force better wipe out over a billion people, or the mission will not be "terminated" for generations to come. A "mission" of this sort isn't like an employee you don't need. You can't just terminate it when you feel like it.

If Mitt does become president, he is going to learn very quickly that the structured boardrooms of corporate America-- with their set rules and regulations-- is nothing like the real world he will have to deal with as its most powerful leader. 



 




140 comments:

Whitey's Conspiracy said...

"It’s obvious Romney wants to prove his manhood before the electorate"
-------

The neocon chickenhawks are all cowards trying to sound brave with war talk that someone else will have to walk. That makes them and Raunchy a perfect match.

Anonymous said...

Whitey's Conspiracy said...

"It’s obvious Romney wants to prove his manhood before the electorate"
-------

The neocon chickenhawks are all cowards trying to sound brave with war talk that someone else will have to walk. That makes them and Raunchy a perfect match.

So head on over and teach those Muslims some tolerance. Speak to them in progressive language. We are counting on you to do your part. Please hurry, it's getting bad. Is there any thing else you think should be done?

Anonymous said...

Robert Mugabe's latest rant: 'Jamaicans are drunkards and pot smokers who don't work'

By Emma Reynolds

'Drunks': Mugabe said Jamaican men had no interest in higher education and the country's universities were filled with women

'Drunks': Mugabe said Jamaican men had no interest in higher education and the country's universities were filled with women

Zimbabwean president Robert Mugabe has infuriated Jamaican men by labelling them chronic drunkards and unambitious pot smokers.

He claimed they had 'no interest in higher education' and are 'always drunk', during his controversial speech last week at the University of Zimbabwe in Harare.

'The men want to sing and do not go to colleges, some are dreadlocked, let us not go there,' said Mugabe in several unscripted asides.

He alternated between English and the Shona language during the three-hour talk, but his comments were corroborated by reporters afterwards.

His comments are now making waves across the Caribbean island, where Jamaicans are debating the matter on street corners, in letters to newspapers and on radio talk shows.

Over the years, Mugabe has repeatedly made disparaging remarks about Rastafarians, whom he whom he once described as having 'moths and mud' in their hair.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2202793/Jamaicans-offended-Zimbabwean-leader-Robert-Mugabe-brands-chronic-drunkards-pot-smokers.html#ixzz26P2ax2lx

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2202793/Jamaicans-offended-Zimbabwean-leader-Robert-Mugabe-brands-chronic-drunkards-pot-smokers.html#ixzz26P1oljWj

jackson said...

"After stumbling through Britain on a recent tour..."

Media Matters lie.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

Scary! Hollywood should replace horror movies with a film on Bolton and Mitt's foreign policy and that will be enough to scare the dung out of anyone and guarantee an Oscar for the most scariest flick of the year. I swear!

Both Mitt and Bolten can sit in the comfort of their cozy office and practice golf or pretend balled up paper is a basketball and shoot hoop, while our poor children go out on the battlefield to lose an arm, leg, half of their body, traumatized, or die in behalf of some dung Bolton and Mitt want to start because to them the poor and middleclass people are dispensable.

Why don't we change the way a war is fought. Instead of sending our men and women out to fight in their behalf, why don't we just let Mitt and Bolten have a one on one fight with the leaders of other countries.

Anonymous said...

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

Scary! Hollywood should replace horror movies with a film on Bolton and Mitt's foreign policy and that will be enough to scare the dung out of anyone and guarantee an Oscar for the most scariest flick of the year. I swear!

Both Mitt and Bolten can sit in the comfort of their cozy office and practice golf or pretend balled up paper is a basketball and shoot hoop, while our poor children go out on the battlefield to lose an arm, leg, half of their body, traumatized, or die in behalf of some dung Bolton and Mitt want to start because to them the poor and middleclass people are dispensable.

Why don't we change the way a war is fought. Instead of sending our men and women out to fight in their behalf, why don't we just let Mitt and Bolten have a one on one fight with the leaders of other countries.


Those folk are Crazy. So what do you think Obama should do? Do you think we need to worry about Iran getting the bomb and delivery system worked out? What then? Maybe they won't use it and just want respect? The sanctions aint really worked they issued waivers on most all countries and others just aint paying any attention.

Maybe Obama can go over there and talk to them again and let them know we just want peace?

Ashutar Guar said...

Bolton would be huge improvement on our current Secretary of State. In fact, he'd be huge improvement over at least the last five.

Hillary needs to resign over this Middle East fiasco. The Independent is now reporting that the state department was warned 48 hours ahead of these attacks, but did nothing. The blood of those dead Americans is on her hands.

Classified documents listing the names of Libyans cooperating with America has fallen into enemy hands, and the killings have already begun.

The stories we are hearing are mostly lies too. The embassy was attacked by 400 men, and the attack had gone of for four hours when the ambassador tried to flee.

Four hours, and yet no help came from the Libyan government. Despite the evidence they were in on it, Obama thanked the President of Libya today anyway.

What a disaster.

Grandpa Woodley said...

GrannySittinginPoop said...
Why don't we change the way a war is fought. Instead of sending our men and women out to fight in their behalf, why don't we just let Mitt and Bolten have a one on one fight with the leaders of other countries
----------

Why don't you change your diaper and go to bed? You make absolutely no sense.

field negro said...

"Robert Mugabe's latest rant: 'Jamaicans are drunkards and pot smokers who don't work'"

You won't see any Jamaicans burning the Zimbabwean embassy.

What does Mugabe know? He is just mad because they don't have Appleton and collie weed in his country.

"Four hours, and yet no help came from the Libyan government. Despite the evidence they were in on it, Obama thanked the President of Libya today anyway."

Do you have a link to show us that the Libyan government was in on the attacks? This is breaking news on FN blog. We might lead the news in the morning.





Ashutar guar said...

"Do you have a link to show us that the Libyan government was in on the attacks? This is breaking news on FN blog. We might lead the news in the morning."

What is your alternative explanation for the fact no assistance arrived to an embassy under attack for four hours?

it's bush's fault said...

Wait a minute. Obama knew? Of course. Why else would the Obama administration prohibited the Marines guarding the embassy from keeping live ammunition in their weapons?

Exclusive: America 'was warned of embassy attack but did nothing'...

State Dept 'had credible information 48 hours before'...

Revealed: Inside story of ambassador's assassination...

Sensitive documents go missing...

Exposed: Names of Libyans who are working with Americans...

Was 'revenge for drone strike'...

'There were 400 attackers'...

OBAMA ADMINISTRATION DENIES...

PAPER: Egypt intelligence warned on Sept. 4 of possible attacks...

ahmadinejad the nutjob said...

Bomb, bomb, bomb,

Bomb, bomb Iran...

To destroy the Iranian nuclear effort would take nothing more than a number of well aimed cruise missiles. No invasion is necessary.

And no Iranians need be in the nuclear facilities when they're struck.

Sure, a few people will be there, but only a handful, and they'll probably run for the hills after the first explosion.

Anonymous said...

The US administration is now facing a crisis in Libya. Sensitive documents have gone missing from the consulate in Benghazi and the supposedly secret location of the “safe house” in the city, where the staff had retreated, came under sustained mortar attack. Other such refuges across the country are no longer deemed “safe”.

Some of the missing papers from the consulate are said to list names of Libyans who are working with Americans, putting them potentially at risk from extremist groups, while some of the other documents are said to relate to oil contracts.

According to senior diplomatic sources, the US State Department had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged the consulate in Benghazi, and the embassy in Cairo, that American missions may be targeted, but no warnings were given for diplomats to go on high alert and “lockdown”, under which movement is severely restricted.

It would seem this information would be included in security briefings, but the Empty Chair has no use for those. Maybe we can get a mantra going: Hillary lied, Chris Stevens died!

There is growing belief that the attack was in revenge for the killing in a drone strike in Pakistan of Mohammed Hassan Qaed, an al-Qa’ida operative who was, as his nom-de-guerre Abu Yahya al-Libi suggests, from Libya, and timed for the anniversary of the 11 September attacks.

But the media keeps insisting it’s some dopey video. They can’t be lying to us, can they? You know we figure since Obama isn’t bothered much with his day job maybe he can fly over to Cairo and give another important speech. Maybe between fundraisers with Beyonce and appearances on Letterman.

Anonymous said...

field negro said...

"Robert Mugabe's latest rant: 'Jamaicans are drunkards and pot smokers who don't work'"

You won't see any Jamaicans burning the Zimbabwean embassy

So Jamaicans are not like murderous Muslims and you learned to align with them against America only after you became a moonbat. Aha, another piece of the puzzle.

Anonymous said...

White House, Press Corps Use Mid-East Crisis to Distract From Failing Economy

Barrack Obama and members of the institutionalized “progressive” left smear machine, otherwise known as the mainstream media, launched a series of seemingly coordinated attacks on GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney. The White House and the press uncannily echoed each other while criticizing Romney for speaking in opposition to the Cairo Embassy’s apology to Islamists for “efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims” on the eleventh anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States.

Obama attacked Romney for having “a tendency to shoot first and aim later”. After firing that salvo, Obama was off to yet another fund raising event in Las Vegas, where he furthered the assault by saying “It appears that Gov. Romney didn’t have his facts right”. Meanwhile, Obama’s campaign assailed Romney for using the “tragic death of one of our diplomatic officers in Libya” to “launch a political attack”.

It seems that for mysterious, unexplained reasons it has somehow slipped the minds of Obama and the Obama campaign that he politicized foreign policy back in 2008 by attacking George W. Bush and then GOP presidential candidate John McCain for troop deaths in Iraq and their support of the Iraq War.

Not only have the media and the White House been singing from the same sheet music, a discussion caught on an open microphone and recorded immediately before Romney’s Wednesday morning press conference clearly revealed the press corps coordinating hostile questioning aimed at discrediting Romney and knocking him off stride.

While the White House and the “progressive” Party Pravda were busy diverting the public’s attention towards Mitt Romney and away from the sagging economy, new claims for jobless benefits rose again, while a spike in wholesale gasoline costs drove consumer prices higher.

Economists had predicted claims for unemployment benefits would rise to 370,000. However according to the Labor Department, initial claims rose to a seasonally adjusted 382,000. That is the highest in two months. Consistent with a pattern seen since Obama took office, figures from the prior week were again revised upwards, showing 2,000 more applications than originally reported.

For the first time since the Great Depression, the officially reported unemployment rate has been stuck above 8 percent for over three years.

The producer price index, as measured by the Labor Department, jumped 1.7 percent in August. That increase was the biggest gain in three years. Gas prices soared by 13.6 percent. Steep increases in eggs and dairy costs drove food prices up 0.9 percent.

The median income of American households continues to decline on Barack Obama’s watch, dropping to its lowest level since 1995. According to Census Bureau data, 2011 median income fell to $50,054. That is 1.5 per cent below the 2010 level and 4.1 per cent below what the median income level was when Obama took office.

This highlights the extent of the damage inflicted upon America’s middle class by Obama’s failed economic policies.

Outrageous Incompetence said...

Secretary Hillary Clinton has to resign.

Anonymous said...

Forbes

The U.S. is looking for ways to beef up security in Libya, following the Sept. 11 terrorist attack in Benghazi that killed U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. Two warships and 50 marines have been dispatched, as a first move. One item that ought to be added to the list: Could something be done to stop Iranian-linked cargo ships, blacklisted by the U.S., from calling at Libyan ports?

Over the past two months, at least three Iranian-linked container ships, all blacklisted by the U.S. Treasury, have called at the Libyan port of Benghazi. One of them, the Parmis, put in at Benghazi Anchorage as recently as August 30. Since then, it has since been meandering along the Libyan coast, going west to the Libyan port of Misurata, then doubling back east this week, past the Libyan port of Sirte. For the Parmis, this is a voyage that began in early August at the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas, thence to the United Arab Emirates, then Egypt, and on to Libya. This repeats a similar circuit, in which the Parmis sailed in June from Iran, calling in early July at Benghazi.

That’s not to suggest any ties between Iran, or the Parmis in particular, and Tuesday’s attack on the U.S. post in Benghazi. The full tale of who master-minded or helped stage that armed assault remains to be uncovered. But whatever answers might eventually emerge to those urgent questions, it seems reasonable to warn that amid the chaos and carnage bedeviling Libya, port calls from sanctioned Iranian vessels do not augur well.

But this much is clear: All three of these container ships, before sailing for Libya, called at the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas, where the container terminal is operated by a terror-linked Iranian company called Tidewater Middle East Co. Last year the U.S. Treasury blacklisted Tidewater as “a port operating company owned by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) that has been used by the IRGC for illicit shipments.”

It’s worth adding that under U.S. jurisdiction, it is potentially a crime to have any dealings with these ships. Anyone outside U.S. jurisdiction who engages in business with them is at risk of being cut off from commerce with the U.S.

In remarks Wednesday on the deaths of American personnel in Benghazi, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reaffirmed that “A free and stable Libya is still in America’s interest and security, and we will not turn our back on that.” Surely, regardless of who was behind the Sept. 11 attack, the aspirations for a free and stable Libya are better served without the presence of blacklisted IRISL vessels dispatched from terror-linked ports in Iran. Given the costs and risks shouldered by Americans to help free Libya from the tyranny of Moammar Gaddafi, it would reflect better on Libyans — both in their own interests, and those of their benefactors — were they to honor U.S. sanctions on Iran by turning away its ships. Surely it would be in America’s interest to try much harder to help Libya do that?

Media Clowns said...

Yesterday, we learned that there were no Marines protecting our Ambassador to Libya despite State Department warnings about violence and kidnappings in the Benghazi. We already knew Al Qaeda was coming on strong there. But we relied on locals for support and now we know the locals betrayed us as they have in the past in Afghanistan and Iraq too.

But the media wanted to focus on Mitt Romney.

Night before last, the President condemned Mitt Romney in harsher tones than he condemned the rioters. It took him until sun up yesterday to condemn them.

But the media wanted to focus on Mitt Romney.

Yesterday, the media spent much time condemning the Coptic Christians for their movie, but we now know the movie had been out for months and we also know the riots were orchestrated in advance. We also know the attack on the American consulate in Libya used the riots as cover for the attack.

But the media wanted to focus on Mitt Romney.

Yesterday, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, a man who swore an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States of America, called an American civilian to ask him to stop exercising his first amendment rights.

But the media wanted to focus on Mitt Romney.

We also now know that the President, close to 60% of the time, has opted for printed intelligence briefings, which this White House thinks are as useful as an intelligence officer in the room who the President can probe, prod, challenge, and question.

But the media wanted to focus on Mitt Romney.

And in focusing on Mitt Romney, finally, of all the places, Slate and Dave Weigel finally point out that Mitt Romney’s gaffe was no gaffe, it was a consistent view of foreign policy foreign to the ears of the political press. He, I, and many others really do think Barack Obama is an apologist. We really do think his speech to Cairo after his entrance to the White House was part of a world apology tour. And we sure as hell think his actions in the past year to foster the Arab Spring were the actions of a naive fool.

Anonymous said...

Field, why don't you admit that this whole thing looks like a slow macabre dance of a winter freeze for America?

Obama and Hillary are paralyzed and don't know what to do.

This is going to cost Obama and the Dems the WH and Congress. It's over!

Michelle said...

Obama spent today on the campaign trail, cracking jokes like Rodney Dangerfield and having a good old time.

He sure seems to have gotten over Ambassador Steven's death.

Good for him.

obama shoots blanks said...

field bumbles:

If Mitt does become president, he is going to learn very quickly that the structured boardrooms of corporate America-- with their set rules and regulations-- is nothing like the real world he will have to deal with as its most powerful leader.

You obviously know nothing about the activities in boardrooms or who's in them.

Virtually every corporation has former military personnel on the board.

Defense corporations have many.

The person who knows nothing about boardrooms and how to make informed decisions is the idiot in the White House, a screwball who allows Marines to stand in front of our embassies pretending to guard them with weapons containing no ammunition.

That's Obama, loaded with blanks. Actually, unloaded. Not a round in sight, and certainly not a round in the chamber.

smoldering mugabe said...

field says:

You won't see any Jamaicans burning the Zimbabwean embassy.

It's tough to get the flames going when you're drunk and stoned. Moreover, they'd have to find the place, another difficult task for the chemically impaired.

The most likely scenario is a couple of Jamaicans setting their hair on fire.

Anonymous said...

It had always seemed the chickenhawks were more than willing to have a war...because so very, very few would serve.
Bolton as a foreign policy expert is like asking Opus Dei to oversee the continuing problem of priests molesting children.
Mr Romney does see the working class as expendable. One might easily glean that from his vulture capitalism. Or his statements. If you seek historical reference...look to the French and Russian Revolutions.

Mold

Desertflower said...

I heard planes leaving the nearby base. Carrying drones maybe?

Anonymous said...

"The most likely scenario is a couple of Jamaicans setting their hair on fire".

That would get rid of the moths and most of the dirt. Moths like fire less than liberals like reality.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...

It had always seemed the chickenhawks were more than willing to have a war...because so very, very few would serve.

Don't worry, we'll ask you to serve... sammiches.

Anonymous said...

Desertflower said...

I heard planes leaving the nearby base. Carrying drones maybe?

It was Obama snoring, he's had a busy couple days with one statement on Americans being murdered two round trip flights and two campaign appearances. Boy is he going to be pissed when he finds out he will have to put on another disinterested show Saturday after Fridays Muslim violence escalates. He was counting on taking Reggie love out for a few holes....and to wash their golf balls.

Miguel Guttierrez said...

Desertflower said...
I heard planes leaving the nearby base. Carrying drones maybe?
-----------

No, they ran out of Bacardi 150th Anniversary special edition rum at the Obama fundraising party in Aspen. It's a real emergency.

Anonymous said...

"The U.S. media should be all over the failure to protect our diplomats in the Middle East on September 11 of all days. Yet all we received was collusion at Romney’s press conference and snide high-fiving at how successful they were at keeping the focus off of Obama’s failures.

Our position in the Middle East never has been as bad as it is today, at least not in my lifetime. The threat to Israel never has been greater.

And our media never has been as complicit as it is now.

Update: The Obama administration has offered a Clintonian denial that it had “actional intelligence,” which is a non-denial in reality, as pointed out by John Hinderaker:

Of course, the Independent story didn’t say that the Obama administration had “actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. Mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent.” It said that “the US State Department had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged the consulate in Benghazi, and the embassy in Cairo, that American missions may be targeted,” but did nothing to step up security. The administration’s denial does not contradict the Independent’s statement, and the fact that the denial is phrased so narrowly suggests that the Independent’s report is, in fact, accurate.

Remember how the media has treated non-specific warnings of an attack in the months leading up to 9/11? Bush should have figured it out, they demanded in hindsight. Let’s see if that standard is applied to Obama."

Anonymous said...

Dear Mr Field, let me extend a "special" Invitation to you to attend our National Convention in Tennessee.

Our key note speaker will be David Duke who is always charming and a great speaker. I am sure he would be glad to see you.

Also, you may bring along "ONE", and only one, FN Negro. Fyi, we would love to have Granny or Dr Reine, our even PilotX attend one of our midnight parties at the conference.

As Always,
I am White and you are not,

The Grand Wizard

PS Please do not bring Whitey. We are not fond of his kind.

PilotX said...

Oh now Barack didn't arm Marines at an embassy. Uh no that was Reagan when over 200 Americans died in an attack. How come Bush wasn't labled weak when 8 attacks occured on his watch? Oh that's right, we only trot out that lable when a Dem is in the WH.
Well Field, at least your trolls have their Fox talking points down.

PilotX said...

Ha! Looks like the undecided don't like rawmonwy's response. Barack is up in all battleground polls.

Anonymous said...

A White Supremacist National Conference to be held in Tennessess:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012/09/13/white-supremacists-to-gather-in-tenn/57779764/1

field negro said...

Sorry Anon, once is enough. No need to kick David Duke's ass again in a debate.

Tell the Boyz in Tennessee to pour some Jack for me and maybe I will see them at the next convention. Btw, why did they need a separate convention than the GOP? Don't they both have the same platform?.

field negro said...

Pilot X, shhhhh. This is not a time for more bad news for our unhinged trolls.

Bob said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Bob said...

It's a conspiracy, I tell you, a conspiracy so insidious, so far-ranging, it reaches from the President himself all the way down to a Polish-American machine shop operator in Wheeling WV who takes his wife line dancing every Saturday night. His name cannot be revealed at this time, but I assure you it is known to our most confidential security agencies as well as to the judges on X Factor. But we will call him, for the time being, "Anonymous."

Anonymous said...

Blogger PilotX said...

Ha! Looks like the undecided don't like rawmonwy's response. Barack is up in all battleground polls.

You are right. It's all over for those conservative no goodnicks.

Obama has got it in the bag. He is going to win in a landslide....woo-hooo...party like its 1979 baby.

Hey, did you ever check the data on these polls? I mean a little hint was the last set that was found to be interestingly slanted. Just curious. Like the ones IPSOS did commissioned by Reuters that the MSM is using for these results. What do you think this means? It confuses me because we know the current % of party affiliation is 35.4% identified as Republicans, 34.0% as Democrats and 30.5% were unaffiliated. So why would they poll 15% more democrats than Republicans? And would this change the overall result like buy 4-6%? I dunno but seeing your genius in economics I thought you might be better in math than me.

Initial Democrats 32 33
Total Democrats 47 47
Initial Republicans 24 28
Total Republicans 38 42

Anywhoo, go Obama 4 more years, yeah baby. Hope this Bernake thing works out, I mean printing 40 trillion more to get us past the election is gonna work out great right. Just what we needed. Don't mention food/gas and essential prices. Or the dollar crashing or China and Russia/Iran buying up all the gold they can Woo-ho, I mean it's not like the world will stop using the dollar as a global currency just because someone can print as much as they like and devalue what we owe them, no, not at all - If they did we could just call them racist. Just think what we can accomplish with four more years, it's gonna be the land of milk and honey!!!

Thanks for clearing all that up for me. I feel so much better about Obamas chances now. It's in the bag, money bag baby, lots of money bags.

Anonymous said...

You guys don't mind paying a LOT more for food and gas do you? It's for a good cause after all, have to get Obama re-elected. Never mind that 16 trillion in debt that just got a whopping increase with QE III, Don't worry about what happens if he does win. We will deal with that later. I mean every government agency like SS and IRS departments bought millions of rounds of hollow point bullets so they must have some type of plans to ahem protect us.

Oh and that savings retirement account you might have.....plan to save more or retire 5 years later if it even matters then. It just lost a ton of value. But don't worry, Benny said he will continue to print in blocks of 40 trillion as needed or until the dollar is useless paper which seems pretty close.


http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/09/us-dollar-tumbles-following-fed-decision/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=us-dollar-tumbles-following-fed-decision

Anonymous said...

Gottdamn it, now these muslims gotts me mad!!! You fkcu with my siccken and it's the end times you hear me!!

http://news.yahoo.com/crowd-lebanon-torches-kfc-anger-over-pope-visit-121651873.html

Anonymous said...

Shawn Turner, spokesman for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, emailed: “This is absolutely wrong. We are not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. Mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent.”

Of course, the Independent story didn’t say that the Obama administration had “actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. Mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent.” It said that “the US State Department had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged the consulate in Benghazi, and the embassy in Cairo, that American missions may be targeted,” but did nothing to step up security. The administration’s denial does not contradict the Independent’s statement, and the fact that the denial is phrased so narrowly suggests that the Independent’s report is, in fact, accurate.

The administration also denied, incredibly, that the Benghazi attack was “premeditated.”

It was all just a co-inky-dink right Hillary?

everyone hates obama said...

+++

He's down, so keep kicking.

CARTER CORRECTS OBAMA...
-----------------------------------DER SPIEGEL: 'Obama's Middle East Policy is in Ruins'...
-----------------------------------FBI Warns of Violence in America...
-----------------------------------REPORT: Marines not permitted live ammo at embassy in Egypt...

liberals love muslim terrorists said...

pilot of X-crement said:

Oh now Barack didn't arm Marines at an embassy. Uh no that was Reagan when over 200 Americans died in an attack.

Okay bonehead. That attack occurred at the Marine Corps barracks in Beirut, Lebamon in October of 1983. It was the FIRST suicide attack and it was committed by muslim terrorists in the newly formed terrorist group -- Hezbollah, funded and organized by Iran.

241 Marines were killed when a truck bomb was detonated outside their barracks around 4 a.m.

There was no armed assault by an invading force. Just two operatives in a truck supposedly making deliveries.

Unfortunately, Reagan did not respond as he should have. It was a low point of his administration.

How come Bush wasn't labled weak when 8 attacks occured on his watch?

What 8 attacks? Which Bush?

Bush 41 gave Saddam an ass-kicking, and Bush 43 ran him out of town, destroyed his regime and started Iraq on the road to democracy and prosperity.

Oh that's right, we only trot out that lable when a Dem is in the WH.

Yeah. How did Clinton respond to the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993? He didn't.

What did Clinton do in response to the al-Qaeda bombings of two American embassies in Africa? He shot a cruise missile into some desolate region and blew a hole in the ground.

What did Clinton do in response to the bombing of the USS Cole? Nothing.

What did Clinton do in response to the kooky Branch Davidians in Texas? He had about 80 of them, including children, slaughtered in a western-style shoot-out with federal agents, all due to the urging of that grotesque, pipe-smoking manster, Janet Reno.

Anonymous said...

Muslims have once again killed innocent people while protesting a movie that portrays Muslims as savages that kill innocent people while protesting movies of Muslims as savages killing innocent people.

Ezra said...

The buzz on the hill is that Obama is resigning this afternoon. Hillary has already submitted her resignation.

Can you say, President Biden?

Choose said...

"Muslims have once again killed innocent people while protesting a movie that portrays Muslims as savages that kill innocent people."
--------------

"Anyone who describes Islam as a religion as intolerant encourages violence."
---Mahmoud Ahmadinejad


"We are not fighting so that you will offer us something. We are fighting to eliminate you."
---Hussein Massawi, former leader of Hezbollah


"The time is coming when anyone who kills you will think he is offering a service to God. They will do such things because they have not known the Father or me."
(John.16:2-3)

Corky McFucspot said...

This economy is going down faster than Madonna at an Alex Rodriguez look-a-like convention.

Gas Station Ali said...

The results of the Obama Economic Policy will be the same as his Middle East Policy, only the angry mobs will here.

Essence73T said...

WTW???? To The Anonymous(es) on this Blog:

What "are" you talking about? Are you so upset that you can't clearly state your "position" on the subject at hand....you're all over the place. Like I said before you "love" us Black folk because you are here 24/7.

Haid D'Salaami said...

Essence73T said...

WTW???? To The Anonymous(es) on this Blog:

What "are" you talking about? Are you so upset that you can't clearly state your "position" on the subject at hand....you're all over the place. Like I said before you "love" us Black folk because you are here 24/7.


It's all related, connect the dots.

Mustaf Herod Apyur Poupr said...

Whitey's Conspiracy said...

"It’s obvious Romney wants to prove his manhood before the electorate"
-------

The neocon chickenhawks are all cowards trying to sound brave with war talk that someone else will have to walk. That makes them and Raunchy a perfect match.

Thank you Infidel. We shall remember your loyalty and reward it accordingly when the time comes.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

The right seems to forget that our Constitution also says FREEDOM OF RELIGION.

Well, one thing is for sure and that is that HATE makes people stupid! Those whose idea it was to produce this film are so blinded by their hate, until they've cost innocent people their lives and will cause more bloodshed of innocent lives. I hope they're proud of themselves because the blood of those Americans are on their hands as well. No matter how the right or any of these crazy ass trolls try to spin it, they are GUILTY!

Whitey's Conspiracy said...

"So head on over and teach those Muslims some tolerance."
-------------

"Muslims" don't need me to teach them tolerance; almost a billion of them embody it. Only a vanishingly small minority of the most fanatically obsessed among them are intolerant, and much like our very own American Christionist fanatics, they're largely immune to sensible arguments from any quarter.

Whitey's Conspiracy said...

"PS Please do not bring Whitey. We are not fond of his kind."
-------------------

Thanks! I must be doing something right.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

Amen, Whitey!

Apul Maddek Aoud said...

Whitey's Conspiracy said...

"PS Please do not bring Whitey. We are not fond of his kind."
-------------------

Thanks! I must be doing something right.

If that's what you want to call it.

I Zheet M'Drurz said...

Anonymous GrannyStandingforTruth said...

" The right seems to forget that our Constitution also says FREEDOM OF RELIGION.

Well, one thing is for sure and that is that HATE makes people stupid! "

Yes we can see that.


"Those whose idea it was to produce this film are so blinded by their hate, until they've cost innocent people their lives and will cause more bloodshed of innocent lives. "

Right, you condemn the people who practiced freedom of religion and speech but say nothing about the murderous mindless savage Muslims, why is that?


"I hope they're proud of themselves because the blood of those Americans are on their hands as well."

No, the blood of those who kill and who are violent is on their own hands. No one can make you do anything unless you are a savage uncivilized thing to begin with. You have reached adulthood haven't you?


"No matter how the right or any of these crazy ass trolls try to spin it, they are GUILTY!"

How in the world does your addled brain equivocate some religious fringe guy with the right? I had nothing to do with it, but I will not let someone shut you up even though I think you are just a hateful woman who looks to blame everyone but those responsible.

Should whites go around rioting because Black Pampers say such hateful harmful things about them?

Should Jews Go after Blacks because Farrakhan wants them exterminated and says hateful vile things about them?

I say we ban free speech like you want. Starting with you, you offended me. See how that works? Have a clue yet? Any one else you are AFRAID of offending with the god given right that many died to protect for you?

You have the mind of a child. But looking at your beliefs I am sure you blame someone for every riot that occurs except for those who riot.

Maybe some people just weren't meant to live in a civilized society with others if they feel unless someone says, does, acts and is who they want them to be they will become savage animals.

Hanif said...

GrannyStandingforTruth said...
"Those whose idea it was to produce this film are so blinded by their hate"
---------

The film you reference used only Islamic sources for its dialogue, therefore the hate you detect is that from the heart of Islam.

Do you not believe in free speech? How does a poorly-produced You Tube video by a private citizen justify murder and mayhem across the globe?

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

You can twist it anyway you want. Frankly, I don't give a dung.

I believe in Freedom of speech, but I also believe in what is right and just! And provoking and starting unneccessary mess that causes Americans to lose their lives does not fit under what is right and just. You know it and I know it and so does everyone else, but you pretend not to know it to justify something that was wrong. They knew when they produced that film what it would cause. However, they had no real concern for any of the Americans or soldiers safety that are over there. All they were concerned about was a political agenda and peddling hate. Well, they've stirred up the conflict they looking for, but in the long run it's not going to turn out like they've pictured it in their little hateful sick minds.

feel the islamic love said...

"They love me. They really love me," is what Jay Carney heard Obama saying as the president stood in the bathroom looking into the mirror.

WH: Protests not directed at US...

'We're very proud of the president's record on foreign policy'...

FLASHBACK: The Day I'm Inaugurated Muslim Hostility Will Ease...

MOB AT US EMBASSY IN LONDON BURNS AMERICAN FLAG...

Protesters smash windows, set fires at embassy in Tunisia...

GUNFIRE HEARD AT EMBASSY IN SUDAN...

Report: German embassy in Sudan on fire...

Clashes intensify near US embassy in Cairo...

Embassies on high alert as protests spread...

MARINES CALLED IN...

Crowd in Lebanon torches KFC...

Hanif said...

GrannyStandingforTruth said...
I believe in Freedom of speech, but I also believe in what is right and just! And provoking and starting unneccessary mess that causes Americans to lose their lives does not fit under what is right and just.
------------

But Granny, even the Obama adminstration has dropped the ridiculous idea that these attacks were due to some amateur movie:

Senior officials are increasingly convinced, however, that the ferocious nature of the Benghazi attack, in which rocket-propelled grenades were used, indicated it was not the result of spontaneous anger due to the video, called Innocence of Muslims. Patrick Kennedy, Under-Secretary at the State Department, said he was convinced the assault was planned due to its extensive nature and the proliferation of weapons.
There is growing belief that the attack was in revenge for the killing in a drone strike in Pakistan of Mohammed Hassan Qaed, an al-Qa’ida operative who was, as his nom-de-guerre Abu Yahya al-Libi suggests, from Libya, and timed for the anniversary of the 11 September attacks.


You can't blame some nobody Coptic filmaker, or some small time pastor in Florida, or Mitt Romney's comment for this mess.

When will Obama stop the blame game and own up to his mistakes? I'm guessing never, it's just not in him.

Jules Winnfield said...

"Crowd in Lebanon torches KFC..."

Now they've gone over the line. You don't mess with the Colonel when a black man is in charge.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

Yeah, I heard that. Smh!

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/13/13842406-man-behind-anti-islam-film-reportedly-is-egyptian-born-ex-con?lite

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-19596026

http://abcnews.go.com/International/fbi-warns-violence-america-anti-islamic-movie/story?id=17223571

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/15/world/middleeast/anti-american-protests-over-film-enter-4th-day.html?pagewanted=all

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2012/09/14/egypt-president-protecting-embassies-an-islamic-duty/57780766/1

Anonymous said...

Granny, you are repeating yesterday's spin.

SMH.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2012/09/12/meet-steve-klein-the-hate-group-leader-who-consulted-on-the-innocence-of-muslims/

Daniel S. said...

@Granny:

This film was an obscure bit of nonsense that was purposefully sought out by radical Muslims to whip up anti-American sentiment.

The trailer for the "Innocence of Muslims" would have never seen the light of day in the West, it would have been lost among the flood of other silly and banal videos that populate sites like Youtube.

Of course, somehow, a radical Muslim cleric in Egypt with a satellite station acquired the clip, dubbed it over in Arabic, and aired it, claiming that the film was a product of the American government and part of a wider Jewish conspiracy against Islam. Of course, it fits into a wider pattern of obscure “anti-Islam” quotes or images by Westerners being used as a pretext by Muslims to riot and murder (think of the Danish cartoons, the Newsweek Koran flushing story, Pope Benedict’s negative characterization of Muhammad, and Terry Jones’ Koran burning). As such this is nothing new, or even note worthy on its own at this point.

The more important part of this event is that an American ambassador was so ruthlessly murdered by the same Muslim militants that the U.S. had overthrow Qaddafi to help bring into power.

Why do so few find it so troublesome that America is acting in Libya, Syria, and elsewhere to fund, arm, and empower the allies of the same men that attacked New York eleven years ago?

Is it not also a strange coincidence that the ambassador met his demise in a manner similar to that of the Libyan dictator he had helped dethrone?

St. Paul warned that whatever a man sows is what he will later reap. What has the Obama Administration sown in Libya and elsewhere in the Middle East?

anselm said...

The trailer for "Innocence of Muslims" might be bad, but a movie about the actual life of Muhammad would be violent porn.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2012/09/201291482159758224.html

Anonymous said...

The only reason Granny sticks to this silliness is to defend Obama, which she will do to the death out of a misguided sense of racial solidarity.

Whitey's Conspiracy said...

Nut Job the chickenhawk said.......

"To destroy the Iranian nuclear effort would take nothing more than a number of well aimed cruise missiles. No invasion is necessary."
------------

Pure fantasy. It would first take a sustained air superiority-supremacy campaign to knock out Iran's multiply redundant and partially mobile integrated air defense system with the most advanced Chinese copies of our own technology, and then a sustained target-servicing campaign to take out what we can of what we know of their nuclear effort, most of which are in hardened deeply underground complexes close to major population centers.

Then we have the other half of the equation: the Iranian reaction. Start with the Persian Gulf turning into a free fire and mined zone and the energy without which western life dies carried on shipping expensively escorted and insured, and the Hormuz Straits a gauntlet of torpedo boats and land based anti-shipping cruise missiles. A Hezbolla missile war on Tel Aviv and clandestine cel activations throughout the world. The long & painfully well known worldwide terrorist capabilities of the Iranian Pasdaren. A new sectarian bloodbath in Iraq, and the burning enmity of the entire Persian nation instead of unpopular and increasingly isolated and brittle regime stalwarts.

Even in a best case scenario, oil hits $400+ a barrel in days and the fragile Western economies go deeply into recession from the oilshock, terror plots that only a sovereign power could sponsor and control bring the war home in 9/11-7/7-Mumbai intensity, further shocking the economy, and we have yet another decade plus war to fight, weather we want to or not.

Laura said...

@Granny: I believe racial solidarity is neither good or bad. It depends on what is done with it. The fact is, racial solidarity exists and will always exist because people do share certain traits with members of their race. That doesn’t mean they share traits only with members of their race or that they must live all their lives in the company of their own race. Not at all. But there is a deeply-ingrained group connection.

Racial solidarity can be used for good or ill. Blacks have used it in recent years to destroy both themselves and whites. They have used it as a way of claiming moral superiority over whites and of avoiding their own fallibility. In doing so, they threaten our culture at large. To destroy the self-confidence of whites is to destroy the foundations of our society. But, whites are guilty in this area too as they have eagerly embraced suicidal thinking.

Whites are also guilty of grave wrongdoing toward blacks. They have abandoned the moral laws that hold family and society together. This has had much more dire consequences for blacks than it has had for whites. By refusing to recognize that there are differences between the races, whites have made things worse for blacks. The greatest thing whites could do for blacks (and for themselves) would be to reject sexual promiscuity, defend traditional marriage, abhor feminism and promote Christianity. I am not an Obama supporter obviously and believe he is actually anti-black.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

Why do you disrespect the President and the office of President and refer to President Obama as Obama? He is the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA whether you like it or not!!!!!!!!!!!

Stop with your foolishness! If it was about racial solidarity, I wouldn't have voted for the last WHITE Presidents before him or other white politicians, but I did. It has nothing to do with racial solidarity, only the rightwingers believe that race should be the deciding factor when voting because they're still stuck in a time before the Civil War and Jim Crow, but they can kiss my grits!

Matter of fact, I totally agreed with Eisenhower regarding Joe McCarthy's divisive idealogy and style of politics. McCarthy was a rotten apple in the barrel just like Gingrich and Bachmann and Palin. All full of divisive poison.

PilotX said...

WTF is Laura talking about? Blah people have destroyed ourselves? I must have missed that memo. Do your trolls ever have any clue about reality beyond their trailer parks and klan rallies? I'm getting depressed like your boy.

Ann said...

GrannyStandingforTruth said...
"I wouldn't have voted for the last WHITE Presidents before him or other white politicians, but I did."


I think the issue is that you shouldn't have voted at all, Granny. Not just you, but all women. It was granting suffrage to women that started the downward spiral of this country.

Women want someone or someTHING to take care of them. For this reason, women tend to lean socialist, and are generally in favor of the expansion of government when the government promises to “provide” for them.

This healthy feminine dynamic has been perverted by suffrage to systematically replace men with the government as the providers in society. A woman no longer has any need of a man. Marriage no longer serves any practical purpose. A woman can whore around and have as many fatherless children as she pleases, and Pimp Daddy Government will always be there to provide.

Men have learned well from this, too. Men can also slut it up to their heart’s content knowing that the government will take care of their “women” and raise their children for them. Fathering children no longer binds a man to a woman in any way.

Men didn’t vote to societally castrate themselves, and never would have. No – in order for this system to have come about, women’s suffrage was an absolute necessity. Women themselves voted the system into place which objectifies and devalues both them AND their children.

On the issue of disenfranchisement, I believe that the 19th amendment actually DISenfranchised more people than it enfranchised. Many, many married couples quickly found themselves voting against one another. The man would tend to vote for the more conservative platform, and the woman would vote for the more socialist platform. When this happened, the effective result was the nullification of BOTH individuals’ votes. What this did was massively reduce the voting influence of the married household, and magnify the voting influence of the unmarried – and the unmarried tend to be younger, and thus more stupid, and thus vote for big government. It was all part of the plan.

I’ve probably ticked you off with this comment. Here is the question I would ask you: Why? Why are you ticked off? As a woman, the reason you are ticked off is because you put yourself and your desire to assert your will above the well-being of society in general. I don’t feel that way. I would give up my vote in a HEARTBEAT if it meant that right-ordered marriage, family and sexuality was restored to our culture. I would rather that my little female namesakes grow up in a world where they did not have the right to vote, but were treated with dignity and respect, were addressed as “ma’am”, had doors held for them, and wherein men stood up when they entered the room. I would rather they be courted properly and then marry men who would never, ever leave them, and would consider it their sacred duty and honor to protect and provide for their wives and their children because he LOVED them. Oh, HELL yes. I’ll give up my vote in exchange for that any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Why wouldn’t you?

PilotX said...

Oh Jezus. Pretend women against women. Your trolls are nothing if not entertining. Christian taliban trying to take away womens' rights. Ha!

Laura said...

I am adamant that our first allegiance is to be to the people of God (no matter their color) before any allegiance to people of the same race. I believe that is what Scripture teaches. In addition, as I have seen this monolithic mentality (politically speaking) ravage our communities through the election of people who subsidize irresponsibility and anti-family pathologies, I have seen very little come from black solidarity since the grand days of the civil rights movement. This solidarity has degenerated to self-suicide for the black family.

PilotX said...

Granting women the right to vote started a "downward spiral" in this country? Only someone ignorant of history would make such a statement but it shows why fools like rawmoney are popular. They long for this mythical america when things were perfect. When the F wasn't this country not F'd up? Was it when slavery was allowed? When blah people were lynched for having the temerity to look a white person in the eye? Only a young foolish person believes the religious right myth that this was ever a great country.

Terry said...

@PilotX:

The writer "Ann" above has a point about familial disenfranchisement. I watched in 2008 as women I know personally ran to vote for Obama while their husbands voted for McCain. It was then that I started to re-evaluate my thoughts on the issue.

We can agree to disagree. I didn’t think the writer was saying that all single women are young, are mothers living off the system, or don’t know the power of a vote. For my part, I’d rather the vote be reserved for net taxpayers, business owners, property owners, those who are serving or have served in the military, and married or widowed heads of households. In other words, those with skin in the game regardless of gender. Singling out women as a group to bestow the vote on was an error in my opinion.

The Half Blood Prince said...

PilotX said...
"Only a young foolish person believes the religious right myth that this was ever a great country."
----------

There is PilotX, affirming the liberal credo that America has always been evil and thus must be destroyed. Furthermore, he insinuates the religious underpinnings of society are at the root of this evil.

Nothing could be more wrong-headed. But take heart, your side is winning. Our economy is in ruins, our cities crumbling, our families disintegrating, and blood runs in the streets. You're almost there PilotX, almost there.

Mustaf Herod Apyur Poupr said...

Anonymous GrannyStandingforTruth said...

Why do you disrespect the President and the office of President and refer to President Obama as Obama? He is the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA whether you like it or not!!!!!!!!!!!

Stop with your foolishness! If it was about racial solidarity, I wouldn't have voted for the last WHITE Presidents before him or other white politicians, but I did. It has nothing to do with racial solidarity, only the rightwingers believe that race should be the deciding factor when voting because they're still stuck in a time before the Civil War and Jim Crow, but they can kiss my grits!

Matter of fact, I totally agreed with Eisenhower regarding Joe McCarthy's divisive idealogy and style of politics. McCarthy was a rotten apple in the barrel just like Gingrich and Bachmann and Palin. All full of divisive poison.

Oh Granny McCarthy was proven right they were communists it is destroying the country and he is the destroyer. I hope you don't go out and kill anyone now, you seem awfully angry.

Yes you are full of divisive poison. Murderous Muslims killed Americans because this is what they believe brings them closer to their god Allah/Mohammed who is one and the same as this is what he preached, wrote in the Koran and that they still follow. The men you are defending didnt just kill the Ambasador they raped him, they invaded him anally because they were taught this is holy, you defile your enemy, relieve your animal urges and then kill him and you will be blessed by Allah.

This is who YOU are defending against America. You have not one thing to say about the murderers.

McCarthy was right. Again and again the Left and Muslims are one and the same - you both Hate America, Americas standards Ideals and morality.

Enjoy Hell and your Muslim morals.

PilotX said...

How about atheists the Laura? If we choose not to pledge allegiance to your choice of deity where do we align ourselves?

Anonymous said...

Why do you disrespect the President and the office of President and refer to President Obama as Obama? He is the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA whether you like it or not!!!!!!!!!!!


Someone is just looking for distractions.

Like you always called every president by their title and name and always say President Obama and never just Obama.

Stop your foolishness and pettiness.

Anonymous said...

Blogger Whitey's Conspiracy said...

Nut Job the chickenhawk said.......

"To destroy the Iranian nuclear effort would take nothing more than a number of well aimed cruise missiles. No invasion is necessary."
------------

Pure fantasy. It would first take a sustained air superiority-supremacy campaign to knock out Iran's multiply redundant and partially mobile integrated air defense system with the most advanced Chinese copies of our own technology, and then a sustained target-servicing campaign to take out what we can of what we know of their nuclear effort, most of which are in hardened deeply underground complexes close to major population centers.

Then we have the other half of the equation: the Iranian reaction. Start with the Persian Gulf turning into a free fire and mined zone and the energy without which western life dies carried on shipping expensively escorted and insured, and the Hormuz Straits a gauntlet of torpedo boats and land based anti-shipping cruise missiles. A Hezbolla missile war on Tel Aviv and clandestine cel activations throughout the world. The long & painfully well known worldwide terrorist capabilities of the Iranian Pasdaren. A new sectarian bloodbath in Iraq, and the burning enmity of the entire Persian nation instead of unpopular and increasingly isolated and brittle regime stalwarts.

Even in a best case scenario, oil hits $400+ a barrel in days and the fragile Western economies go deeply into recession from the oilshock, terror plots that only a sovereign power could sponsor and control bring the war home in 9/11-7/7-Mumbai intensity, further shocking the economy, and we have yet another decade plus war to fight, weather we want to or not.

Oh we gots one of them know it all do nothings.

So whats the solution? You know what can't be done, what can be done? How high do you think Oil will go when Iran announces it has the bomb and......

PilotX said...

Yeah Terry, restricting the right to vote worked so well in the past. Let me guess, you're included in the group you suggest should be the only people to vote.

Anonymous said...

And the beat goes on.


Ratings firm Egan-Jones cut its credit rating on the U.S. government to "AA-" from "AA," citing its opinion that quantitative easing from the Federal Reserve would hurt the U.S. economy and the country's credit quality.

Getty Images
The Fed on Thursday said it would pump $40 billion into the U.S. economy each month until it saw a sustained upturn in the weak jobs market. (Read more: Fed's 'QE Infinity' — Four Things That Could Go Wrong)

In its downgrade, the firm said that issuing more currency and depressing interest rates through purchasing mortgage-backed securities does little to raise the U.S.'s real gross domestic product, but reduces the value of the dollar.

PilotX said...

Can you build a bigger strawman Half wit Prince? I did not insinuate anything. You're the one making this about religion I simply stated the fact that this country, like all others, isn't perfect. If you wanna play holy roller and pretend America was some sort of garden of eden before the evil liberals took over go right ahead but you only look foolish and hyperbolic.

@Terry, yeah restricting the right to vote worked so well in the past. Let me guess, you're in the group you say should get to vote.

Anonymous said...

Blogger PilotX said...

How about atheists the Laura? If we choose not to pledge allegiance to your choice of deity where do we align ourselves?


Align to your country - oh wait you don't like that either, seems like you have a huge void that you filled with hate.

Laura said...

All people are worthy of Grace. Atheists are people of God too, they just don't know it.

PilotX said...

Tell you what Half Wit, why don't you tell us when this country was so great. Name the years.

Half Blood Prince said...

PilotX said...
Can you build a bigger strawman Half wit Prince? I did not insinuate anything. You're the one making this about religion I simply stated the fact that this country, like all others, isn't perfect
-------------

No, actually you said: "Only a young foolish person believes the religious right myth that this was ever a great country."

If it is not, nor ever was a great country, you are obviously calling for it to be replaced with something else. A few more years of liberal ascendancy, and it will be. I'll expect you'll be surprised about how "great" is then.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

ROFL!

Field, I swear your trolls have more personalities than Sybil. Wait do you think Sybil is really the one posting? Now, they’ve switched from being a male to being a woman.

Jesus, it is hilarious how they think that they can pull the wool over folk's eye with their BS.

Ann and Laura , you are truly hanging in the wrong circles. In person, I'm still referred to as Ma'am by males and they open doors for me, carry my bags, and I'm treated with the utmost respect. My husband was loving, caring and showed me the utmost respect when he was living.

The only ones that have disrespected me or called me out my names have been those men on the right, but then they don't show respect for any of our ordinary citizens. Trust me you have convinced me and made a believer out of me about one thing today and that is that men on the right do treat their women like stepford wives.

BTW, Ann why are you participating in a conversation regarding government since you're so willing to give up your right to vote. Look like you would be chained to the stove and be ready to jump at hubby's command, instead of wasting your time in something that is of no importance to you. Me, myself and I am going to continue to fight for right to vote. Why do people who claim to to hate big government insist on running for government offices?

PilotX said...

Ok Laura, I'm given "grace" by your god. Which god is this? Allah? Yahweh? Oleru? Wanken Tanka? Zeus? So many gods so lttle time to choose.
Funny Field how now your trolls are suddenly holy rollers when something happens in Western Asia. Just a few days ago they were all deficit hawks worried about the economy. They take their gop marching orders and talking points seriously.

Jennifer said...

I thought I was the only woman who supported the repeal of the 19th Amendment (and maybe I still am) but it’s nice to see that I’m not the only one who sees the consequence of giving women the right to vote.

Ann: Well said.

PilotX said...

Because Granny conservatives are the biggest hypocrites on earth. Ann probably spouts off about freedom and then in the same breath talks about limiting voting rights. Typical authoritian conservatives, they need someone or something to tell them what to do.

Heather said...

1. Feminism, and “the right to vote”, didn’t cause the problem It has simply enabled US citizens to unrepentantly indulge in the types of sinful behavior toward which there is already an inclination. The depravity of the human heart is allowed free reign when there is no internal guide or externally enforced consequences for wrongdoing, and our current laws reflect such ugliness.

2.It is disgusting that our govt rewards couples for having children out of wedlock.

3. My Aussie SIL gave me a talking -to about the American attitude regarding “the right to vote” and the poor rate of turnout. She informed me that where she comes from, it is neither viewed as a right nor a privilege, but a responsibility of citizens to be informed and active. While I appreciate the realization of the serious nature of the citizens duty, I suppose her view comes with its own set of difficulties.

4. A friend of mine believes the woman’s right to vote was a bad plan. But, she says that since we’ve been given this ability, she uses hers to reinforce her husbands choice. I tend to agree with her (and your) perspective on that.

5. IMO, Ann's closing statement is brilliant.

Women don’t need to vote in order to revolutionize the consistency of our society. We need to re-discover what it means to be women.

Anonymous said...

PilotX said...

Ok Laura, I'm given "grace" by your god. Which god is this? Allah? Yahweh? Oleru? Wanken Tanka? Zeus? So many gods so lttle time to choose.
Funny Field how now your trolls are suddenly holy rollers when something happens in Western Asia. Just a few days ago they were all deficit hawks worried about the economy. They take their gop marching orders and talking points seriously.


Why Allah of course given your alignment with Muslims.

You seem shocked that there are intelligent people who know about finances and believe in God. Do you think just because you are empty void and vapid that everyone else must be also?

PilotX said...

Granny, I see this is a game for some bored trailer park teenaged boy.

Anonymous said...

PilotX said...

Because Granny conservatives are the biggest hypocrites on earth. Ann probably spouts off about freedom and then in the same breath talks about limiting voting rights. Typical authoritian conservatives, they need someone or something to tell them what to do.

Oh my GOD this has to be the most classic case of liberal protectionism I have ever seen. You are the one who needs government to tell you what to eat, drink breath, spend, borrow, like dislike. You are the one who needs government to protect you.

You are the one who has replace all values/morals and beliefs with Daddy government. You, no one else. And it is spelled authoritarian X-man, at least try to live up to your self proclaimed intelligence level. Even if you can't fool anyone at least try.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

Let's see has Pilot X, Whitey, Field, Shabazz, or any other Black males on the left disrespected me? NOPE! Have any of those on the RIGHT disrespected me and called me out my name. Hell YES! All the time!

Yep, Ann and Laura you've been hanging around the wrong men. Girls, you need to get you a black or white male on the left that will treat you like a woman should be treated. I'm just saying! It must be awful being treated like an object of no value.

PilotX said...

I'm only shocked you consider yourself intelligent there anon.

Blount said...

With our embassies going up in smoke all over the Muslim world thanks to their groveling policies, you’ve got to wonder just how useless our “leaders” are. Here is the answer, compliments of White House Press Secretary Jay Carney:

“We also need to understand that this is a fairly volatile situation and it is in response not to United States policy, and not to, obviously, the administration, or the American people, but it is in response to a video, a film that we have judged to be reprehensible and disgusting.”

That is, the official administration stand is to pretend that our embassies burning and our ambassadors being murdered are not directed at the USA. Obama et al. take zero responsibility for the crisis, and rather than trying to do something about it, are openly siding with the Islamic mobs by denouncing the movie transparently being used by Muslims and their liberal media allies as a flimsy pretext for the anti-American violence.

Nothing could be worthy of more profound contempt than the mentality that put people like Obama in charge of our country.

Blount said...

Rather than explain why the so-called “President” has been fundraising in Las Vegas rather than attempting to deal with this crisis, White House spokesturd Jay Carney regurgitates enemy propaganda by blaming it on a movie.

Surely the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, sitting atop the entire US Armed Forces, is addressing the threat. But no; Martin Dempsey is a political figure who sides with Carney in pretending that the enemy is not hordes of maniacal Muslims hell-bent on the eradication of Western Civilization but some obscure film:

General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, called a Florida pastor on Wednesday and asked him to withdraw his support for a film whose portrayal of the Prophet Mohammad has been linked to violent protests — including one that ended with the death of America’s envoy to Libya.

Having identified the threat to American security, the Obama Regime has asked YouTube to remove the video, in an obvious violation of the liberties our government exists only to secure, and in an equally obvious attempt to placate Muslims by acceding to their demands — that is, to reward them for burning our embassies and killing our citizens. Our dhimmi rulers have even released the identity of the filmmaker, facilitating the inevitable Muslim attempts on his life, and sicced the FBI on him.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

Look at them, they're so desperate that they're answering their own silly posts in which they've changed their names to pretend that it is more than one person speaking. Just think they're pretending to be women now and the role they're playing is called drag queens. Drag Queens across America should protest because the right has insulted them.

PilotX said...

Well Granny, conservative women need AUTHORIATARIAN males who use spellcheck to tell them what to do. They also need an invisible daddy in the sky to inform them of their morals obviously because they can't figure it out on their own.

Anonymous said...

@ PilotX: you don't need anyone to help you sound like a moron, you do just fine by yourself. But Granny sure helps.

muhammad was a pedophile said...

whitey, fearful of all that's Islamic:

It would first take a sustained air superiority-supremacy campaign to knock out Iran's....

Nope. You'll believe anything those clowns say.

They've got an unreliable pile of rockets that won't hit much of anything. They'll fire them off, missing wildly and more likely than not, kill their own citizens in sizable numbers.

...and then a sustained target-servicing campaign to take out what we can of what we know of their nuclear effort, most of which are in hardened deeply underground complexes close to major population centers.

Once again, you'll believe anything. Their atomic pile is a Potemkin Village, run by their own Wizard of Oz.

Then we have the other half of the equation: the Iranian reaction.

Whoa now. Yeah, that'll be scary.

Start with the Persian Gulf turning into a free fire and mined zone...

The Iranian "navy" would find itself sunk in an hour.

...and the energy without which western life dies carried on shipping expensively escorted and insured...

Very little oil from the Persian Gulf flows to the US. Meanwhile, it's the THREAT of War that makes the price jump. Actual war makes it drop.

When the US prepared to kick Saddam's ass in 1990-91, the price of oil rose to a near record high.

As soon as our attack began, the price of oil crashed. DOWN.

Why? Because everyone in the world knows the US military can wipe the floor with any so-called military pretending to defend these pathetic Islamic nations.


...and the Hormuz Straits a gauntlet of torpedo boats and land based anti-shipping cruise missiles....

Wrong again.

...A Hezbolla missile war on Tel Aviv and clandestine cel activations throughout the world.

And Israel jumps on, continuing the merciless pummelling of these hapless Iranian fools.

The long & painfully well known worldwide terrorist capabilities of the Iranian Pasdaren.

Doesn't matter when the home office has been reduced to dust.

A new sectarian bloodbath in Iraq, and the burning enmity of the entire Persian nation instead of unpopular and increasingly isolated and brittle regime stalwarts.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Have you got your white flag in your pocket? Get over there and surrender.

Even in a best case scenario, oil hits $400+ a barrel in days...

It won't, but if it did, then oil would match the price of solar energy, which would please the hell out of Obama.

...and the fragile Western economies go deeply into recession from the oilshock...

Nope. The Iranians would cave in a day or two, and in no time, global production would adjust.

...terror plots that only a sovereign power could sponsor and control bring the war home in 9/11-7/7-Mumbai intensity,...

Only in your imagination.



field negro said...

Right about now folks who don't believe in those Gods are looking pretty good.

Evil Muslims on one side, and Christian fanatics on the other.

Romney, like W before him, wants to rid the world of those evil doing Mooolslems. Onward wingnut soldiers.

field negro said...

Oh boy, right on cue here comes Slappy. I think a Muslim stole his girl back in the day.

Just checking said...

"Romney, like W before him, wants to rid the world of those evil doing Mooolslems"

Really? When did he say that?

Mac said...

If W wanted to eid the world of Moslems, he wouldn't have got us stuck in Iraq and Afghanistan, rebuilding the place and trying to establish 'democracy'. He just would have levelled both countries and left.

Which is what we should have done.

Mac said...

"rid"

PilotX said...

I had a good laugh listening to Paul Ryan's speech today. He was upset unelected judges get to decide what a woman does with her body, he and the crowd think that decision is best left to elected officials. These fools are unbelievable.

field negro said...

Hey Laura, do u think that God made those black folks because she wanted to f*** with people like u? Or did she just want to try out some new crayons that day?

PilotX said...

No Field, Laura's god was too busy creating the world in six days and causing global floods. Go to the creation museum, or should I say the conservative museum of natural history, to learn how humans and dinosaurs walked the earth at the same time.

PilotX said...

Then again Romney's god Mormo created blah people to serve as slaves on the planet Kolob. Well at least until 1976. I guess he saw "car wash" and decided we were cool afterall. Since then we too can wear magic underwear.

Anonymous said...

PilotX said...

I'm only shocked you consider yourself intelligent there anon.

Is there someone posting here called "thereanon"? Sounds like one of the gods you referenced earlier.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous GrannyStandingforTruth said...

Look at them, they're so desperate that they're answering their own silly posts in which they've changed their names to pretend that it is more than one person speaking. Just think they're pretending to be women now and the role they're playing is called drag queens. Drag Queens across America should protest because the right has insulted them.

Typical empty headed liberal, nothing else to say it must be just a couple people, because surely there aren't that many who I cannot have a cogent response to...oh yeah there are.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

Field, Yep! It never ceases to amaze me the lengths that they will go to keep on proving to us and the world just how hypocritical, hateful and a messy bunch of deceivers they are who can't and don't know how to get along with anyone on this planet except greedy rich men. They would go to war with Mother Teresa if they thought it would help them win the election and make a profit. The warmonger right would rather go to war than try to find a peaceable solution first or be diplomatic. Our soldiers are dispensable pawns to them in their sick war games.

PilotX said...

Well Granny, at least were smart enough to not vote republican.

antijesus said...

PilotX mocks people's expressions of faith and love.

Cool.

Carney said...

GrannyStandingforTruth said...
Our soldiers are dispensable pawns to them in their sick war games.
-----------

I think you meant to say our "ambassadors".

Anonymous said...

PilotX said...

Well Granny, conservative women need AUTHORIATARIAN males who use spellcheck to tell them what to do. They also need an invisible daddy in the sky to inform them of their morals obviously because they can't figure it out on their own.

Of course that's it Pilot. Because you being a dumbass and quasi literate can't imagine anyone who can actually spell without using a program and somehow equate women to your lack of spelling. Interesting so you think you turned gay because you don't have the intellect to spell?

Why don't you just stick with words that are simple and concepts you can actually understand so you don't keep making an idiot out of yourself. In example you could have said instead of authoritarian something like; you the boss, I'm the hoss. Those words I am sure you can spell. And of course you know it's not spelled the way you pronounce it "Ebonics-ally" as you have done here right? It's authoritarian - save this for future reference if you need to remember how to spell the word.

Black Hole said...

Obama is a mulatto, this make him a better president.

Anonymous said...

field negro said...

Right about now folks who don't believe in those Gods are looking pretty good.

Evil Muslims on one side, and Christian fanatics on the other.

Romney, like W before him, wants to rid the world of those evil doing Mooolslems. Onward wingnut soldiers.

Christian fanatics? Where are they?

Lets not forget people like you who think standing for nothing allows you to somehow be something. Nope, nothing is nothing. Except that you always as in this case here side with evil. It doesn't matter how evil or why, as long as it is Anti American.

Who is attacking people and burning down buildings? Who raped and anally violated a man before killing him? Who Field who? You justify that behavior? You excuse it? You condone it and attack Christians instead?

Yes, you do. OK, well everyone has to pick their morals and a side.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous GrannyStandingforTruth said...

Field, Yep! It never ceases to amaze me the lengths that they will go to keep on proving to us and the world just how hypocritical, hateful and a messy bunch of deceivers they are who can't and don't know how to get along with anyone on this planet except greedy rich men. They would go to war with Mother Teresa if they thought it would help them win the election and make a profit. The warmonger right would rather go to war than try to find a peaceable solution first or be diplomatic. Our soldiers are dispensable pawns to them in their sick war games.

Seems to me you were the one who came out attacking conservatives having somehow made the connection with your feebled logic that conservative not liking Muslims raping and killing Americans and standing up for free speech is bad.

You are insane. I mean that literally. You excuse horrific savage uncivilized barbarism and attack those with beliefs that provide a safe country for you to live in.

You need to go to Yemen and live with the people you admire and defend. Or Somalia, you take your pick but your morals fit right in with the ones they have.

pat said...

Speaking of Muslim riots. Why are we so concerned? If we just evacuated all the Americans they would just have themselves to annoy. They would just have their own property to burn.

This is the strategy adopted by white America toward our black rioters. Every central city that had serious black riots ended with white flight from the area and the remaining blacks living in a waste land of their own making.

Anonymous said...

Granny, here are your friends. They are so sorry and love you.


(NEWSER) – The US embassy in Cairo caught the ruling Muslim Brotherhood being two-faced as the protests were under way earlier this week, reports the Hill. The Egypt group’s Arabic feed praised the protests, while its American feed expressed support for American staffers:

Brotherhood’s tweet in Arabic: “Egyptians rise to defend the prophet.”

Brotherhood’s tweet in English: “We r relieved none of @USEmbassyCairo staff were harmed & hope US-Eg relations will sustain turbulence of Tuesday’s events”

US response to the latter: “Thanks. By the way, have you checked out your own Arabic feeds? I hope you know we read those too.”

The US embassy feed is run by Larry Schwartz, the senior policy officer responsible for the controversial American statement released just after the protests started.

jody said...

Hey Field:

how come Obama is off-limits to being made fun of? poking fun at presidents has always been a staple of SNL, late night talk shows and comedians everywhere. 15 years ago, some of the clinton jokes were hilarious. not a single real obama joke has been attempted ever.

it's notjust SNL. it's every major show, every major comedian in america.

obama was declared off limits in early 2008. american comedians on network television absolutely, positively will not make fun of him, ever, under any circumstances whatsoever. there's never been a more glaring unspoken agreement among ALL of them.

wtf?

Anonymous said...

@jody:

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

--Voltaire

Barry said...

This Middle East mess points to sheer incompetence. I mean, come on--no added protection for consulates and embassies on 9/11?

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

@Pilot, I agree with everything you've posted.


The right hates common ordinary Americans. I'd rather ignore comments by people who switch names like they drink water. Those type of folks seem, well, mentally unbalance, racist, and angry all the time. As a matter of fact, I have been ignoring them and scrolling pass their comments.

That's why I'm voting for President Obama/Vice President Biden 2012!

I sure hope the moderators ask Mitt when they have the debates why he erased those harddrives on computers that were the State of Massachuett's government property. And why those harddrives and computers were sold ONLY to his staff. I'm curious. Like Keith Sweat said, "Something, something ain't right!"

The Right said...

GrannyStandingforTruth said...
The right hates common ordinary Americans
---------

Ridiculous.

Only a fool would say such a thing.

No wonder you are voting for Obama.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

Can we trust Mitt not to erase the White House computer harddrives too?

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

I'm voting to re-elect President Obama and Vice President Biden. The best choice for those offices, they don't erase government harddrives.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

I'm voting to re-elect President Obama and Vice President Biden because they don't disrespect Seniors, women, workers, and are not gender and ethnic bias; they're not obstructionist or racist nor do they have an anger or SYBIL personality problem. I like my leaders to be cool headed and think things through rather shoot before they aim.

Anonymous said...

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

I'm voting to re-elect President Obama and Vice President Biden because they don't disrespect Seniors,

They say nice words and steal medicare money so it will go bankrupt in 8 years. But don't worry they just won't pay anyone, that will help you.

women - making women look like grabby, selfish sluts who want nothing but the rest of the country to pay for condoms and birth control pills is sure to help them a lot.

workers - Yes making the debt increase food, gas and everything increase in price so the workers can pay for 49% of the rest of the country is so nice of them.

and are not gender and ethnic bias; - Nonsense. They are the worst - they live on gender and ethnic bias otherwise they would have to talk about everyone of their failed policies. Including how every democrat led city is a hellhole and bankrupt.

they're not obstructionist or racist - they are the worst racists we have ever had in office. The worst - everything is about race, nothing is about issues or policies. Even after seeing how his policies have destroyed the economy he refuses to ask the democratic senate to pass any of the 56 bills just sitting there that would help that were already passed by congress. Perhaps you are confused, spending more money and throwing it away helps no one, no one in the long run.

do they have an anger or SYBIL personality problem. I like my leaders to be cool headed and think things through rather shoot before they aim. Yeah ok carter talking points, why has obama had to walk back nearly everything he has done? Because he can't think it through, he lies and blusters.
Speaking the truth finally isn't getting angry, it's speaking the truth.


Now who are democrats? The party of race first, country last. The party of Hell No thrice to go. The party of screw you, give me mines.

People like you who when Americans are brutally murdered you side with the murderers and say, if only you didn't anger them or do anything they didn't like.


Well
"Americans should not be surprised that a culture that embraces such atrocities as child rape, homosexual hanging, and the persecution of religious minorities would resort to the murder of Americans over an “offensive” internet video. Islamists embrace a barbaric ideology; they act accordingly."

and Americans should never be surprised that leftists like you align with them over America. You always do.

Anonymous said...

Granny can you comment on this intelligently without adding in politics or racial excuses?


Below the fold is a NSFW image. It is obscenely offensive. It was posted by The Onion in one of the most brilliant satirical statements about the cultural difference between the Muslim world and everyone else I’ve ever seen. As The Onion writes:

The image of the Hebrew prophet Moses high-fiving Jesus Christ as both are having their erect penises vigorously masturbated by Ganesha, all while the Hindu deity anally penetrates Buddha with his fist, reportedly went online at 6:45 p.m. EDT, after which not a single bomb threat was made against the organization responsible, nor did the person who created the cartoon go home fearing for his life in any way. Though some members of the Jewish, Christian, Hindu, and Buddhist faiths were reportedly offended by the image, sources confirmed that upon seeing it, they simply shook their heads, rolled their eyes, and continued on with their day.

The FBI will not launch an investigation to find out the identity of the artist involved. The offices of The Onion will not be besieged by angry Christians, demanding death to the editors. No heads will be cut off. No Internet-wide debate will be sparked on whether or not this image should be reproduced. No calls for the arrest and imprisonment of the author will be made.

But, if you were to add a bearded fellow with a turban into this depraved scene, we all know the response would be far different.

So, you can take your multicultural "no culture is better than any other" nonsense and stick it where the sun don’t shine.

http://www.qando.net/?p=13835

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

"women - making women look like grabby, selfish sluts who want nothing but the rest of the country to pay for condoms and birth control pills is sure to help them a lot." ~~anonymous~~

"It was granting suffrage to women that started the downward spiral of this country." ~~Anonymous alias Ann~~

"A woman can whore around and have as many fatherless children as she pleases, and Pimp Daddy Government will always be there to provide."
~~Anonymous alias Ann~~

"Women themselves voted the system into place which objectifies and devalues both them AND their children."~~Anonymous alias Ann~~

Another reason I would never vote for a Republican. Their opinion of women is degrading, denigrating, disgusting; and just down right repugnant, gutter low. I guess, their preference for being undercover pedophiles has a lot to do with it.

GrannyStandingforTruth said...

"We need to re-discover what it means to be women."

Oh my, this is more serious than I thought at first. The Republican's women do not know what it's like to be women? Sad! You best come on over to the Democrat's side because their women know what it's like to be women and they love the freedom in being women and not having to be programmed robotic servants.

Democrat men value and are proud of the fact that their women are qualified able to think for themselves. Because Democrat men are not insecure in who they are. Democrat women do not have to act like plastic in public or look like an arm piece. Their men are not insulting them on the airwaves and calling them ho's and blaming them for their mistakes either.

derek said...

Wait...hold up.

Romney could make him 4 heartbeats away from the PRESIDENCY?

No, just...no.