Tuesday, July 29, 2014

NRA issues, and the rise of the machines.

I knew that it would be just a matter of time before something like this happened.


"A leading neuroscientist was busted for allegedly pointing an assault rifle at two women in an Arizona airport while on a coffee run.


Peter Nathan Steinmetz, of Tempe, did not think he did anything wrong when he brought the AR-15 to Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, according to local media.


The brain scientist for the Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix reportedly had the gun slung over his shoulder while ordering the cup of Joe, which did not cause a problem.


The trouble began after he removed the gun and inadvertently pointed the muzzle at a mother and her 17-year-old daughter, reported the Phoenix News Times.


Phoenix police took issue with "the way he was carrying it," police Sgt. Steve Martos told the paper.


"(B)oth stated they felt in fear of their safety when the rifle was pointed in their direction," the booking sheet said.


Steinmetz was arrested and booked into Maricopa County jail on one count of disorderly conduct with a weapon. [Source]


The guy is a neuroscientist for crying out loud! He is high up on the intelligence chain when it comes to gun owners and he does some dumb crap like this. Typical.


Speaking of the NRA, Mother Jones published a fascinating article about one of their (The NRA's) most influential lawyers and the fact that he just might have gotten away with murder when he was a youngster.


The weapon used in the alleged murder? Why a gun of course.


Finally, I think our friend Bill O'Reilly has finally jumped the shark.


Here is why: Bill believes that President Obama won two national elections because of the machines. No, not the voting machines, the machines, period.


“The voters go and they swallow all of this BS… As far as this country and how it runs, the reason Barack Obama is president for two terms is because of the machines. The machines have portrayed him in a way that isn’t true.”


Ahhm....ahhhm....I am speechless.


If only those ATM machines and lawnmowers had voted for Mitt Romney. Maybe for the next presidential election we can have an independent machine moderate the debates.


The irony is, of course, that Mr. O'Reilly is on one of those machines every night spreading this kind of crap.


Hopefully it will be over soon, us real people can only take so much.





















49 comments:

Anonymous said...

First of all, the guy in the pic has a stocked AK 7.62 variant and not an AR. Do you think that you could get the proper weapon displayed? Get it right field.

QLB

señor kinky said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
señor kinky said...

Getting it right in the fields doesn't matter. Spreading bullshit is what helps the fields grow.

Lilacpr2000 said...

Field said...
If only those ATM machines and lawnmowers...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ahahahaha! Entire post gave me a good and sorely needed laugh! xD

They really have to s*** or get off the pot! Because if there is a open carry there, then he wasn't breaking any laws!

Also the golden rule rule for gun owners is you never point at anything unless you're going to shoot it. So I'm thinking he might have been carrying out a crazy experiment of some kind??? dunno o-O

I do know He's screwed if prosecutor Juan 'Pitbull' Martinez gets his case :D









PilotX said...

And how about the 11th circuit court (I think) that overruled a lower court ruling that allowed doctors to ask if their patients owned guns. By a 2-1 ruling they said it was ok for florida to jail doctors if they simply asked about gun ownership. Guess what party the 2 represented. The NRA owns America.

Anonymous said...

What a load of crap Pilot. Is he/she going to waste my time asking about if I have a pool, a car or a ladder? Here's the real rub. Democrats and Blacks just can't handle firearms.

QLB

señor kinky said...

Was anyone shot? Was anyone killed?

NO!

Field, and many on the left were hoping this guy would have shot and killed these two women.

Better luck next tine!


Anonymous said...

According to Field's logic, the firearm, in the hands of a brother, would force said individual to wear his pants down to his ankles right before he committed a drive by and other criminal behavior. Why is that Blacks and firearms don't mix besides the usual lack of impulse control and future time orientation?

QLB

Anonymous said...

Field, you get weaker by the day. When you try to criticize the esteemed Bill O'Reilly you are quite desperate and reaching for straws.

Mr O'Reilly is rarely wrong. But you are quite wrong most of the time. Regardless, FN is entertaining and requires no brains to comment.

However, The Factor led by O'Reilly requires thinking people with degrees.

Wesley R said...

Check out o'reillysucks.com . It gives daily facts and updates on Bill O The Clown.

StillaPanther2 said...

Thanks for your comment, Of course your commenting "requires no brains. Thanks for the self confession 10:21 PM. I rarely try to insult/correct- seeing I really don't know the originator; you left that statement dangling.

StillaPanther2 said...

"requires no brains". You must be new to this site or your bias has taken control of your fingers.

señor kinky said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
señor kinky said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
señor kinky said...

LOL@ o'reillysucks.com.

What is that? The fifth hate Bill O' site?

Wesley, why not watch Bill O' and form your own opinion?

Why does the left need people to tell them what to think about Fox News?

Can't leftwingers think on their own?

Anonymous said...

Brother Wesley R, and StillaPanther2, let me try to encourage you to 'reconsider' your mental stance and prejudice against Mr Bill O'Reilly.

This 1 minute video I am sure will open your minds and give you new vision. You can thank me later.

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/index.html#/v/3703668057001

Anonymous said...

Mr Field, John Wiley is innocent.

Shabazz said...

This loon @11:16pm actually linked a faux news article??? What sane individual do you think is going to take you seriously?

-and they don't call that pale pig o'lielly for nothing...

Btw- i clicked on the link you provided out of curiosity, and I had to fight to control my laughter because my wife is sleeping.Insightfulness is definitely not your golden boy's strong point. If you follow the ramblings of this guy, you reilly(really)should commit yourself asap before it's too late. I hear a frontal lobotomy and electroshock therapy works wonders. Is being a sociopath one of the requirements to become a conservative, tea bagger or reich winger?

Anonymous said...

I'm still reeling at the stupidity of taking an assault rifle to the airport. I can't think of a more security-obsessed location, which means this little stunt is quite likely to provoke some nervous policeman into shooting the rifle's owner for no reason. Open carry at an airport is so foolish, it makes open carry at Starbucks or Target look like an absolutely brilliant idea.

When such a shooting happens, I won't feel remotely bad about it. That firearm fetishist can enjoy his 2nd Amendment rights from a refrigerated drawer in the morgue. Darwin Award.

"If only those ATM machines and lawnmowers had voted for Mitt Romney. Maybe for the next presidential election we can have an independent machine moderate the debates."

Hey, everyone was already convinced Romney was a badly programmed android. (*Bleep boop* 47% of Americans are bums ... *Bleep boop* Corporations are people ...)

If toasters could've cast a vote for one of their fellow mechanical brethren, maybe he'd have had a shot at winning.

Anonymous said...

I'd rather vote for a toaster than mitt romney

Anonymous said...

There is no doubt im my mind that Romney would have been a better President than Obama.

There is no doubt in my mind that if he should run again, he'll win...UNLESS Warren decides to run.

Nobody will beat Warren IF she runs.

Anonymous said...

Shabazz said, "Btw- i clicked on the link you provided out of curiosity, and I had to fight to control my laughter because my wife is sleeping.Insightfulness is definitely not your golden boy's strong point. If you follow the ramblings of this guy, you reilly(really)should commit yourself asap before it's too late. I hear a frontal lobotomy and electroshock therapy works wonders. Is being a sociopath one of the requirements to become a conservative, tea bagger or reich winger?"

Obviously, you missed Mr O'Reilly's point: don't be a zealot, or drink Obama koolaid. And by all means don't be a pinhead.

Your comment indicated that you are all three. It's a damn shame that some of you black lefties can't hear anything constructive because of your bigotry.

You can't get to heaven as a racist.

Anonymous said...

There are now women conducting "tits-out" protests against the open-carry activists.

Sure, why not fight stupid with more stupid? The whole open-carry movement is completely moronic, so why not turn it into an even bigger circus?

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/07/28/watch-texas-open-carry-advocates-fume-after-skanky-topless-libtards-disrupt-pro-gun-rally/

I will heartily support this cause on its own merits, and also because I might get to see more boobs. Which is never a bad thing.

focusedpurpose said...

if only disarming americans wasn't proving so difficult...

though folk won't really need to fire off a shot.

it will be like Blessed Blacks in this nation getting something like human rights.

most won't tell it, but folk were armed. they just weren't going around shooting folk.

there is a machine. it determines quite a bit about what folk will get to see or not see 'bout most anything.

so it is not that fantastic of a notion to say that the machine determines which political puppet gets selected.

folk should've heard and heard about this;

http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/law-enforcement-corruption--abuse-1/child-sex-ring-run-by-republicans.html

but we didn't.

before folk start with the left right silliness...

there's corruption all the way around. 'ole HRC's name is popping up with MK presidential model sex slaves. there is corruption on both sides. well paid political puppets ride what's known as the freedom train.

which is why i am thankful for the Promise:

http://focusedpurpose.blogspot.com/2014/07/his-promise.html

blessings all!

focusedpurpose said...

http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/spin-1/the-growing-web-troll-industry.html

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

I'd rather vote for a toaster than mitt romney


You did. Obama is nothing but a pop tart.

field negro said...

Wingnut logic at work. FYI, a toaster and a pop tart are two different things.

You must watch a lot of O'Reilly.

Did anyone read the Mother Jones article about the NRA lawyer? Please follow the link.

Shabazz said...

Anon. 12:52am- "Obviously, you missed Mr O'Reilly's point: don't be a zealot, or drink Obama koolaid. And by all means don't be a pinhead. "

I didn't vote for Obama. (I didn't vote for anyone due to good 'ole disenfranchisement)I would have voted for him though over mittens because he's democrat. Hell, I'd vote for a goldfish as long as he wasn't replublikkkan. Why would I vote myself back into slavery?

"Your comment indicated that you are all three. It's a damn shame that some of you black lefties can't hear anything constructive because of your bigotry."

I don't support political parties asshat, however I do know a vote for a rethug is a vote for slavery.

"You can't get to heaven as a racist." (says the resident racist)

I didn't plan on my body floating away into the clouds. If you and your ilk are gonna be there, I'd rather stay where I'm at, thanks anyway.





Anonymous said...

"Real people" what a hoot!

Bill said...


I see FN is still whining about white people with guns.

How many black kids died because of being shot by other black kids?

FN sure has a funny way of protecting black children from guns by ignoring that problem and only whining about white people with guns.



Isn't it about time to be honest about gun violence Field Negro?

Do it for the poor black children that need your help.



Bill said...


field negro said...
Did anyone read the Mother Jones article about the NRA lawyer? Please follow the link.


Your link said there were problems with the police investigation. Haven't you written about black criminals getting framed by cops?

Another flip-flop for you FN?



From your left-wing link...
with its insistence that ready access to guns prevents, rather than provokes, violent crime.

Yet black police chief responsible for saving the lives of black kids says otherwise.

Detroit police chief gives credit to armed citizens for drop in crime
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140716/METRO01/307160034#ixzz38xwkTfsI


What is the purpose of the intentional misinformation?

Is the motherjones goal more black kids shot dead in the street?





focusedpurpose said...

http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/defending-civil-liberties-1/the-secret-history-of-the-civil-rights-movement.html

"The Gun Control Act of 1968 kicked off a frenzy of new US gun laws...

Here´s the secret history behind the timing:

The first gun laws restricting private citizens where dictated by the British Empire against American colonists. The Empire wanted only its military to have weapons of self defense.

The next wave of anti guns laws in the US took place after slavery was abolished. The laws, passed by Southern legislatures, explicitly prohibited African-Americans from owning firearms.

The next big wave of anti gun laws, which we are still in the middle of, started in the mid 1960s.

Why?

Yes, there were a number of high profile assassinations, but they've all since been proven to be government conspiracies at least in their non-investigation if not their actual execution. (JFK, RFK, Martin Luther King, etc.)

The hysteria against private gun ownership was revived in the United States at exactly the same time that African-Americans started using firearms to protect their civil rights.

That's the real history behind these laws.

Civil rights laws were not granted to African-Americans by a beneficent federal government. They were taken by the accumulation of millions of acts of courage, some of them armed.

Note: Gandhi believed in private ownership of firearms too. Look it up."

señor kinky said...

"Gandhi believed in private ownership of firearms"

Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Obama, Castro are against gun ownership.

Funny that.

Anonymous said...

"Senor kinky"... Pull your head out of your ass, for chrissakes. When did Obama ever say he was against gun ownership? You fu..ing right-wing neo-cons; your god needs to slap you upside your heads.
And, FN, when you gonna change the head count for "Killadelphia"?

Anonymous said...

Blogger señor kinky said...
"Gandhi believed in private ownership of firearms"

Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Obama, Castro are against gun ownership.

Funny that.

12:51 PM
-------------------
I used to admire your courage and honesty until you made this obvious lie.

I have deep respect for Gandhi. He advocated "non-violence" and was against guns. In fact, he was assassinated by a person with a gun.

You seem to have no reverence whatsoever. You lie about Gandhi in the negative and lie about the evil dictators of the world in the positive. Only followers and devotees of Satan do crap like that.

You are a disappointment. However, you do prove the warnings about evil as is sometimes mentioned by FP.

field negro said...

Kinky, like his boy O-Lie-ly, has now exposed himself to the rest of the world as a total loon.

Bill, I am alway supporting our children, which is why I am against the NRA and their guns should be as prevalent as candy, policies.

PilotX said...

The NRA used to stand for common sense gun education but changed their focus to right wing politics in the 70's. They even used to be for background checks before they were against it.

Bill said...


field negro said...
Bill, I am alway supporting our children, which is why I am against the NRA and their guns should be as prevalent as candy, policies.



Not that I ever inhaled before it became medical and legal, I know quite a few people that had no problem getting an illegal substance the federal government said "Just Say No" to.

City/State/Federal laws didn't stop these "criminals" from getting pot despite so many people jailed for it.

Why would criminals wanting guns be any different?



Do you believe the white male mass shooters intentionally pick places that are gun free?



señor kinky said...

Not only is the left incapable of thinking for themselves,(They need many a websites/blogs to tell them what to think about Fox News)they can't read either.

This is what FP posted "Gandhi believed in private ownership of firearms too. Look it up."

So look it up.



"When did Obama ever say he was against gun ownership?"

Obama's actions and associations speak louder than words.



"The NRA used to stand for common sense gun education'



The NRA still stands for gun education and gun safety. They teach everyday...


Pilotx, you would know this if you actually took some time and look at the NRA instead of depending on anti-gun nuts like field to tell you what to think.


PilotX said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Our ruling

In his Rose Garden comments, Obama said "the NRA used to support expanded background checks." He’s correct: In congressional testimony following the Columbine High School shooting, LaPierre called it "reasonable" to conduct a background check "for every sale at every gun show. No loopholes anywhere for anyone." Subsequent statements by NRA officials acknowledge that the group’s position has since changed to opposition to more background checks. So we rate Obama’s statement True.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/apr/18/barack-obama/barack-obama-says-nra-used-support-expanded-backgr/

Anonymous said...

"The NRA still stands for gun education and gun safety. They teach everyday..."

But X said "The NRA used to stand for common sense gun education'


What two words were left out of the liar's response?

Anonymous said...

No wonder he left out those words, he doesn't understand the meaning.

Paranoid White Guy said...

And dumbass wants to know why white males with guns go to gun free zones. Like all white men with guns, they are cowards. Duh!
And his solution is more scary white guys with guns. And QLB believes these asshats have higher IQ's huh?

Anonymous said...

Paranoid White Guy said,
And dumbass wants to know why white males with guns go to gun free zones. Like all white men with guns, they are cowards. Duh!

Yep, that's why the majority of the trigger pullers in the military are White. Did I mention that virtually all SF'er are White. Then again ALL of the medal of honor winners are white too. But we have no problem finding multiple episodes of gangs of blacks attacking singe Whites, especially the elderly. We call that TNB.

QLB

Anonymous said...

Kinky Con said, "This is what FP posted "Gandhi believed in private ownership of firearms too. Look it up."

So look it up."

You know, I am beginning to think you two are in this right winged misleading information together.

It's a world full of LIES. Who is there to trust?

Anonymous said...

kinky porn is a gay molester of little boys

focusedpurpose said...

folk, i was quoting someone else. in case folk missed the quotes. even provided the link for the copy.

come on now.

it is time out for closing out opposing views. much is missed that way and = part of the divide and conquer plan. bickering and splitting hairs clearly makes folk feel smarter;(

that said...

do what you will with your free will.


@ 9:11pm- you would do well to watch all as well as pray without ceasing.

additionally, kindly please don't accuse me of anything. how would anyone KNOW what another truly Believed anyways? folk could argue 'til Shiloh comes and never reach the Truth.

i would trust Almighty/His Word and watch everyone else closely. but that's just me + my free will.

Blessings all!

focusedpurpose said...
This comment has been removed by the author.