Bad policing equals lost revenue.

It is getting uglier here in Philly with every passing day as it relates to some of our boys in blue.

"Seven Philadelphia police narcotics officers at the center of a federal corruption probe are also named in scores of civil lawsuits that add more claims of thievery, intimidation and brutality to those described in their criminal indictments, according to court records.

The potential financial impact of these suits, along with any others that may be filed, could expose the City of Philadelphia to millions of dollars in damages or settlements.

Officers Thomas Liciardello, Brian Reynolds, John Speiser, Michael Spicer, Linwood Norman and Perry Betts allegedly formed an out-of-control band of rogue officers who conducted illegal stops and searches as pretext to rob people, particularly those they believed to be drug dealers, according to the indictment filed last month. Jeffrey Walker, who is named in the indictment but charged separately, has pleaded guilty to charges stemming from his role.
Those same officers are the subjects of at least 81 pending federal lawsuits filed between November 2011 and this month, according to a search of court records.


At least 78 of the suits also name the City of Philadelphia as a defendant, claiming the police department’s alleged failure to properly train, supervise or discipline officers fostered a culture of indifference to constitutional rights."

Sadly, this scandal is going to cost the taxpayers of the city millions of dollars, while yet another story surfaced yesterday about a police officer who was assaulted by....wait for it.....his fellow police officers. Yep, you read that correctly.


I actually saw Philadelphia Police Chief Charles Ramsey of all people, commenting about Ferguson last week on MSNBC.


As Kat Williams would say, "The audacity of this N****r!"


Memo to Chief Ramsey: You might want to get your own house in order before you have a sit down with Spittle Matthews to discuss good policing.

"Scores of brutality lawsuits are filed against the Philadelphia Police Department every year. But it’s unusual for an officer, a sergeant no less, to make those charges.

In a suit filed Monday, Sgt. Brandon Ruff did just that.

Ruff claims he was roughed up by seven officers from the 35^th District when he attempted to anonymously turn in three handguns at the precinct. Ruff, who says he suffered two sprained wrists and two sprained shoulders in the fracas, filed suit in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia.

Ruff, an eight-year veteran assigned to the 16^th precinct, said the acts of the 35^th District officers “were committed willfully, wantonly, maliciously, intentionally, outrageously, deliberately and/or by conduct so egregious as to shock the conscience.”

The City of Philadelphia, he said in his civil suit, encourages and is deliberately indifferent to the abuse of police powers. Among other accusations, Ruff claims the city tolerates officers who misrepresent facts in order to establish probable cause, and allows officers to have persons falsely arrested or maliciously prosecuted. He also asserts the city permits the continued employment of officers who are psychologically or emotionally unfit to serve.

Ruff is currently under investigation by Internal Affairs in connection with the incident. 

In his suit, Ruff said a friend asked him to turn in three firearms the friend had bought from neighbors “in a proactive attempt to stop violence.”

Ruff, who was off duty, checked to make sure the guns were unloaded and then drove to the 35^th District station at Broad Street and Champlost Avenue. When he arrived at the precinct, he told an officer he wanted to turn in some firearms. The officer asked who owned the guns. Ruff – who refused to identify the owner -- said he was turning them in under a “no-questions-asked” policy and asked to speak to a supervisor, the suit states.

But according to a police spokesman, a “no-questions-asked” policy does not exist outside of periodic gun-amnesty programs.

“Can you drop them off like a baby? Typically, no,” said Lt. John Stanford, a department spokesman. “That’s only done when we do buybacks.”

After a supervisor failed to appear, another officer demanded to see Ruff’s identification. He told her that he didn’t have a state ID on him but had his work ID instead. Ruff asked to make a phone call outside the building. As he walked out, someone shouted, “There he is,” the suit states. Another officer came up behind Ruff and twisted his right hand behind his back. More than five officers ran to the scene. At that point, Ruff used a code number to identify himself as a fellow officer and said that his ID was in his pocket, according to the suit.


Two of those police officers held Tasers to his chest and rib cage and threatened to activate them. One of the officers spotted a weapon holstered to Ruff’s hip and demanded, “Why the hell would you come into a police station with a gun on your hip? Where is your permit to carry?” Ruff responded that his police officer ID was his permit to carry, according to the suit.

After being held for six hours, Ruff was released. On Aug. 4, he went to Chestnut Hill Hospital, where he was treated for injuries he said he received during his arrest and detention." [Source]


Things got really rough for Officer Ruff in the 35th there for a minute. (Ok, that was too easy)


Seriously, though, this is no laughing matter. There has to be some institutional control and proper policies and procedures set in place in these police departments all over the country. I bet that there would be less Mike Brown type situations if we did.


And, let's not forget, the police---especially in cities like Philadelphia- do have a tough job to do. It's literally a war zone on some of these mean streets, and in our rivers.


A friend of mine is an attorney who represents the police union and we were just chopping it up recently about what some of the stuff these cops go through.


Needless to say my man had some stories.


It's a tough job, but it's one they all signed up for, and if they can't do it right they should be in another line of work. Hopefully something legal.

 

“Bro, I knew something was wrong when a little pretty white girl ran into a black man’s arms.”

We are all fascinated by this story out of Cleveland. Three girls kidnapped and held against their will for almost ten years. It has all the makings of a made for television movie. ("Terror On Seymour Street".) Everyone is scratching their head and wondering how this could have happened. How could three women be taken off the street and held captive within a three mile radius of where they were taken in a major American city? This story just goes to show you that you never know who your neighbors really are.

There are others aspects of this story that I found somewhat depressing as well, and it is the behavior of America's new hero, Charles (Chuck) Ramsey, the neighbor who allegedly rescued one of the women.

I am sure that you all know Charles by now, he is an Internet sensation and folks are eating up the fast talking dishwasher who seemed to be more at ease on the camera than the reporters who were reporting the story.

Of course you Negroes all know the drill when it comes to news crews in the hood: they always seem to try to find the most ignorant person to interview. With my man Charles it looks like they hit the jackpot.

Charles, if his account of the event is true, is a hero, and he should be given all the credit and praise that heroes deserve. But sadly, Charles, like so many Negroes living in America, seems to be trapped in a state of mental slavery.
His line about the "pretty little white girl" was cringe worthy. I am glad for his candor, but it says a lot  about poor Charles Ramsey and where his head is.

I am sure that I am in the minority with this observation, (I feel like Sgt. Waters in a Soldier's Story) because I have seen the love Charles is getting from all quarters. Folks are sending him money and even trying to get him an audience with his Oness. But they are not doing it because his openness and honesty made public an "uncomfortable truth about race relations in America", ( I saw the news man trying to cut him off as well) rather, I suspect, that many of them are loving his act because he reinforces their stereotypes, and he came off in those interviews in perfect character as the kind of Negro that some Americans just love.

Charles, they are laughing at you, not with you.

If only I thought Charles was the reading kind I would leave him with the following quote from Carter G. Woodson.*

“If you can control a man’s thinking, you don’t have to worry about his actions. If you can determine what a man thinks you do not have worry about what he will do. If you can make a man believe that he is inferior, you don’t have to compel him to seek an inferior status, he will do so without being told and if you can make a man believe that he is justly an outcast, you don’t have to order him to the back door, he will go to the back door on his own and if there is no back door, the very nature of the man will demand that you build one.”

Calling Sgt. Waters.