Sunday, August 13, 2006

1984 In The Fields

"The 'war on terror' has always been a misnomer. It assumes that the terrorist threat can somehow be 'eradicated' through the mechanism of war" -Julliette Kayyem. | Lecturer in public policy at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.

I couldn't agree with Julliette Kayyem more. Terrorism and the people who use the threat of terror as a means to an end, will never be eradicated from our midst. That's just a fact of life. There will always be people who are so fanatical and so hell bent on destroying a counter point of view that they will resort to the most extreme means of making their point. If it means taking the innocent life of civilians, so be it. This is what we face from radical Islam, white supremacist, and various separatist and nationalist movements throughout the world. I have always known this, so why do I feel like I am living out my own version of George Orwell's "1984"?

Kayyem argues, and I am paraphrasing; that we should engage them, that there will always be a core group of people such as Osama bin Laden, who will never change, but we must make it less attractive for the bigger circle around the core to join the extreme group in the middle. Again, Keyyem is on point. It seems with his current fool hardy Middle East policy frat boy is doing just the opposite. By sitting on our asses and letting the tensions play out between Israel and Hezbollah; we have allowed a full scale war to break out between the two. And by doing so, we have made a hero of Hezbollah leader, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah. Not to mention inflamed the rest of the Arab world by creating sympathy for the terrorist group Nasrallah leads. When Osama bin Laden attacked us on that faithful September morning, this is exactly what he hoped would happen. -A full scale war between extremist Muslims and the west- Things could not have worked out better for OBL if famous Muslim author, Abu Hamid al-Ghazali had scripted it himself. Frat boy attacked a country that had nothing to do with the 911 attack, and now our troops are viewed as occupiers not saviors. Arabs all over the world are opposed to the war; they see the sectarian violence, the daily blood shed, and they hear of the prison abuse scandals. They hear news reports of American soldiers behaving badly, see images on Al- Jazeera T.V. of liitle Arab children being blown to smithereens; and as a result, they move closer to the core, the inner circle, closer to Osama bin Laden and his terrorist deeds. Of course, this means nothing to frat boy. Because here in America, his base smells blood, and they see this war as an us against them showdown that is already a fait accompli. And anyone who sees it differently, is a "cut and run" traitor. To those who aren't in frat boy's core,- the independents on the outer ring- he appeals to their fears, not their thirst for blood, but their love for their children, and the thought that another 911 could be looming right around the corner. There goes my thoughts of "1984" again. It's why terror has now become so politicized. Karl Rove sees this as a win win issue for the GOP, and any news of terror regardless of where it is in the world, is good for the GOP in this country. It's why cynics, such as yours truly, will always question the timing of news about a terror cell break up somewhere in the world. I have seen this act before, and I always say to myself, why do these terrorist groups always try to act close to an election in America? Mmmmmm. "The plot is further evidence that the terrorist we face are sophisticated and constantly changing their tactics" Really frat boy? You think! Nooooo, what makes you think that? And just exactly what did invading Iraq have to do with neutralizing thiese terrorists?
In his radio address, frat boy linked Hezbullah, to the insurgencies in Afghanistan, and Iraq. Nice try frat boy, but the only link that I can see to these groups is your abominable foreign policy.

So let's talk about that foreign policy, and this so called "war on teror". If this was a real "war on terror" all our troops would be in Afghanistan trying to find OBL himself, the culprit who was responsible for the real terror that poor innocent Americans experienced. Instead, we are still bogged down in Iraq, and the killings, bombings, kidnappings and all out sectarian violence continues. And there is no end in sight, and no strategy in place to bring it to a winning conclusion. Let me quote Kayyem again: ""...we keep believing-in Iraq, and possibly now in Lebannon-that the Arab world understand only force and power; as if the Arab world is a beta dog, needing the alpha United States to put it in is place. The administration has insisted on bringing 'democracy' through force to Iraq and unconditionally supporting Israel in its present battles in Lebanon" Once again, Kayyem is right. Frat boy and madam secretary just sat back and co-signed on Israel's actions in Lebanon, and gave Israel their blessings. By the time Condoleeza took her trip it was too late, and all hell was breaking out from Haifa to the Litani River. Now hundreds of lives and billions of dollars in destruction later, all we have to look forward to is a quickly brokered cease-fire, and ultimately, a UN peace keeping force which will not be able to keep the peace if Israel or Hezbullah decides to do like Marvin Gaye, and "get it on" all over again.

So where does this so called war on terror stand? Well according to "Pews World Survey, Arab attitudes towards the United States is the lowest it's ever been. So we can look forward to more extremist being created among that outer ring of Arabs, because more hate is festering and more fanatics are being born, and embracing a destiny of martyrdom every day. Some are already grown, and many are children. But they will be adults real soon, and there is no telling what type of hate they are feeling towards us. Now I don't know about other Americans; but the terrorist who is not afraid to give up his or her own life because of a total commitment laced with fanaticism, to his or her beliefs, just scares the living s#@% out of me. Because no matter how crazy most criminals are, they still think self preservation first, and will do what it takes to save his or her own skin. Not the terrorist frat boy is creating with his Middle East policies; these terrorist hate us and everything we stand for so much that they are willing to give up their own lives to take ours. That my friends, is scary, and that's why we need to start looking for real answers and engaging these people in a constructive way, instead of thinking we can change their hearts and minds by dropping leaflets or bombing them into oblivion. And unlike a conventional war, they are not all unified in some recognizable country that we can strategically attack. They are all over the world, they are among us, and contrary to what the proponents of racial profiling would want you to believe, they have no discernible look. Organized battalions are not needed, instructions can be given via the Internet, and all it takes is an army of one to walk into a crowded restaurant or a mall to strike the enemy. So we keep playing politics instead of trying to come up with real answers, while our enemy takes on a more sinister profile, and continues to try to find ways to be the ultimate victor in a war that no one might end up winning.

I started with Kayyem, and I will close with Kayyem-

"De-radicalizing a generation is not a job we can do alone, and it's not a job we can finish. (That's partly because our policies have helped radicalize people) But we need to stop doing so much to hinder. The world does not want to necessarily, and we ought not to require it as a condition for working to minimize a threat we all will win for some time"

The field-negro could not have said it better himself, and if Mr. Orwell was around, he would change the title of his book to 2006.


Asabagna said...

FN… I enjoyed your analysis and your tie-in with one of my favourite novels, “1984” (as an aside… the movie featuring Richard Burton and John Hurt I found disappointing).

As you stated in your previous post, my work in the terrorism field, plus living in Canada, does afford me with the advantage of a different perspective. Also, due to my job and personal interest I watch and read Canadian news, BBC World News and on a daily basis to get much more than the American news perspective of events happening in the world (yes I also watch CNN International and every so often Faux News). It does afford me the benefit of looking “out” and not “in”, as I find with most American based analysis, whether from the so-called right or left.

In my humble opinion, to start to get a handle on the “Islamic terrorism” thing of today… it doesn’t start anywhere with Bush, Rove or Blair (even though they do utilize it for their benefit). Nor with Osama or Nasrallah (who also benefit as you state from the policies of the U.S. led so-called "War on Terror"). NOR with America and Iraq for that matter. The rise in what I will simplistically call “modern Islamic-based terrorism” starts at the end of World War 1 with the fall of the Ottoman Empire and the European nations dividing up and colonizing that empire, now termed the “Middle-East”. The next round of significant events begins at the end of World War 2 with the formation of the nation of Israel, the rise of national independence movements within the European colonies of Africa and the Middle-East, and the rise of American and Soviet imperialism and the resulting Cold War. Finally... the last proxy conflict in the Cold War era: the Afghanistan war from 1979-1989 as well as the success of the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran, all add to this very complex mix of what has developed into what we call “Islamic-based terrorism” or “Islamofasism” (which is a ridiculous term in my opinion!).

I found books such as “Unholy War” by John K. Cooley, “Hatred’s Kingdom” by Dore Gold, “Revising Culture-Reinventing Peace” by Edward W. Said, “Imperial Hubris” by Michael Sheuer, and even “Yuguru: An African-Centered Critique of European Cultural Thought and Behaviour” by Marimba Ani, as well as reading numerous journals, articles, and reports, beneficial in helping me to just scratch the surface of these very volatile and dynamic issues. I have also engaged in many conversations with a variety of people from the Middle-East, Pakistan, Somalia etc.- some Muslim, some Hindu, some Christian, some Jewish and some secular minded to help deepen my understanding. However, with all this effort on my part, I do quickly admit that I am nowhere near having a handle on it all. But even with my very limited knowledge, or because of it, I am humbly aware that there is so much more than meets the eye, which cannot be understood and/or explained, even minutely, by the obvious conspiracy theories and so-called left-wing vs. right-wing Eurocentric based analysis/rhetoric.

I will end with a quote by Hamlet to Horatio: “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”

BTW… I also agree wholeheartedly with the quotes and analysis of Julliette Kayyem that you referenced. Keep on keeping on my Bruh!


ugz said...

“modern Islamic-based terrorism” :\hmph
world war 1 is not really a world war. It is a european war-- and they in turn were fighting all over the world.

Wha is termed as terrorism of islamic based or otherwise is a reaction to a hopelessly oppressive action of western nations on the middle east.

the west has devised social political and economic laws coupled with military strength that perpetually rob, rape and dehumanize and disrespect the land and people of a culturally proud people.

the result is a reaction --enough is enough m$@%^^f&--\] Too bad the western negro dont know when enough is.

Francis said...


I don't know if I agree with your analysis in regards to the "Core". To speak of a core implies the center of some object or focal point. In Christianity the core is Jesus Christ. So, if the core of one's belief or circumstances drives them closer to violence, as in the case of Islamic based terrorism then wouldn't you say that belief structure is badly flawed?

We can all agree that Bush's policies are badly flawed too! But what do we do in the interim to address the current situation? Like it or not, where in a fight and Islamic based terrorism is clear and present threat.

field negro said...

Asa,I hear you on politics sometimes getting in the way of common sense. And I agree with you about the history of this Islamic conflict. Although I think the Palestinian situation with Israel contributed to it as well. But if "W" knew half the history that you did, maybe we wouldn't be in this mess. I am dissapointed with T. Blair, because I thought he would know better; but I think he wanted to build up the UK's relationship with America at any cost.

And as for "1984", you are right; great book bad movie ;)

TNB Alerts said...

You are a racist, just face it. You keep referring to me as 'trailer trash', you hate filled racist. You have no evidence whatsoever that I live or have ever lived in a trailer, do you? Yet you perpetuate that stereotype over and over, just like the racists you criticize. You better look inside FN and make sure you have a clean house because you start talking about other peep's houses. Oh wait, that's TNB!

Anonymous said...

cheap wedding gowns
discount bridal gowns
China wedding dresses
discount designer wedding dresses
China wedding online store
plus size wedding dresses
cheap informal wedding dresses
junior bridesmaid dresses
cheap bridesmaid dresses
maternity bridesmaid dresses
discount flower girl gowns
cheap prom dresses
party dresses
evening dresses
mother of the bride dresses
special occasion dresses
cheap quinceanera dresses
hot red wedding dresses

Anonymous said...

Replica Handbags
Fake Handbags
Knockoff Handbags

Replica Louis Vuitton Handbags
Replica Gucci Handbags
Replica Chanel Handbags
Prada Handbags
Replica Fendi Handbags
Replica Dolce Gabbana Handbags
Replica Chloe Handbags
Replica Jimmy Choo Handbags
Replica Thomas Wylde Handbags
Replica MiuMiu Handbags

Replica Balenciaga Handbags
Replica Coach Handbags
Replica Lancel Handbags
Replica Hermes Handbags
Replica Marc Jacobs Handbags
Replica Anya Hindmarch Handbags
Replica YSL Handbags
Replica Mulberry Handbags
Replica Givenchy Handbags
Replica Valentino Handbags
Replica Versace Handbags
Replica Cartier Handbags
Replica Marni Handbags
Replica Bottega Veneta Handbags
Replica Loewe Handbags
Replica Kooba Handbags

Replica Bally Handbags
Replica Burberry Handbags
Replica Christian Dior Handbags
Replica Juicy Couture Handbags
Replica Ferragamo Handbags
Replica Celine Handbags

Anonymous said...



Anonymous said...

Hogan scarpe makes some amazing shoes for men. Whether you need Hogan scarpe donna to play basketball or another sport, or just want to look good when you're walking around with a pair of jeans, hogan donna have something to fit every taste and situation. There are a few new ones that are really making a huge impression. Hogan scarpe uomo men's basketball shoe is a great looking shoe.