Tuesday, December 20, 2016

The fix was in.

Image result for James comey images  Poor Hillary was doomed from the start. Not that she was the best candidate to begin with, but she would have been a far better president than Herr trump.

Now it looks like the entire James Comey thing was a set up. The old white men in the FBI did not want to be led by a woman. Shades of the infamous  cross dresser himself who formally led that organization. He waged war against the "Negroes", Comey and his boys waged war against Hillary.

"The FBI warrant that shook Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign in its final two weeks has been unsealed, and the lawyer who requested it says it offers "nothing at all" to merit the agency's actions leading up to the Nov. 8 election.

The warrant was released in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by Los Angeles lawyer Randy Schoenberg, who wants to determine what probable cause the agency provided to suspect material on disgraced congressman Anthony Weiner’s computer might be incriminating to Clinton. Weiner is the estranged husband of Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin. Under the Fourth Amendment, search and seizure can only be granted when proof of probable cause of criminal findings has been documented.

The letter confirms news reports in late October that the FBI had detected “non-content header information” suggesting correspondence with accounts involved in its already-completed investigation of Clinton's private email server. The FBI request concludes there is “probable cause to believe” that the laptop contained “evidence, contraband, fruits and/or items illegally possessed,” without providing specifics.

"I see nothing at all in the search warrant application that would give rise to probable cause, nothing that would make anyone suspect that there was anything on the laptop beyond what the FBI had already searched and determined not to be evidence of a crime, nothing to suggest that there would be anything other than routine correspondence between" Clinton and Abedin, Schoenberg said in an email to USA TODAY. It remains unknown "why they thought they might find evidence of a crime, why they felt it necessary to inform Congress, and why they even sought this search warrant," he said. "I am appalled." The FBI's Manhattan office did not immediately return a call seeking comment." [Source]

Nothing to see here, folks, move along. The men in suits got the "law and order" president they wanted. Now they will be cracking down on all those black lives matter agitators and enforcing the law from sea to shining sea. Stocks in private prisons have shot up, as those in the prison business see things looking up under the old white man in charge.

The white woman would have been too soft on crime, and they just couldn't have that.

Now, under Herr trump, stop and frisk will be implemented nationally (or so he thinks),  and  due process will be a thing of the past.

"Standing before a vastly white crowd in Ohio on Monday evening, Donald Trump made a passionate pitch to African American and Hispanic voters, whom he described as living in poverty in neighborhoods that are more dangerous than war zones.

"What do you have to lose?" Trump asked again and again."

I have a simple answer for that question: Our lives.  

*Pic from rawstory.com

   




103 comments:

The Ministry of Truth said...

"Nothing to see here, folks, move along. The men in suits got the 'law and order' president they wanted. Now they will be cracking down on all those black lives matter agitators and enforcing the law from sea to shining sea."

Honestly, this is what I suspect happened with Comey and company as well.

James Comey has gone on the record saying he believes in the (not empirically proven) Ferguson Effect: BLM calling attention to cop misconduct makes cops not do their jobs, which in turn makes crime go up.

And I would say that endorsing the Ferguson Effect is the cop equivalent of a poker tell. It indicates you feel that cops are being treated unfairly if they're not allowed to kill people with impunity, and black people just need to shut the hell up.

So, naturally, Comey is pro-Trump, because Trump favors doing exactly that: making black people shut the hell up about police brutality. No one should expect the Trump Justice Department to intervene to reform violent police departments. It's not gonna happen. Trump, meanwhile, will be giving lots of speeches praising the heroism of the police and encouraging them to crack heads more often and harder.

mike from iowa said...

Such revelations won't matter to Drumpf or Russian-American Communists.

Mitchie McCTurtle sez no to a select committee to investigate. It is not that important sez the nutjob on the half shell.

Josh said...

So, it's not that all these conspiracy theories have anything whatever to do with the fact that donors are demanding an accounting of 1.2 billion dollars lost. Noooo...that's absurd. What's really the case is that Hillary lost the election because (let us count the ways to date):

- Fake FBI letters targeted against a woman because she's a woman
- Russian hacking
- "Fake" news from Alex Jones and Stormfag
- Patriarchy
- White supremacy
- Voter suppression

In quiet moments, when no one else is around, and when you're buzzed up enough on booze to be this brave, you folks should ask yourself a few very simple questions: Is it perhaps possible that, given the utter annihilation of Hillary Clinton in the EC per county in the USA, and her incredibly slim margins in some states like CT, she was just a loser? Is it at all possible that Americans were fed up with the Clintons and their brand of dishonesty? Is it possible that a vote for Trump, which was cast by a hell of a lot more than just white males, was a referendum against the PC culture Clinton stood for?

Publicly, this answers will all be "NO! White people! Putin Hitler! Comey! Fake NEWS!" But if your ilk want a shot at ever, ever regaining power in America, you owe it to yourselves to ask these questions and to answer them honestly.

Let's not pretend this is just a Hillary-Trump dynamic. It's fucking objectively not. Democrats have been losing massive ground for a few years. Democrats have 11 governorships out of 50. They've lost their majorities in the House and the Senate since Obama's been in office. America's been busy repudiating the likes of Hillary Clinton for years now, evidenced by election results from sea to shining sea. While you collectivists may project on everyone else that the top tier of federal power is all that counts, the rest of us can read the wall's writing. And it says: Democrats have been losing for a while now. WTF are they all blaming it on? It's awfully convenient poor Hillary has all these many scapegoats, all these "reasons" the election was stolen from her. But what about the other few hundred Democrats losing to Republicans?

What's their fucking excuse?

mike from iowa said...

Whassa matter sport, dog quit putting out? You stole the election. It is patently obvious to anyone with a fucking brain. The Russians, the FBI, the RAC-wingnut party are all involved in this conspiracy to destroy our Democracy and hand everything over to the 1% compliments of Josh and other brainwashed morons.

Why can't you be satisfied with the spoils of larceny and just shut the fuck up about it? Nutjobs are the poorest, sorest, sorriest bunch of thieves I have ever seen. Want a little titty to suck on?

Winning! said...

"Nothing to see here, folks, move along"

Nothing but illegally deleted emails that contained evidence of influence peddling and treason.

You stupid motherfuckers still don't get it. You lost because you deserved to lose.

LMAO.

Nigmund Freud said...

mike from iowa said...
You stole the election. It is patently obvious to anyone with a fucking brain. The Russians, the FBI, the RAC-wingnut party are all involved in this conspiracy to destroy our Democracy and hand everything over to the 1%.
------

This isn't deranged. Not at all.

mike from iowa said...

Glad you agree, Freud. Now if you can tell me what 1.2 billion dollars is missing or hiding we can put Joshes little mind to rest. Care to taske a stab at it?

mike from iowa said...

1.2 billion dollars lost must be in your fevered brain, Josh. I can't find any articles about. I find a report of a transferred 1.8 billion dollars to Qatar, but that has been debunked by Snopes among others.

Nigmund Freud said...

"What do you have to lose?" Trump asked again and again."

I have a simple answer for that question: Our lives.

--

You know, I could see the simple minded (like mike) actually believing Joe Biden when he said "they are going to put y'all back in chains", but you are supposedly a law school graduate. If you seriously think the Klan is coming for you, what you really need is medication.

Irishgirl said...

I think many trump supporters will have buyer's remorse.

And I hope that Comey will live the rest of his life in hiding. What he did to democracy was appalling.

It was well known in Ct that he hated the Clintons.

Lucy Montrose said...

Actions speak louder than pretty words... NIGmund Freud.

Say hi to your Klan buddies for me. Tell them nice try on the soothing, reassuring words.

Lucy Montrose said...

I agree.
Pretty sad when they can only win by cheating, eh?

Lucy Montrose said...

Just curious, Josh. Do you live in a R-controlled state? Do you like it? And what do you like about it?

mike from iowa said...

Well Fraud, was it not Drumpf who thanked the Blacks for not coming out to vote? Was it not your party of treasonous sonsabitches that legislated voter suppression among Blacks and other minorities to prevent them from voting for HRC and Dems? And you expect the people you kick in the teeth to vote and work with your party of lying, racist, misogynitic, homophobic. narcissistic,anti-immigrant, anti-constitutional child molesting perverts? You are seriously fucked in the head.

Lucy Montrose said...

@Mike:
I'm pretty sure that Freud = Losing = Anon = RapeFantasee = Proglodyte. They all have the same style.
Josh feels different and Trumpening feels different. So 3 trolls, at least, in the house.

mike from iowa said...

Josh, where you at boy? What 1.2 billion dollars are you complaining about? Or is this just another diversion away from the fact the election was stolen from HRC?

The Ministry of Truth said...

"You know, I could see the simple minded (like mike) actually believing Joe Biden when he said 'they are going to put y'all back in chains', but you are supposedly a law school graduate. If you seriously think the Klan is coming for you, what you really need is medication."

The boys in the white sheets may indeed become more aggressive. (In fact, they definitely already have. Remember the two slack-jawed yokels who planned to celebrate Trump's victory by blowing up an apartment complex full of Somalis?)

But the more immediate problem for black people is the gents in the blue uniforms. President Trump is a big win for bad, dirty, violent cops.

Lucy Montrose said...

Would it be a good idea to contact our local police forces and talk to them, in an attempt to inoculate them against the Trump virus?

Josh said...

"I can't find any articles about."

That you're completely unaware of the cost of Hillary's presidential campaign is no real shock. You're probably also completely unaware that a large percentage of her campaign monies were given to her by radical Islamic nations like Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

In short, this nonsensical bullshit about election theft is solely to allow Hillary a scapegoat so she doesn't have to be answerable for losing $1.2 billion of other people's money.

"It is patently obvious to anyone with a fucking brain. The Russians, the FBI, the RAC-wingnut party are all involved in this conspiracy to destroy our Democracy and hand everything over..."

You have to make that jibe with reality. You have to also explain how, bereft Russian influence and James Comedy, Democrats--many of whom held Hillary's platform(s)--have been losing Congressional seats and governorships for years now. How do you make that work? Democrats have been losing all over the place; Hillary is just the latest and most high profile.

Do you know ANYTHING about this topic other than a few corporate media headlines about how poor Hillary had the election stolen from her?

I'd say no, seeing as you don't even understand that WE DON'T LIVE IN A FUCKING DEMOCRACY IN THE FIRST PLACE, you ignorant wretch. We live in a representative republic, which is why we have the Electoral College -- which prevents a sanctuary state like California, whose population is made up of primarily either illegal immigrants or Dem-voting Latinos, from deciding an election. Two wolves DO NOT get to decide to eat the one sheep for dinner. Every county has its say, which report to the state, and each state has its say. That's not "democracy," you moron. That's a fucking representative republic. You want democracy? Return to high-school (since you obviously dropped out in 9th grade) and vote for a prom king. That's the closest you're going to get to America being a democracy.

You don't know this simple fact, taught to people in 4th grade, yet you're going to lecture others here about how the election was stolen from Hillary. LOL Never a dull moment when speaking with progressives. The saddest part, however, is that you morons obviously have access to the Internet yet are so deluded in your lunacy that you won't even run something by Google before typing here.

But that may be too harsh. Likely is that case that "to destroy our Democracy" was a line you picked up from corporate media and not an original thought. You heard/read someone else say it--probably a rich white liberal--and you just agreed wholesale without asking a single question.

mike from iowa said...

Josh, here is something else for you to whine about. From investigative journalist Greg Palast- How did Detroit end up with the crap machines?
Detroit is bankrupt, so every expenditure must be approved by “emergency” overlords appointed by the Republican governor. The GOP operatives refused the city’s pre-election pleas to fix and replace the busted machines.
“We had the rollout [of new machines] in our budget,” Detroit City Clerk Janice Winfrey said. “No money was appropriated by the state.”
Same in Flint. GOP state officials cut the budget for water service there, resulting in the contamination of the city’s water supply with lead. The budget cuts also poisoned the presidential race.

85 voting machines broke down in Detroit-the Black part of the state of Michigan. Flint had problems as well. But not a hitch in the whiter parts of the state. Imagine that?

mike from iowa said...

Technically it is a democratic republic-shit for brains.

Firebush said...

Irishgirl said...
It was well known in Ct that he hated the Clintons.

Is that why he went to extraordinary lengths to avoid indicting her over the email server and deleted emails? Or was he jsut executing the deal made on the tarmac between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton?

mike from iowa said...

What in the world does HRCs campaign budget have to do with the fact the election was stolen? Not a god damn thing. Neither does Dems have been losing ground for several years. Nothing to do with the election being stolen. Get it? Do I need to write this out in crayons? Your entire post is hogwash and totally irrelevant to the subject at hand. You try to get more circles inside of circles to throw people off the subject. Now stick with the assignment. The election was stolen. All evidence points that direction. Why do you nutjobs fear investigations? Why the panic over recounts? Pretty obvious you are well aware of the dirty tricks and the more scrutiny these get the more likely it is you will be found to be frauds. Look a squirrel.

Hate Fact™ said...

mike from iowa said...
85 voting machines broke down in Detroit-the Black part of the state of Michigan. Flint had problems as well. But not a hitch in the whiter parts of the state. Imagine that?
---

White communities by and large have the cognitive capital to properly manage the electoral process; a significant percentage of black communities do not.

Also large inner city precincts are one-party operations that the Democrats use to generate millions of fraudulent votes.

Al Franken said...

nutjob from iowa said...
"The election was stolen. All evidence points that direction"

Actually, Sherlock, there is zero evidence of anything like that. Maybe you have some secret information you could share with the reality-based community?

mike from iowa said...

State of Denial is getting pretty damned crowded nowadays. Fortunately they can't blow themselves up. Not enough brain power to light a match and fart at the same time.

Uh, hate fact, Detroit and Flint have been under right wing nut job rule for a number of years. The nutters are appointed by the lily white nutjob guv and they decided not to bother fixing or replacing any of the damaged machines. And, of course, you have no evidence that millions of fraudulent votes were ever cast. Unbelievable how some so called humans can be this unconscious and still be alive.

http://crooksandliars.com/2016/12/michigans-unemployment-system-bilked-poor Here is some more inconvenient facts for you believers in Lord Drumpfuck. Automated system for unemployment charged 93% of applicants with fraud and many of these who should have gotten unemployment had to pay fines instead. Another public service of the party of hate against the poor and minorities.

mike from iowa said...

Firebush-the evidence did not support charges. It wasn't just Comey saying so.

Proglodyte said...

Regardless of one's politics, I think we can all agree that the horrific German truck attack underscores the urgent need for gun control and articles of impeachment against Trump.

dinthebeast said...

Does Gish have a faster speed than gallop? Naw, they're really kinda slow. Doesn't matter what you try to tell them, they'll just call your sourcing into question because it wasn't Fox, Rush, Drudge, or Breitbart. They're too damn stupid and vain to realize or admit that they're being played, and they'll insist they're right until they die of something that health insurance could have prevented. That's the level of stupid we're dealing with here, just this side of suicidally demented. As Joe Walsh once said, you can't argue with a sick mind.

-Doug in Oakland

Josh said...

Well, if true and not simply another example of a majority black government structure really being to blame and just blaming whitey again, I guess that leads to a point or two about Republicans.

1) They're far less effective at voter fraud than Democrats.

2) I guess those 13,000 votes that put Trump over the top in Michigan could have mattered. Though probably not so much as all the illegal immigrants voting for Hillary in California alone; lest we forget, of course, that her margin of victory in CA, being over 4m votes, is the only reason people (who don't understand we live in a republic) keep spouting this "popular vote" nonsense, as if to say that California's ultra-liberal residents get to tell the other 49 states how to live. Remove California, Trump actually won the popular vote by over 1.4 million votes. Maybe that's because blacks didn't have access to clean water and working machines, too?

3) And, of course, that's you assuming that every single black person thinks exactly the same and would have voted Hillary. But that's not racist, for some odd reason. LOL

Hillary should buy a home in CA this year. She's a fucking shoo-in for governor, should she want it.

Literally Hitler said...

Merkel has condemned Germany to generations of living with terror.

Obama/Hillary would've done same to America.

Thank God for Trump.

It's Yīshēng, Stalking B*cthes said...

First heroin, now this!

Why Straight Rural Men Have Gay ‘Bud-Sex’ With Each Other
“I don’t want the effeminate ones, I want the manly guys … If I wanted someone that acts girlish, I got a wife at home.”
http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/12/why-straight-rural-men-have-gay-bud-sex-with-each-other.html

Anonymous said...

NYMag = Fake News

Josh said...

Also: A "democratic republic" is the fucking Congo. LOL (Go there and vote. I dare ya!)

We'll say that about America colloquially because it's true that we have some processes which are democratic in nature. However, the way our republic is described is as representative. And why is that important? Why is that its title? Because that's how we operate. It's not just "democracy"; the principle by which we operate is that elected officials represent groups of people.

I only attempted to correct you because I don't want you suffering under the delusion that Hillary Clinton should be America's president because she won a single state by more than 4 million votes. Saying that this process was "democracy" directly implies that a popular vote should result in a victory; however, that's not the makeup of the nation in which we live. It could probably even be better described as a constitutional republic.

Granted, my area of expertise is evolutionary biology and not government. But as someone who can use a search engine, I can attest to the fact that information--that you don't know or simply need to double-check--is readily available via the Internet.

mike from iowa said...


2) I guess those 13,000 votes that put Trump over the top in Michigan could have mattered.

You've devastated your entire argument that Drumpf won. Maybe there is some hope for you.

Now explain how a so called evolutionary biologist can be a RAC-wingnut that doesn't believe in sciency stuff?

mike from iowa said...

RAC-wingnuts are MUCH better at voter fraud because they are the only party employing it. The right wing states that scream voter fraud the loudest are the ones implementing every form of voter suppression, unnecessary voter ids and then they shut down polling places in minority areas, shut off early voting, disallow 17 year old high school students to register to vote when they turn 18 and the list goes on. Wisconsin was charging $28 for free voter ids to prevent the poor from exercising their constitutional right to vote. Face it-RAC-wingnuts are the crookedest POS America has ever seen when it comes to denying civil and equal rights to minorities.

Josh said...

"because they are the only party employing it"

lol

Yeah, man. Holy shit. Everything wrong on the entire planet, in the history of the world, is the fault of right-wingers.

That's why things get fixed and operate correctly when Democrats are in power, like in a majority of black inner cities and with Obama and the supermajority he had for years.

Oh, wait...

What a great set-up you have: Things go right, it's despite the right-wing. Things go wrong, it's because of the right-wing.

Look how well being that ideologically immovable has worked out for Democrats recently. You ideologues are doing a bang-up job.

Josh said...

"sciency stuff?"

What is "sciency stuff"?

I guess you're going to tell me that I'm a climate change denier and the suchlike. I guess, because I'm not a liberal Democrat, you're going to assume I'm a conservative Republican, and even after correcting you, you'll still label me as such because you are, at this point in your life, intellectually incapable of anything outside of identity politics. Because I see Hillary is a corrupt maniac, you're going to suggest I'm a Trump fan.

But seriously, WTF is "sciency stuff"? And let's not pretend that your side knows anything whatever about "sciency stuff," as they deny genetic racial differences in a variety of traits, and as they push the myth that a gender binary--e.g. SEX CHROMOSOMES!--are socially constructed.

Politics and science don't get along well. The right-wing are primarily scientifically illiterate. But so are the left-wing.

mike from iowa said...

Winning! said...
"Nothing to see here, folks, move along"

Nothing but illegally deleted emails that contained evidence of influence peddling and treason.

You stupid motherfuckers still don't get it. You lost because you deserved to lose.

Exlain something to me. dumbass. How did these supposedly illegally deleted emails from HRC's private server end up in DNC computers if they were deleted. If they were deleted how could you possibly know what they contained? Stupid motherfucker!

mike from iowa said...

Obama never had a supermajority for any of his 8 years as our last legally elected Potus since Bill Clinton. You're not very good at revisionist history, are you?

mike from iowa said...

and even after correcting you, You ain't been alive long enough to correct me, sport.

Josh said...

I'm just waiting to read about this "sciency stuff" that I apparently should know about but don't.

Please, by all means, educate me on science. Having people who barely got out of high-school, if at all, attempt to educate me on the scientific method and what "science" is, is the most entertaining this blog gets.

Typically is the case that the people attempting to explain science to me cannot structure a sentence correctly or spell scientific terms correctly. Typically is the case they just shout "SCIENCE" without knowing what it means. Typically is the case they believe more in voodoo than in science.

But maybe you're different. Maybe you can school me on what this "sciency stuff" is. The floor's yours (if ever you get tired of patting yourself on the back for imagined victories previous).

Director Homey said...

mike from iowa said...
"How did these supposedly illegally deleted emails from HRC's private server end up in DNC computers if they were deleted."
----

I'll go real easy for you Mike because I know you are a little slow: When you send an email to someone, not only is a copy saved in your sent folder, but a copy is also saved in the inbox of the person you sent it to. You can delete your copy, but not those of anyone else in on the conversation.

Everyone knows Hillary deleted at least 30,000 emails that she was obligated by law to turn over to the government she worked for. She used her own unsecure private server rather than the secure government system so that she could hide from FOI requests. She wanted to hide her communications because she was conducting illegal and unethical business. She eventually had to be subpoenaed for her email records, and the very next day she obliterated them with software designed to make them unrecoverable.

The reason we have them is that although Hillary destroyed her files, there is always another person who receives them. Some of these persons were idiots, like John Podesta, who used a Gmail account with the password "p@ssword", fell for a phishing email, and then didn't change his password despite being told to do so.

As far as the DNC leak goes, WikiLeaks is on the record saying it was an insider who was disgusted at how the nominating process was rigged against Sanders. You can believe it or not, but it's not exactly far-fetched.

Whether it was the Russians, a Bernie Bro, or a bored teenager, doesn't matter. Hillary destroyed evidence of political chicanery and influence peddling, but the evidence got out anyway. It was the truth that sunk her.

mike from iowa said...

DNC had State Department emails? Riiiight. The truth that sunk HRC turns out to be non-actionable. She committed zero fucking criminal offenses, but it was okay for a foreign government, the FBI and the right wing nut job party to throw the election to a fucking misogynist, racist, homophobic, narcissistic, tax cheater, sexual predator and a pathological liar know nothing who is selling access to the WH and will be in violation of the constitution's emolument clause the minute he is sworn in, but ,but HRC is a crook. Brilliant work, team. Maybe you could toss HRC into the Potomac and if she floats or swims you can burn her at the stake.

BTW dumbass dubya deleted 22ooo emails that were under subpoena and he told Congress to go fuck themselves. How did that turn out?

Lance Cockstrong said...

Josh mon ami you wouldn’t have any problem finding this in a search engine. But if you want to go on believing Alex Jones and Breitbart (soon to be elevated to Pravda status which should tickle your balls no end) are genuine news sources then a salud.

As for stealing the election, it is important to make a distinction. Actual vote tampering constitutes stealing the election. So does voter suppression. Releasing hacked (and possibly bogus) emails constitutes influencing the election. As does (at worst) Comey’s notification to Congress. Think of the Russians as a super-pac with cyberweapons if that helps. Delivering a tongue-lashing that it is not nice to fuck with another country’s elections (while fucking with another country’s centrifuges if fine and dandy) is not likely to gain much traction. Instead we should concentrate on things we can control, namely, tightening up our infrastructure, and presenting our best candidate, which Hillary wasn’t, as Field notes.

As an aside, Field, why is it that on the IPhone you can reply to specific posts and they show up correlated as such, while Windows doesn’t have that capability and posts always show up in chronological order?

Director Homey said...

mike from iowa said...
DNC had State Department emails? Riiiight.
--

Sir, I can only conclude that you are a complete and utter idiot.

You are completely unworthy of engaging on an intellectual level. I would advise those posters attempting to challenge your confused assertions with "facts" and "evidence" presented in a logical manner that they are wasting their time with a moronic zealot who lacks the capacity for basic reasoning and discernment.

Reality is going to be very challenging for you for the next four years, at a minimum.

Townie said...

It's true. The Russians may have rigged the election by showing that the Democrats definitely rigged the election.

Josh said...

"Think of the Russians as a super-pac with cyberweapons if that helps."

No. Anonymous sources supposedly from the CIA releasing a "secret" report, bereft of evidence, stating that Russia--and namely Putin--sought with malicious intent to get Trump elected doesn't set off alarms in my head that I need to think of them in any way whatever.

1) Prove Russia hacked the emails
2) Prove that Russia's intent was to get Trump elected

Just because progressives are willing to run wild with the speculation doesn't make it a fact.

I don't like Alex Jones; he's a conspiracy theory nutjob. I do, however, like Paul Joseph Watson. I don't like Brietbart; they're a right-wing shill machine. I do, however, like Milo Yianoppolis (sp).

Also, believing them on what, exactly? CNN has been caught red-handed shilling for Clinton. They're not called the "Clinton News Network" as just a smear. Tons of independent research shows how they stacked the deck intentionally against Trump. However, that doesn't mean someone like Anderson Cooper doesn't tell the truth and do decent reporting at times. My news intake is from 100% independent sources. Fittingly enough, these are all sources that you corporate media-watchers have been instructed to call "fake news."

"News" isn't some broad category whereby one can claim it fake or fact. Information must be taken on a case-by-case basis. Just because an Alex Jones might lie about Obama's birth certificate, for example, doesn't mean he's necessarily lying about another topic.

Forcing "news" to abide the standard of identity politics is a quick way to whore away your rational capacities.

Take information independently; check the message, not the messenger.

Or not. Let Vox and Buzzfeed and HuffPo and MM lead you around by the short 'n curlies. Makes me no never mind.

BTW: STILL waiting to hear about this "sciency stuff"

mike from iowa said...

There were 4 verifiable cases of voter fraud. 1 in iowa, 1 in Texas, 1 in Illinois and one in Florida. The first 3 were all RAC-wingnuts, the third was an election judge. The 4th fraudster has not been identified by party, but it is patently, empirically clear right wing hut jobs commit the preponderence of voter fraud in America. It has been that way for a number of years.

Director Horny, you are mixing up emails from 2, count them, 2 different groups. HRC's private server was never hacked. The DNC emails were. They are not the same which makes it hard to take any of you nuts seriously.

mike from iowa said...

Typically is the case that the people attempting to explain science to me cannot structure a sentence correctly or spell scientific terms correctly

See Spot run. What a pathological liar you are. Need more prufe? Scientific terms correctly. You iz still a liar.

It's Yīshēng, Stalking B*cthes said...

mike from iowa said...
Now explain how a so called evolutionary biologist
>>>>>>>>

Faulty white privilege at its finest, they can title themselves anything which explains how easily they get away with fraud.

mike from iowa said...

It's true. The Russians may have rigged the election by showing that the Democrats definitely rigged the election.

The election was between the actual winner,HRC and the riggers FBI,Russians and the entire right wing nut job congress and party. The election was rigged, Toto.

mike from iowa said...

Trump Transition Team: Russia Hacks And Wikileaks Had No Effect On Election

Did sombody finally admit the worst kept secret in history?

James Deplorable said...

The conspiratorial, magical thinking of the African is remarkable to behold.

"Now it looks like the entire James Comey thing was a set up."

It wasn't that Hitlery didn't violate classified-information laws by transmitting it to her own, unsecured (and multiply-hacked) server.  It wasn't that Hitlery mixed the business of the Clinton Foundation and the US government, in a classic pay-for-play fashion.  It wasn't that field agents were in rebellion against their political leadership for allowing crooks to call the shots at the top.

Nope, it had to be 'cause vagina, even though Comey pulled his punches TWICE and refused to recommend that charges be filed.

You Africoons are inventive.  Stupid, but inventive.  You come up with excuses very quickly, but they're about as strong as wet tissue paper.


"The warrant was released in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by Los Angeles lawyer Randy Schoenberg, who wants to determine what probable cause the agency provided to suspect material on disgraced congressman Anthony Weiner’s computer might be incriminating to Clinton."

So this guy is obviously digging for something that would possibly get a friendly judge to grant a motion to suppress... and you're taking it as unvarnished truth.  Such credulity.

"The men in suits got the "law and order" president they wanted. Now they will be cracking down on all those black lives matter agitators and enforcing the law from sea to shining sea."

So this was always about your cadres of revolutionaries.  It looks like they'll be going to prison instead of into office... or the grave, which is where you'd send the ones you can't co-opt and can't risk using their experience to foment a counter-revolution either.  Hey, if Black Lives Really Mattered, you would have had them protesting the release of murderous thugs FROM prison.

""What do you have to lose?" Trump asked again and again."

I have a simple answer for that question: Our lives."

The total lost in Chimpcongo might top 800 for 2016, but you don't care; those aren't the Black lives that matter.  Only the ones useful in the fight against Whitey do.

Anonymous said...

Once again we see sorry cowardly white men afraid to follow orders from a woman. These guys impending exit from the planet and America can come soon enough for me. I'm going to enjoy watching Comrade Trump accelerate their exit.

James Deplorable said...

"James Comey has gone on the record saying he believes in the (not empirically proven) Ferguson Effect: BLM calling attention to cop misconduct makes cops not do their jobs, which in turn makes crime go up."

There was NO misconduct in the Michael Brown case.  There was NO misconduct in the Freddy Gray case.  Walter Scott assaulted and finally shot Michael Slager with his own Taser, and was legally under arrest at the time he was shot.  There was no cause even for suspension in any of those cases, let alone criminal charges.

When cops are being persecuted for doing their jobs, you WILL see de-policing.  That DOES make crime go up.  But you Africoons are notoriously unable to comprehend cause and effect.


"I would say that endorsing the Ferguson Effect is the cop equivalent of a poker tell. It indicates you feel that cops are being treated unfairly if they're not allowed to kill people with impunity, and black people just need to shut the hell up."

Black people just need to shut the hell up because their brains do not function at adult levels and the essential decisions of society cannot be made by petulant, dangerous children.

"Whassa matter sport, dog quit putting out? You stole the election. It is patently obvious to anyone with a fucking brain."

Denies that 34 state governments are now fully in Republican hands, election after election... which they could have done something about, had there been anything to do.

Petulant, dangerous children.

When that number hits 38 we will be able to amend the Constitution and simply bypass your corrupt judges and gridlocked Congress.  We'll institute Official English.  We'll throw out Affirmative Action.  We'll not just stop all immigration, we'll make both illegal aliens and their children forever ineligible for residency let alone citizenship.  Better yet, we'll re-apportion House seats based on citizens, not residents... and California will go back to Republican hands as it loses perhaps 15 of its 53 seats.


"Why can't you be satisfied with the spoils of larceny and just shut the fuck up about it?"

Because we aren't looters like you.  We Want Our Country Back.

"RAC-wingnuts are MUCH better at voter fraud because they are the only party employing it."

Africoons Always Project.  The DNC is not subject to a consent decree which prevents it from "discriminating" by pursuing voter fraud in Republican-held districts.  The RNC is subject to an opposite consent decree, and there's solid evidence of Dimocrap voting fraud in Detroit, Indiana, Wisconsin and massively in Nevada.

"The right wing states that scream voter fraud the loudest are the ones implementing every form of voter suppression"

Projection.  The governor of Virginia was pardoning felons left and right to make them eligible to vote.

"Obama never had a supermajority for any of his 8 years as our last legally elected Potus since Bill Clinton."

Obamacare was pushed through under a Senate rule which bypassed filibusters, and despite it being deemed a "tax" it was still allowed by the SCOTUS despite not originating in the House as tax bills are Constitutionally required to do.

"You're not very good at revisionist history, are you?"

You're not very good at reasoning, are you?

Anonymous said...

"Faulty white privilege at its finest, they can title themselves anything which explains how easily they get away with fraud."

Says the woman who went for years as "Dr. Queen".

SMDH

BTW, Josh's IQ is at least 20 points higher than yours.

Self-awareness is not a negro attribute, it is?

Akbar Anis said...

On refugees, Trump wants to create safe zones in Syria. Democrats want to create politically correct danger zones in America.

Anonymous said...

The desirable cultural religious mix is 0% Muslims.

Mooger said...

Everything I know about white people I learned from travel ads.

The Ministry of Truth said...

"On refugees, Trump wants to create safe zones in Syria. Democrats want to create politically correct danger zones in America."

Trump doesn't want to do shit in Syria. His solution to avoid anyone having to take in refugees is to allow his buddy Vlad to simply massacre all the civilians. No one alive, no one left to flee to the U.S. where Trump doesn't want them anyway.

mike from iowa said...

Because we aren't looters like you. We Want Our Country Back.

Russia is there for the taking, stud. See ya later.

For all you morons that think I'm dum, I just took and ACED (I might add) and elementary school entrance exam. So who is the dum one, now?

mike from iowa said...



Projection. The governor of Virginia was pardoning felons left and right to make them eligible to vote.

Article V, Section 12 of the Constitution of Virginia grants the Governor the authority to “remove political disabilities consequent upon conviction” of a felony.


bamacare was pushed through under a Senate rule which bypassed
filibusters, and despite it being deemed a "tax" it was still allowed by the SCOTUS despite not originating in the House as tax bills are Constitutionally required to do.

Not a word about a supermajority? Why is that?

and there's solid evidence of Dimocrap voting fraud in Detroit, Indiana, Wisconsin and massively in Nevada

Let's see all this made up evidence.

mike from iowa said...

t wasn't that Hitlery didn't violate classified-information laws by transmitting it to her own, unsecured (and multiply-hacked) server. It wasn't that Hitlery mixed the business of the Clinton Foundation and the US government, in a classic pay-for-play fashion. It wasn't that field agents were in rebellion against their political leadership for allowing crooks to call the shots at the top.

HRC's emails weren't classified until after the fact. That is a fact your fucking nutjobs just love to ignore.

There is no evidence HRC mixed any CF business and she didn't sell any influence or uranium for contributions. More facts you continue to ignore.

The last time the chain of command was checked the FBI inmates did not run the asylum and the bureau is not supposed to be political-or so right wingers keep whining except when it is biased against the Legal winner of the 2016 Potus election Madame President HRC.

We have always been at war with Eastasia said...

The Guy who doesn't understand Orwell's use of "Ministry of Truth" said...
Trump doesn't want to do shit in Syria. His solution to avoid anyone having to take in refugees is to allow his buddy Vlad to simply massacre all the civilians. No one alive, no one left to flee to the U.S. where Trump doesn't want them anyway.

Putin is defending the lawful government of Syria against a coalition of Sunni jihadists which includes ISIS. It is these "rebels" who for the most part are the ones committing atrocities against civillians. The U.S. has been supporting the side that ISIS is on. We are doing this because Obama supports Islamists, the Saudis support jihadists, and toppling Assad furthers Israel's interest. We are on the bad guy's side in this conflict. I hope Trump stops this on day one.

And as far as bringing them here, you'd have to be full of insane hatred for America to want to import this murderous culture into our cities. Have you learned nothing from the disasters of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya?

Anonymous said...

"The white woman would have been too soft on crime, and they just couldn't have that."
So you forget about the Crime Bill signed by Bill Clinton, supported by Hillary in which she called POC "super predators". A bill which was directly responsible for the mass incarceration of POC.

Hate Crime Update said...

Authorities arrest African-American man in burning of black church spray-painted with "Vote Trump":

https://apnews.com/4e14f73be8df4caf90643cd2d757054c/Arrest-in-'Vote-Trump'-burning-of-Mississippi-black-church

Another Field Negro promoted hoax debunked.

Don't anyone expect a retraction or correction, though.

Being Black means never having to say you are sorry.

mike from iowa said...

The Syrian government has been accused of using nerve gas numerous times. I believe that is an atrocity and a war crime.

Hate Crime Update said...

Guy Named Jasskirat Saini Arrested For Writing ‘KKK’ On College Campus:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/21/jasskirat-saini-arrested-for-writing-kkk-on-college-campus/

Initial media coverage of the discovery of swastikas tied it to the election of Donald Trump. The Long Island Press wrote, “Although three of the incidents occurred before Nov. 8, the latest discovery has further troubled minority and Jewish groups amid a surge of hate crimes across the country following the election of Donald Trump.”

Don't worry America, the media remains committed to promoting the narrative of hate crimes committed by Trump supporters. They won't let the lack of actual events get in the way of their agenda.

mike from iowa said...

Anon- you are wroooongggga. She did not call POC "superpredators".

Here is the actual quote: "But we also have to have an organized effort against gangs," Hillary Clinton said in a C-SPAN video clip. "Just as in a previous generation we had an organized effort against the mob. We need to take these people on. They are often connected to big drug cartels, they are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called superpredators — no conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why they ended up that way, but first, we have to bring them to heel."

She clearly said kids, nothing about colors.

mike from iowa said...

December 2014: After removing her personal emails, Clinton delivers all her official emails to the State Department. Her staff asks Clinton what they should do with the personal emails, and she tells them she no longer needs them. The hosting company in Colorado, Platte River Networks, is instructed to delete Clinton's existing email archives and to thenceforth preserve new emails for 60 days before deleting them.

March 2015: The New York Times reveals that Clinton's emails were hosted on a private server. The Benghazi zealots immediately subpoena her email server.

March 2015: A Platte River tech discovers that he never deleted the email archives. At this point, even though Clinton's staff has notified him not to make any changes (due to the subpoena), he deletes the old archive.

HRC is gompletely innocent of deleting her PERSONAL emails.

Anonymous said...

"December 2014: After removing her personal emails, Clinton delivers all her official emails to the State Department."

1. Using an unsecured server in the first place to house emails containing US governemnt communications at the highest levels of authority was hugely negligent to the point of treason.

2. It was not up to her to decide what was "personal" and what was not. She was legally required to turn over everything on the server that was used for State Department business. Her not doing so when she left her position was a crime, and then when finally compelled to turn them over, deleting 30,000 of these emails was another crime.

3. She was lying about what was deleted, as was shown when thousands of work-related emails were recovered from other peoples accounts and then later by the huge number uncovered by the dump of John Podesta's emails.

4. When the server was scrubbed using Bleach Bit the day after it was subpoenaed, Hillary committed obstruciton of justice through destroying evidence.

She belongs in jail, and I hope the Trump DOJ pursues this matter.

John Rivers said...

Millions of illegals voted. Democrats almost stole the election again.

We have to the Build the Wall.

Anonymous said...

We're not all old white men in suits. Younger whites are waking up to the monkeyshine.

You know these whites, they are the ones that serve in the military defending your country. You know, the stupid ones.

Anonymous said...

Eventually Hillary will win the "popular" vote by a half million people.

The Ministry of Truth said...

"Putin is defending the lawful government of Syria against a coalition of Sunni jihadists which includes ISIS. It is these 'rebels' who for the most part are the ones committing atrocities against civillians."

No. The rebels aren't the ones committing most of the violence. That would be Assad and Russia, barrel-bombing entire neighborhood, schools, and hospitals.

Both sides of the Syrian Civil War include major scumbags, but one side is killing way more civilians than the other. The jihadis are the greater threat to the West, but Assad and Russia are actually the greater threat to everyday Syrians.

None of this will matter to you, of course, because you don't like facts or Muslims.

mike from iowa said...

1. Using an unsecured server in the first place to house emails containing US governemnt communications at the highest levels of authority was hugely negligent to the point of treason.

The rules on servers was changed AFTER HRC left the State Department.


She belongs in jail, and I hope the Trump DOJ pursues this matter.

Gingrich, speaking for Drumpf said today that lock her up, just like drain the swamp was a useful tool to get votes for Drumpf, nothing more. In fact Drumpf has more Wall Street billionaires in his cabinet and WH staff than there are left on Wall Street. How are those hopey changey Drumpf lie.....er campaign promises working out for you?

mike from iowa said...

Hate crime update- I have it on good authority that every single Black man was held at gunpoint by whitey wingnuts in white robes and white, ointy hats and forced to burn and spray paint. After which they were delivered to thug white cops who beat confessions out of them and paid the white robes $100 for each criminal they could frame. I know someone who has this all on tape but he doesn't want to be identified so he ate the tape and then joined a convent for fear of his life.

Lance Cockstrong said...

Bereft of evidence, you might want to inform Congress, because both sides of the aisle seem to be swallowing it. Tons of independent research? No point in asking you to back that up. Shilling for who? CNN broadcast every Trump rally, hired Trump's campaign manager, and had other Trumpettes on air non-stop. Yiannopoulos who regurgitates other flakes, such as one Greg Phillips's "analysis" concluding that over 3 million illegal immigrants voted and as we speak is "joining True The Vote to initiate legal action"? Let's see how that turns out. And one Orly Taitz demanding criminal indictment of Obama for encouraging voting by illegal aliens? Get serious.

Josh said...

Yeah, Lance, imagine that. Our government officials, obviously astute and honest, would NEVER press for actions against Russia--of all fucking nations--bereft actual evidence.

Do you have evidence of Russian hacking? Do they? To date, the only piece of "evidence" that's been provided has been supposed anonymous sources for the CIA. And sorry if I'm a little cynical here, but Operation Mockingbird comes to mind. Weapons of mass destruction come to mind.

I'm not trying to impugn the CIA; I just want evidence. Give me a reason-one reason; ANY reason--to take the government's word (proven liars) over Julian Assange's word (proven 100% honest and reliable for over a decade of leaking documents).

From what I can tell, the only criteria you have to say I should trust the government over Assange is fuck Trump.

"No point in asking you to back that up."

Is there really a point? I know you're trying to be a snarky bitch; but you don't have to wear that mask with me. Since when have I ever been an asshole to you? I've proven time and again that I'm perfectly capable of having civil, rational discussions with you. Which leads me back to the question: Is there really a point? All you have to do is scroll through my previous comments and you'll find multiple examples of me going out of my way to source things. And what happens 100% of the time? The source is rejected--imagine my shock!--and the person just reasserts that they haven't been given a source.

Lance, if you were in my shoes, would you actually go spend your time doing that shit just so ideologues can paste their prefab "I don't believe it" responses to it? Just go down to the next post on the page and see where I just got through this shit with Field. He REFUSES to go to Twitter to see for himself, so demands I provide the sources. I provide them, and what happens? Rejection. Some variation of "This information can't be true if I don't trust the source." It's the literal equivalent of "nanny nanny boo boo"

So you're right. There is no point in asking me. Not at this point. Take it as a lie, conjecture, or whatever you want. You fucking will with or without it being sourced, and we both know it. Why do y'all insist on playing this game, as if you're only one source away from changing your minds, when in fact you're existing in the confident expectation that X and Y are lies anyway and thus all sources will be preemptively rejected?

I haven't been back to kindergarten since '84. I'm ready for my nap.

Anonymous said...

No mainstream media outlet, pundit or satirical show has balls to acknowledge how many post-Trump hate crimes were hoaxes.

John Jessica said...

My name is jessica, I was able to spy on my cheating ex phone without her finding out.....it really helped my lawyer during my divorce ...you can contact: hotcyberlord@gmail.com for spying and hacking phones,computer,email,Facebook and other social networks account,his services are cheap... His email address: hotcyberlord@gmail.com and please tell him Jessica referred you to him as he is a man with a heart of GOLD

Lance Cockstrong said...

Sensitive aren't we Josh? Ok fine who can argue with "tons of independent research"? Still doesn't explain how CNN can be shilling for Hillary when they broadcast every Trump rally etc. Poor Putin, so misunderstood. That will change when Trump drains the swamp. Except now he is punking out on that too

Anonymous said...

ibertarianism is an effect, not a cause, of a well ordered society.

Anonymous said...

Libertarianism is an effect, not a cause, of a well ordered society.

Jim said...

The Cathedral is the Academic-judiciary-media complex. It is also priestly power, even if some of the priests are not actually in academia, the judiciary, or media. It the set of people, with actual privilege under democracy. All people are equal, but some are more equal than others. The Cathedral are the ones that are more equal than others. Jews tend naturally to priesthood, but the Cathedral is not entirely ruled by Jews, and in practice Orthodox Jews are normally excluded from the Cathedral as unbelievers, revealing the Christian roots of progressivism.

The Cathedral has organizational continuity with the state religion of Massachussets, in that Harvard was the headquarters of the state religion of Massachusetts. Harvard is a heretical offshoot of the Church of England, in that Harvard was founded by clerics expelled from the Church of England by Charles the second, clerics known at the time as dissenters or noncomformists, and the State Religion of Massachusetts was founded by clerics who fled England to avoid the authority of Charles the first, clerics known at the time as Brownists. The frequent name changes, which continue to this day, indicate that this religion keeps developing a dreadful reputation.

The problem is the priesthood of all believers. This is wonderful in theory, but in practice, some believers are more equal than others, so what you get in practice is what Moldbug calls informal power – power that is unofficial, secretive, insecure, conspiratorial, and based on lies and pretence, as illustrated by the Climategate files.

It used to be that Royal society decided what was science, what was the scientific method, and awarded prestige to some scientists more than others. Its motto was “Take no one’s word for it” – which meant that scientists that claimed X had to show how they knew X. When Harvard got supremacy over the Royal Society as a result of World War II, we got scientific truth determined behind closed doors on the basis of secret evidence that they will not show you even if you mount freedom of information requests. Peer Review is in practice the clerical synods that the State Church of Massachussets demanded. Similarly accreditation of educational (credentialing) institutions.

Anonymous said...

All stereotypes are distillations of greater truths; unfiltered emanations of common experience. ‘Hey you know that thing where…’, ‘yeah that totally happened to me too!’

The parable of the Frog and the scorpion neatly encapsulates the relationship between neandertalics and the khazarians; they can hardly help themselves, it is in their nature.

Jim said...

Wikipedia treats academia and the mainstream press as authoritative, and forbids any direct personal knowledge as “original research”. If you want to say that Karl Marx was an anti semitic Jew, you are not allowed to quote Karl Marx saying genocidal things about Jews, you have to quote some academic interpreting Karl Marx’s genocidal remarks about Jews.

These days, most Academic “research” is custom ordered by the permanent government, global warming being an egregious example. The permanent government decides it will promulgate some regulation or finding in order to reward a friend or punish an enemy, and then commissions some “research” to authoritatively justify this regulation or finding. Thus most academic research is meaningless except as an answer to “Who does the permanent government intend to destroy?” We are in the third childhood of human reason, the latter days of the Roman empire being the second childhood of human reason.

Thus Wikipedia simply feeds you the poisons manufactured by Academia and the mainstream media.

Google actively censors and manipulates your searches, in order to manipulate you. This becomes apparent when you start searching conspiracy theories. Which for most conspiracy theories is probably a good thing, but Google’s idea of what is a conspiracy theory and what is fake news is alarmingly broad and grossly biased politically. I would not mind a search engine censoring conspiracy theories and fake news if it would tell me it is doing so and allow me to turn off the censorship, but Google deceptively and silently censors, thus manipulatively deceiving you.

Josh said...

"Poor Putin, so misunderstood."

Fuck Putin. But, for real, it's objective reality that this current administration treats Vladimir Putin infinitely worse than they treat Bashar al-Assad and Salman bin Adbulaziz Al Saud.

"Trump rally"

Yep. And how did they cover them? By showing only Trump, refusing to show the crowds, and saying that the crowds were small. How was their post-rally coverage of Trump? Hordes of guests after each one to tell us all that Trump's a racist Islamaphobic xenophobe and that the "alt right" is made up of racists and white supremacists, people saying that "Make America Great Again" is a slogan for making America "white" again. Yes, Lance, they covered every one of his rallies -- but ONLY so they could rub his--and his supporters'--nose in shit.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/negative-media-coverage-donald-trump-hillary-clinton/2016/12/07/id/762783/

In context with WikiLeaks, and what we've seen from media since 2008 when they dropped their pretense of impartiality, it's hard--and completely illogical--to argue that the 13% difference in negative coverage wasn't solely media attempting to effect change by displaying Trump in a more negative light than Hillary.

Though with media being sheltered and unable to actually gauge American attitudes, the way they treated Trump was a favor for him. Example: When Trump would point out that CNN's cameras refused to show the audience but only keyed in on his face, the crowds would go wild. When he called someone a bad reporter, or referred to the media as liars and crooked, the people went wild. So while they tried to effect change, using the Obama strategy, it just backfired.

And that's because media either (a) ignore these people and their problems, or (b) call them names and blame them for everyone else's problems. Let's unpack that just a tad...

IMHO, the single-most important stat of the entire election is this: California's population is 39 million, with around 3 million illegal immigrants who can easily vote in that sanctuary state. They had 18 million registered voters, and there are nearly 20% more Democrats than Republicans among that populous. Therefore it's no shock that California had over 4 million more voters for Hillary (and I'll even assume they were ALL legal; fuck it). This is the only reason people can say that Hillary won the "popular vote," because if you take California out of the equation, with its obvious blue makeup, Trump actually won the popular vote by 1.4 million in the other 49 states combined.

He dominated the Electoral College. It was nasty for Hillary. Have you seen the county/district maps? The overwhelming majority of Americans voted for Donald Trump per district/location.

How were these attitudes missed? It's not that they were missed; it's that they were dismissed. Media remained so confident in the expectation Hillary would win that they never tried to conduct fair polling. They either ignored or smeared the majority of Americans--again, outside of California--and never bothered attempting to gauge their real feelings.

Now it's Comey and Putin and white supremacists. Maybe if progressives would step outside of their bubble, put down the identity politics, they could actually win an election.

James Deplorable said...

"Russia is there for the taking, stud. See ya later."

Russia was never my country, and the record of those who tried to take it isn't so good.  Do the names "Napoleon Bonaparte" and "Adolph Hitler" ring any bells?

I'm not going to bother replying to "Mike from Iowa" any more.  His 5:43 PM comment is clearly satire, and I'm just going to laugh and move on.

And hint, Josh:  you mean "populace" (noun).  "The populous" needs a noun to modify because "populous" is an adjective.  Words ending in "-ous" are generally adjectives, as in "populous areas" and "scrofulous negroes".

jazzmary said...



My Rant of the day: I used to be on twitter, but no more..maagdalene says here:
ECONOMIC ANXIETY? NOT.

I find it ironic.. now it is called "economic anxiety.." it really means that the crappy jobs that made you ill and paid you little.. until you formed into unions, under a hail of clubs and bullets.. are gone now. The SAME UNIONS that you would NOT let any "minorities.." into. the SAME JOBS that, if a black person dared to advance, you called out the KKK on his/her uppity butt.. the SAME communities that REFUSE to support, care or even think about anyone but white folks, as you have been steeped in generations to do.. and NOW you want to be first in line.. AGAIN.. for any scraps that are getting yanked away from you now.. the VERY things that you HOWLED that "brown" folks were getting.. and the VERY things that you now miss, because you are the populations that needs your HATED brown government's help the most.. and NOW you want to flaunt your hate .. AGAIN.. and cloak it in "pride.."

You bullied anyone that does not fit your "american dream" ideals.. or looked, or worshiped, or were poorer than you were/are. To the point where anyone with any scars.. left for the cities.. to the point where potent drugs are a better existence.. and NOW you want sympathy.

You RAN out of the cities into all-white triple-pay-the-value high-taxes 'burbs that offered whiteness through and through.. and thought NOTHING of the theft of taxes of hard working brown folks who you "left behind.." to plant your pretty trees, to make your water clean..

So now, you MAD.. because the RICH WHITE MEN who stole everything from you.. your job, your pay, your pension, your money through debts.. So, in a blind rage.. you point your WHITE HATE "punishnent" vote to brown folks again..blind to the real One percent pirates..
You want to punish the VERY SAME brown citizens who have ALWAYS supported you..

Economic Anxiety?? Call it by it's real name.. Greed laced with racism.

field negro said...

What jazzmary said. *nods head*

James Deplorable said...

"The SAME UNIONS that you would NOT let any "minorities.." into. the SAME JOBS that, if a black person dared to advance, you called out the KKK on his/her uppity butt.."

White people made those jobs.  Why didn't you just make your own jobs?  What's wrong with you anyway?

"the SAME communities that REFUSE to support, care or even think about anyone but white folks, as you have been steeped in generations to do.. and NOW you want to be first in line.."

You mean, like the lack of "support" White people get from Black communities that harass, burn out and murder Whites who dare to move in or even remain where they've lived for decades?

"You RAN out of the cities into all-white triple-pay-the-value high-taxes 'burbs that offered whiteness through and through.. and thought NOTHING of the theft of taxes of hard working brown folks who you "left behind..""

You mean "were RUN out of", and if you're so great why didn't you just pay your own taxes and keep those cities—which were ALREADY BUILT FOR YOU and handed over to you mostly intact (after what you ruined in e.g. riots)—in the shape you expect?

You expect to do and pay nothing while getting everything.  That dog won't hunt.

We're tired of your hypocritical whining.  White America wants a divorce from you.  The settlement will include passage to Africa, where you can be fully and finally free of Whiteness.

Enjoy.

It's Yīshēng, Stalking B*cthes said...

The mike has been officially dropped thanks to Jazzmary!

Of course, the problem is that these weak, nonthinking mofos, will find a way to blame POTUS for their stupidity in being used by the ALL white and male 1%.

Josh said...

"the ALL white and male 1%"

Yeah, because apparently professional athletes, rappers, actors, authors, etc, don't get into the 1% if they're black. Yet another example of a mind lost entirely to corporate media. Which, ironically enough, is controlled by 100% WHITE PEOPLE. LMFAO. It's past the point of being too sad to be funny; it's so fucking sad that it's just funny again.

I second James' comments in this regard: It is not the responsibility of whites to take you along for the ride. You cannot simultaneously hate us, decry "whiteness," yet at every conceivable turn expect that whites are supposed to voluntarily improve your collective plight without you doing so much as lifting a finger--or closing your legs--to help.

These are mutually exclusive propositions. Black people in America need to decide which one they want: (1) Kill whitey. (2) Beg whitey to uplift them in society until which point they're wholly dependent on whites. (Whites will balk at either one, but at least with #2 you'll get enough sissy liberals in government to keep single mamas in da club while their bastards raise our crime rates and lower our national IQ.)

White society is under no obligation to do anything for you. Yet still and all, much of white society bends over backwards to grant special privileges to people just because they're black. Been doing it for half a century. And what happens? Blacks burn down what whites built the first time they get butthurt.

In these white nations that are supposedly so bigoted and oppressive and cruel, blacks have the highest quality of life in the history of the planet. There's not a single welfare baby or whore mama out there who doesn't have a big-screen HD TV, free medical, free food, free education, and on it goes.

What some of you demand is tantamount to jealousy. You see being rich as this "white" thing, although most white people fall right in with that 99% and don't have a pot to piss in themselves. But because they're white, you not only want to smash their pot, you want to simultaneously have them build you one and give it to you for FREE.

Start your own unions. Holy shit. I can barely comprehend the Frank Gallagher-level shamelessness of people who come right out and demand freebies as some sign of equality. Have you not an ounce of pride or self respect?

I'm not a nationalist, but I understand its appeal. I believe that we can all coexist if ever we get over this victim bullshit and Oppression Olympics. Get educated. Work harder. Stop murdering one another. Suddenly, you're back on track moving forward like the '60s when the black family wasn't a myth like Bigfoot. Though if you choose to insist that whites need to propel you through society for no other reason than your skin tone, you can expect to live pretty miserable lives as fake victims.

Anonymous said...

The FBI found out that the Clintons and Trump were in cahoots together to shade the public, but the plan backfired once the FBI found out about it. The FBI didn't want to look like suckers.

field negro said...

"I'm not a nationalist, but I understand its appeal. I believe that we can all coexist if ever we get over this victim bullshit and Oppression Olympics. Get educated. Work harder. Stop murdering one another."

I hear ya, Josh. Oh wait.....

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/6d31dba7-ab58-3147-8871-e27deda08e3d/man-wanted-for-murdering.html

James Deplorable said...

Straight from the TNB files (T because Typical, even stereoTypical) comes FN:

"I hear ya, Josh. Oh wait.....

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/6d31dba7-ab58-3147-8871-e27deda08e3d/man-wanted-for-murdering.html"

He finds ONE case and jumps up and down in triumph, hooting "WHITEY DOES IT TOO!  WHITEY DOES IT TOO!"  In his primitive mind, that makes every statistic regarding Black violence and criminality totally moot.

Meanwhile, homicides in Chicago are looking to be up almost 300 over 2015:
http://heyjackass.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/murder_trend-2016.png

The one White guy is everything, the 251 extra (mostly Black) dead in Chimpcongo alone are nothing; those Black Lives Don't Matter.  Neither will the ones who die in disputes over the last turkey drumstick or slice of pie in the next couple of days.  Will Chimpcongo hit 800?  Maybe.

And Field wonder why we mock him and refuse to take him seriously.  That cluelessness is at least half of the comedy value here.  As for why we don't want him anywhere near us, here's a hint:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/12/23/four-sentenced-in-almost-indescribable-kidnapping-torture-of-n-y-college-students/

If some Whites did this to a couple of Blacks, we'd still be hearing about it 50 years later.

Josh said...

"If some Whites did this to a couple of Blacks, we'd still be hearing about it 50 years later."

And that's if we're lucky. Likely is the case that, should America still be here in 300 years, it would be taught in kindergarten African-American intersectional gender studies to 5-year-olds about how evil and racist whites still were in 2016.

Josh said...

"WHITEY DOES IT TOO!"

A YouTuber named Tommy Sotomayor, whose pursuit to expose the truth of ghetto black mothers is tireless, has had an ongoing challenge for years and years. Every time he shows weave-wearing hoodrats shutting down a shopping mall, or their fatherless bastards pulling white people out of cars to beat them, playing the knockout game, beating people escaping hurricanes, etc, he poses his challenge: Show me that white people do it too!

To date, there have been zero people who have accepted this challenge. In a world where everyone has a cell phone, yet the Ana Kasparians of the world conveniently forget to record white racism, no one seems to be able to provide footage or any evidence of any of the 200 million white people "chimpin' out" like black people. Instead of providing evidence that whites do it too, they instead call him a self-hater and claims he hates his mother, etc.

But when a group of blacks viciously attack white people for being white, the closest folks can come to showing the reverse is a bus full of white people saying the word "nigger," and that's not only thought to be the equivalent, but worse. In these small, underdeveloped minds, a white person calling a black person a nigger is worse than a group of black people robbing, raping and murdering a white person.

Lt. Commander Johnson said...

I know I will surely miss Holder, Reno, I can't even go on.

Heni Herbal said...

The information you provide on this afternoon so rewarding once thanks .
Ciri-Ciri Penyakit Liver Dan Pengobatannya
Obat Pengapuran Tulang Pinggang
Ramuan Gagal Ginjal Tradisional
Obat Tradisional Kidney Care Capsule Green World
Tanda-Tanda Penyakit Alzheimer Pada Usia Muda

James Deplorable said...

A few days ago I noted this:

"Neither will the ones who die in disputes over the last turkey drumstick or slice of pie in the next couple of days."

The creativity of the Africoon has surprised me, because the latest shooting wasn't over drumsticks or pie, but HOT SAUCE!

http://patch.com/illinois/tinleypark/man-shoots-girlfriends-family-member-christmas-party-police

You can't make this stuff up.