Sunday, October 22, 2017

When bigots are "emboldened".

"Police in Florida arrested three men who allegedly made Nazi salutes, repeated Hitler chants and then shot at a group of protesters after white supremacist leader Richard Spencer’s speech at the University of Florida on Thursday.
The gunshot narrowly missed the group of six to eight protesters, striking a business behind them, police said.
Tyler Tenbrink, 28, William Fears, 30, and Colt Fears, 28, had driven from Texas to Gainesville, Florida, for Spencer’s speech at the Phillips Center.
The Fears, who are brothers, spoke to CNN on Thursday prior to the incident about their support for Spencer, the white supremacist leader of the “alt-right.” In one interview, William Fears said protesters did not need to be afraid of them.
“They don’t have to fear us. It’s always the left that brings the violence,” he said.
Colt Fears said he agreed with about 75% of what Spencer says. And in an interview with The Washington Post on Thursday, Tenbrink said he came to Gainesville to support Spencer.
Gainesville police spokesman Ben Tobias said Friday that he thought it was “reasonable to believe they came here to bring some hatred.”
Spencer, who advocates for a white-ethno state, arrived in Gainesville on Thursday to deliver a speech on his views at the university. The controversial event brought out a large number of students and community members protesting against the speech, as well as a much smaller number of Spencer supporters.
The three men were all charged with attempted homicide, and Tenbrink was also charged with possession of a weapon by a convicted felon.
Attorneys for the defendants did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

‘Kill them’

The incident began shortly before 5:30 p.m. Thursday, about an hour after Spencer’s speech ended, when the three men allegedly drove up to a nearby bus stop in a silver Jeep, according to police. They began threatening and yelling what the police report described as “Hail Hitler,” and other chants at a group of protesters..
An argument ensued, and one person in the group of protesters used a baton to hit the rear window of the vehicle. At that point, Tenbrink left the vehicle and pulled out a handgun, the police report said. Both Colt Fears and Williams Fears yelled at the victims “I’m going to f***ing kill you” and were also yelling “kill them” and “shoot them,” according to the police report.
Tenbrink allegedly fired at the group of protesters, police said. The three men then got back in the vehicle and fled the scene, police said.
One victim called police and “amazingly” recited to them the license plate number, police said. An off-duty deputy with the Alachua County Sheriff’s Office who was heading home after the event located the suspects’ vehicle shortly before 9 p.m. about 20 miles north of Gainesville, according to authorities. Units from two police departments and the Florida Highway Patrol conducted what was described in a police press release as “a high-risk Felony stop” on the suspects’ vehicle.
Police recovered “at least two” handguns from the vehicle, according to Gainesville police spokesman Ben Tobias.
Tenbrink admitted that he was in the vehicle at the time and was the shooter, according to a police report.
The community had taken considerable steps to prevent violence at the Spencer event.
On Monday, Florida’s governor declared a state of emergency to provide resources to law enforcement, and an extensive police presence was on campus for the event. University of Florida Pesident W. Kent Fuchs estimated that security costs were upward of $600,000.
“Yesterday, people from outside of our community came to create violence and disruption,” police spokesman Tobias said Friday. “They came to bring hate to our city, yet the people of Gainesville showed them exactly what our town is all about.”
The Fears brothers were in Alachua County jail Friday under $1 million bond each, and Tenbrink is in jail under a $3 million bond, police said.
Spencer previously helped organize the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, at which heavily armed white nationalists fought with counterprotesters in a bloody day of violence.
There, a man described as a Nazi sympathizer drove a vehicle into a crowd of counterprotesters, killing one woman, according to police." [Source]
So this is where we are in America. And according to George W. Bush, it's cool to be a bigot these days. They have been "emboldened". Gee, I wonder who is responsible for that? Again, this is not The Field Negro talking, this is a former republican president, George Bush. He can see some of the things that we have all been seeing. For instance, it seems that there is another hate march damn near every weekend.  These folks are no longer wearing hoods. They don't have to, not when they have so much support from powerful people. 
trump and his supporters would like nothing more than to get rid of black folks and the black vote. (I guess when your popularity is in the single digits with a particular group it's time to consider marginalizing them.) 
This is why trump has no problem feuding with congresswoman Wilson. His supporters enjoy seeing him beat up on a black female elected official. The fact that she is defending a constituent whose husband gave his life for this country means nothing to them. It was never about America; it was always about control and power, and trump has tapped into that energy with 30% of the American people that make up his base.
“Bigotry seems emboldened. Our politics seems more vulnerable to conspiracy theories and outright fabrication,” ...We've seen our discourse degraded by casual cruelty. At times, it can seem like the forces pulling us apart are stronger than the forces binding us together." [Source]
I never thought I would say this: But I actually miss George Bush. I hated his politics, but at his core he was not an evil narcissistic simpleton.  He was not the smartest guy in the world, but unlike the current occupant in the White House, he seemed to know his limitations, and he was intellectually curios enough to pick up a book from time to time. I doubt seriously if Mr. trump has ever read an entire book. But then, neither have most of his supporters, so I guess we can say that they are a match made in racist heaven.  
*Pic from blacksportsonline.com 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

125 comments:

Blick Black Balckety Black said...

When white guys shoot at strangers is that considered appropriating black culture?

False Flaggots said...

They began threatening and yelling what the police report described as “Hail Hitler,”

It's "Heil" Hitler.

The feds can't even train their stooges properly.

Not the FBI said...

"One victim called police and “amazingly” recited to them the license plate number, police said."

Wow. What an amazing stroke of luck.

Charlotte's Web said...

"There, a man described as a Nazi sympathizer drove a vehicle into a crowd of counterprotesters, killing one woman, according to police."

You could aslo describe him a schizophrenic, but one man's mentally ill person is another man's propaganda opportunity.

And the woman who died was not struck by the vehicle, she died of a heart attack.

Out the House said...

trump and his supporters would like nothing more than to get rid of black folks and the black vote.

field and his supporters would like nothing more than to get rid of white folks and the white vote.

It's called identity politics. Your side decided that's how the game will be played. Don't whine about it now.

PilotX said...

It's pretty depressing that this guy has no interest in being the president of the entire country. Maybe he'll see the errors of his ways but I won't hold my breath.

Genius T. Coates said...

"I never thought I would say this: But I actually miss George Bush. I hated his politics, but at his core he was not an evil narcissistic simpleton. He was not the smartest guy in the world, but unlike the current occupant in the White House, he seemed to know his limitations, and he was intellectually curios enough to pick up a book from time to time. I doubt seriously if Mr. trump has ever read an entire book. But then, neither have most of his supporters, so I guess we can say that they are a match made in racist heaven. "

George Bush used to be Hitler to Field, but now he criticizes the current Hitler, so he's cool.

Maybe someday Trump will criticize the sitting republican President, and Field will think he's cool too.

BTW Field, what's the last book you read by a non-black author?

Bitter Clinger said...

PilotX said...
"It's pretty depressing that this guy has no interest in being the president of the entire country."

Tell us about how Barack Obama had any interest in being the president of the entire country.

Anonymous said...

"The feds can't even train their stooges properly."

I don't think these guys were FBI plants, just some yahoos who brought guns somewhere they shouldn't have.

Insanely, they are being charged with “attempted homicide” and media is reporting – without the use of “alleged” – that the single shot they fired was intended to kill someone.

I believe they were acting in self defense, and I believe it is nuts to suggest otherwise.

But that doesn’t really matter, does it?

You see how that doesn’t matter?

How the facts don’t matter?

On top of that, these guys doubled-down and talked to the cops, making this entire situation exponentially worse. They wouldn’t already have these “attempted murder” charges – and possibly never would have ended up with them at all – if they had said “I want to talk to a lawyer.”

I know they are innocent of any actual wrongdoing (other than felon with a gun, which is already a pretty serious crime), but they created this situation for themselves.

Now the media is going to use these three idiots to attack everyone who opposes their globalist agenda.

Life during wartime.

Flying Junior said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
PilotX said...

"It's the answer spoken by young and old, rich and poor, Democrat and Republican, black, white, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, disabled and not disabled. Americans who sent a message to the world that we have never been just a collection of individuals or a collection of red states and blue states. We are, and always will be, the United States of America."

Flying Junior said...

Good luck spinning this one Nazis. You thought you pulled it off with Charlottesville. Yeah, the poor guy in the Dodge Challenger pursued by angry liberals with clubs.

Nobody is going to believe you except the hardcore alt-right.

Self-defense, right? That's the basic premise for shooting at protestors.

Fuck you.

Sleve McDichael said...

>BTW Field, what's the last book you read by a non-black author?<

Read "Gulag Archipelago." In progressive dogma everyone gets eaten right down to the trans midget BLM AIDS unicorn.

Volumes one and three are crucial. Two is a lot of endless suffering. Excellent writing and very accurate but it gets brutal.

Anonymous said...

@PiotX:

Obama lied; America died.

Razor said...

2004 Field Negro: Bush is Hitler
2012 Field Negro: Romney killed a guy with cancer
2017 Field Negro: Why can't Trump be like Bush or Mitt

dinthebeast said...

Colt Fears? You can't make this shit up.
"trump and his supporters would like nothing more than to get rid of black folks and the black vote."
Nope. Fergus needs "those people" for his two minutes hate. Without them, the Pig People might start to notice how utterly fucked they are, and some of them might accidentally ask why.
Then it's game over, just like when the wheels came off of the Bush administration and all of the sudden his supporters (all except the 27% hard-core crazies who would support him even if he took a dump in their baby's crib) put on stupid hats and bought Chinese-made Gadsden flags and were newly minted "independents" who had never even heard of this Bush fellow (who they had twice voted for).

" Our politics seems more vulnerable to conspiracy theories and outright fabrication,”

You mean outright fabrications like the non-existent weapons of mass destruction that you used as a pretext to kill a half a million people, destabilize the middle East, and create ISIS?

Fuck you, George.
I don't miss you.
Go paint another dog or something.
Being not as bad as Fergus is not much of an accomplishment. It puts you in the company lice, tapeworms, and any random idiot who isn't trying to kill tens of thousands of poor people.

And fuck those stupid, stupid Nazis.

-Doug in Oakland

PilotX said...

Gotcha.

PilotX said...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_ctNdLZz4us

Anonymous said...

Which oughta tell you how horrible trump is. Worse than a killer and a nazi.

Josh said...

Dumb fuckers. Lock their gay asses up.

But as to everyone freaking out about the 0.1% of the right-wing to even agree with Spencer, much less would enact violence in his name, I think we got a long, long way to go before we catch up with the black supremacists who shoot white babies, still in strollers, in the face because the NBP preach about "Kill dey kids too."

I mean, I get it -- nobody 'round here with Field's ideology would ever admit the problem cuts both ways. But not only does it cut both ways, black-against-white hate crimes are exceedingly more likely and happen orders of magnitude more often.

My point in bringing that up: The nation doesn't start flippin' their tops over that shit. We're told that those racist, hateful blacks aren't representative of all blacks, and that we shouldn't judge all blacks by it. So maybe the same standards of judgment here? Maybe every time some idiotic white Nazi terrorist goes out, maybe don't put that on all Trump supporters and white people?

Trump's election may have actually emboldened a few unhinged white people, but it's made fucking maniacs out of you never-Trumper lot. You're gonna give yourself ulcers if this shit keeps up.


When a Muslim kills someone, which happens multiple times every single day in the world, we're all told, by you finger-wagging liberals, that we can't paint Islam with a broad brush. And they kill orders of magnitude more people than white supremacists. In one day, Muslims kill more than white supremacists have killed in the past fucking century! Yet with Muslims, we can't typecast or profile or anything. But these faggot wannabe Nazis, you lot let the clutch out and scream about "white people" and "white supremacy" and "Trump" like you've been hitting the pipe.

So, again, another thing we see that's only wrong when white people do it. Maybe, just maybe, some of you people would he happier in a non-white-majority nation. And air travel is pretty cheap thanks to market parity.

Intellectual honesty goes a long way...

Flying Junior said...

I'm glad you oppose violence, Josh, but this is the second time in just three rallies in only about one month. All three rallies involved Richard Spencer. There was another video from Charlottesville besides the maniac in the Challenger. I could probably find it for you. Maybe you saw it. It took place in a parking garage. I think it was about five white guys that went after a black guy who was just an amateur journalist. About four of them had clubs, one guy broke the wooden thing that comes down to block your car while you pay to get out or wait to get in. These five guys were clubbing and kicking the helpless young black guy when a group of black youth saw what was going on and rushed the attackers. A dickhead with a gun was getting ready to shoot into the press of men when he noticed that there was another journalist with a camera taking stills of everything that was happening. He put his gun away and drove off. The other guys all got scared of the black guys that were saving the victim and took off on foot.

Anonymous said...

I don't know about Bush knowing his limitations. He was a pretty incompetent president. Not as completely ignorant in all areas of policy as Trump, who literally had zero experience in government prior to his presidency. But Bush was still fairly clueless.

What Bush was not (despite Kanye's accusations) was a racist.

We now know what an openly racist White House looks like.

Josh said...

Sure, there are unfortunately too many of these people. And I wholeheartedly condemn these faggots and think they should be shot on fucking sight. Fuck 'em. If you wanna run around America and act like it's 1832, maybe the police should come at you screaming about "Take your 2nd Amendment orally, bitch." Pew, pew, pew...

The only point I was getting at is, to be the best of my knowledge*, these people have only killed one lady. They injured some more. Have scared a lot. But their "violence" seems to be like 99% rhetoric, 1% action. And from that, we have a lot of people--some of whom are here--ready to extrapolate from that small sampling size the entirety of the white bloc that voted for Trump, and Trump himself. And I'm just saying this isn't a standard these very people allow anyone else to use. When, for example, we see a white baby get murdered by black racists, only for being a white baby, we don't see this level of mainstream freak-out. And, unfortunately, those crimes happen a hell of a lot more black-on-white in the past few decades. Like 25:1, the last math I seen on it. And also the Muslim point is very relevant: Their radicals kill more in one day than "white supremacists" have killed in fifty years, yet the same people freaking out how white supremacists will say "You can't blanket Muslim like that! It's racism!"

Basically, I don't have a bone to pick on this post. I'm not trolling to get people riled up. I'm honestly just suggesting that some people with Field's ideology, for instance, just use their own advice that they constantly give the right-wing about black criminals and Muslim criminals, and take it down a notch. Allowing these few morons to paint an entire group is really no different than whites using the worst of the black elements for cause not to hire blacks or clutching their purses. Right? The logic's the same.

*If anyone has anymore victims of white supremacists, I'd like to see. I can't find anything on Google or Bing beyond the one woman killed, and the talking point that "words are violence in this instance" and some "muh feels" bullshit.

mike from iowa said...

Since the Charlottesville Challenger was travelling an estimated 40 mph, it must have been being chased by 100 mph muthafuckas with clubs.

Poor oppressed white supremacists. It breaks my heart when they commit attempted murder and then whine about being the victims of oppression. Hope the state has a nice warm home for wayward terrorists in a nice secure facility with peoples of all colors so they can learn to assimilate - or die.

Winston Smith said...

dinthebeast said...
"Fergus needs "those people" for his two minutes hate"

Care to comment on what you need "Pig People" for, Dougie?

Josh is a bitch said...

Say stupid shit, flash tits and hope someone pays her some attention. Rinse and repeat. Josh is sooooo predictable.

Josh is kinda stupid too said...

https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/9-heinous-acts-white-nationalist-terror-just-year

Anonymous said...

https://www.alternet.org/right-wing/racist-violent-unpunished-white-hate-groups-campaign-menace

PilotX said...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/epa-cancels-appearance-of-scientists-climate-change-event-rhode-island/

Josh said...

So apart from the guy in the car, you found 7 more, 2 of which had no actual victims but only property damage (still I'd agree with the author that it's terrorism; shoot the bastards!). So, in total, 6 incidents of white supremacists killing people.

6. Out of 200,000,000 white people. My PC won't even compute that tiny a fraction.

Good job finding them. And I'm not even bothered about fact-checking them. I'll assume they're all true and that white supremacists killed people on 6 separate occasions. (And even though the article says "this year" and they're reaching back to 2015 and 1995; no matter. I forgive it.)

I'm sure James Bold could come in here and link 6 incidents of black-on-white murders from this week alone -- and it's only Monday. LMFAO!

But no matter.

My point: Let's not extrapolate an incredibly tiny minority to the whole. Y'all don't do it for Muslims, who murder orders of magnitude more people, so why when it's white people?

Why? "Josh is dumb, Josh is stupid, Josh is a faggot, Josh is a white pussy, Josh is James' boyfriend" and whatever else your low-IQ ass thinks it cute. But what's wrong with the question? Why are we supposed to freak out that white supremacists are taking over, but look at 2% of the 13% black population committing 50% of all our violent crime and say "Oh, it's not ALL black people! Let's not stereotype!"?

Does anyone care to answer this? I'm genuinely asking. Is there one honest person here who's intelligent enough to have a go at answering that?

But these maniacal racist violent fuckwits need to be put down.

Anonymous said...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/white-ex-tulsa-cop-shannon-kepler-convicted-in-death-of-daughters-black-boyfriend-jeremey-lake/

Josh is an attention whore said...

Does anyone care to answer this? I'm genuinely asking. Is there one honest person here who's intelligent enough to have a go at answering that?
----------------
You can't even answer where you get your news but now you wanna have questions answered for you? Oh, that's right we're getting the quiet calm "I wanna have an intelligent dialogue" Josh and not the "nigger" screaming James Bold befriending Josh. So hard to know which one we're getting sometimes. I guess she only screams when she's not getting enough attention. I just wish she would go to her iwn blog and the ones she gets $45,000 to write but my guess is no one reads them and she needs people to show attention.
Field, do you pay Josh 45K?

anotherbozo said...

"I never thought I would say this: But I actually miss George Bush. I hated his politics, but at his core he was not an evil narcissistic simpleton."

If we're into nostalgia, Field, please miss Obama instead. Objective analysts think he could have won a third term if not for the legal limitations.

Bush is the guy who lied us into war and legalized torture. His administration may have a higher tally of deaths than Trump's, not that I want to start a competition.

Which reminds me: "45% of Republicans favor war with North Korea." Sweet Jesus, they are so fucking ignorant.

Josh is kinda dumb said...

Why are we supposed to freak out that white supremacists are taking over, but look at 2% of the 13% black population committing 50% of all our violent crime and say "Oh, it's not ALL black people! Let's not stereotype!"?
----------------
One obvious reason is that most victims of the violent crime committed by negroes are gang affiliated so if you're not in a gang you're probably safe. White assholes lime Dylan Roof just shoot negroes period so any random negro could be a victim such as the 87 year old woman who was killed.
For such a supposedly smart person your deduction skills are pretty dull there Josh. You may wanna do some thinking skills and spend less time "debating" online sweety.

Josh wears panties said...

Using Josh logic, why should we freak out about N. Korea or Iran having nuclear weapons when only the US has used 100% of nuclear weapons?

Anonymous said...

Yeah, I guess she is trying to come across as intellectual today but we all know she is just using the CHICAGO! defense of white racism. Yawn. Somebody pays that nitwit 45K for that level of numbskullery? Wow.

Bold, James Bold said...

"Trump's election may have actually emboldened a few unhinged white people, but it's made fucking maniacs out of you never-Trumper lot. You're gonna give yourself ulcers if this shit keeps up."

Ain't it great?  Reading FN is popcorn time.  Eating popcorn now AAMOF.

OBTW, Richard Spencer is a deep-state plant with strong Bush ties.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10/exclusive-report-richard-spencer-confirmed-deep-state-plant/
Forget Spencer, he's done.  So's Jason Kessler, outed as a CNN employee.


"There was another video from Charlottesville besides the maniac in the Challenger. I could probably find it for you. Maybe you saw it. It took place in a parking garage. I think it was about five white guys that went after a black guy who was just an amateur journalist. About four of them had clubs, one guy broke the wooden thing that comes down to block your car while you pay to get out or wait to get in."

Those white guys had been pursued by armed, violent Antifa and BLM mobs and finally got the chance to turn the tables on one who got too close.  He deserved it.

So did DeAndre Harris, who had been beating people with his 5-cell Maglite (a deadly weapon) but also got too bold and got his ass handed to him in the final parking garage melee.

DeAndre Harris was arrested October 13 and released without bond.  Meanwhile, Christopher Cantwell, who only used pepper spray to defend himself against other armed attackers, is still being held without bail.  He's a political prisoner.

Anonymous said...

http://www.theroot.com/why-we-never-talk-about-black-on-black-crime-an-answer-1819092337

Big Black James Bold, a brotha who actually has a 151 IQ said...

Oh lovely, Josh's boyfriend just showed up. He must want a BJ from his sweety. Hey James what's up? I can tell from your screed that you just huffed some spray paint, I guess you didn't suck enough dicks to buy real meth. Man, you would think an inventor with several US patents wouldn't have time to post utter stupidity on a blog but other than myself who has about 30 US patents no one else would know right?
150 IQ bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

James is a bitch said...

He's a political prisoner.


Bwahahahahahahahahaha! No, he's a dumb ass racist bowl cut having nazi just like you James. Well at least he has balls and actually did something other than post on a blog like your bitch ass. You are such the pussy James.

James seems to like little bitches, male little bitches said...

https://www.google.com/amp/www.newsweek.com/christopher-cantwell-charlottesville-crying-nazi-wants-sympathy-jail-657675%3famp=1

Oh yeah, the dude crying like a little bitch. I'm starting to get the perception that all of you nazi types are bitches. Oh yeah, he was a badass the night before showing off all the guns he was going to bring but when he got snatched up by 5-0 he starts crying like a real bitch. This is the leader if your movement James, soak in all of the bitchassedness.
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Bold, James Bold said...

"I'm sure James Bold could come in here and link 6 incidents of black-on-white murders from this week alone -- and it's only Monday. LMFAO!"

6 Whites murdered by just one Black serial killer in KCMO.  Blacks don't get to mention Dylann Roof ever again.

"I never thought I would say this: But I actually miss George Bush. I hated his politics, but at his core he was not an evil narcissistic simpleton."

You just called him Chimpy McHitler for 8 years.

And you wonder why actual Nazis are making a comeback?  It's you.


"One obvious reason is that most victims of the violent crime committed by negroes are gang affiliated so if you're not in a gang you're probably safe."

Tell that to Angel Antonio Santiago.  He deserves an apology from you.  If you can find the poor kid's grave, that is.  And how about the Black mob which went around Temple University targeting White people for beatings?  The targets weren't gang-bangers.

I know, I know.  "Payback for slavery and Jim Crow."  Meanwhile, you prove that those who established Jim Crow in the first place were completely justified.  Jim Crow was to keep the dangerous animals at a safe distance from the humans without putting them in cages... or putting them down.  Those two options are still on the table.

pterochromics said...

Josh said...

When, for example, we see a white baby get murdered by black racists, only for being a white baby, we don't see this level of mainstream freak-out.


- Two points, though, stand out - and I'm just talking here, not "yelling" ((although I do use emphasis just to, well, emphasize certain things)):
1) This is not the "mainstream media"; this is a personal blog written by a Black man which is unapologetically written from a Black point of view - therefore, what the "mainstream media" might or might not do, or where it might or might not do it, doesn't apply;
and
2) Before complaining about the "mainstream media", always remember to first look at the six ((if it's even still as many as six!)) transnational corporations which have been allowed to buy-up, what, 90% or more, if I recall correctly?, of ALL media outlets, and think about what sort of a slant they permit their employees to present, and most especially, why - like, maybe the Corporatists want the majority of the population ((a.k.a., still merely the "lumpenproletariat" to them)) to be at one another's throats, because it keeps us too distracted to focus on what's actually going on.
-
- Rather than being all insulted, and imagining that allowing more people to exercise their Constitutional rights somehow "takes away" their own, maybe, just maybe, more White people should wake up to the fact that people like that Spencer guy ((whom more people follow than some evidently care to admit)) are NEVER satisfied - even if they do get to remove the first focus of their hatred and their lust for power/control, they are still left with their hatred, and rather than deal with it at the root, such people instead always find another group to scapegoat.
- Remember Martin Niemöller's famous poem.
and no, that's not a question, it's a statement, something we all must do, or else suffer the consequences of our refusal to acknowledge both history, and the nature of true tyranny.
- The root of tyranny is the insatiable lust for control over others, just as greed, far from being "enlightened self-interest"!, is the insatiable lust for material wealth. The operative phrase in both cases is "insatiable lust" - it not only dehumanizes others, but it destroys any and all people and things which don't feed that lust.
-
- That is why this sudden mushroom-cloud of fascist revivalism is frightening to so many people. WIth only a handful of exceptions, it's not "because they're White" for goodness sakes! - that absurd hallucinatory claim is part of their propaganda, not the reason for the fear; people are afraid because most have at least =SOME= level of understanding that tyrants be they major ones like Stalin or Hitler, or be they the minor ones whom we've all come across in work and/or other areas of life, are never satisfied, and always - ALWAYS - try to commandeer as much power as they possibly can.
- And yes, each time they get some part of what they lust after, far from satisfying them, it inflames their lust, it adds fuel to the fire so to speak: the more one gives them, the more they grab for.
-
- That is why people are nervous and fearful.
- Most people don't have the words and/or knowledge to express it, though, so it comes out in snips and snarks that don't really address the ROOT of their disquiet.
-
con.t------>

Proglodyte said...

anotherbozo said...
"If we're into nostalgia, Field, please miss Obama instead. Objective analysts think he could have won a third term if not for the legal limitations."

That pesky Constitution again! Keeps us from having Presidents-For-Life, lets people we hate say things we don't like and keeps us from confiscating their guns. We really need to do something about that.

James is a bitch said...

Speaking of cages did youvsee how your "political prisoner" Cantwell cried like a bitch when he knew he was going to jail?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Real tough guys just like you huh James?

pterochromics said...

----->con.t

-
- As for "Black on White" crime, I really don't see how one can say it "doesn't get reported", because it does - just probably to a lesser or greater degree in certain areas of the country, and in some areas, blown up disproportionately; and quite possibly, toned down in a few markets, although it's just as likely that there isn't as much of it as people like that Spencer guy like to claim.
- The reason that people are upset about White-on-Black violence is that, for a long time, unnecessary police force/violence has been visited disproportionately upon Blacks, and all "non-White"-appearing people, AND had been going unreported, and therefore, unpunished.
- It's not about "Black being above the law"; it's about SOME POLICE ignoring the law, setting themselves above it.
- Of course, people being human, someone takes it to some extreme, and then others get upset and come back with replies that are just as extreme, and then the entire POINT gets lost, that point being that
EVERYONE
is at risk when police, OR government, ignore the law and any semblance of at least *trying* to be Just and Ethical/Moral.
- That is true for the same reason as described above:
the lust for power and control only increases when it is fed, and it expands the pool of victims so as to feed itself as much as possible. People who say tings like "just obey the law and you'll be fine" either cannot, or more often will not, acknowledge the root fact, the nature of that lust - and many who will not, actually share that lust.
-
- I await the inevitable catcalls and silly accusations and and schoolyard-insults. OK, actually, no, I don't "await" them, because I have a slew of items to go work on and get done so I can get them to my clients, regardless of what ridiculous puerile imaginings some people will inevitably choose to have about me.
- To everyone else, though, have a good day! :)
-

Bold, James Bold said...

4 replies to 1 little troll in just 13 minutes?  Damn, I'm on a roll today.

Dylan Roof said...

Blacks don't get to mention Dylann Roof ever again.

Dylan Roof Dylan Roof Dylan Roof Dylan Roof Dylan Roof Dylan Roof Dylan Roof Dylan Roof Dylan Roof Dylan Roof Dylan Roof Dylan Roof

Anonymous said...

Proglodyte said...

That pesky Constitution again! Keeps us from having Presidents-For-Life, lets people we hate say things we don't like and keeps us from confiscating their guns. We really need to do something about that.


Um, no-ooo, the Constitution only works when both people and the government abide by it.

After all, one of the "best" Constitutions was that of the USSR - the only problem being that it was ignored by the government, and therefore, considered a joke by the people.

Anonymous said...

When, for example, we see a white baby get murdered by black racists, only for being a white baby, we don't see this level of mainstream freak-out.
------------------
or when we see a white baby raped to death by a white male we see ZERO press coverage. It's almost as if even white crusaders like Josh, Lt. Commander Pussy and James Bitch only seem to give a fuck about white folks when they are touched by a negro. Funny that. If you're white you can kill, rape, burn or whatever the fuck you want to other whites (even babies) and these bitches won't utter a peep. Hmmmmm, are these racists or something? Nah, couldn't be that could it?

Anonymous said...

Jeez, it's almost as if you're not doing what James says.

James' mom said...

Yeah guys, feel free to ignore James. He's always been a little off, maybe because I had sex with my brother and he's probably James' daddy.

Bold, James Bold said...

"- The reason that people are upset about White-on-Black violence is that, for a long time, unnecessary police force/violence has been visited disproportionately upon Blacks, and all "non-White"-appearing people, AND had been going unreported, and therefore, unpunished."

Wrong.  The "upset" is because of the moral inversion which is part of the subversion pushed by the Frankfurt School, which treats non-Whites as literally sacred objects who may not be criticized, let alone harmed, by Whites.  Violence is often necessary to deal with Blacks, as a great many of them are too stupid to understand or be deterred by anything else.  Seriously, when prison is full of your buddies and your fambly throws you a big party when you get out, you're going to be bothered by a stint behind bars?  But if you are the guest of honor at a boot party, you're going to avoid that kind of situation.

After seeing the psychopathic nature of Black activists including Field, I have zero sympathy for Black anyone or anything.  I'm done with leftism in general.  It all has to go, including its sacred minorities.

Flying Junior said...

Why are we supposed to freak out that white supremacists are taking over, but look at 2% of the 13% black population committing 50% of all our violent crime and say "Oh, it's not ALL black people! Let's not stereotype!"?

You said it yourself, Josh. It is terrorism. Another legal concept is hate crime which carries its own penalties and for good reason.

I have heard the meme that anyone who kills is guilty of a hate crime. True in a sense, but we all know what hate crime is. How about the guy who was dragged behind a pickup truck for a mile? Hate crime or just lethal violence.

Thank the Goddess in this case the boys were too fucked up to aim straight. But we need to ramp down the rhetoric. The supremacists are very much emboldened which was the real thrust of Field's article. This Richard Spencer is a dangerous provocateur. His ideas aren't really political or right-wing that I know of. He just hates black people, Jews or liberals or protestors? Everyone could see "Unite the Right" was really all about ginning racial hatred and violence. I don't really know the guy but you can see the circles that he is travelling with. You can see the damage everywhere he goes.

Hate Fact™ said...

"Another legal concept is hate crime which carries its own penalties and for good reason"

That reason is to give state the ability to selectively punish certain groups more than others.

Look up "anarchotyranny".

you-know-who said...

Holed, James holed said...

pterochromics wrote: "- The reason that people are upset about White-on-Black violence is that, for a long time, unnecessary police force/violence has been visited disproportionately upon Blacks, and all "non-White"-appearing people, AND had been going unreported, and therefore, unpunished."

Wrong. The "upset" is because of the moral inversion which is part of the subversion pushed by the Frankfurt School


- Another load of crap. First of all, that "claim" is contrary to reporting, eye-witnesses ((yes, some of whom are - GASP!!! - White)), and what police departments themselves have been looking into. Also, here is a link to info re: the Frankfurt School which he impugns:
http://www.iep.utm.edu/frankfur/
-
- Here is what actually pisses-off Spencer's butt-monkey:
"The initial idea of an independently founded institute was conceived to provide for studies on the labor movement and the origins of anti-Semitism, which at the time were being ignored in German intellectual and academic life."
- OH MY STARS AND GARTERS!!! CALL OUT THE MILITIA!!! How DARE such a thing be set up by those stinking rotten genetically-inferior White Germ........oh, um, wait a minute......
-
[Eye-Fricking-Roll...!!!]
-
- "Makes minorities sacred", Good Grief!, that's worse than merely being in error - it's a deliberate misrepresentation ((a.k.a. "a lie"")) mewled by someone who has *nothing* going for him other than being - so he claims - "White", and who cannot cope at all with the idea that ANY person of Northern European ancestry *would or could* dare have the temerity to see through his supposedly-"bold" drivel - as if using emphasis makes his irrational hate-speech "profound".
- OTOH, it*is* profoundly something...
-

you-know-who said...

Hate Fact said...

"Another legal concept is hate crime which carries its own penalties and for good reason"

That reason is to give state the ability to selectively punish certain groups more than others.


- More hokum, because it cuts ALL ways. Some people just choose to *only* see when it applies to "one of their own" or more accurately, someone whom they *perceive* as being "one of their own".
-

James is kind of dumb said...

After seeing the psychopathic nature of Black activists including Field, I have zero sympathy for Black anyone or anything. I'm done with leftism in general. It all has to go, including its sacred minorities.
-----------------
Hmmmmm, let's see. Field is a gainfully employed barrister who upholds the constitutional rights of citizens and often humorously makes observations about life while James has no observable job and only rails against people different than himself. Nah bro, we'll keep Field while you pack your panties. Don't let the door knob hit you in the ass on the way out.

you-know-who said...

anotherbozo said...

Which reminds me: "45% of Republicans favor war with North Korea." Sweet Jesus, they are so fucking ignorant.
12:43 PM


- See, what interests me is the other 55%
-
- The 45% are probably lost causes, and no amount of discussion can or will change their minds. I'm personally far more interested in the 55%.
- I personally think that there are still some actual Republicans ((in the sense that Eisenhower was a Republican, and not the Bircher-Dominionist-etc. extremists who have militantly comandeered the GOP)) who are just as appalled by Donald as are moderates of both leanings, and centrists. ((I d not include extremist Leftists because ALL extremists are, by definition, dismissive of, and dangerous to, the Majority of people)).
-
- There are a heck of a lot of people who have more in common with one another, than they have in common with either of what the major parties have become. Some people are fomenting devisiveness, and claiming that even the mere mention of Equal Constitutional Rights is supposedly "exactly the same thing" as "making minorities sacred".
- No, it's not, except in the sense that if human life is sacred, and if we are all "created equal" ((which AFAIK meant "equally human", in other words, "equally the Creator's children", since Jefferson was a Deist)), then ALL are sacred, in the most basic sense.
-
- When anti-equality types claim that it "takes their rights away" to allow other people to exercise *their* Constitutional rights, it is, in essence, akin to claiming that, if one has a second child, it meas that some love "must be taken away from" the first child to give to the second.
- Any reasonably-normal parent knows that it doesn't work that way.
- Neither love, nor rights, are like a basket of marbles, with only X-number of marbles to go around. Any reasonably-normal parent, reasonably-normal *human being*, knows that love GROWS when there is more to love. It's the same with rights.
- The main thing that's being "restricted" are certain preciously-perceived-"rights" to harm other people if they were defined, or perceived, as belonging to "certain groups", which pretty much ended up encompassing most of the world's population.
-
- So, I feel compelled to wonder, What about that 55% of Republicans who *do NOT* want to rush into war with N. Korea ((which would inevitably end up involving China...and the possibility, or ?probability?, of a "Guns of August" scenario))?
-
- Would it be possible to get the Moderates to finally ignore the two extremes, and get together to have - dare I say it? - *reasonable* governance, rather than having the whole nation be sucked into one or another gravity-well of extremist nuttery? Is that *reallY* such a radical suggestion these days?
- If being a Moderate is now radical, well, I really never thought I'd live long enough to see it happen, but it happened far more quickly then I'd imagined - but be that as it may, I personally would like to see a lot more "Radical Moderates" ;) stand up and say the famous "We're sick and tired, and we're not gonna take it any more!", and kick *ALL* the nuts to the proverbial curb.
- But hey, I'm just crazy that way.... [shrug]
-


Black James Bold, a brother who actually is an orbital engineer said...

After seeing the psychopathic nature of white nationalists including James, I have zero sympathy for white anything or anyone. I'm done with rightism in general. It all has to go including its sacred whites.

mike from iowa said...

Asshole Drumpfuck and his henchpeople want to stop paying for birth control and have fuckers rely on the rhythym method. What the fuck!!! White people ain't got rhythym.

Bold, James Bold said...

"Field is a gainfully employed barrister"

You mis-spelled "affirmative-action hire."  His civil-service job doesn't take up much of his time as it's done by White guys for whose work Feeled takes the credit, which allows him to play private lawyer as well.

"who upholds the constitutional rights of citizens"

Using bogus accounts of events to stoke race hatred is an attack on rights.

"and often humorously makes observations about life"

You don't get that YOU are the joke here.

"while James has no observable job and only rails against people different than himself."

I actually took a public-facing side gig recently, not for the money but because it's a lot of fun; I'm definitely observable there.  Meanwhile I'm researching laser-sintering as a possible solution to a problem that cropped up in my search for suitable parts.  And then there's the fact that every B787 you see has some of my work in it.  Heck, you may have owned products I had a part in making.  But none of these things will ever catch your attention.

That's the problem with you.  Even after the reason for your failure to understand is explained to you, you cannot take that information and bridge the cognitive gap.  For you, your first impression is all you will ever be able to grasp.  You go through life in a stupor, unablel to see through the fog of your own mental limits.  You are stupid.


"I have zero sympathy for white anything or anyone. I'm done with rightism in general. It all has to go including its sacred whites."

You won't find any in Liberia or Zimbabwe.  You won't have to fight 50 million rednecks with scoped deer rifles to get to your White-free, right-free paradise in Africa either (that would be rather dangerous).  So when are you leaving?  Put something up on GoFundMe, lots of us will only be too happy to wish you bon voyage.

"White people ain't got rhythym."

More White babies is a good thing.

James is kinda inbred said...

More White babies is a good thing.
--------------
Except if the parents are siblings like in James' case. Then they end up stoooooopid and have large foreheads just like James.

Flying Junior said...

you-know-who

Let's hope that you are right. If there are still moderate republicans out there they are very complacent when it comes to resisting Trump. He didn't get much pushback from mainstream republicans until he praised the white supremacists and tried to stir up the hornet's nest in Korea. Or maybe Bob Corker finally got fed up with ignoring anti-social behavior.

The problem is that the republicans so oppose any liberal or democratic ideas that they are happy just to be winning. It cuts both ways. I'm starting to hate them too.

dinthebeast said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Fake News Update said...

anotherbozo said...
"45% of Republicans favor war with North Korea."

Another fake news poll.

Do you really believe the stuff you post?

We have always been at war with Eastasia said...

Picture Doug screaming "Fergus!!!" for two minutes every day at a picture of Trump.

dinthebeast said...

"Care to comment on what you need "Pig People" for, Dougie?"

I don't need them. But they deserve to be represented in government just like I do.

If they, or you, don't like being called Pig People, they, and you, are perfectly free to stop behaving in such a stupid and destructive manner as to merit the name.

"45% of Republicans favor war with North Korea."

The latest numbers I could find, from last year, I think, put "Republican" and "lean Republican" at right around 42% of the electorate (it is probably less by now). Multiply that by the 45% stupid and reprogrammably dangerous enough to favor getting millions of our allies killed in a first strike on North Korea (that was the poll question) and you get a skosh less that 19%.
So Fergus apparently has 8% fewer meat sticks in the "mindless follower" box than Bush did at the end of his presidency, when the Iraq war was obviously off of the rails, New Orleans had been drowned, and the economy was spiraling down to the worst recession since the thirties.
I only refer to "the 27% crazies" because that's how many dead-enders were still holding on to the toxically disintegrating Bush administration when their Republican brethren were frantically burning their "Bush/Cheney" yard signs and calling themselves Tea Party Independents who had never even heard of George W. Bush because it had become too embarrassing to admit they had voted for him twice in polite company.
So Fergus isn't commanding the size of idiot hordes that he threatens Republican congresscritters about primary challenges with. Perhaps that is part of the reason he can't get any legislation passed.
Well, that and the legislation has been abominable and Fergus is incompetent, ignorant, and offensive to the constituents of said congresscritters.

-Doug in Oakland

Yīshēng said...

Rednecks made my time at UF decidedly less pleasant, I KNEW some dumb shit like this would happen.

Yīshēng said...

So senator McCain said the "bone spur" line is COMPLETE bullshit gee, I wonder who he was talking about?

BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!!!

"Gasps for air"


BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAABAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAABAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAABAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAABAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAABAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!!!!!

Yīshēnigger said...

Niggers made my time at UF decidedly less pleasant, I KNEW some dumb bitch like Yisheng would try to make everything that happens about herself.

PilotX said...

He should have confronted the wanna be soldier boy who went to a pretend military academy the second he started chirping about how he likes heroes who weren't captured. He let it go and now look where we are. Day late and a dollar short.

mike from iowa said...

Infowhores sez 50% of Americans favor pre-emptive frontal lobotomy on Drumpfuck Drumpfuck

mike from iowa said...


Yīshēnigger said...

Niggers made my time at UF decidedly less pleasant, I KNEW some dumb bitch like Yisheng would try to make everything that happens about herself.


No wonder whitey wingnuts kids are part born feral and dangerous. The way their inbred parents court the female of the species, they should consider themselves fortunate they can stick it in anything.

Bold, James Bold said...

Found a video of Yīshēng in her evolution class down in Florida.

Do you wonder why we don't take your claims of "oppression" or even basic humanity seriously any more?  We have too much evidence that you act like animals.  Yes, even those of you who can get over the AA-lowered bar to get into college.

mike from iowa said...

Any guesses what happens to the three white killers if they had been black when the cops pulled them over?

Baldingo is still going in circles, stroke, stroke, stroke. The leader of the circular clan, doesn't have a plan, each and every man must keep time best they can.

First missed beat and they start all over from the top. Anna one, anna two anna three- champagne music to choke yer chicken by.

James is kinda dumb said...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gsC4kf6x_Q0

Here's James in his full glory. No need to wonder why his forehead is so large because his mom gave away the secret. My guess is it won't be long before he becomes an uncle/daddy/brother.

Anonymous said...

Yes, even those of you who can get over the AA-lowered bar to get into college.
-----------
Says the guy who couldn't finish 7th grade. Wow, the stooooopid in this one is pretty strong.

Josh wears panties said...

Hey Josh, any thoughts of James' comments or is this just an example of the what's for?

Yīshēng said...

PilotX said...
He should have confronted the wanna be soldier boy who went to a pretend military academy the second he started chirping about how he likes heroes who weren't captured. He let it go and now look where we are. Day late and a dollar short.
>>>>

The understatement of the century!!

Anonymous said...

What about the black serial murderer at large in Tampa Florida???

Anonymous said...

What about the black serial murderer at large in Tampa Florida???
-----------------
He's trying to get his numbers up like the white guy in Vegas.

I'z a doctor! said...

Bold, James Bold said...
"Found a video of Yīshēng in her evolution class down in Florida."

Good find, James. Everyone should know just what Yisheng is like.

What a Sheboon!

BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!!!

"Gasps for air"

BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAABAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAABAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAABAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAABAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAABAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!!!!!

5:45 PM

Anonymous said...

knockout game alive and well:

http://www.cwbchicago.com/2017/10/woman-charged-with-attacking-robbing-81.html

Anonymous said...

http://breaking911.com/dna-links-two-time-felon-home-invasion-rape-elderly-woman-brooklyn/

Josh said...

"This is not the "mainstream media"; this is a personal blog written by a Black man which is unapologetically written from a Black point of view"

1: Ptero, a year ago, I'd agree with that 100%. But now this blog is nothing but steppin' 'n fetchin' for the white DNC overlords. Seriously. 99.9% of shit Field posts now is anti-Trump shit you'll find in any Soros-controlled daily mailer.

1a: "Black" point of view makes all black people sound like a monolith that has to think, act, vote a certain way. Not for nothing, but this was an attitude given to black people, IMO, by white Democrats who wish to keep you stunted in society and needed them to step in and play the white savior. May have been a time it was advantageous to think as a monolith, but those evolutionary pressures are no longer present. Individualism would go a long, long way to helping solve many issues in downtrodden black areas.

2: Corporatists can suck my ass. Ironically, the nation's biggest corporatists are those millennials who claim to be Marxists, who basically prop hordes of corporations up as their number-one customer base. lol

"mushroom-cloud of fascism" -- yeah, my point is it's like a puff a smoke from a back-firing '68 Chevy. It's not a nuke, mate. And I was simply asking the question of why--to borrow your analogy here--people are treating firecrackers like a nuke when, elsewhere in society, we continually have much bigger bombs going off on a daily basis yet are told not to panic -- no mushroom cloud; nothing to see here, people.

I know I come here a lot to troll and just to see people get angry. It's funny to me. But I can't see what's wrong with the question of asking why the same people have two separate reactions. And thank you for fleshing out your reasoning on it. Glad to see this blog has some people willing to speak intelligently rather than spamming ad hominems.

"As for 'Black on White' crime..." I mean mainstream reporting. I live in NOVA now, outside of DC, grew up in Suitland, MD, and I've seen it reported plenty on the locals all my life. My point: The "white supremacists" are CNN, MSNBC, PBS, Sunday morning wall to wall, NYT, etc, whereas I had to grit my teeth and watch a post-Bill-Schulz Fox to see a story about a white baby, in a stroller, being murdered.

And I agree that people take things to extremes. It's what a lot of people do. Again, I'm speaking about the huge mainstream media outlets, whose stories are in a much better position to whip people into frenzies; e.g. if CNN is preaching that white supremacy is a nuke, people are going to be scattering into fall-out shelters. It's not a nuke. It's a firecracker. It should be stamped out ASAP, but it's far from a nuke. We still see it in society, the FBI and DOJ stats to back it up, happening the other way around literally 25-times more. Twenty-five times. And other than a few loony
right-wing outlets, which are far from mainstream, I cannot see where people are treating that as a mushroom cloud, and it's primarily because, IMO, they aren't being told to treat it as such by fearmongering media.

"silly accusations of schoolyard insults" -- I couldn't care less about that. I have half a dozen people here who troll every word I say, trying to outdo each other on insults. I find it to be fucking hilarious and I'll insult right back. lol No issues there, mate.

....

"only seem to give a fuck about white folks when they are touched by a negro"

You either intentionally missed the point or are too stupid to understand the point. But since you're a habitual quote-mining cocksucker, I'm guessing it's the latter and you're not smart enough to comprehend the point. Sad.

Josh said...

"Found a video of Yīshēng in her evolution class down in Florida."

Evolution is something a collectivist nut of any race should not be learning. They carry their presuppositions into it, are basically religious people, and refuse to "learn." I guess this is why students at Mizzou and other places demand "easier," black-specific courses that only require you to agree whitey is the devil to pass with flying colors.

This insane bitch doesn't understand evolution, and when she realizes she's the dumbest person in the class, she gives in to her tribal propensity for violence. Ironically, since it's an evolution class, a few there probably understand these behaviors are a direct result of behavioral modernity not passing through her ancestral genome as a set of cognitive characteristics in her phenytype.

In other words, many who understand evolution expect this behavior exponentially more from blacks, and lo and behold... Be the stereotype and then bitch and white folks for using it!

This isn't a bitch in grade school. This is fucking college. And clicking on this to watch it on YouTube, there are dozens upon dozens of them in my suggestion bar now. My favorite ever: The black girl at Yale screaming that college is supposed to be like "home."

1) No. It's not.
2) You'll probably find men at the "home" in college, whereas it's only your mama at your house. Which is apparent from the way you act.

Yīshēng said...

Bone spurs, BAWHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!

Josh is kinda pathetic said...

Seems Josh has a lot of time to post meaningless and worthless drivel every night. You would think the editor in chief of her own site and 45K contributor to other sites would be too busy to get involved in juvenile back and forth every night here. Wanna bet she's just as much the editor and paid commentor that James is the genius inventor he claims to be.
Racist whites are so transparent in their attempts to be superior they fall for their own lies. Pathetic if you ask me.

Josh said...

Unlike your low-IQ ass, I can bust out a comment in under 5 minutes. Now, I know you have no idea what it is to actually be employed, since you've likely never had a job and just keep using your mama's rebooted EBT card, but one who has a job doesn't work said job every waking minute of every day. You work for a few hours, make your money, and, boom, you're done working!

Something to think about if ever the band-aid is pulled from your leeching ass. JS

Besides, I write 1 article a week for Halsey News, and DIRE isn't even launched yet. I would say "You'd know this if you'd read," but that presupposes you can read. Sure, you can probably sound out words in your head, or take an hour and a half to compose an insult-riddled 50-word diatribe, but you don't seem to be able to grasp what it is to retain what you have read. Which goes a long way to explaining why schools fail despite receiving more funding, TBH, but that's another "blame whitey" debate.

The point here: People who are gainfully employed don't work 24 hours a day and can sometimes spare five minutes... here or there. You wouldn't know, but it's the truth. Ask anyone who's employed!

How many people who post here have jobs? By your own logic, everyone here must be unemployed, lest they wouldn't have all this time to spend here. Holy shit! 90% of the people in these comments are here 10-times longer than I am. They must not work at all! Lazy bastards; winos, I bet. Yisheng, Mike and Doug especially -- and YOU! You post here with half a dozen different fucking anonymous names, stalking me around on every single post! Well, never mind. We've already established you don't work. LOL

LOL You can't fix stupid.

But I'll take that bet. Contact Halsey News, or get at us at Twitter. I'll put up $1,000 against a bag of 20-26 shrimp you can get for me on your mama's EBT card. I want some seafood.

Josh is a silly white girl said...

Flash tits for attention rinse and repeat. Josh is so predictable.

Josh and James are a cute couple but kinda dumb said...

And to think Josh and James profess to be sooooooo smart. Scary huh? The white supremacy movement is in real trouble.

Bold, James Bold said...

"Any guesses what happens to the three white killers if they had been black when the cops pulled them over?"

Ye gods you faggot.  They killed nobody.  They HIT nobody.  They hurt exactly nobody and nothing... and you call them killers?  You are beyond fucked in the head.

"Says the guy who couldn't finish 7th grade."

Finished the 13th when I was of age to graduate the 12th, TYVM.  Finished 16th at 15.5.  Got TFO of Wackademia and never looked back.

"This insane bitch doesn't understand evolution, and when she realizes she's the dumbest person in the class, she gives in to her tribal propensity for violence."

That's why evolution kills Black people:  they don't have the brains to survive anything but challenges from hostile tribes or insect-borne diseases.  Everytthing else is beyond their comprehension.

"How many people who post here have jobs?"

My employer PAYS me to DRINK on the job!  How cool is that?

James and Josh are dumb assed fake bitches said...

James you know you don't have a job. You don't have any patents. You don't have a college degree. You didn't get 1530 on your SAT. You are not an orbital engineer. Every single thing you say is a lie that only your little bitch Josh believes. You are a fucking joke just like your tit flashing girlfriend.

Black Power said...

Josh is kinda pathetic said...
Seems Josh has a lot of time to post meaningless and worthless drivel every night.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Josh/James are the EXACT same pile of Orangutan shit that posts everyday AND night.

Bold, James Bold said...

Anonymous Coward @1:50 AM, how much are you willing to bet on each of those things?

I've offered a $200,000 payoff to anyone willing to bet $100,000 against me that I'm making this stuff up.  Not a one of you has dared to take me up on any of them.  You are just niggers talking shit, because that's all you have in you.

James is kinda dumb said...

Bwahahahahahaha! Ok, James I accept your bet. Take a picture of the $200,000 and we can talk.
(James has to be the single dumbest person in human history). We don't need your money, we'd be happy if you just posted something remotely intelligent.

James is an exceptional moron said...

Where would that moron get $200,000?
BwahahahahahahahahHHahahaha! The same place that pays Josh to write?
BwahahahahahahahahahahHahaha!

Big Black James Bold said...

I'll put up $500,000 to your $200,000 that says you're full of shit.

Bold, Black James Bold said...

You are just niggers talking shit, because that's all you have in you.
-------------
No, I'm a highly intelligent Black man who has a PhD in Orbital Engineering, I have over 20 US patents, I go through advanced math books looking for errors, I write books and I get $50,000 for every article I write online. So you're wrong again as usual Jamie.

pterochromics said...

Josh said...

"This is not the "mainstream media"; this is a personal blog written by a Black man which is unapologetically written from a Black point of view"

1: Ptero, a year ago, I'd agree with that 100%. But now this blog is nothing but steppin' 'n fetchin' for the white DNC overlords.


- I chose to leave Soros out of it. I don't have any clue as to whether the DNC is paying Field or not, but that question begs another question, which is: Why is it OK for you to get paid, as you've said, to comment on your political opinions, but somehow despicable for Field, or anyone else who is right-moderate and "left-wards" thereof, to do the same?
- My personal opinion regarding the DNC muckety-mucks notwithstanding, if someone can earn a bit of a living by being paid by the DNC to write, that, in and of itself, should be absolutely *no* different from someone being paid by a right-wing source.
- So, sorry, but impugning someone merely on the basis of a cunjectured-and-unsubstantiated employer, while lauding one's own employment for the same work, is illogical if accidental, and hypocritical if deliberate.

1a: "Black" point of view makes all black people sound like a monolith that has to think, act, vote a certain way.

- Why do people continually assume I'm Black, when I've stated repeatedly that I'm Slavic, and specifically, Northern Slavic, blue eyes, blonde, doesn't tan? Is it because I never reneged on my Oath to "defend and protect the Constitution" - meaning, the ENTIRE Constitution - "from all enemies, foreign and domestic"...?
- I don't give a hang whether someone is Black, White, Brown, Beige, Yellow, Red, Blue, Green, or whatever the heck. It doesn't even matter whether I love someone, merely like someone, or even whether I have an intense *dislike* - my Oath stands, PERIOD. Taking it, and standing by it, required me to acknowledge that
***we are all *created* equally human and we are ALL "equal before the law", with equal Civil, meaning Constitutional and Legal, Rights.***

- I never claimed that any racial group is either completely sacred, or completely evil. All living beings, including all humans,
- Across all groups, for example, one finds sociopaths and psychopaths. Some people are born with organic neurological problems (to the best of my recollection, a lack of adequate connection between the amygdala/emotional-center and the rest of the brain) which causes an inability to feel emotions towards others, and in severe cases, a lack of emotion even towards oneself, such that one doesn't care whether one lives or dies. I don't know off-hand whether any possible causes for that physical disconnect have been found. - On the other hand, some people start out with normal emotions, and develop sociopathic behaviors due to various factors, including physical factors such as nutritional deficiency, and/or psychological factors such as abuse and/or other severe stresses during early childhood. Those as the specifics I can recall at this moment ((especially since I'm doing several things at once...)), and in no way represent anything more than a very brief summary.
-
To be continued------>

pterochromics said...

@ Josh
Continuation - damned 4096 character limit :p

- The point is that sociopath and psychopathy occur in all human groups. I don't know any statistics, and I refuse to either speculate, OR accept any speculation, regarding any frequency data, especially since the causes are, to the best of my knowledge, not known.
- Then, just to make it even more complex ((and in a way, more human, given that we are complex creatures)), there are genetic factors, ranging from stable genes, to epigenetics, to post-fertilization mutations of the fetus caused by various "pollutants" ((basically, things that are not normally found in the natural environment)), to maternal stress and/or illness ((such as exposure to Rubella)) and/or malnutrition during gestation, to post-birth malnutrition of the child.
- Again, all of those can and do occur across all ethnicities.
-
- An additional complication is that different individuals can be affected differently. Why? Well, nobody is quite sure. Children from the same family, raised in nearly the same environment, can turn out to be *completely* different. Others turn out like the proverbial "peas in a pod". One does one's best to try to understand what one can, and improve those things which can be improved ((such as nutrition)).
-
- All of the described "possible factors in the development of maladaptive social behaviors and/or intellectual problems" are biological facts. All of the above, as I repeatedly noted, occur across ethincities. If a specific problem occurs with more frequency in a given group, all of the potential factors must be examined and analyzed so that the problems can be mitigated.
- For example, there is that one very small area in New Jersey where the cancer rates were abnormally high ((sorry, that was a long time ago and I don't recall details)); fairly recent data listed Kentucky as having the highest cancer rate in the US. It would be absurd to claim it is "all just race", or worse, "all just their own lazy fault", and just ignore it, when some decent research could reveal the actual cause, and how to lower the rate.

- Anyway, getting back to behavior, the fact is that one, or a combination, of >any or all of those factors listed regarding sociopathic behavior can cause other problems, including intellectual problems and a host of personality disorders.
-
---> yes, another continuation - being succinct has never been one of my talents...

Josh said...

"Why is it OK for you to get paid, as you've said, to comment on your political opinions, but somehow despicable for Field, or anyone else who is right-moderate and "left-wards" thereof, to do the same?:

- I never accused Field of getting paid; just for parroting the left's talking points
- I also never said anything was wrong with it either way; it was just an observation

"Why do people continually assume I'm Black"

I didn't accuse you of being black; but you did objectively imply that to be "black" is to think a certain way or have a certain point of view. A "black" perspective. What even is that? It's literally stating that every black person is the same and has the same thoughts and experiences. As a Slavic person, maybe you want to check yourself and realize that collectivism isn't a very nice way to view people, even if you believe you are viewing them in a favorable light. Despite how many black people do seem to hold this belief, e.g. Field's house/field-negro dichotomy, it's still stereotyping an entire people.

"An additional complication is that different individuals can be affected differently. Why? Well, nobody is quite sure"

We sorta do understand the mechanisms behind this. You're just not allowed, in a polite, PC society, to point to genetic mutation and suchlike to pinpoint anything, because people are scared to death that you'll start building an IQ hierarchy or suggesting that cognitive traits differ in races, and that group X has more A or B than group Y. And people think this is a white supremacist racist trick, just like diehard Christians think evolutionary science in general is some atheist-led trick to get rid of god. It's a taboo subject, but people who have studied it are fairly confident as to why person X can differ from Y so much. The gist of it is that mating doesn't produce clones. Siblings can be 100% genetically identical yet still experience different activation, particularly when two alleomorph recessive traits combine.

But, again, if we ever admit genes are responsible for things, the fuel that's ignited by a slew of different factors, then people are scared to fucking death that it will lead to the hierarchical shit about races and might point out that blacks recreate Africa everywhere they happen to go in the world because that is how they evolved, or something similar. Just an example. Apropos for this blog.

pterochromics said...

@ Josh
-------con.t again YIKES:

- The point of all of the preceding is that socially maladaptive behaviors are in no way the sole purview of any one ethnic group. There are numerous factors involved, some known and "fixable", others unknown - why, after all, do some kids, who have loving parents and the best environment, etc., possible, turn out to be drug addicts and/or violent criminals, while some people who grow up in really bad conditions become physicians, lawyers, engineers, nurses...? That question crosses all ethnic "lines".
-
- So I have never claimed that any "race" or ethnic group is "above" another, or "sacred" as someone ((not you/Jsh - someone else)) had ridiculously put it. My sole claims are, and for the past 40+ of my Adult years, have consistently been, that:
1) human is human,biologically and physiologically in terms of fact, and spiritually in terms of my own personal opinion,
2) maximizing human potential benefits benefits all humans, even if "only" indirectly,
3) all humans have equal civil and legal rights and responsibilities, elaborated below.
-
- Regarding point #3, it's not a matter of me having a "lovey-touchyfeelie-warmfuzzy-kumbaya" view of my species. It's a matter of rationality and logic. I personally am not all that enamoured of my own species, but we're part of the Universe as are all living Beings. That's the foundation of all of my subsequent beliefs. Knowledge and experience have expanded that concept to include the fact that people must feel that they ARE seen as living Beings, as equally Human, and absolutely must feel "invested in", "part of", a society before they can or will take their civil and legal responsibilities seriously.
- It doesn't matter what ethicity someone is or is not - there are consequences that follow from people being told from birth that they are nothing, and treated as nothing. That's not "BS", it's a fact. It is part of what gives us a Dylan Roof, it is part of what gives us a Fredrick Demond Scott. Not the only reason - of course not. But definitely part of the puzzle.
-
----> one more part is coming, for those who have not yet driven completely insane ;)

Josh's bra said...

- I never accused Field of getting paid; just for parroting the left's talking points
-------------
and you parrot the right's talking points. Rememer a few months ago you were telling us all about Russia but now suddenly those talking points changed and now you don't give a shit about Russia. Go pound sand and pretend you get paid to write.
Where do you get your news from Josh?

Josh is a drama queen said...

The problem with Josh is she believes she knows everything. She'll go on about being against black monoliths then in the next breath lecture blacks about (whatever the latest Fox news talking point is. I believe it's Marxism now right?). Blah blah fucking blahity blah I'm right I know all and everyone else is stupid. Look at me look at me I'm getting paid to write.
Josh getting paid to write bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

pterochromics said...

@ Josh

LAST PART

Corporatists can suck my ass. Ironically, the nation's biggest corporatists are those millennials who claim to be Marxists, who basically prop hordes of corporations up as their number-one customer base. lol

- I'm ignoring "marxists" because, by definition, a corporatist is the opposite of a collectivist, and there are actually very few actual collectivists any more, since the Commune movement "way back when" proved that the vast majority of Americans are simply not able to *be* collectivists, and since certain tendencies of Kibbutzim proved to be problematic in situations where leadership is necessary.
- There are Left-authoritarians, but that's an entirely different beast which actually has far more in common with Fascism than with Collectivism; Collectivists reject a centralized all-powerful "State" which takes all and redistributes it - and since power corrupts, most goes to the cronies at the top of the heap, which is exactly the same thing that happens with crporatism/fascism. In the end, it doesn't matter WHO supposedly "owns the means of production", because it all is at the mercy of the Plutocracy.
- Corporatism, meanwhile, is something that the "founding fathers" opposed, although it of course wasn't called that at the time. The Boston Tea Party was not only protesting taxation without representation - it was also protesting the mutated corporate-government beast that perverted *both* business and governance, removing all sense of ethic and morality from both, and making the proverbial Golden Calf their only object of respect and worship.
- And corporatism is by no means restricted to "millenials", not in any way whatsoever. There are corporatists of all ages and colors, and a lot of them CLAIM to be something else, but claiming is not the same as being.
-
"mushroom-cloud of fascism" -- yeah, my point is it's like a puff a smoke from a back-firing '68 Chevy. It's not a nuke, mate. And I was simply asking the question of why--to borrow your analogy here--people are treating firecrackers like a nuke when, elsewhere in society, we continually have much bigger bombs going off on a daily basis yet are told not to panic -- no mushroom cloud; nothing to see here, people.
-
- Well, all I can say is that a hell of a lot of people disagree with you on that one. The resurgence, the "emboldenment" referenced by the original post, *should* be disturbing, because it's inextricably interconnected with all of the other attempts to elevate one group or another ((be it Dominionists, White Supremacists, Birchers, et cetera - all of whom are, disturbingly, White and some form of Protestant)) while restricting or eliminating the rights of all other groups, including White people such as myself who take exception to their opinions. So it's not even about race per se - it's about a "Select Few" who wish to have absolute control over the rest of us, over everything we do, even in our own homes. I reject that, utterly and completely and unmitigatedly, regardless of which *-ism or *-tion or *-ist or other misappropriated term or form behind which ANY would-by tyrants choose to cower like the squishy little puddles of rat diarrhoea they are.
-
- That's all I have te energy for - writing is exhausting to me because I'm primarily a visual-spatial thinker, and all of the "shapes of concepts" and locational interrelationships and iages and yadda yadda yadda have to be shoehorned into the liner-logic of language, which is exhausting, more so now than it was when I was young. So lucky for everyone, Ima gonna STFU...
-

pterochromics said...

@ Josh

- OK, one last thing...
please don't confuse words like "assume" or "appears" or so on with "accuse". If you were talking about "talking points" rather than "getting paid", just clarify what you meant, because it's not a matter of me saying you "accused" Field of getting paid.
- Believe me, if I mean to note that someone made an accusation, I would be specific about it, because the word "accuse" is most accurately paired with some sort of wrong-doing, e.g., "Sally accused Mary of copying her homework"; "The job of the District Attorney is to prosecute the accused".
-
- Whether intentional or not, it is misrepresenting my words by protesting that you "never accused" someone of something, when I never used, or even remotely implied, any "accusation".
-
- Like it or not, words have shades of meaning, touch various emotional and often subconscious responses.
-
- Time for aspirin, and a Redd's or two...
-

pterochromics said...

Josh said...
pterochromics wrote:
"Why do people continually assume I'm Black"
I didn't accuse you of being black; but you did objectively imply that to be "black" is to think a certain way or have a certain point of view. A "black" perspective.


- I neither wrote, nor implied, an "accusation". It merely strikes me that anyone who believes in "equality before the law", and equal civil, i.e Constitutional, rights is Black.
- And no, "a Black perspective" does NOT "imply" a monolithic view and idefinitely does not imply "collectivism". Aside from the fact that "collectivism" refers to an economic system, whereas "monolithic viewpoint" refers to a sociocultural characteristic, the fact is that "a Black perspective" refers to the fact that being a member of a visually-identifiable minority does, like it or not, in fact TEND - pay attention to that word! - to give an individual a different perspective.
- And really, trying to lay guilt on me for a supposed implication of "collectivism" which I never made ((another misrepresentation on your part)) is **exactly the same thing you incorrectly claimed I did**, namely:
assuming that all Slavic people are "supposed" feel a certain way about "collectvism", I assume because of Stalin, despite the fact that Stalin **was NOT** a "collectivist" - he was a dictator who used "state ownership of all things" as a weapon against his own nation's population.
-
- That is entirely specious, and manipulative.

We sorta do understand the mechanisms behind this. You're just not allowed, in a polite, PC society, to point to genetic mutation and suchlike to pinpoint anything, because people are scared to death that you'll start building an IQ hierarchy or suggesting that cognitive traits differ in races, and that group X has more A or B than group Y.

- And there is good reason why the topic is avoided, which is, that the mere mention of the word genetic" is seized almost immediately by people with very little, if any, experience with genetics or knowledge thereof to spuriously attempt to set up "an IQ hierarchy or suggesting that cognitive traits differ in races", which is *then* used to back their nonsensical claims of "us smart, them dumb".
- And no, it's not a matter of being "scared to death" - that phrase is belittling and inaccurate. It's a matter of people being sick and tired of, and fed up with, dealing over and over, year with the same false-equivalency and pseudo-"scientific" crap that has has been, time after time, *proven* wrong. And people are justifiably, validly concerned about the increase in violent rhetoric and actions by people who wish to emulate the actions of genocidal maniacs.

"but people who have studied it are fairly confident as to why person X can differ from Y so much."

- SOME of the genetics are known. Maybe at some point, all will be, but still, there are far too many influences upon human development which are simply not genetic and not heritable. I don't have time to go on with examples, so suffice it to say that genetics are NOT the end-all and be-all of human development, regardless of how many times "racial purists" repeat their nonsense.
-
- And the comment about "Blacks recreating Africa", though camouflaged as supposedly being something people are ((supposedly)) "scared to death of", is not something I see as appropriate for either this blog, or my comment. If anything, it merely feeds right into what actually disturbs people:
perpetuation of the blatant lie that "difference equals hierarchy", as if all of reality must be subject to the micro-minded fantasies of those people who see everything being some some sort of silly little "zero sum game".
-

Josh said...

"because, by definition, a corporatist is the opposite of a collectivist"

I agree with that entirely. Marxism and capitalism are mutually exclusive. It's just that you won't catch an American "Marxist" outside without their latest version of the iPhone or wearing the best in new hipster gear. They're corporate slaves who pretend to be otherwise. As someone who personally refuses to buy a smartphone bcz fuck smartphones, I'm more a Marxist than they'll ever be. I'm very against big corporations. I try to buy mom-'n-pop local. But it's easy when you're spending your parents' money on the shit.

"The resurgence, the "emboldenment" referenced by the original post, *should* be disturbing"

1) I'm counting the violence, the deaths. So long as blacks in America still kill whites at 25X the rate, I'm not wigging out over "white supremacists." 2) My point wasn't that we shouldn't be disturbed, or working hard to stop it, but rather that the same people flippin' their shit over it now honestly have an approach that's 180 degrees different for black or Muslim violent.

pterochromics said...

@ Josh

- "American Marxist" is *your* label for some people. I would have to personally read or see the person to whom you repeatedly refer.
- Also, again, what *you* see as "wigging out*, is not how anyone I know describes themselves. I've heard and read a great deal of concern, especially because the *president* is encouraging the extreme right, as are other officials - and BTW, I deliberately and specifically did NOT limit "extreme right" to "white supremacists".
-
- Are some people hypocritical? Well, duh, yeah. Are some people bundles of free-floating anxiety looking for someone, anyone, to blame it on? Again, well yeah. Average people react like average people, and average people generally emote before they settle down and think.
- If all one is interested in is crowing about oneself and belittling others, one should be honest about it. If, OTOH, one actually gives even a tiny little *gnat's* crap about actually trying to improve the human situation, using patronizing and belittling phrasing ain't exactly the way to "win friends and influence people", at least, it does not influence them in a positive, constructive manner.
- You can opine all you want that "psychology and sociology are BS", and maybe win a few giggles or snark-points from a few people, but Dale Carnegie made a great deal more sense ((not to mention money)) using his knowledge of human nature to help people improve their social relations and their lives.
-
- As for the supposed hypocrisy of rejecting racism, well, it's also hypocritical when people carp'n'harp endlessly about "racial inferiority" and "innate violence" of non-white races and so on, when they approve of the continuation *and worsening* of the very things which exacerbate the situation.
-

Bold, James Bold said...

"Ok, James I accept your bet. Take a picture of the $200,000 and we can talk."

Do you think my wealth is in stacks of bills?  It's in banks, real estate, stocks and bonds.  I have a substantial holding in Berkshire Hathaway B.  I can give you a picture of a statement from my brokerage account... which I'd have to edit.  My house is worth north of $750,000, but I won't give you a picture of the property tax bill because I'm not about to give you anything you could use to identify me.  You'll have to take the word of a lawyer that you hire that it's true... a lawyer who'd be bound by contract not to reveal anything beyond the fact that it's true or not.  Oh, and transfer your payment to me through my lawyer when it all turns out to be true.

"Where would that moron get $200,000?"

I have over $100,000 in the bank right now.  I could get another $100k in days.

:"I'll put up $500,000 to your $200,000 that says you're full of shit."

Great!  Now, who are you exactly?

Yeah, thought so.  Anonymous Coward Shit-Talker.


"my Oath stands, PERIOD. Taking it, and standing by it, required me to acknowledge that
***we are all *created* equally human and we are ALL "equal before the law", with equal Civil, meaning Constitutional and Legal, Rights.***"

That same document enumerated slaves as 3/5 of a person for apportionment of members of the House of Representatives, and included clauses requiring the return of slaves to their owners.

Maybe they knew something you don't.


"- The point is that sociopath and psychopathy occur in all human groups. I don't know any statistics, and I refuse to either speculate, OR accept any speculation, regarding any frequency data, especially since the causes are, to the best of my knowledge, not known."

We don't have to know the causes to know the epidemiology.

Richard Lynn proposes that Blacks are more psychopathic than Whites, and there's a vast amount of data to back up his theory.


"- Again, all of those can and do occur across all ethnicities."

Irrelevant.  The question is, are those the reviled exceptions or accepted norms?

"1) human is human,biologically and physiologically in terms of fact, and spiritually in terms of my own personal opinion"

Sub-Saharan Africans have no Neandertal genes.  All other extant examples of genus Homo do.  There is a fundamental break between them.

"- I neither wrote, nor implied, an "accusation". It merely strikes me that anyone who believes in "equality before the law", and equal civil, i.e Constitutional, rights is Black."

Equality before the law implies that equal acts deserve equal consequences, and equal dysfunctions deserve equal penalties.  We do not observe this from our government.  Our government is practicing distinct INequality before the law.. .favoring Africans.

"- And no, it's not a matter of being "scared to death" - that phrase is belittling and inaccurate. It's a matter of people being sick and tired of, and fed up with, dealing over and over, year with the same false-equivalency and pseudo-"scientific" crap that has has been, time after time, *proven* wrong."

Except it's your shit that's been proven wrong, time after time.  Morton's skull measurements were condemned by Stephen Jay Gould, whose moral condemnation was unassailable until he died (because Jewish)... but measurement afterward proved that Morton was absolutely correct.  And so with everything else.  Your crap is moral posturing based on bogus authority.

pterochromics said...

Flying Junior said...

The problem is that the republicans so oppose any liberal or democratic ideas that they are happy just to be winning. It cuts both ways. I'm starting to hate them too.

4:53 PM


- The ironic thing is that I remember when there actually *was* an activist Left in the US, and the more rightward the national politics have become, the more anti-"Left" rhetoric has been increasing.
- It's easy to feel hatred, but I try ((not always successfully I admit, but more successfully than not)) to avoid it, because that is what the Self-Anointed Few have been paying their propagandists ((who are highly paid experts in all of that "BS" psychology and sociology)) to propagate.
- As of 2012, six transnational corporations owned 90% or more of the media outlets. That includes the so-called "lefty" media outlets like MSNBC and the Washington Post :p
- I think there has been even more conglomeration since then, but it's searchable ((assuming one has turned off those tracking cookies search engines use to show one only what the algorithms calculate that one wishes to see)).
- The point is that the media have been corporatized, so it's absurd and, really, kind of stupid, to actually believe in a "leftist media". Meaning that all of the divisive hype and hate is being done with full corporate blessing. And now corporatists occupy most of the Legislature, as well as the Executive. Gee, no reason to be at all worried about that, now, is there... Bleh :p
- And still people carry on about "the MSM" as though it operates independently. It's too sad to be called a bad joke.
-
- "United, we stand; Divided, we fall." It's just as valid and significant now as it was back in the 1770s. And at this point in time, we are allowing ourselves to be divided.
-

James is just a broke ass bitch said...

Do you think my wealth is in stacks of bills? It's in banks, real estate, stocks and bonds. I have a substantial holding in Berkshire Hathaway B. I can give you a picture of a statement from my brokerage account... which I'd have to edit. My house is worth north of $750,000,
--------------
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahha!
So in other words you're full of shit and can't cover your bet. I knew it.

Big Black James Bold said...

Your house is only worth $750,000? Wow, that must be one small mother fucker. I don't fuck with people with houses under 1 mil. You're to broke to even deal with. Hit me up when you can stomp with the big boys.

Josh said...

"proven wrong"

I've tried to have this discussion a thousand times here over the years. For as intelligent as most people pretend to be, most--at least on Team Field--seem to have no idea how to even navigate this topic.

To put in succinctly, anti-race-difference advocates "disprove" evolutionary sciences (physical anthropology, taxonomy, genealogy, etc) the same way Ken Ham "disproves" geology -- by cherry-picking dataset A, misinterpreting dataset B, and literally just saying "It's wrong," which is backed by those who believe him. There is not a single difference within the race-denial genre.

Try a fun little experiment; your personal search results might be different for a range of reasons. But I typed into Bing--because Google is racist so fuck them--terms like "race is a social construct." The first 10 articles that are listed, some of which are in Scientific American (wtaf?) and NYT, etc, and not a single one mentions haplogroups/types! Not a fucking one of them!

My point: People who deny these branches of science and their conclusions seem to never actually disprove them with science of their own. They basically just (a) wag their finger in disapproval, or (b) colloquially "deconstruct" objective data through an emotional, argumentative lens, citing how nothing good can come of this knowledge, therefore the knowledge must be false. And then wagging their finger.

I'm not bullshitting. Go do your own experiment and see for yourself. All of these people who claim to have disproved X and Y really don't even have a fucking clue at all what they're talking about and are really the reason why we can't actually HELP communities more prone to A, B, and C, because we're forced to fucking pretend that we're all created 1:1 identically in a marshmallow factory in the clouds, so employing measures that might help community Y have to be shelved if they're not applied to X, Y and Z, because Y will get butthurt and burn its own fucking cities down if they think they're being unfairly targeted.

We're anti-science in America, and it's far from the right-wing. Look at this "gender is fluid" bullshit. It's fucking not! Gender is an expression of allosomal consequence about 99.7% of the time, with the other naught-point-three being literally mental disturbances or chromosome abnormalities. Yet instead of allowing for SCIENCE to try to cure people of their dysphoria, we funnel tiny little kids into clinics and give them HRT drugs and convince them to chop their dicks off because all that matters in this world, apparently, is how you FEEL.

We're anti-science; we're anti-nature. And we're all going to eventually pay for our hubris.

Mr. Rational said...

Anonymous Blowhard gives us more hot air:

"So in other words you're full of shit and can't cover your bet."

By the time you can hire a lawyer to handle your end of settlement, I can have another $100k in cash in the bank.  You can't.

BTW, your speed is improving.  You managed to get out FOUR sentences in your follow-up 3 minutes later.

pterochromics said...

@ Josh

- To put in succinctly, anti-race-difference advocates "disprove" evolutionary sciences

- More misstatements.
- It all comes down to one simple question:
Are, or are not, all Humans members of the species Homo sapiens?

- All of your blither about "race" is no more meaningful than claiming that one or another set of shared familial traits makes one family "completely different" from another family, as though they're a different species.
- So you can be as patronizing as you wish, and deliberately continue to misrepresent what others say, but in the end, all of your claims amount to nothing more than that.
-
- The fact, regardless of however many words you produce in your patronizing attempts to deny it, is that humans are actually one of the least genetically diverse species on earth.
-
- You talk about wanting to have rational discussions, but everything you write has the same tone of self-appointed "superiority", as though you actually imagine yourself to be The World's Most Intelligent Human.
- I had decided to give you a chance, but it's always the same tune.
-
- Well, even *if* you have a 150 IQ and your SATs were X, or you get paid Y-dollars to push your highly-manipulated race-obsessed version of science, suffice it to say ((since I owe you no explanations or "justifications" whatsoever)) that I don't find any of it to be at all impressive, aside from the volume of blatant egotism involved in your pretentious self-aggrandizement and your evident belief that you're being oh-ever-so-subtle about it. Furthermore, I don't care how many polysyllabic phrases someone turns out; I don't stop in hushed awe merely because someone can write something like "molecular beam epitaxy" or "laser welding" or "poly(bis(ethoxy)phosphazene)", or can rattle off a few Linnean names.
- I recognize condescension, and deliberate misrepresentation, and data-massaging, when I see them. I have no use for any of it, and I certainly have no need, or inclination, to try to "prove myself" or "prove my capabilities" to anyone whose only interest is in using their moderate intelligence to try, however unsuccessfully, to "prove" the supposed "witlessness" of everyone who sees through the equally-unsuccessful "proof" of an ideology.
-
- Go play your little games with someone else. I have far more useful and enjoyable things to do with my time.
-

Josh said...

This is why we can't have or teach actual science. Because too many of you bring religious dogma to the table. You seem to believe that we were all created exactly identical, in some marshmallow factory in the clouds, and you have actual disdain for people who understand the facts to be entirely different. You have disdain for people who know what haplogroups are, and who know what behavioral modernity is, and who understand the selection pressures and how they differed between an ice age and a desert. You view it as vanity and ego to look at objective data under a microscope.

This is religious dogma. And because you don't understand this topic doesn't mean you need to project on me your sense of inferiority. Sorry; I happen to have a master's degree in evo-bio. I guess after I get through apologizing to BLM for being white, I can apologize to self-hating Slavs for understanding a topic about which I speak, rather than saying stupid fucking shit like, "The fact, regardless of however many words you produce in your patronizing attempts to deny it, is that humans are actually one of the least genetically diverse species on earth."

You have no fucking idea what you're talking about, yet will still spout it anyway. Because you think I'm talking down to you, you'll bring out some stupid-ass shit not backed by anything save some opinion article you read one time.

Just among the few different subspecies of homo sapien:

- Different follicles
- Different ocular functions
- Different olfactory responses
- Different bone densities
- Different average heights
- Different muscle distribution
- Different tendon/ligament size/strength
- Different immune systems
- Different gestation periods
- Different hormonal levels
- Different bone shapes and sizes
- Different brain sizes
- Different processing capabilities
- And the list goes on and on

Some species don't have ANY subspecies. Some have only X=extant1. We have a few subspecies within our species, and dozens of different ethnicities are quickly evolving to become recognized as subspecies.

But we're not genetically diverse.

Those fucking race-is-a-social-construct morons with their postulates posing as hypotheses. And, of course, you're like the anti-vaccer talking to the doctor. "Sir, here I have over 1 million studies that say vaccines don't cause autism. Here I found one blog opinion piece that says they do."

"I KNEW IT! They cause autism!"

Maybe if you weren't such a dullard you wouldn't feel as if I was talking down to you. This is a you problem, not a me problem. Stop projecting.

We're also 98% identical to other great apes. But only a moron would say there's "very little diversity" within that 2%. It means the fucking world! Do you not understand even the base fundamentals of genetics? The Y chromosome/allosome alone has 59 MILLION base pairs! That's one fucking sex chromosome! The slightest bit of genetic variation in the genome is monumental in how fucking extremely diverse it is.

Bruh. You step into this shit you don't understand and then pull the victim card and act like people are being big ol' meanies to you because you don't understand WTF you're talking about. No wonder ppl keep thinking you're black. LMFAO!

you-know-who said...

Oh, joshie-poo is either incapable of comprehending, or else malevolently and deliberately rejects, the difference between "all humans belong to the species Homo sapiens", and what he calls "religious dogma [...] that we were all created exactly identical", especially given that there is NO religion which claims any such thing - and then has the hubris to call someone else a "dullard".

He also writes as though he actually believes that tossing-off the schoolyard taunts he's been using since 4th grade are magically going to reduce professionals and hardened survivors of violence and so on to impotent tears - and then expects everyone else to kowtow in silent, awed-filled worship to his claims of gigantic intellect.

What a git.

Josh said...

"Oh, joshie-poo is either incapable of comprehending, or else malevolently and deliberately rejects, the difference between "all humans belong to the species Homo sapiens", and what he calls "religious dogma"

Oh, the fucking irony.


"I can apologize to self-hating Slavs for understanding a topic about which I speak, rather than saying stupid fucking shit like, "The fact, regardless of however many words you produce in your patronizing attempts to deny it, is that humans are actually one of the least genetically diverse species on earth.""

Reading comprehension is too much to expect here.

Race denialism is pretty much a fucking religion. It's argued with the identical set of apologetics the big-wig religions use.

And it's really not my fault that people who know zero about the topic decide to make dumb-ass statements, like humans aren't genetically diverse. What the fuck? Are we foxes? Do any of you even know what "genetic diversity" is? Do you? It's basically differences in populations' phenotypes that put individuals in positions to survive their environments better in order to pass along their genes. For fuck's sake, mate. Look at how many different fucking ethnicities we have that have evolved to their environments. We're the poster children for genetic diversity as humans!

It's not my fucking fault that this tool thinks "diversity" means extra limbs, a third eye, eyes on ass cheeks, etc. Whose fucking fault is that?

That we're all the same species is irrelevant. We're extremely genetically similar to every other organism in our family, infraorder, suborder, order, class, phylum and kingdom too. So what? Genetic diversity doesn't mean what this buffoon thinks it means. I'm not allowed to correct him on that? I'm not allowed to point out how similar to religious tactics that is? It's basically a Ken Ham argument.

Yes, the argument is being made that we're all so similar that there are basically no differences within the species and, yes, that's basically a religious magical argument.

Maybe this is something y'all should read up on before attempting to argue. You won't. You'll quote-mine and quibble instead, add an ad hominen here and there. But all you're doing is showing your own ignorance.

Put the thesaurus down. Your buck-fiddy words don't even make sense in your context, dumb Marxist cunt.

Bold, James Bold said...

"Are, or are not, all Humans members of the species Homo sapiens?"

Homo neandertalis is classified as a different species.  All non-sub Saharan Africans carry Neandertal genes.  No SS Africans do.  The genetic distance between SS Africans and Europeans is greater than the distance between chimpanzees and bonobos (morphologically and behaviorally different and incompatible).  Therefore, sub Saharan Africans are their own species, or more than one species; arguably, pygmies and San are species in their own right.

Josh said...

Eh. We have that classification of being able to interbreed as our single-largest designation of species. Though the Negroid is the farthest separated of the subspecies within the species. The Caucasoid is far and away the most phenotypically diverse. But it's far, far too advantageous for this species of great ape to be able to interbreed, so likely is the case we'll never lose that ability unless some unforeseen pressures spur that mutation.

Bold, James Bold said...

Left to themselves, the purebred Africans kill off the hybrids.  See Liberia and Haiti.  That's effective reproductive isolation despite live offspring.

Breeding with Africans is genetic extinction in the long run.

Josh said...

What was advantageous for the Negroid thousands of years ago was to steal each others' resources. They had splintered, individualist mating hierarchies. If A murdered B and B's entire village, A ate well. These primitive cognitive traits were something acting as the driving force for all humans until which point behavioral modernity spurred cooperation.

The problem, of course, is that these phenotypic cognitive traits never populated Sub-Saharan Africa. Most other populations had this sweep through. Whether it was spurred by Neanderthal or not, something spurred it, and it never happened to blacks. This is likely why we see such parity in stats all around the globe for crime, poverty, birth rates, etc.

Africans, in the aggregate, tend toward recreating Africa.

Though a note to these idiots who want to argue with me, when they have no fucking idea about what they're speaking: Genetic variation is not genetic diversity, morons. They're two different things! Though I can't really blame you idiots for not knowing that. If you're reading anything on the first few pages of a search engine, it's nothing but pseudoscience, written by activist bloggers, posing as real "science." I know you won't listen to me because:

- White man
- Not PC
- Too mean to you
- It pains you to admit you're wrong

But I can back up what I say with actual objective science. Y'all just spout random blogger-based nonsense and run away.

https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_17
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_diversity

I'm saying, it's a bit more complex than African-American Studies courses, where all you have to do is agree white people are bad, but it's not fucking rocket science.