Wednesday, October 17, 2018

"911, there is a Negro in my space."

White woman dubbed 'Golfcart Gail' calls police on black father at soccer game
I swear there must be some kind of secret game going around among white folks that they are not telling us Negroes about.

How else do you explain all the calls to 911 to report black folks for being...well, just black folks minding their own business and going about their day doing ordinary stuff.  At some point this isn't even funny anymore. I mean do some of you white folks even watch the news? We can't study, walk, drink coffee, go to the bathroom, take our kids for a stroll in a stroller, work, sleep....I mean come on now. Hell we can't even barbecue in peace these days. When a Negro can't even barbecue in peace in America things have gotten serious.  (Thank you Barbecue Becky.)

The latest culpret, as you all might have heard, is called Golfcart Gail (I love all the names). And she felt the need to call the law on a black man who was yelling encouragement to his son on the soccer field. His own son. The poor guy had to probably go home and explain to his son what it means to be black in America all over again. The poor kid had to be traumatized.

Of course he probably wasn't as traumatized as the nine year old boy in New York who was accused of sexual harassment by Cornerstone Caroline.  The poor kid's backpack brushed against the woman's derriere and she claims that he sexually harassed her. Can you say Emmett Till, people? She later apologized, but too late, the damage was already done. Her implicit bias ( that's a fancy way of saying racism) already got the better of her.

Seriously, if this is some kind of  sick cry for attention from some  of you 911 callers, you need to stop, because you are going to get someone hurt. Some of you have already lost your jobs because of  this nonsense. How are you going to block someone from trying to enter their own apartment?

Anyway, hopefully this is just phase you all are going through. I know that you all have been emboldened by the MAGA movement. But hopefully one day you all will learn that the police are not your personal bodyguards to serve and  protect you from the "scary" black people, and assuage your fears of them. 

*Pic from nbc.com




Monday, October 15, 2018

Proud thugs.

TWEET MEWe have heard a lot about Antifa movement from the right wing media machine and screaming heads over the past couple of years. They have, for the most part, become the right wing's bogeyman of choice. FOX VIEWS has created a world for their mostly older, and mostly white viewers, where Antifa hooligans could come storming  into their homes at any moment. (Hide the women and little blond babies.)

This is all, of course, false. The truth is that there is a group on the right that does everything ----and more--- than what the Antifa crowd is being accused of, and we are just starting to take notice. 

If you haven't heard of the Proud Boys before, you should get acquainted with them. They are a right wing group of thugs who are doing their best impression of the Sturmabteilung, Hitler's paramilitary force that helped him with his rise to power in pre- nazi Germany.

This past weekend, with the help of some friendly NYPD officers, the  Proud Boys were doing their thing on the streets of Manhattan.

"NEW YORK — Minutes after an event at a Manhattan Republican club meant to celebrate violence against leftists, attendees belonging to a proto-fascist, pro-Trump street gang reportedly pummeled three people on the sidewalk in Manhattan’s Upper East Side while shouting homophobic slurs.
Footage posted online by video journalist Sandi Bachom shows a group of men who appear to be Proud Boys — a misogynistic and anti-Muslim fraternity known for committing acts of political violence across the country — kicking and punching three apparent anti-fascist protesters as they lay prone on the sidewalk.

“Do you feel brave now, faggot?” one of the attackers yelled, according to Bachom and another journalist, photographer Shay Horse. Another video shows multiple attackers yelling “faggot.”'. [Source]

But their brutality wasn't limited to the East Coast.

"The Proud Boys made national news this weekend as members of the far-right nationalist group were caught on video engaging in street violence in both New York and Portland, Oregon. Both fights looked brutal and similar, with young men running at each other, fighting, punching, and occasionally circling and kicking people already on the ground.


The brawls eventually ended when police swarmed in, but leaders in both cities are asking if cops could have done more to stop the violence and arrest the fighters. While officials call for investigations into the fights, the organizer of Portland’s rally is already using the violence to promote himself. Joey Gibson, the founder of Patriot Prayer, released a video on his Facebook page showing him encouraging his followers to engage in violence if they felt attacked, telling the crowd that sometimes citizens need to “clean up the streets…”[Source]

Mr. trump loves dictators, and he longs to become one himself. Every dictator, I suppose, needs a group like the Proud Boys to put fear in the hearts of those who dare to question the supreme leader.

Of course you won't hear about these thugs on FOX VIEWS, they are too busy focusing their attention on the non-existent Antifa threat and evil Eric Holder. 

Holder wanted to "kick em" when they go low. He was speaking metaphorically. The Proud Boys showed this past weekend that they will literally do the kicking.

And somewhere on a golf course in New Jersey, the supreme leader is smiling.   



Sunday, October 14, 2018

The death of democracy?

The following essay is important, because no one in America (including the cowardly press) seems to understand what is happening at this point in our history.

"Usually, comparisons between Donald Trump’s America and Nazi Germany come from cranks and internet trolls. But a new essay in the New York Review of Books pointing out “troubling similarities” between the 1930s and today is different: It’s written by Christopher Browning, one of America’s most eminent and well-respected historians of the Holocaust. In it, he warns that democracy here is under serious threat, in the way that German democracy was prior to Hitler’s rise — and really could topple altogether.

Browning, a professor emeritus at the University of North Carolina, specializes in the origins and operation of Nazi genocide. His 1992 book Ordinary Men, a close examination of how an otherwise unremarkable German police battalion evolved into an instrument of mass slaughter, is widely seen as one of the defining works on how typical Germans became complicit in Nazi atrocities.

So when Browning makes comparisons between the rise of Hitler and our current historical period, this isn’t some keyboard warrior spouting off. It is one of the most knowledgeable people on Nazism alive using his expertise to sound the alarm as to what he sees as an existential threat to American democracy.

Browning’s essay covers many topics, ranging from Trump’s “America First” foreign policy — a phrase most closely associated with a group of prewar American Nazi sympathizers — to the role of Fox News as a kind of privatized state propaganda office. But the most interesting part of his argument is the comparison between Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Paul von Hindenburg, the German leader who ultimately handed power over to Hitler. Here’s how Browning summarizes the history:
Paul von Hindenburg, elected president of Germany in 1925, was endowed by the Weimar Constitution with various emergency powers to defend German democracy should it be in dire peril. Instead of defending it, Hindenburg became its gravedigger, using these powers first to destroy democratic norms and then to ally with the Nazis to replace parliamentary government with authoritarian rule. Hindenburg began using his emergency powers in 1930, appointing a sequence of chancellors who ruled by decree rather than through parliamentary majorities, which had become increasingly impossible to obtain as a result of the Great Depression and the hyperpolarization of German politics.
Because an ever-shrinking base of support for traditional conservatism made it impossible to carry out their authoritarian revision of the constitution, Hindenburg and the old right ultimately made their deal with Hitler and installed him as chancellor. Thinking that they could ultimately control Hitler while enjoying the benefits of his popular support, the conservatives were initially gratified by the fulfillment of their agenda: intensified rearmament, the outlawing of the Communist Party, the suspension first of freedom of speech, the press, and assembly and then of parliamentary government itself, a purge of the civil service, and the abolition of independent labor unions. Needless to say, the Nazis then proceeded far beyond the goals they shared with their conservative allies, who were powerless to hinder them in any significant way.
McConnell, in Browning’s eyes, is doing something similar — taking whatever actions he can to attain power, including breaking the system for judicial nominations (cough cough, Merrick Garland) and empowering a dangerous demagogue under the delusion that he can be fully controlled:
If the US has someone whom historians will look back on as the gravedigger of American democracy, it is Mitch McConnell stoked the hyperpolarization of American politics to make the Obama presidency as dysfunctional and paralyzed as he possibly could. As with parliamentary gridlock in Weimar, congressional gridlock in the US has diminished respect for democratic norms, allowing McConnell to trample them even more. Nowhere is this vicious circle clearer than in the obliteration of traditional precedents concerning judicial appointments. Systematic obstruction of nominations in Obama’s first term provoked Democrats to scrap the filibuster for all but Supreme Court nominations. Then McConnell’s unprecedented blocking of the Merrick Garland nomination required him in turn to scrap the filibuster for Supreme Court nominations in order to complete the “steal” of Antonin Scalia’s seat and confirm Neil Gorsuch. The extreme politicization of the judicial nomination process is once again on display in the current Kavanaugh hearings. ...
Whatever secret reservations McConnell and other traditional Republican leaders have about Trump’s character, governing style, and possible criminality, they openly rejoice in the payoff they have received from their alliance with him and his base: huge tax cuts for the wealthy, financial and environmental deregulation, the nominations of two conservative Supreme Court justices (so far) and a host of other conservative judicial appointments, and a significant reduction in government-sponsored health care (though not yet the total abolition of Obamacare they hope for). Like Hitler’s conservative allies, McConnell and the Republicans have prided themselves on the early returns on their investment in Trump.
This is the key point that people often miss when talking about Hitler’s rise. The breakdown of German democracy started well before Hitler: Hyperpolarization led Hindenburg to strip away constraints on executive power as well as conclude that his left-wing opponents were a greater threat than fascism. The result, then, was a degradation of the everyday practice of democracy, to the point where the system was vulnerable to a Hitler-style figure.

Now, as Browning points out, “Trump is not Hitler and Trumpism is not Nazism.” The biggest and most important difference is that Hitler was an open and ideological opponent of the idea of democracy, whereas neither Trump nor the GOP wants to abolish elections.

What Browning worries about, instead, is a slow and quiet breakdown of American democracy — something more much like what you see in modern failed democracies like Turkey. Browning worries that Republicans have grown comfortable enough manipulating the rules of the democratic game to their advantage, with things like voter ID laws and gerrymandering, that they might go even further even after Trump is gone:
No matter how and when the Trump presidency ends, the specter of illiberalism will continue to haunt American politics. A highly politicized judiciary will remain, in which close Supreme Court decisions will be viewed by many as of dubious legitimacy, and future judicial appointments will be fiercely contested. The racial division, cultural conflict, and political polarization Trump has encouraged and intensified will be difficult to heal. Gerrymandering, voter suppression, and uncontrolled campaign spending will continue to result in elections skewed in an unrepresentative and undemocratic direction. Growing income disparity will be extremely difficult to halt, much less reverse.
I’ve observed this kind of modern authoritarianism firsthand in Hungary. In my dispatch after visiting there, I warned of the same thing as Browning does here: The threat to the United States isn’t so much Trump alone as it is the breakdown in the practice of American democracy, and the Republican Party’s commitment to extreme tactics in pursuit of its policy goals in particular.

We are living through a period of serious threat to American democracy. And Browning’s essay, a serious piece by a serious scholar, shows that it’s not at all alarmist to say so."  [Source]

Saturday, October 13, 2018

Caption Saturday.

  • Kanye West Lunches With Donald Trump at the White House
I need a caption for this pic.


Thursday, October 11, 2018

Night off.

I'm off tonight field hands, but think about this for a minute: An almost cat 5 storm just destroyed portions of the Southwest United States, there is an international crises brewing with the Saudis, the Dow dropped over 1,000 points, and trump decides to meet with...wait for it....Kanye West.😊



Tuesday, October 09, 2018

America's new victims: White males.

TWEET MERemember when black folks were accused of being in a constant state of being aggrieved? I do. Whenever I wrote or spoke about a case of injustice being done to poor and minority people I would be accused of being a professional complainer, one who drank at the trough of the woe is me industry. "There goes field Negro again playing the victim card." 

Now, amazingly, it is the white male in America who has taken up the mantle of the aggrieved. It is the white male who is crying woe is me from the rooftops and complaining to the world that the world is just "not fair". Imagine that.

Of course nothing could be further from the truth. We all know where real power in this country lies, and who controls it. But thanks to Mr. trump and the new trump party (formerly the republican party) it's all about playing the victim-card to fire up an already insecure and nervous base. Why are they nervous? Well, as fate would have it, they are about to lose the country that they love and grew up in, and they do not recognize America as it stands today. It is too brown; too secular; too open; and too global. And, as a result, they feel like they are being left behind. These are the people who make up trump's base. These are the angry fired up people you see at his rallies who cheer after every racist and xenophobic word. They feed off his bitterness and anger, and they hate together like the Klan of old.

It's a strategy that worked in the case of Brett Kavanaugh. Just listen when trump declares that Kavanaugh was the victim, and that he and is family has been put through hell. Forgetting, of course, that the real victim is Dr. Ford. A woman who was assaulted and who has to live with the trauma of that incident every day for the rest of her life. But in the world of white male victimhood it's Brett Kavanaugh  we should feel sorry for. You know, because life has not been good enough to him already. *sarcasm off* 

Anyway, I can see how this strategy works for some poor white guy in Kentucky, because in his mind it cannot be his fault that he is uneducated and broke. It must be the world and the new America coming down on the white man and making his life miserable. Honestly, I am still a little surprised why this all works with white women. Many of them have totally bought into the  white male grievance industry.  Chauncey Devega nailed the phenomenon in an article I posted yesterday:

"White male rage is also a powerful cultural force in America because, while it may be sourced and rooted in entitled white masculinity, many white women are partners in it as well. They reproduce, legitimate, nurture and literally benefit from it. "

It will be interesting to see how white women vote in these upcoming mid-terms and what type of turn out we will see from them. Some of them are angry, because the Brett Kavanugh fiasco was personal. But sadly, many of them fall right into the category that Chauncey described above. They too feel aggrieved, because their partners have convinced them that that the reason they are not living the American dream is because of those other people.

I will give trump credit for one thing, he knew that these types of individuals made up a large chunk of America all along. And, like a true con man, he played his aggrieved card just right.






Monday, October 08, 2018

Privilege on display.

TWEET METoday's oped is from Chauncey Devega, and Chauncey is writing about what most people of color are thinking after the Brett Kavanaugh fiasco.   

"In a sociology textbook yet to be written there will be a chapter on white male privilege. The spectacle of Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination will be one of that textbook's primary case studies.

There are numerous credible allegations against Kavanaugh, and multiple witnesses who confirm that Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee and his friends participated in a culture of sexual violence, debauchery, drunkenness and violence while they were students at Georgetown Preparatory School and then at Yale University.

During his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Kavanaugh repeatedly lied about a range of topics including his drinking, personal relationships and other behavior. It has also been reported by NBC that Kavanaugh also lied about his knowledge of the sexual assault allegations made against him by Deborah Ramirez.

Kavanaugh also claimed that he was admitted into Yale University by "busting his tail" and that he had no "special connections." This is nowhere near true. Kavanaugh was a legacy admission; his grandfather attended Yale.

Moreover, during his Senate testimony Kavanaugh displayed moments of fitful rage and anger. Under the influence of alcohol and fueled by male bravado, confidence, entitlement and peer pressure a younger Brett Kavanaugh was quite likely a terror.

By comparison, Christine Blasey Ford was remarkably credible. She was calm and poised, even while being, quite literally, publicly interrogated by a sex crimes prosecutor hired by Republicans.

As Dr. Stacey Patton summarized on Twitter:

White male privilege is being able to cry during a job interview, interrupt the folks asking questions, yell at them, ask snarky questions, refuse to give straight answers, talk about how much you like to drink beer, and have other white men on the committee empathize with you.
Even Paul Krugman, more a mainstream liberal than a radical "social justice warrior," can see the levers of white male privilege coupled with money and power at work in the Kavanaugh debacle. On Monday, he wrote in the New York Times:

When Matt Damon did his Brett Kavanaugh imitation on “Saturday Night Live,” you could tell that he nailed it before he said a word. It was all about the face — that sneering, rage-filled scowl. Kavanaugh didn’t sound like a judge at his Senate hearing last week, let alone a potential Supreme Court justice; he didn’t even manage to look like one.
But then again, Lindsey Graham, who went through the hearing with pretty much the same expression on his face, didn’t look much like a senator, either.

There have been many studies of the forces driving Trump support, and in particular the rage that is so pervasive a feature of the MAGA movement. What Thursday’s hearing drove home, however, was that white male rage isn’t restricted to blue-collar guys in diners. It’s also present among people who’ve done very well in life’s lottery, whom you would normally consider very much part of the elite.
In all, Kavanaugh's nomination to the United States Supreme Court -- whatever may happen with his confirmation -- is one more reminder of how social capital, gender, race and class create a system of entitlement and privilege for rich white men like Kavanaugh (and Donald Trump) where they are never to be held accountable, either as adults or children, for their behavior. As sociologist Shamus Khan explains in the Washington Post, this is elite privilege filtered through America's rape culture.
How could a man who appears to value honor and the integrity of the legal system explain this apparent mendacity? How could a man brought up in some of our nation’s most storied institutions — Georgetown Prep, Yale College, Yale Law School — dissemble with such ease? The answer lies in the privilege such institutions instill in their members, a privilege that suggests the rules that govern American society are for the common man, not the exceptional one.

The classical root of “privilege,” privus lex, means “private law.” The French aristocracy, for instance, was endowed with privileges, primarily exemption from taxation. Today’s equivalents are not aristocrats, yet they have both the sense and the experience that the rules don’t really apply to them and that they can act without much concern for the consequences. Elite schools like Georgetown Prep and Yale have long cultivated this sensibility in conscious and unconscious ways.

Of course Kavanaugh's defenders and enablers are personally invested in denying such contradictions and hypocrisy. David French's defense of Kavanaugh last week in the National Review is a near-perfect example:
Let’s first begin with obvious points, points I’ve made time and time again. Emotion isn’t evidence. But emotion has power. When you combine emotion with evidence, there is greater power still. And, make no mistake, when Brett Kavanaugh spoke with great emotion not just about the sexual-assault allegations against him but also the broader character attacks made against him by Democrats, he voiced the emotion of honorable conservatives across the nation. ...

This was the moment when a member of the “establishment,” the person who is supposed to sit quietly, respond mildly, and understand the pain of their opponents without voicing their own anguish, to absorb anger without showing anger, finally said “enough.” And he did so with great passion in his own defense, and no rancor against Christine Blasey Ford.

It was all the more powerful because it came from a person of known restraint. And his passion was magnified by another person known for his desire to reach across the aisle — the “RINO” most loathed by the populist Right — Lindsey Graham. This, incidentally, is why you default to restraint. This is why you don’t live a life of rage but instead strive for proportionality — because when you do express your anger, people listen.
French concluded:
Today, there were conservatives across the nation who choked up — some openly wept — during his testimony. Not because they disrespect women. Not because they excuse sexual assault. But because they also love their sons. Because they are tired of being painted as evil when they are seeking to do what’s right. Because they want to see a man fight with honor.

That’s what Brett Kavanaugh did today. He fought with passion, evidence, and compassion. And absent any new, substantiated revelations, he united the conservative movement. Any Republican who abandons him now will abandon the electorate that put them in power.
What French sees as a noble and valorous display of emotion by elite white male conservatives such as Brett Kavanaugh are behaviors not publicly tolerated or encouraged for black Americans or women.

In American's (white) popular imagination, black men and black women who act in such a way are deemed to be "angry." Women who act in such a way are "hysterical" or "bitches." These dehumanizing labels are used to legitimate violence against black people and women. Black women bear a double burden because historically and through to the present they have been stigmatized both because of their skin color and gender.

The freedom of Whiteness and white masculinity as spaces where emotions like rage and anger are both allowed and encouraged is exclusive. Like black people, Asians, Arabs, Muslims, Latinos, Native Americans and other nonwhites are not allowed such liberty. In that and other ways nonwhites are most certainly less free as citizens and human beings than are white men in America and other parts of the West.

French's argument is part of a broader strategy by Republicans, conservatives and other Kavanaugh defenders. It has two dimensions.

Superficially, the goal is to present Kavanaugh as a man and a human being who just happens to be white, male and angry and has suffered a great disservice. If viewed through such a lens and framework, what reasonable and rational person would not be angry?

This is French's main ploy and distraction. What he and other right-wing defenders of Kavanaugh want to avoid is a discussion about angry white men as a group, one with a distinct and clear set of political priorities and goals.

What do these angry white men want? It's an easy question to answer. They want to rule over and control all areas of American life, both private and public.

But here Kavanaugh's defenders fail in their insincere efforts to present him as the universal subject and a stand-in for all men (or women) unjustly accused of a crime. From Donald Trump to Fox News and the direct statements of white men such as Sen. Lindsey Graham and many others, Kavanaugh is the standard bearer for an obvious and clumsy type of white identity politics in which rich white conservative Christians are the "real victims" in America.

It is all delusional. Rich white men control every social, economic and political institution in the United States; the lies of white male victimhood remain compelling and intoxicating, as they have since before the founding.

This cult of white male victimhood would not be such a powerful cultural and social force if it was only rich white men and other elites who were invested in reproducing this fantasy. Angry white men are a fraternity that cuts across lines of class and income. They collectively imagine themselves to be under siege.

On Tuesday, Donald Trump told reporters: "It is a very scary time for young men in America, where you can be guilty of something you may not be guilty of. ... This is a very, very -- this is a very difficult time. What's happening here has much more to do than even the appointment of a Supreme Court justice."

When Trump says "young men," no adjective or modifier is needed. It is clear to everyone, given his inclinations, history, words and deeds, that "young men" of course means "white men".
This reflects a larger sentiment in America at present. For too many white men -- poor, working-class and middle-class -- there is widespread anger at somehow being displaced by nonwhites and women who are "cutting ahead in line" because of "affirmative action" and other nonexistent "entitlements."
These angry white men feel obsolete and marginalized in a changing America, frustrated by globalization and excluded by a more cosmopolitan country. But their anger is misdirected toward the groups they perceive to be receiving "special treatment." Their collective anger would be better directed at men who look like them but who have created social inequality, injustice and immiseration in America and around the world.

These angry white men are apparently incapable of personal self-reflection and accountability, and also loath to acknowledge how for centuries in America they benefited from unearned advantages that insulated them from having to compete fairly with people below them in the social order. Privilege can often make such critical thinking impossible.

White male rage is also a powerful cultural force in America because, while it may be sourced and rooted in entitled white masculinity, many white women are partners in it as well. They reproduce, legitimate, nurture and literally benefit from it. To cite an obvious example, Sarah Huckabee Sanders is Donald Trump's mouthpiece and apologist.

A recent CBS News public opinion poll shows that 70 percent of Republican women support Kavanaugh, while a Morning Consult poll indicates that only 15 percent of Republican women oppose his confirmation.

History is a shadow over the present.

In America, for at least 100 years white women instigated racial terrorism against black men and boys with false cries of rape. From the end of slavery through to the late 20th century thousands of black people died because of the way white women incited white male rage and violence. Ultimately, women's investment and participation in white male violence against nonwhites is not a form of false consciousness: It is a choice.

This imagined fraternity of angry white men fills the hearts of its members with rage and resentment. But only the bellies of the very rich, the Brett Kavanaughs and other men of his class, which are truly full. The other white men in this fraternity of white male rage live on the scraps and hand-me-downs.
It is important to acknowledge and highlight the power and cultural force of angry white men in America. But we also cannot overlook the kinds of laws that their leaders want to enact and the kind of nation they hope will result.

Hiding behind the rhetorical camouflage of "originalism" and "textualism" in their understanding of the U.S. Constitution and its role in American life, these elite white men present the law and their interpretation of it as somehow pure and apolitical. In reality, it is anything but.
Writing at Current Affairs, Nathan Robinson explores how Brett Kavanaugh's record as a judge reveals his deficit of human empathy:
So the courts are “political,” have always been political, will always be political. But political is not a dirty word. Politics is the expression of our deepest values, that which we find important. What does Brett Kavanaugh find important? Mark Stern of Slate says Kavanaugh has spent “his career protecting polluters, scammers, corporations, and gun sellers” and his idea of liberty is perverse: “Liberty for undocumented minors and Guantanamo detainees? No. Liberty for predatory lendersindustrial polluterstelecom monopoliesreligious employersAbu Ghraib abusers, and assault-weapon enthusiasts? Absolutely.” I am not quite this cynical, and would not put “religious employers” alongside  “Abu Ghraib abusers,” though the telecom companies certainly belong there.
 But I do believe Kavanaugh would be a horrific Supreme Court justice, and I believe that because I think that judges should make sure claims by torture victims get litigated, should make sure workers get to unionize, and should make sure detainees aren’t imprisoned on an island without trial until eternity. These are the responsibilities not just of a judge, but of any moral human being who has the power to affect the situation. And so Kavanaugh’s parenting skills and stimulating repartee are irrelevant. It is important to use your job to do good, and to make sure the justice system is functional and fair, and Kavanaugh has not done that. Instead, he has made biased, illogical, morally repugnant, non-textualist (gasp!) decisions that make the world worse. This should cause everyone to oppose his confirmation.


Angry white men like Brett Kavanaugh want to further expand an American dystopia where women, nonwhites, Muslims, immigrants, gays and lesbians, the disabled, the poor and other people and groups deemed to be "less than" are treated as second-class citizens. This American dystopia sounds terrifying for many people, but it represents a paradise greatly to be desired for men like them." [Source]






Saturday, October 06, 2018

Caption Saturday.

First Lady Melania Trump goes her own way on trip to Africa

I need a caption for this pic:

Example: Melania trump, in an effort to reach out to young urban voters, tries to recreate Michael Jackson's Smooth Criminal video.


Pic from theguardian.com

Friday, October 05, 2018

Grumpy old (white) men.


There are a lot of angry women in America these days. (Mrs. Field is one of them.) They have watched these old white men in the republican party impose their will on them, and they are not happy.

Imagine being a woman and having to listen to the president of the United States (a man who himself has been accused of sexually assaulting women) tell you that it is more dangerous to be a man in modern day America than it is to be a woman. I don't know about you, but I am not aware of rampant acts of sexual assault being perpetrated on men by women. Or, for that matter, women just going around and randomly accusing men of sexual assault. The truth is that only about 5% of these types of cases end up being a situation where a woman lied about her accuser or fabricated a sexual assault claim. You know who will never have to worry about being accused of sexually assaulting a woman? Men who don't sexually assault women.

Anyway, the GOP and the old white men who control that party would have you believe that they are under siege. They want you to believe that the Dr. Fords of the world are a part of some globalist left- wing plot to weaken their masculinity and give super natural powers to the vagina.

Watching Hatch, Corn, Graham, and the rest of the usual suspects give a middle finger to the American women, was just another low point in American history. They had to put Kavanaugh on the court at all costs, and they made fools of themselves while doing it. They could have put another conservative Judge on the bench who would have also been the deciding vote in overturning Roe v. Wade. But, incredibly, they decided to stick with Kavanaugh, a man with more baggage than the bottom of a Greyhound bus. Clearly there had to be better conservative Judges waiting in the wings. Judges who do not have the cloud of sexual assault hanging over their heads. Neil Gorsuch is probably more conservative with his judicial philosophy than Brett Kavanaugh, and yet he didn't go through this.There is a reason for that.

But it's not only the men in the republican party who are complicit in this war on American women. Today, in a rambling, hypocritical, politically calculating speech, Susan Collins declared her support for the "alleged" sexual assaulter,  Brett Kavanaugh, while also declaring her support for the "alleged" victim,  Dr. Ford. She declared that Dr. Ford was sincere, and that she believed her one hundred percent. (How can she believe Dr. Ford, and Brett Kavanaugh at the same time? One of them is lying.) And yet, she read the political tea leaves, and she decided to side with trump and the boys.
 
I have always known that Susan Collins and the rest of the republicans in Washington are no different than trump. It's just a matter of style. They all have the same vision for America: An older, whiter, patriarchal society, where old white men rule, and women and people of color are relegated to second class citizenship status.

*Pic from crainsnewyork.com

Thursday, October 04, 2018

Open thread.

MORE DISCLAIMERSIt's open thread day field hands. Tell me what's on your mind.

I am wondering why Sarah Sanders lies so openly and blatantly to the American people.

I am wondering how Senator Collins and Flake are going to justify voting for preppy Brett this week.

I am also thinking about Megyn Kelly showing her true colors again.

I want to know if trump's tax returns will finally be released after this latest New York Times article..

I want to know what you all think about the presidential alerts today. Lot's of folks didn't want trump being able to text them on their phones, but some say it's necessary for emergency situations in the country.

Finally, I am thinking that Kanye West needs help, and if his wife cares about him she would have him committed.



Tuesday, October 02, 2018

"Scary time"?

TWEET MEDid you know that "It's a scary time for young men in America?" So says Donald trump  What he really meant, of course, was that this is a scary time for white men in America. Because let's face it, it has always been a scary time for black men in America. Just ask Trayvon Martin, and Eric Garner. Oh wait, you can't; they are DEAD.

trump, of course, is just parroting what he heard from his friends over at FOX. They have, in typical FOX manner, declared that it's open season on white men in America.   Go figure.

It's funny, Mr. trump wasn't worried about due process for men when he condemned the men of the  Central Park Five to death.  His fear is saved for the Brett Kavanaughs of the world. Men like him, who have a history of degrading and "allegedly" sexually assaulting women.  Think of all the black men who have died under questionable circumstances at the hands of the police. And yet you will never hear this clown say that this is a scary time for men of color in America.  So now it's a scary time, because women are finally speaking out against sexual assault and acts of violence against them by men.

I guess it would have been better for Mr. trump if they all just kept quiet. 

Speaking of Mr. trump, remember how he liked to brag that his father only gave him a million dollars to get him started? Well, as it turns out, he was off by about 412 million dollars. Talk about being born on third base. What's worse, is that his daddy might have actually broken all kinds of tax laws while slipping his fortune to baby trump. No wonder he (trump) didn't want to release his tax returns.

Anyway, thanks the New York Times and the great reporting they did on the subject, we might be learning more about trump's shady dealings when it comes to his daddy's money very soon.