Monday, March 07, 2011

More hearings?



Since it's "March Madness" time I think I will do a blog post about Indiana. They love their basketball in the Hoosier state.

"FORT WAYNE, Ind. (Indiana's NewsCenter) - Spreading hate. A report recently released by the Southern Poverty Law Center indicates that radical groups on the hard-right grew by 22% in 2010.

The SPLC tracks four distinct extremist groups - hate groups that hate an entire population of people (like Neo Nazis), anti-government patriot groups (militias), nativist extremist groups (anti-immigrant groups) and religious-right anti-gay groups.

For two years, those groups have been increasing dramatically. Indiana has 24 such groups overall. Roanoke is home to WTM Enterprises, a white nationalist group. Warsaw is home to a neo nazi group, the White Aryan Resistance. Van Wert, Ohio has a group of Ku Klux Klan members.

Nationally, it was the militia groups that saw the biggest increase. There was a 61% growth in 2010 with 312 new groups popping up in the U.S.

Why the increase? SPLC officials say the primary cause is changing racial demographics. Caucasians are expected to become the minority by 2050. Second, the economy has people angry and upset at the government. The results, say SPCL officials, are heightened political vitriol and a rise in the threat of domestic terrorism." [Source]

Oh my! Hate groups on the rise in A-merry-ca? Hey at least there will be hearings in Washington to address this serious issue...... Oh wait, you mean they won't be addressing hate groups in A-merry-ca? Just Muslim hate groups? Oh well, I guess not all hate groups are created equal. "Come on field, what about the black hate groups? You failed to mention them as well." Of course, how could I forget? We should have hearings about them, too. I think that will be 15 minutes well spent.

















244 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 244 of 244
Mack Lyons said...

"do I have to become corrupt, break the law, screw everyone I can get away with screwing to "gets me mines"? Get my own by trickin and standin on the head of my brother by misleading him? Emasculate myself by living off a woman? Not "act" white by speaking properly and getting a good education, not one that majors in fake history but a real education"

You're content with playing off on the worst stereotypes of black Americans in the guise of "helping" them. Even minstrels don't operate with the sort of malice you're showing.

You truly are a pathetic creature.

Anonymous said...

PilotX said...
http://blog.ametsoc.org/columnists/neutralizing-some-of-the-language-in-global-warming-discussions/
That was not my question anon. My question was, what effect will increased levels of CO2 have on the atmosphere in 50 years? 100 years?
Thank you.

Well for starters it will increase plant growth. Photsynthesis and all that stuff....

Check out Sylvan Wittwer in Food, Climate and Carbon Dioxide.

We might just be able to use this universally free premium to feed the starving millions in the world.

The effect of increased CO2 in narrowing the stomata of plants has the additional benefit that a lesser amount of pollutants in the air will make it through the narrower openings. Thus enhanced CO2 has the effect of protecting plants against damage from air pollutants such as ozone or sulfur dioxide.

The effect of enhanced CO2 is even greater for plants grown under low light conditions. The enhance growth is greater than 100 percent for a 100 percent increase in CO2. This compares to less than 50 percent for plants grown in normal light conditions.

The evidence that clinches the argument is that some greenhouse owner artificially elevate the CO2 level to triple what the level in the atmosphere is.

Anonymous said...

You're content with playing off on the worst stereotypes of black Americans in the guise of "helping" them. Even minstrels don't operate with the sort of malice you're showing.

You truly are a pathetic creature.



Minstrel player, tom, buck dancin tom, nigger...keep callin me names.

We all know who the expert at coonery is around here and what the real discussion is and was.

Anonymous said...

Umm...the TeaBaggers are Klanners. They are the same folks. You can check by comparing membership. bush letting NO drown was totally racist. You could easily compare the hurried rush of resources to a much lesser event in white areas of Jeb! Florida. Matter of record. bush really does not like Black people...unless they are Condi and wear thigh-highs. Kanye may be wrong about Taylor...but he called it on bush.
The 'sorce' for the Jacskon-Lee material is the Daily Caller...which is a conservative wingnut welfare place. Tucker Carlson, Breitbart, SECupp...are what the Caller deems adequate. -snort-
As far as ego...I doubt any Congresscritter has need of more.
Why would a person use a Bible for Science? Isn't that an open admission of complete and utter ignorance? Bible tells us to own slaves, rape our daughters...then claim they 'seduced' me, murder neighbours for having better stuff, lie, cheat, kill sons for no reason whatsoever, commit adultery for fun...oh...that IS what christians do.
Anywho, what does climate modeling have to do with the lusts of christians for having many sheep to -ahem- tend?
Wonder if math was needed? Or Physics?

Mold

Mack Lyons said...

"Answer My Question even though you already did. YOu say I have to recognize whites as an enemy because they call me nigger when I leave the room. So thats what you want? You want everyone with Black Skin to not know people but call all Black Frnds and all Whites enemies? Who is the hateful racist fool? How do you deal with whites in the real world? Do you hate them all on sight and love all brothers on sight? Or do you deal with them as people?"

You've just answered your own question. Not all whites are enemies and not all blacks are friends.

Your problem is that you want all blacks to consider ALL whites as friends and their own brothers and sisters as enemies. That's the gist of your argument.

Not only that, you want full and unconditional validation from the black community for your love of ALL whites, with absolutely no criticism of such. Criticism is solely reserved for fellow blacks.

You want to be loved for your tap-dancing buckcoonery. Whites adore you for it (to the extent that they'll pat you on the back and invite you to dinner, but they won't let you get intimate with their daughters), but blacks want nothing to do with you. And you just can't, for the life of you, understand why.

Mack Lyons said...


Minstrel player, tom, buck dancin tom, nigger...keep callin me names.

We all know who the expert at coonery is around here and what the real discussion is and was.


You're a misguided fool who doesn't know when to admit defeat.

Take off those tap shoes, so you can know how it is to walk like normal people.

Anonymous said...

Wonder if math was needed? Or Physics?

Mold


Keep wondering, moron. You couldn't count all 12 of your toes or calculate F if given m and a.

Pork Chop Jones said...

This country is SOOOOOO screwed!:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/41969508

Anonymous said...

Sylvan Wittwer, an LDS agronomist who was funded by Cato? From his age...he was one of the Mormons who felt that AfAms were not for Jesus. Oh, he has a 'Climate Center' staffed by ag folk...but no climate scientists? Can you say ExxonMobil funds the Center? Can you see that the family all works there? Hmmm.
I love how the 'peer-review' is done in-house...by relatives.
There is also the Peabody Energy angle. Seems the perfesser is not doing research...he's the employee of Peabody. Peabody has a looong history in union, environmental, and safety issues.
Oh, the Center accepts money...but lacks a mailing address...which is what most kids can tell you is highly indicative of an Internet Scam.

Mold

Anonymous said...

Piggy Leblanc, an GE astronaut who founded Libya? From his planet...he was one of the Ubangis who smelled that porkchps were not for Muhammed. Oh, he has a 'rectal Thermomenter' stuffed in his rectum...but no shaving cream? Can you say Butterball turkeys owns detroit? Can you see that diapers are full? Hmmm.
I love how the 'penis-pumper' is backwards compatible...by dolphins.
There is also the angle of the dangle. Seems the brillo pads aren't holding up...it's moldy mess. Gilligan has a looong history in navigation nd safety issues.
Oh, the gumball machine accepts money...but lacks a mailing address...which is what most kids can tell you is highly indicative of gumball machines.

Moldew

Anonymous said...

Pork Chop Jones said...
This country is SOOOOOO screwed!:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/41969508


Cloward-Piven anyone?

maria said...

why did my family abandon me? LOL!!

the anons today are making about as much sense as the word verification for this post:

cidebea

Anonymous said...

ever notice how whenever that kuntlicker declares she's leaving anons show up and pollute the threads just as she did? that shitstain hasnt left and is still phoulling up this space buceta breaf banks, that is

now eye wonder how many non sensical anon posts will follow this cuz that nasty shithead dont know how to keep quiet

The Purple Cow said...

Field, threads like this reveal the dark heart of the white American psyche. You, as a blogger don't have to do very much to demonstrate that, but you are very clever in giving them just enough rope to hang themselves.

What is clear from reading this is that America is truly, deeply, and irredeemably fucked. Do you have an escape plan, Field? A plot of land with room for a nice little place somewhere in west Jamaica? If not, you need to start thinking about acquiring one.

I worry about America, I really do. Some of my best friends are Americans.

Anonymous said...

Purplecow: "I worry about America, I really do. Some of my best friends are Americans."

Don't worry. Just stay the fuck out.

Anonymous said...

"Don't worry. Just stay the fuck out."

AMERICA FUCK YEAH!!!! *SALUTE*

Anonymous said...

Chocolate Chuggin Maria said...
why did my family abandon me? LOL!!

the anons today are making about as much sense as the word verification for this post:

cidebea

Reminded you of your pal chlamydia aye?

Anonymous said...

Your problem is that you want all blacks to consider ALL whites as friends and their own brothers and sisters as enemies. That's the gist of your argument.

Not only that, you want full and unconditional validation from the black community for your love of ALL whites, with absolutely no criticism of such. Criticism is solely reserved for fellow blacks.

You want to be loved for your tap-dancing buckcoonery. Whites adore you for it (to the extent that they'll pat you on the back and invite you to dinner, but they won't let you get intimate with their daughters), but blacks want nothing to do with you. And you just can't, for the life of you, understand why.

5:33 PM



Two words for you Total CoonFuckery.
Your the one that real Blacks want nothing to do with and real whites as well. No one wants to hang with a hateful self loathing dependant whiney little bitch who is always crying woe is me, the world dun fucked me, so stroke my poor, poor little sense of self worth.

Well heres some news for you, fuck you ego, your fake inflated sense of self worth, if you are a victim it is of your own making and again anyone not a coon wouldnt let you near the house.

Funny how you talk about screwing white girls. Now we know what the truth is you an ugly coon that got rejected and have been resentful ever since.

Your the needy one who demands everyones patience and approval or else you call them names.

I'll leave you exposed and seething in your ignorant coon fuckery. Have a nice life. Youll find a frnd some day when you stop being a drain and leech on life.

PilotX said...

@anon 1729, I want to see the data you used to make your conclusion that increased CO2 will not increase temps in 50 and 100 years. you know the SCIENCE stuff. The model runs, the numerical statistics you based your conclusions upon and all that SCIENCY stuff. No simple, uh CO2 will make more plants. I want climate data, projected temps, asumed variables such as water vapor content, shanges in jet stream position, ect. you know the stuff your SCIENTISTS based their conclusions. I'll wait but I know it'll take as long as Slappz to get me the ole Miss numbers and Right to get the info on Ayers and his fingerprints on a bomb he had no part in making.
You are making the job of making conservatives look foolish easy.

field negro said...

"What is clear from reading this is that America is truly, deeply, and irredeemably fucked. Do you have an escape plan, Field? A plot of land with room for a nice little place somewhere in west Jamaica? If not, you need to start thinking about acquiring one."

Not in West jamaica, but in the hills of Manchester. A wonderful little town called Mandeville.:)

no_slappz said...

pilotx,

University of Mississippi enrollment:

1962-63 -- 4,770 -- the year James Meredith was admitted. Black enrollment -- 1.

1965-66 -- 5,488

1968-69 -- 6,736

Black enrollment in 68-69: 232

Thus, from one black student in 1962 to 232 in 1969.

In percentage terms, the increase was huge.

With respect to draft deferments, what do you think.

PilotX said...

These conservatrolls are interesting. They do not understand science and proudly display this with their "evolution is only a THEORY" and climate change is officially debunked by a quoting a book written by an agriculture professor funded by the fossile fuel industry. No climate modeling, no consulting with geologists to replicate past climates no real understanding about greenhouse gas forcings.
I also love the whole concept of ignoring the intent of the First Amendment to get their religion into schools. Sad if so many of these fools aren't in power in this country. At least he quoted an agriculturalist and not Genesis, that is progress I guess.

PilotX said...

No Slappz, 1965 to 1969. Nice try, you're getting closer. I won't even ask how many were women but I am still interested in the aformentioned years. Is my question too hard for you?

no_slappz said...

pilotx,

Climate Change: total nonsense.

We've gone from Global Warming to Climate Change.

Why? Because Global Warming states an incontestable conclusion, which cannot be made about anything 100 years down the road.

Thus, the Climate Scammers shifted to Climate Change, which accounts for warming AND cooling.

The latest nonsense is priceless. According to the Weather Cult, the current trend of cold weather is, in their view, caused by Global Warming.

Cooling is caused by warming.

Yeah, that's consistent with everything humans know about heat, temperature, heat transfer and thermodynamics.

This idea of cooling being caused by warming may have a great future if I can make ice by heating a pot of water on my stove.

Now, I admit that an air conditioner gets hot when it cools the air, That's why we put the air conditioning unit away from the area it's cooling.

Therfore, if we're really worried about too much heat, then all we have to do is move the planet a little further from the source of the heat, which is the sun.

Seems easy enough.

no_slappz said...

pilotx,

The number of black women at Ole Miss in 1969?

Half the black total. Is that too tough for you?

That means 116 black men, virtually all of whom -- with exception of a few who had already served in the military -- were benefiting from draft deferments.

PilotX said...

No Slappz, you missed the question. I did not ask the Black female population, I asked the INCREASE in Black students from the period 1965-1969. What is so hard about that question?

As far as why warming can also cause certain areas to cool I won't answer you directly as you will dismiss any expanation but I will put you on the path of self discovery and thus you may understand the dynamics better. If climate models are correct the areas that will experience the most warming would be the poles, thus lower latitudes may not even have sensible temp changes but increased temps in the poles would cause melting on the ice. Polar ice is mostly composed of fresh water thus its melting would change the salinity of the oceans. Keep that in mind and keep in mind the old glass of water, egg and salt experiment we all did as kids. Flowing along the western coast of Europe is a current of warm water that influences its climate, thus London experiences warmer winters than a U.S. city at a similar latitude. Now imagine the melting polar ice influencing the ocean current of warm water flowing nearby Europe. Put that puzzle together and you will begin to understand how an overall increase in global temps can cause colder winters and drier hotter summers in certain locations. And best of all it conforms to the laws of thermal dynamics.

no_slappz said...

pilotx,

In the early 1980s, when fear of AIDS was blossoming, it was predicted by every credible and responsible organization of levelheaded experts that AIDS was going to wipe out huge swaths of humanity, and do more damage than the Black Plague, which wiped out about one-third of the people in the known world.

Well, nothing of the sort has happened in most of the world. But the human devastation is running rampant in Africa.

Meanwhile, there's no cure for AIDS and there's no vaccine to protect humans from infection.

Nevertheless, the world has continued to spin and the global population is growing as wildly and uncontrollably as ever.

The median age in almost all African nations is 19 or less. The espected life span in most African nations is around 50.

But despite the multitude of threats that actually kill people in huge numbers today, you concern yourself with an even more complex issue that has, so far, harmed no one.

More silly is your belief in "climate models" that predict whatever it is that worries you so.

However, inasmuch as we cannot predict the weather more than a few days ahead, it is inconceivable that you or anyone else believes it's possible to reach only ONE conclusion about what's coming in 100 years.

Here's what's true. There's always been a good business in predicting the apocalypse.

Famous Scottish economist Thomas Malthus concluded -- in 1803 -- that the world was headed for mass starvation in a matter of a few years because there were too many people to feed.

In 1803, the best estimate for global population was 1 billion.

We are now approaching 7 billion, and the only place on the planet where people face starvation is in parts of Africa, because, well, you know, because African leaders are such vicious idiots that they do not care about food or clean water.

no_slappz said...

pilotx, you wrote:

If climate models are correct...

Inasmuch as there is NO WAY to test the models, you can be certain they reach the conclusion most desired by the grant-seeking scientist who concocted it.

no_slappz said...

pilotx, you wrote:

I did not ask the Black female population, I asked the INCREASE in Black students from the period 1965-1969. What is so hard about that question?

Because James Meredith enrolled in 1962 and he was the FIRST black student, it seemed as though you were capable of seeing the trend of rising black enrollment which had reached about 3.5% in 1969.

Today, black enrollment at Ole Miss is about 15% and the student population is around 15,000.

PilotX said...

Correct, climate models are projections of future climates. Until someone discovers a time machine we have no way of accurately predicting future climate thus your assertion that global warming is bunk is a false assumption. We are working on trying to figure out what effects CO2 will have on future climates but we don't know, that's what I was trying to tell your fellow conservative friend who stated emphatically what will happen in 50 and 100 years. I'm glad you understand that but we can determine if the polar ice is melting and that would be another parameter to put into the models to attempt to figure out what will happen.
Slappz, you are trying to wriggle out of your statement. You claimed that the Black emrollment at the University of mississippi increased from the years 1965 to 1969. If you did not have the numbers to back up your claim you pulled it out of your ass. If you did have the numbers what are they?
i do not care what the number of Black students at ole Miss are today, yesterday or in they year 2079. I want to know the increase in Black enrollment from the years 1965 to 1969! Not before or after! You made a specific claim and I want to know if you made it up or not. Seems obvious you did so why should we trust anything you post? Get it? 1965 to 1969.

no_slappz said...

pilotx, you wrote:

And best of all it conforms to the laws of thermal dynamics.

The field is known as thermodynamics. Other factors playing a role are fluid dynamics and heat transfer.

Doesn't matter. The "climate models" are self-serving vehicles easily manipulated to produce any desired result, and when it comes to academics and scientific study, the models always point to something that demands a lot of costly analysis paid for with tax-payers' money.

Like I said previously, if the air is warmer, it will, as a matter of thermodynamic fact, contain more moisture. The moisture will come from all the traditional sources, which means instead of melting polar ice caps adding water to the oceans, they will give up moisture that is absorbed into the atmosphere.

If we have more storms, so what? Maybe we'll have fewer storms. Maybe changes will turn deserts into bread baskets.

What difference does it make? If the water levels of the oceans rise, I know that Americans will move away from the shore.

The only people who will care are the people in New Orleans, who already live below sea level. They will feel really stupid if they stick around a place that's further and further below the surface of the surrounding water and they get washed away by a little storm.

PilotX said...

So do you kinda understand how an increase in average global temps can also cause temp decreases in certain locations? I'll help you a little more if you need it.

no_slappz said...

pilotx,

Based on your obsession with average temperatures and temperature differentials in places around the globe I see that you have dropped the essence of the Global Warming argument, which is about HEAT, not Temperature.

It really matters almost not at all if it's hot here and cold there. It is the total HEAT content of system that matters.

If London gets a little colder and another Chicago gets warmer, well, it just doesn't matter.

no_slappz said...

pilotx,

Here's a basic fact -- humans are going to use more and more hydrocarbons as long as they are available. When supplies truly began to dwindle, substitutes will have their day.

Or, if an alternative outperforms hydrocarbons, a market for it will develop with no help from government idiots.

But there are no alternatives.

Meanwhile we will NEVER have an electric airplane. NEVER. Unless there's a reason to build a plane that carries batteries, but nothing else. Of course it will fly for only a few minutes before its batteries are fully discharged.

Anonymous said...

"AMERICA FUCK YEAH!!!! *SALUTE*"

LOL. Ya'll know that was a white guy, right?

Rev. Right said...

PilotX said...
"Correct, climate models are projections of future climates. Until someone discovers a time machine we have no way of accurately predicting future climate thus your assertion that global warming is bunk is a false assumption."

Ergo, so is the assertion global warming is real...

So, explain again why we need to immediately spend trillions of dollars and sacrifice our chances for future economic growth?

I do not believe anthropogenic global warming is a significant problem, and I base this belief on a firm (if not personally expert) grasp of the science. Dissing on people as "science deniers" when in fact your own opinion is in reality just as faith-based as theirs is puerile and not becoming of a man of your intellect.

PilotX said...

Rev. Right, your science denying buddy Slappz didn't get the memo about the Cessna 172 that is planned to be able to fly for two hours and has a 180 hp engine. You can explain that to him to.
http://www.flyingmag.com/news/two-place-electric-skyhawk

PilotX said...

"Ergo, so is the assertion global warming is real..."

Didn't say that. I don't know one way or the other.

"I do not believe anthropogenic global warming is a significant problem, and I base this belief on a firm (if not personally expert) grasp of the science."

expert grasp of the science? Where did you get your degree in atmospheric science? A Phd and some research into the subject would make you an expert. If you really are an expert I have a few questions for ya.

PilotX said...

BTW, Rev Right since you are such the expert maybe you can explain the relationship of temperature to heat to Slappz and how it can be warmer AND cooler on earth. I mean since you are such an expert and have such a grasp on atmospheric science.
Also Rev did you find that evidence linking Ayers to the bomb that went off in New York in 1970?
Just checking.

PilotX said...

Why don't you think AGW is a problem? Is this a guess or is it based on sound scientific reasoning? What data are you relying on and what are the temp projections in 50 years? 100 years? Thanks Rev.

Rev. Right said...

@PilotX:

I said: "I base this belief on a firm (if not personally expert) grasp of the science"

NOT personally expert.

A firm, not expert, grasp. OK?.

I don't think AGW is a problem because there is absolutely no evidence that it is.

Because all the variability we have seen is within normal climate flucuations.

Beacause we are are actually still in a relatively cool climate phase.

Beacuse there have been periods in the past where CO2 levels have been multiples of current levels.

Beacause ice ages suck.

Because the models used are completely dependent on tweaks and assumptions that render any conclusions useless.

Because scientific truth is defined not by consensus but by proof and because money and power are behind promoting the "consensus" view (which in fact is not really much of a consensus anymore).

PilotX said...

Because the models used are completely dependent on tweaks and assumptions that render any conclusions useless

Of course models are dependent on assumptions but they are useful tools to get an idea of what MAY happen if certain parameters are met. What are "normal" parameters? Define normal. Also what were the climatic effects when CO2 levels were similar to todays?
I'm not worried about bad science, I prefer good science and dismissing a conclusion either way without good evidence is not good science.
BTW, anything on the fingerprints left by Ayers on the bomb in New York or did you make that up?

PilotX said...

I have a bit more time now to pontificate further. To dismiss the possibility of future enhanced warming based on past climate data is as bad science as wholeheartedly believing computer projections. Without specific knowledge of the earth's exact position during past climate events, the absence or presence of increased/decreased solar activity, ect. ect. we cannot just say "well we've seen CO2 levels like this before and X happened". How much data do we really have from past climates? How long have we been recording data? Is the data accurate? Can we really verify the exact climate modifications 1,000,000 years ago? Those conclusions are as suspect as computer models. Like I stated before the atmosphere is complex and fragile and we have no clue as to what increased levels of CO2 will do in the future. To say otherwise is somewhat foolish IMHO.

Anonymous said...

What exactly have the KKK done to protect or preserve anything white? It is easy in an all white suburb or small town to create an illusion of the preservation or promotion of already polluted white blood due to white women being so promiscuous and searching for another alternative to white viagra dependent whiteboy sexual lames. Never heard of a KKK member meeting in an all white inner city area where they are supposedly needed. The KKK hide their faces like a bitch pulling down their skirts to hide minority semen running down their legs and crotch.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 244 of 244   Newer› Newest»